Declassified Papers Shed Light on US Role in Liaquat’s Murder

 

Big fish eat little fish. It is the Law of Jungle and not of Democracy that the US preaches-
KIB

An important article. Liaqat Ali Khan has been sought to be demonized
by some quarters. He was a man of great integrity. And his patriotism
was beyond question. It is his death which screwed up  politics in
Pakistan, for which we have paid dearly, and shall continue to pay.

Declassified Papers Shed Light on US Role in Liaquat’s Murder
Syed Rashid Husain, Arab News

ALKHOBAR, 18 July 2006 — Oil, Iran and air bases, seem to be issues ofrecent times. Not indeed. It was some 55 years back that these issues
were very much in play and a recently declassified document indicates
that these were the reasons behind the assassination of Liaquat Ali
Khan, Pakistan’s first prime minister on Oct. 16, 1951.

Like a number of other high-profile killings, the assassination of
Liaquat Ali Khan, has also remained a mystery. Conspiracy theories
abound, yet are difficult to substantiate.

A recent declassified document from the US State Department brings to
light some interesting facts. According to the document, a telegram
was sent by the American Embassy in New Delhi on Oct. 30, 1951.

“Is Liaquat Ali Khan’s assassination a result of a deep-laid American
conspiracy?” The telegram from the US Embassy in New Delhi carried the
summary of an article published in the Urdu daily of Bhopal, “Nadeem”
on Oct. 24, 1951, charging the US with the responsibility of Khan’s

death.

The summary then points to the facts raised in the Nadeem article, “It
was neither a local incident nor connected with the Pashtoonistan
movement (as some may have believed then). It had behind it a
deep-rooted conspiracy and recognizable hand.”

The article then says that the then Afghan government “knew about the
conspiracy and the assassin was an Afghan, yet, the plot was hatched
neither in Kabul nor in Karachi (the then capital of Pakistan).”

The declassified document reveals that the day before assassination,
the secretary to the American ambassador in Karachi absent-mindedly
jotted down “holiday” for Oct. 19 in a table diary and then
immediately struck it off.

Following the secretary’s departure, Mohammad Hussain, a Pakistani
employee at the American Embassy in Karachi asked the secretary’s
British clerk about the holiday. The clerk described it as a possible
slip. “Mistake meaningful,” however, because “the secretary knew the
embassy would be closed (on) Oct. 17 (sic) although no American or
Pakistani holiday was scheduled then to fall that day.

The story in Nadeem then points to another fact, as given in the
declassified document. The American ambassador (in Karachi) offered
condolences to Liaquat’s wife (Raana Liaquat Ali Khan) on the phone,
some three and a half minutes before even the Governor General of
Pakistan Khawaja Nazimuddin managed to offer his condolences. This was
despite the fact that the governor general was the first to be
informed (of the killing) by the Rawalpindi authorities. Indeed with
no mobile connection, no live transmissions, even no TV, those were
different days and the flow of information was much slower than today.
The question that the newspaper article thus tried to raise was how
did the American ambassador come to know of the assassination before
the governor general of Pakistan found out?

The newspaper article, as summarized by the declassified US document,
then discusses the possible reason for the disenchantment of the US
and the UK governments with the Pakistan prime minister and his
government. Liaquat was not ready to toe the US line, the newspaper
pointed out and hence the US wanted him eliminated.

“While the UK was pressing Pakistan for support on the issue of Iran,
the US demanded Pakistan use its influence in Tehran and persuade it
to transfer control of its oil fields to the US (oil apparently has
remained a major issue with the Americans ever since, especially while
Mohammad Mosaddeq was in power in Tehran then).

According to the article, Liaquat Ali Khan declined to accede to the
request. “The US then threatened to annul the secret pact on Kashmir
(between Pakistan and the US). Liaquat replied that Pakistan has
annexed half of Kashmir without American support and would be able to
take the other half too.” Not only that, Prime Minister Liaquat Ali
Khan also demanded that the US vacate air bases in Pakistan.

“Liaquat’s demand was a bombshell for Washington. Americans who had
been dreaming of conquering Soviet Russia from Pakistan air bases were
flabbergasted,” the article emphasized. And hence the plot to kill
Liaquat was hatched, says the article.

However, “the US wanted a Muslim assassin, so as to obviate
international complications. The US could not find a traitor in
Pakistan (apparently for the reason that the new country was then
brimming with nationalistic pride and hope for future),” the article
added.

The US then turned to Kabul. “Washington contacted the US Embassy in
Kabul. They in turn got in touch with Pashtoonistan leaders, pointing
to Liaquat as their only hurdle and assuring them that if some of them
could kill Liaquat, the US would undertake the task of establishing
Pashtoonistan by 1952.”

At this the “Pashtoon leaders induced Akbar to take the job and also
made arrangements for him to be killed immediately after so as to
conceal the conspiracy. The Pakistani currency recovered from the
assassin’s body also reveal that others were also involved. Due to
already strained relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan no
currency exchange was then taking place between the two countries.
Hence only the “American Embassy (in Kabul) could have supplied the
Pakistani currency notes to the assassin,” the summary argued.

The article also mentioned that the cartridges recovered from the body
of the assassinated Pakistani premier were US made. The type of bullet
used to kill the Pakistani prime minister were in “use by high-ranking
American officers”, and were “not usually available in the market”.
The rest is for us to deduce.

The article then summarized that all these facts prove that the real
culprit behind the killing was the US, which had committed similar
acts in the Middle East as well.

There are many parallels between then and now. And all this could not
be just a matter of chance. Oil, assassinations, dollars, Iran, air
bases, all these sound familiar even today. Fifty years have passed,
yet things may not have really changed.

باغِ بہشت سے مجھے حکمِ سفر دیا تھا کیوں
کارِجہاں دراز ہے،اب میراانتظار کر !!!

 

Comments are closed.

(will not be published)