INDIA’s AND ISRAEL’s PROXY WAR AGAINST PAKISTAN VIA CENTRAL ASIAN AGENTS

Pakistan needs to respond, politically and militarily to Israel and India’s proxy war against Pakistan via Afghan and Central Asian proxies.

The Great Game to prove:

  1. Pakistan’s strategic facilities are vulnerable
  2. Pakistan’s nuclear weapons can fall in the hands of anti-US and anti-India/Israel terrorists
  3. Provide reasons for global Muslim community to worry about Pakistan’s nuclear assets
  4. The International community, including the Islamic world must act jointly to wrest control of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons
  5. In this adventure, India and Israel will be most active, but, act under a cloak of secrecy
INDIA AND ISRAELS ORGASMIC WISH— — USE US AS A SURROGATE TO ATTACK PAKISTAN

India and Israel badly want US to carry most of the load in attacking Pakistan in order to hijack its nuclear weapons.

Jewish Owned Media and Newspapers, CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, and newspapers like the inveterate anti-Pakistan Zionist paper, New York Times & Washington Post are Spearheading Global Propaganda Against Pakistan’s Nuclear Program. Their aim is to develop a ground swell in US and Global public opinion to legally “hijack,” or neutralize Pakistan’s strategic Programs.

What would US and Obama administration get out of it? Another 4 years in the White House, because that would put the losses in the Afghan War appear well worth the effort

It would provide a fig leaf to President Obama’s administration or justify the trillion of dollar losses and thousand of battle causalities in Afghanistan.

Therefore, a justification for the global community wrest control of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, with US spear-heading an effort under the UN charter

JOKER IN THE DECK

 

But, what these naive thinkers do not take into account is Pakistan’s response. Yes, any base of any country is vulnerable to suicide attacks. Even, the US base in Bagram has been attacked and penetrated several times by Taliban. It is how such attacks are countered by the defenders of the facility, to the chagrin of Israeli-Indian nexus, their latest scheme failed miserably. All nine terrorist sent from Central Asia through Afghanistan via FATA were killed before they could even come close to Pakistan’s strategic assets, i.e. its AWACs.  Why AWACS? Because, the objective of India-Israel nexus is to neutralize the most lethal arm of Pakistan Armed Forces (and its eyes and ears), its early warning airborne radars, so that an airborne assault of US and ISAF to wrest control of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons could be mounted.

 

The Joker in the deck is Pakistan’s response, which is inevitable, within seconds of such foolish misadventure; India and Israel will be toast. How that will happen? Lets leave it at that…So, any power which is planning for such an attack must think a thousand times, before incurring losses of over 1.2 billion Indians and their Israeli friends.

 

Pakistan’s strategic forces will launch within three minutes their strike weapons, if an attack to wrest Pakistan’s strategic weapons by any nation, unilaterally or jointly.

 

Also, Pakistan’s safety and security is linked with China. An attack on Pakistan from any direction will trigger China’s nuclear defenses, because, China is wary of India launching a joint attack with US on it.  Every, which way, you cut it; India and US end up as losers. So, US should let wisdom prevail and not let its junk yard dogs, India and Israel loose, because, once they are loose, the response to their attack may be uncontrollable, even, the great, and “almighty,” only global power. And, it may trigger another plan, which is Allah’s Plan, which works and may have devastating consequences for mischief making nations.  History has shown this time and again. Hitler, the Super Man, died like a sick junk yard dog. So be warned all comers, you may trigger something, which like a fission reaction, may destroy all humanity.

 

Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Review on Iran-Israel Issue

 

 

Although, Pakistan has kept out of the fray between Iran and Israel over the formers development of nuclear technology, Pakistan’s tolerance threshold of India-Israel nexus has its limits. Indian and Israeli Intelligence agencies are training fanatical extremists in Afghanistan to attack Pakistan’s defense installation. This is happening under the nose of US and ISAF forces, which are turning a blind eye to it. However, the US does not want to rebuke Israel and India publicly, due to the danger of annoying US Jewish and Indian community, and those acting on their behalf and promoting funding Congressional campaign, like those of Dana Rohrabacher, through stealth contributions (fee paid speaking engagements to Indian and Jewish Organizations Israeli and Indian lobbyists in the US Congress.)

 

DEOBAND AND INDIAN MUSLIM DARUL ULOOM — — USED AS TRAINING GROUNDS FOR HINDU AND ZIONIST AGENTS

 

Training of Taliban takes place under Israeli and Indian agents, who in turn are being trained by Hindu teachers, who received their Islamic education in Deoband and other Muslim Madrassas’ in India. Hindu agents of RAW and Indian Military Intelligence get their initial training in Islamic studies department of Indian Universities.  Then, they are sent to Darul Uloom Deoband disguised as Muslims to get in-depth knowledge of Fiqh. After this training they are sent to Afghanistan, where in collaboration with similarly trained Zionists, disguised as Mullahs, “brain-wash,” the naive and illiterate Afghans. The bogeyman presented to these trainees is that Pakistan is a Kafir state. Its people are kafirs, thus to save both Pakistan and Islam, attacks against these “kafirs,” are justifiable, and a direct ticket to Jannah.

 

Therefore, these Manchurian Candidates are ready to do their masters bidding and launch subversion against Pakistan.

 

One such attack, according to PTT sources in Pakistan is that on PAF Base Minhas, Kamra.

In the past, Pakistan did not retaliate against the RAW/Mossad inspired attack on GHQ, and Mehran Naval facilities. But, enough, is enough, Pakistan’s SSG, Salahuddin, Khalid, and Tariq Black-OPS unit, within ISI are perfectly capable of teaching Israel a lesson. India is a pathetic tag along with Israeli mastermind. We also would like to serve this as a warning to the Israeli intelligence operative, which is monitoring this site. Pakistan is NOT Iraq. Pakistan intelligence operatives know about Israel’s “secret,” strategic sites and locations of nuclear stock piles. DON’T TREAD ON US!

Pakistan also needs to reach out to Iran to have a joint plan of action against Israel/India nexus inspired attacks on Pakistan and Iran.   Pakistan must warn both these mischief mongers traipsing around in ISAF Occupied Afghanistan. If there is no response, there will be more proxy attacks on Pakistan, by these enemies. Pakistan had warned Israel once before, when Gen.Zia told them that Tel Aviv is accessible to Pakistani retaliation.

It is also imperative that US take an active role in putting a chain around two of its vicious junkyard dogs. Or lose Pakistan’s support to ISAF against the Taliban.

McNair Paper Number 41, Radical Responses to Radical Regimes: Evaluating Preemptive Counter-Proliferation, May 1995

 

 

 

Israeli Wanted Destruction of Pakistan’s “Islamic Bomb”

 

Reference:http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/mcnair41/41ind.htm

 

There is some evidence that Iraq was not the only nuclear peril to Israel that Begin saw in the early 1980s. Nor was the Osirak reactor in Iraq his only intended target. He also feared the Pakistani nuclear effort because Israeli intelligence had found evidence that Libya and other Moslem states were helping Pakistan, supplying both money and uranium to their effort. (Note 52) Pakistan’s leader, Bhutto, was therefore under some obligation to share the nuclear fruits of Pakistan’s bomb effort with other Moslem states such as Libya.

 

According to an Indian official, Subramaniam Swamy, a former Janata Party member, Israel in 1982 asked him to sound out other Indian leaders to see if India would grant Israeli warplanes landing and refueling rights were they to undertake an Osirak-type raid against the Kahuta nuclear reactor in Pakistan. (Note 53) India refused, probably for a combination of reasons. As one expert on South Asia speculated:

 

“First, the Kahuta facility is well-protected and is thus a hard target to destroy. Second and more important, India expects that any first strike by India against Kahuta would be swiftly followed by a Pakistani attack against India’s nuclear facilities. Such an exchange would leave India worse off, since any potential deterrent capability against China would thereby be eliminated. Finally, India would be wary of launching such an attack against Pakistan as it would cause not only great death and destruction to Pakistan, but could blow radioactive fall-out back over India. Such an attack against Pakistan would also alienate the Muslim Middle Eastern states whose amity India has assiduously cultivated.”(Note 54)

 

In 1991, India and Pakistan signed a treaty pledging that neither would preemptively attack the nuclear facilities of the other.

 

 

 

 

By Raja G Mujtaba

 

Pakistan Air Force Base at Kamra was attacked in the very early morning hours today. Kamra, besides an Air Base, is Aeronautical complex also where PAF not only produces her latest JF 17 Aircraft but also has the rebuild facility for its entire weapon system.

 

Attack on Kamra is continuation of previous attacks on GHQ where the attempt was to take General Ashfaq Kayani as hostage and at PNS Mehran where the P3 C Orion Anti Submarine warfare Surviellance Aircraft were the target. At Kamra, SAAB 2000 the Early Warning Aircraft Sytem equipped with the latest techonology was the target.

 

The attack took place at 0230 hours when people were generally supposed to be busy with preparations of fasting. The date and time by the attackers was very carefully selected as it being the 27th of Ramadan on which night the maximum number of Muslims try and pray the whole night. Thinking that at this time all would be on low guard, the attackers tried to enter the base in PAF uniforms. The security guard Mohammad Asif having sensed the foul play shot dead one of the attackers who was later identified from Central Asia. Later the security guard was shot dead by the other attackers.

 

 

 

With this everyone was alerted and everything moved in very swiftly to defend the base successfully. Air Commodore Mohammad Azam who moved in immediately to lead the operation got a bullet a bullet in his shoulder. Likewise an injured Squadron Leader who crawled to put out the fire from a random firing that damaged a SAAB 2000 Aircraft.

 

The PAF spokesperson when contacted on telephone informed that PAF Chief Air Chief Marshal Rafiq Butt immediately at 0230 hours took over the entire operation for its logical conclusion.

 

All the eight attackers have been killed, the operation has concluded successfully for which the PAF deserves a commendation.

 

Prior to this report, I had written an analysis of the incident that is placed below.

 

 

Why are they a thorn in the side of so many?

 

 

 

 

“Pakistan’s nuclear facilities are secure”

 

 

 

Axis of Logic – When India exploded its first nuclear device in 1974, culminating a program launched as far back as 1951; Western powers only reacted with customary “show of concern”. But on the other hand, Pakistan’s nuclear program, initiated in response to the Indian acquisition of nuclear weapons, evoked immediate and “serious concern” from the same Western powers. This discriminatory attitude has since persisted. Pakistan has remained under pressure from the US-led lobby to scrap its program while the Indians remained uncensored.

 

India has often tried to justify its nuclear program as a counter to the Chinese threat. This is preposterous. China has shown no belligerency towards India. The war of 1962 resulted from India’s arrogance in refusing to amicably settle a boundary dispute with China, just as it has done with Pakistan. And if China was such a big threat why have other countries of the region not complained or scrambled to seek nuclear umbrellas?

 

Bhutto and the “religious bomb”

 

 

 

“The West simply used Pakistan’s bomb to make Islam and aggression synonymous.” That Western attitude was discriminatory can also be seen by the religious color it gave to Pakistan’s bomb by calling it an ‘Islamic bomb’.

 

One has never heard of the Israeli bomb being called a ‘Jewish Bomb’, or the Indian bomb a ‘Hindu Bomb’, or the American and British bomb a ‘Christian Bomb’ or the Soviet bomb a ‘Communist’ (or an ‘Atheist) Bomb’. The West simply used Pakistan’s bomb to make Islam and aggression synonymous, although Pakistan’s bomb was merely for defensive purposes and was not even remotely associated with Islam.

 

 

With India going nuclear soon after playing a crucial role in dismembering Pakistan in 1971 and enjoying an overwhelming conventional military superiority over Pakistan (in the ratio 4:1) a resource-strapped Pakistan was pushed to the wall. Left with no choice but to develop a nuclear deterrent to create a balance of power and ward off Indian threat, Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto declared: “Pakistanis will eat grass but make a nuclear bomb”. And sure enough, they did it. But soon both he and the nuclear program were to become non-grata. Amid intense pressure, sanctions and vilification campaign, Henry Kissinger personally delivered to a defiant Bhutto the American threat: “give up your nuclear program or else we will make a horrible example of you.”

 

And a horrible example was made of Bhutto for his defiance. Bhutto signed Pakistan’s nuclear program with his blood to enable Pakistan to become the 7th nuclear power in the world, forcing India to shun belligerency. Although there has never been real peace in South Asia, at least there has been no war since 1971.

 

Pakistan’s nuclear program: a deterrent to Indo-Israeli dominion

 

Ignoring its perspective on acquisition of strategic assets, Pakistan’s Western ‘friends’ refused to admit it to their exclusive nuclear club, pressuring it to give up nuclear ambitions instead. However, expediency made them look the other way when it suited their purpose. In 1980s and post 9/11 when Pakistan was needed to play a key role in Afghanistan as the ‘front line state’, the American spotlights on its nuclear program were switched off.

 

 

 

Pakistan obstructs quest for dominion by India and Israel. But Pakistan’s nuclear program remained under threat from the foes – India and Israel, who felt their interests, were threatened. In collusion, both of them missed no opportunity to directly or indirectly malign Pakistan’s nuclear program or subvert it. Both countries having similar geo-strategic interests in their respective regions see Pakistan as an obstacle to their designs.

 

 

India sees Pakistan as an unnatural creation which, having been carved out of its body, now refuses to submit to its diktat and obstructs its quest for unchallenged domination of South Asia and the Indian Ocean region.

 

Israel looks at Pakistan’s military prowess and its nukes as indirectly strengthening the hands of Arab states with which it has remained in a state of conflict and which it has continued to terrorize all these years. It is conscious that several Arab states look up to Pakistan for military support when faced with external threat to their security that comes mainly from Israel. It is unsettling for Israel to see such a state to be in possession of nuclear weapons.

 

Israel also cannot overlook the fact that Pakistan Air Force pilots, when flying mostly Russian aircraft, surprised the Israeli Air Force and shot down several relatively superior Israeli jets in air combat in the 1973 Arab Israel war. They shattered the myth of the invincibility of Israeli pilots who believed themselves to be too superior in skill and technology. These Pakistani pilots happened to be assigned to Jordanian, Syrian and Iraqi air forces on training missions when the war broke out and they inconspicuously joined the operations.

 

The foiled Israeli plan to bomb Kahuta

 

Having successfully bombed and destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981, Israelis were encouraged to launch a similar attack on Kahuta, a village to the east of Islamabad where Pakistan’s nascent nuclear research program was located. In collaboration with India, the Israelis made plans for this mission in early 1980s. Using satellite pictures and intelligence information provided by the CIA, they reportedly built a full-scale mock-up of Kahuta facility in the southern Negev Desert and pilots of F-16 and F-15 squadrons went through mock attack exercises.

 

According to the story published in London by The Asian Age citing revelations by journalists Adrian Levy and Catherine Scott-Clark in their book ‘Deception: Pakistan, the US and the Global Weapons Conspiracy’, the Israeli Air Force planned to launch an air attack on Kahuta in mid 1980s from Jamnagar airfield in Gujarat (India) and land and refuel at a base in northern India. The book claims “in March 1984, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi signed off (on) the Israeli-led operation, bringing India, Pakistan and Israel to within a hairs breadth of a nuclear conflagration”.

 

Another report claims that Israel had planned to launch an air strike directly out of Israel. After midway and midair refueling, Israeli warplanes were to shoot down a commercial airline’s flight over the Indian Ocean that routinely flew into Islamabad early morning. The Israelis would have flown in a tight formation to appear as one large aircraft on radar screens preventing detection. Using the drowned airliner’s call sign they would have entered Islamabad’s air space, knocked out Kahuta and flown on to land in Jammu, an Indian airbase, to refuel and make an exit.

 

 

 

“Pakistan reminded the Israelis that Pakistan was no Iraq and that the Pakistan Air Force was no Iraqi Air Force.”

 

{Pakistan Air Force Must Retaliate Against both India and Israel, if, another Kamra incident occurs or this proxy war continue}

 

Reliable reports say that in mid 1980s this mission was actually launched one night. But the Israelis were in for a big surprise. They discovered that Pakistan Air Force had already sounded an alert and had taken to the skies in anticipation of this attack. The Indo-Israeli mission had to be hurriedly called off.

 

 

Pakistan reminded the Israelis that Pakistan was no Iraq and that Pakistan Air Force was no Iraqi Air Force. Using indirect channels, Pakistan is reported to have conveyed that an attack on Kahuta would force Pakistan to lay waste to Dimona, Israel’s nuclear reactor in the Negev Desert. Pakistan drew up contingency plans for retaliatory strike on Dimona in case of any future Israeli misadventure. India was also warned that Islamabad would attack Trombay if its facilities in Kahuta were hit.

 

The above quoted book claims that “Prime Minister Indira Gandhi eventually aborted the operation despite protests from military planners in New Delhi and Jerusalem.”

 

A paper published by the U.S. Air Force Air University also confirmed this Indo-Israeli plan.

 

It stated,

 

“Israeli interest in destroying Pakistan’s Kahuta reactor to scuttle the ‘Islamic bomb’ was blocked by India’s refusal to grant landing and refueling rights to Israeli warplanes in 1982.”

 

 

 

Clearly India wanted to see Kahuta gone but did not want to face retaliation against its own nuclear facilities at the hands of Pakistan Air Force. Israel, on its part wanted this to be a joint Indo-Israeli strikes so that Israel alone would not be held responsible.

 

The Reagan administration also showed reluctance to support the plan as any distraction on Pakistan’s part at that juncture would have hurt American interests in Afghanistan where Pakistan was engaged as key US ally against the Soviets.

 

The Propaganda Campaign

 

Although the two countries had to give up plans to hit Kahuta, they continued their diatribe against Pakistan’s nuclear program through an organized propaganda campaign, which has been accelerated today. Israel used its clout over the American political establishment and the Western media to create hysteria. India also worked extensively to promote paranoia. Pakistan’s program was branded as unsafe, insecure and a threat to peace, although it is technically more sound, much safer and more secure than that of India and has ensured absence of war in the region.

 

Use of terrorists to destabilize Pakistan

 

The US invasion of Afghanistan provided another opening for the Indo-Israeli nexus to target Pakistan’s strategic assets. This time the strategy was to present Pakistan as an unstable state, incapable of defending itself against religious extremist insurgents, creating the specter of nuclear assets falling into their hands in Islamabad. This was achieved by creating a proxy organization -Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) in Pak-Afghan border areas where they recruited rogue elements and spread chaos to destabilize Pakistan through terrorism. Suggestions were floated that in view of the possibility of Pakistan succumbing to extremists, its nuclear assets should be disabled, seized or forcibly taken out by the US. Alternatively, an international agency should take them over for safekeeping.

 

Pakistan has paid a high price in terms of civilian and military casualties but it has foiled the conspiracy and thwarted the threat. As a result of operations by Pakistan Army in Swat, South Waziristan and other areas in FATA, TTP terrorists have either been eliminated or are on the run. With the insurgency crushed, peace is returning to these former havens of terrorism.

 

Pakistan has made it clear that it would act decisively against any attempt by any quarter to seize its nuclear assets. The resulting situation would be disastrous as it could send South Asia up in flames.

 

The Indo-Israeli nexus is losing the initiative. But as long as the American umbrella is not denied, Afghanistan will remain a playground for these mischief mongers. It is now up to the US to walk its talk if it is sincere about its claim that it wants to see a secure and stable Pakistan. It must put an end to conspiracies to destabilize Pakistan.

 

 

 

Reference

 

By Shahid R. Siddiqi. Axis of Logic

 

 

 

Axis of Logic

Saturday, Jan 2, 2010

 

Comments are closed.

(will not be published)