December 26, 2009
It is not European woes nor its Identity Crisis, and nor any ‘shortcomings’ of Islam that is causing Muslims to be demonized in the Western World. It is also not very obtuse. Why are brilliant social scientists and academics like Ramzy Baroud getting confused about it: “Unearthing the reasons behind the disturbing phenomena is hardly an easy task, for it arguably requires a greater examination of the political, economic and social woes of European states than it does of the ‘shortcomings’ of Islam.”?
It has neither anything to do with “political, economic and social woes of European states” nor with Islam. Why do brave people continually rise to defend Islam as if the world’s great religion of more than 1.5 billion people needs their pathetic defense, that it can’t stand on its own without their guarded fig leaf: “Islam is a great religion in many respects; it has endured for over 1400 years. Its membership is never confined by skin color, culture, political ideology or geographic boundaries. Its views of antiquity, on equality, women rights and peace are considered progressive even by today’s standards. The detractors of Islam fail to see all this.”
The foundations of what is courageously not stated however is actually rather easily visible for anyone well versed in political and social sciences in the “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment” designed to sustain “imperial mobilization” as a Hegelian Dialectic to raise the phoenix of the new Atlantis from the ashes of the Old Order: a One-world government. Is this so very profound to comprehend?
Why do pious people continually make “World War IV” out to be about Islam and Muslims? They either see it as being a war on Islam and apologetically argue that Islam is benign and that “The detractors of Islam fail to see all this” as Ramzy Baroud does in ‘Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis‘; or see it as there being something inherently wrong with an antediluvian Islam which needs to be overhauled to bring it in line with modernity as Daniel Pipes and Bernard Lewis et. al. do in their doctrinal craftsmanship such as ‘Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror’ and in propagandist statements like it’s “Not a Clash of Civilizations, It’s a Clash between the Civilized World and Barbarians”; or see it as something wrong with the Muslims who need a reformation from their Dark Age as Pakistani native informant par excellence, Pervez Hoodbhoy does in his atheistic zealotry to reform the Muslim mind. In all cases, they calculatingly distract attention from the blatant fact of the matter that hectoring hegemons are engaging in demonization and false-flag operations to “goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers” in their age old quest for Lebensraum, euphemistically called Global Governance.
A similar demonization was employed against the communists not too long ago, and even backed by wanton acts of terrorism upon the civilians in Western Europe – see Operation Gladio, NATO’s Stay-Behind Armies which did more than just fight the communists with their false-flag operations – to convince an ever growing skeptical European public of the communist threat.
From Kawther Salam’s coverage of “the referendum in Switzerland on banning the construction of minarets” to Ramzy Baroud’s: “targeting of Muslims and Islam has become a kind of national theater in France”, is entirely along that very political science axis.
It is crafting a broad spectrum public enemy to rally the masses against in a lifetime of “World War IV” – from cultural to militant – in order to engage in a social transformation that is to take a lifetime to accomplish. That requires a sustained “doctrinal motivation” to fuel the global transformation-inducing World War for that duration. It makes it possible for the public to pay its full price in the “economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers)” including exchanging their “essential liberties for some temporary safety”, all of which is otherwise “uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
As was noted in the minute books of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace in 1909 and discovered by the Congressional Reece Committee’s lead investigator in 1954, Norman Dodd: ‘The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.’
Only through that transparent standard 50 mm lens of Machiavellian political science does the reality imaged on a 35 mm film plane, as the observation made by Mr. Ramzy Baroud, becomes correctly captured without inducing perspective distortion: “what is most alarming about the anti-Muslim measures is that they are largely led by the government itself, rather than a fanatical group of disenchanted ideologues”.
Further elaboration was already penned in response to Kawther Salam’s coverage of Islamic minarets despoiling the beautiful scenic views of the Swiss Alps. See ‘Minarets blocking the view of the Swiss Alps‘.
Unless one calls a spade a spade ab initio beginning at the first cause, starting at some intermediate effect and getting lost in the carefully crafted ‘Hegelian mind fcks’ which are calculatingly manufactured to “look like a ‘booming buzzing confusion'” as the CFR author Richard Gardner put it in 1974, is apparently trivial for even the most brilliant and/or pious of observers.
But start ab initio at the gates of political science, namely, with “Hegemony is as old as mankind” and “democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization”, even a lowly plebeian can straightforwardly get it right, that: “In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” All that remains if one starts ab initio, is to boldly traverse the poisonous tree of hegelian dialectics in a depth-first search and systematically unravel the multi-spectrum, deception-laden, and blood-drenched diabolics crafted to achieve that first-principle.
Or does it actually take a wholly un-pious and non-academic conspiratorial mind to penetrate the depths of moral and intellectual depravity of the realpolitik of hectoring hegemons?
Or is it perhaps only the co-opted mind working on fabricating dissent which fails to see the obvious? Or is it merely the fools who fail to see it? Indoctrination I fear is oversold in the psycho-babble of erudite learning and makes a convenient excuse for not exercising one’s commonsense, one’s gift of thought and reflection, one’s gift of being human. All of us have it – why do only a handful use it? Intellectuals like Noam Chomsky would of course argue ‘indoctrination’. But Chomsky does not finger the puppetmasters either, and like the rest of the progressive, and/or liberal, and/or left-wing, and/or right-wing truth-tellers, hectors the empire in much lauded and passionate dissent while still echoing its message. An entire book can be written on how that is accomplished!
A people can suffer its traitors but not its fools, as a wise man once put it. When humanity is being systematically enslaved across the world at the altar of “imperial mobilization” into a one-world government of the banksters’ making, and the most pious of truth-tellers refrain from expressing the puppetmasters and instead concentrate on their puppetshows, the biggest impediment to checking the Hectoring Hegemons becomes the fabricated dissent and the countless type-1 and type-2 fools (see Hitler’s classification in Mein Kampf) who respectively follow them. And they thus detract from forming a cohesive and focussed alliance against the singular enemy of mankind which seeds all corruption and is entirely responsible for “all the evil that follows”.
References:
1: Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard, 1997.
2: Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003, http://tinyurl.com/Deconstructing-Brzezinski
3: Papers and policy prescriptions of the Council on Foreign Relations, and its Foreign Affairs.
4: Nuremberg Transcript, Closing speech of Robert H. Jackson.
5: Ramzy Baroud, ‘Muslims Must Not Pay Price for Europe’s Identity Crisis’, http://tinyurl.com/baroud
6: Kawther Salam, ‘Swiss Govt Unhappy With Minaret Referendum’, http://tinyurl.com/Kawther-Swiss
7: Zahir Ebrahim, ‘Minarets blocking the view of the Swiss Alps’, http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/minarets-blocking-the-view-of-swiss-alps.pdf
8: Zahir Ebrahim, ‘War on Terror’ is not about ‘Islamofascism’ – Please get with the real agenda you people! http://tinyurl.com/WarOnTerrorBS
9: Zahir Ebrahim, Between Imperial Mobilization and Islamofascism: Bribing the Maggots and the Soul Extractor, http://tinyurl.com/Imperial-Mobilization
10: Hegelian Dialectics Tutorial http://tinyurl.com/Hegelian-Dialectics
11: Norman Dodd, ‘The Hidden Agenda of Tax Exempt Foundations for World Government’, interview G. Edward Griffin, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8605813744843314322
