“Quem Deus vult perdere prius dementat” Whom God wishes to destroy, he first makes mad.
NO APOLOGY FOR DIRT CHEAP PAKISTANI LIVES ARE DIRT CHEAP
Price of a Pakistani’s Life= $1.52 Million,
180 Million Pakistanis’ Lives = $2.7 Billion
Another Scenario
US after paying Zardari/Gilani Corrupt Government $2.7 Billion, US will be allowed to decimate all Pakistanis, in a Final Solution, except their agents like Zardari, Gilani, Kayani, PPP Jiyalas, Nawaz Sharif & Co, and Awami National Party US spies, whom they can airlift to to Dubai.
The attack, launched by an unmanned drone near the Afghan border in South Waziristan province, was certain to heighten tensions between Pakistan and the United States.
It came as the Pakistani president, Ali Asif Zardari, acknowledged that the Taliban were present “in huge amounts” of his country.
|
|||
No official apology from United States: Report
Thursday, May 17th, 2012 11:21:44 by
In quite an expected move, the US Department of Defense officials have indicated that there might not be any official apology on the Salala incident by the United States (US).
The statement comes at a time when many in Pakistan were anticipating for a breakthrough in the bilateral ties between Pakistan and the US after meeting of the Defence Committee of the Cabinet (DCC).
The powerful panel signaled resumption of NATO supplies for the allied forces battling in Afghanistan.
According to the media reports, the US is mulling not to offer any official apology to Pakistan over the killing of 24 Pakistani troops.
A report quoting an American official said, “US officials have offered our deepest regrets and for that tragic incident and sincerest condolences to the families of the Pakistani soldiers who lost their lives. We are committed to working closely with Pakistan and Afghanistan to prevent this from ever happening again”.
However, the official rejected the impression that Pakistan was not being paid for the usage of land route for the NATO supplies.
He commented, “Coalition cargo transiting Pakistan has been subject to all general fees applied to any goods transiting Pakistan according to Pakistani laws and regulations, and has paid additional fees for services requested by Pakistani government entities”.
Conversely, he stated that an extra $350 million will be paid to Pakistan under a new agreement between the two states.
War Machine
Earlier, the Pentagon spokesperson told reporters that a US team has been in discussions with Pakistani officials since Islamabad blocked supplies for allied forces battling in Afghanistan.
George Little said that they were hopeful that in the very near future the land route will be reopened, adding the US and Pakistan share common threats, concerns and interests.
He commented, “Terrorism is common concern that both the United States and Pakistan face,” he said. “The same terrorists that come after us go after Pakistanis and have been responsible for the deaths of thousands of Pakistanis”.
In his view, other aspects of the US-Pakistan relationship were not affected. Washington continues to work closely with the Islamabad to reset new terms of engagement that gets over some of the obstacles that we faced in the past, he added.
Dande Darpa Khel, Aug. 21, 2009
Another victim in the U.S. ‘War on Terror’. Click to enlarge.
By the time Behram reached Bismullah Khan’s mud house, partially destroyed in the strike, Khan’s youngest son, Syed Wali Shah, had already died. Behram watched as the boy’s body was laid out on a prayer rug, a “very small” one, in preparation for his funeral.
“The body was whole,” Behram recalls. “He was found dead.” The villagers wrapped a bandage around the boy’s head, even though they had no chance to save his life.
Behram doesn’t know who the target of the Dande Darpa Khel attack was. (“You’d have to ask the CIA that,” he says.) But he observed people’s anger as they prepared bodies for burial and cleared the wreckage. “The people were extremely angry. They were talking and shouting against the U.S. for the attack,” Behram says.
In some cases, Behram is able to take more than pictures. Survivors of drone strikes give him pieces of the AGM-114 Hellfire missiles that the drones fire. This fall, his lawyer, Shahzad Akbar and human-rights activist ally Clive Stafford Smith displayed Shahzad’s photography at a Lahore art festival with the unusual name Bugsplat Week. They decided to include pieces of the missiles themselves.
Akbar says it was a “hassle” to get the missile parts out of North Waziristan, as it would have been difficult to explain to a soldier or policeman what they were doing with missile fragments in their car. “We transported about seven pieces separately to a city in Punjab and then from there I drove these to Islamabad,” Akbar explains.
Three U.S. ordnance experts verified for Danger Room that these are Hellfire missile fragments.
“It’s basically a second project we started,” Akbar says. “All the people we know whose houses are attacked, we wanted to have the missile pieces, so we can trace the corporations manufacturing missile parts.”
Akbar and Stafford Smith got British photographer Ed Clark to photograph the missile parts for Bugsplat Week.
Tehsil Datta Khel, Oct. 15, 2009
Sometimes Behram arrives at the scene of an apparent drone attack only to find a shellshocked community that resents the presence of a camera-wielding journalist. That happened at Tehsil Datta Khel, a village about 50 kilometers west of Mirin Shah. After receiving a phone call on his landline alerting him to the strike – along with walkie-talkies, landlines are a primary, albeit unreliable, mode of communication in north Waziristan – Behram found few people on the scene the day after the attack willing to talk to him.
“People there were very angry, criticizing the role of the media,” he says. He opted to take a picture of the destruction of a house – his camera captured a pile of mud, stone, brick, wood and rebar – before deciding to leave the scene in order to defuse hostility.
Much of the reporting on the drones in the area isn’t actually done in the area. And much of it relies on official statements – which can be lax with the truth – for describing what happened and who was killed. That breeds contempt among the locals. “A lot of the media don’t go on the site of the attack,” he says. “If more went to the sites, it’d be more useful.”
Tehsil Datta Khel, Dec. 18, 2009
This mess of straw, wood and a blue crossbeam used to be someone’s roof. The blue beam is meant to be bear the load of bricks used to make the ceiling more substantial. “The person didn’t have so much money,” Behram explains.
He arrived on the scene of a strike eight hours later. Funerals had already been performed for the victims. Locals told him three people had died – “the media reported many more,” he says – but he did not see their bodies directly.
Usually, Behram says, locals will open up about what they saw after an attack if a journalist helps with the cleanup. Not this time. When he tried to snap a portrait of a rescue worker, he was told, “What’s the point? It’s all going to be wrong anyway.” Behram decided to limit his photography to the wreckage of the house.
Datta Khel, Oct. 28, 2010
The man in the brown bending down is Zar Gull, a vendor in the district of Datta Khel near Mirin Shah. The brick rubble he stands amongst used to be his home. He’s searching for the remains of his possessions.
The locals told Behram that the strike killed four people, all of whom were Gull’s cousins. They all lived together in one large room.
By the time Behram arrived, the locals had buried the dead. They gathered when they saw Behram begin to take photographs of Gull. They weren’t in much of a mood to talk, Behram recalls.
Datta Khel, Oct. 18, 2010
Pakistan’s Express Tribune reported a drone attacked “two suspected militant hideouts” in Datta Khel near Mirin Shah. Behram never saw the scene. He headed instead to a Mirin Shah hospital, where he heard residents had frantically driven one of the strike’s victims: Naeemullah, a boy of about 10 or 11.
Naeemullah was said to be injured in the strike after a missile struck the house next door. Shrapnel and debris travelled into Naeemullah’s house, wounding him in his “various parts of his body,” Behram says. “You can’t see his back, but his back was wounded by missile pieces and burns.”
An hour after Behram took this picture, Naeemullah died of his injuries.
Pakistan’s price: US to pay $365 million more a year to reopen supply lines
A US-Pakistan deal to reopen a key NATO supply route through Pakistan, closed for nearly six months, would raise the cost of the war effort in Afghanistan by about $365 million annually.
Fuel tankers, which were used to carry fuel for NATO forces in Afghanistan, are parked at a compound in Karachi, Pakistan, Wednesday, May 15.
Athar Hussain/Reuters
Islamabad, Pakistan
The cost of the US-led war effort in Afghanistan is about to rise by $365 million annually under an agreement that would reopen a key NATO supply route through Pakistan that’s been closed for nearly six months.
The accord, which the Pakistani government announced late Tuesday, would revive the transport of vital supplies of food and equipment from Pakistani ports overland to land-locked Afghanistan.
In return, the US-led coalition will pay Pakistan a still-to-be-fixed fee of $1,500 to $1,800 for each truck carrying supplies, a tab that officials familiar with negotiations estimated would run nearly $1 million a day. The officials requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to reveal details of the agreement.
Pakistan closed the land route to supplies headed to the coalition after American aircraft mistakenly attacked two Pakistani border outposts Nov. 26, killing 24 Pakistani soldiers. Since then, supplies for coalition forces in Afghanistan have passed through one of two routes that stretch from Afghanistan through central Asia and Siberia to Georgia on the Black Sea. One of the routes is nearly 6,000 miles long. The Pakistan route is less than 500 miles.
Officials in Washington said they didn’t know how much of the new cost the United States would bear. As the United States contributes more than two-thirds of the 130,000-strong international force, which operates under the command of NATO, it’s expected that Washington will pay most of the new fee.
What Pakistan supplies in return
In return, the US is asking Pakistan to provide security for the supplies, which are trucked through the country by private local transport companies, and much speedier clearance of customs and checkpoints. Militants and robbers frequently attack trucks carrying NATO goods. No effective security had been provided in the past.
“Security is the most important thing we require for swift transportation to be sustained,” said Nadeem Khan, the chief executive of Raaziq International, one of the major Pakistani companies involved in carrying NATO supplies. “That is the least that the (Pakistani) government can provide us as taxpayers.”
Before the Pakistan route was suspended, 30 percent of coalition supplies passed through the country, according to the Pentagon.
Reopening the route could be key to plans by NATO forces to end their combat mission in Afghanistan by the end of 2014, a goal that would require the US and other countries to move equipment out of Afghanistan to Pakistani ports.
American and Pakistani negotiators are still haggling over details of the new supply agreement. A definitive deal is likely by early next week.
600 trucks a day
The NATO traffic in and out of Afghanistan through Pakistan is anticipated to be as many as 600 trucks a day between now and the end of next year.
Until now, Pakistan, which joined the United States as an ally in invading Afghanistan after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, has charged only nominal fees for shipments to US-led forces. But the new charge is considered a Pakistani effort to assert itself in its relationship with Washington, which suffered a series of serious setbacks last year, beginning with a CIA contractor’s shooting of two Pakistani civilians in January, continuing with the May raid that found and killed Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and ending with the border outpost attack.
Late Tuesday, after a meeting of Pakistan’s top civilian and military officials in Islamabad, the prime minister’s office confirmed that the NATO supply route, known as GLOC or Ground Lines of Communications, would be reopened, subject to final negotiations.
The meeting “authorized officers of relevant ministries/departments to conclude the ongoing negotiation on the new terms and conditions for resumption of GLOCs,” a statement from the prime minister’s office said.
No apology necessary?
In a major climb-down, Pakistan dropped its demand that Washington apologize for the deaths due to the November raids. There was also no agreement to end controversial strikes by American drone aircraft against suspected militants in Pakistan’s tribal area, as demanded by a cross-party resolution of Pakistan’s Parliament.
The statement added that “the Ministry of Foreign Affairs would continue to remain engaged with the government of the United States on other parliamentary recommendations, including the question of apology and cessation of drone attacks.”
The other major point of contention, on which no accord was announced, is the money that the United States owes Pakistan under the Coalition Support Funds program that reimburses Islamabad for the cost of guarding its western frontier with Afghanistan. According to Pakistani security officials, Pakistan is owed more than $2 billion and hasn’t received a payment for two years.
Earlier Tuesday, NATO formally invited Pakistan to attend a meeting of the military alliance that begins Saturday in Chicago. The invitation had been held up because of the closure of the supply line.
Shah is a McClatchy special correspondent.
References
