Falling Chairs

 

Falling Chairs  
Humayun Gauhar

As President Zardari stood up clumsily to deliver his annual address
to parliament his chair fell. His sage said it was a bad omen –
“Beware the ides of March” and all that jazz – for ‘The Chair’ is akin
to a throne, symbolizing power and office. “You will have to pray at
the shrine of a Sufi much bigger than any we have in Pakistan,” the
sage declared. So Zardari decided to go to the biggest South Asian
Sufi of them all, Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti (1141-1230 CE), whose
shrine is in city of Ajmer in India.

Many kings, presidents and prime ministers have gone to Ajmer.

Emperor Akbar is said to have gone to Ajmer to pray for a son.
Some say it was to a Sufi in Sheikhupura, I forget his name, but
that is another story. Either way, Akbar got a son and successor
from his Hindu Rajput wife and the Mughal dynasty continued.

The official reason for Zardari’s visit was that he went to honour

his late wife’s promise or ‘mannat’ to the pir, but the talk in the
bazaars is that it was the ‘bad omen’ that triggered it off. It could
have been both. Should it matter?

Yes it should, because the Pakistani state, ergo the people, must have
paid for some part of the visit, even though it is said that the
president paid for everything from his own pocket, including the one
million US dollar offering he gave to the shrine. Fine, but the
questions then arises: from where did he get so much money? Best to
leave it to the judges of our highest exalted court – the ‘Supreme’
one that is – to take suo moto notice. I don’t know how Muslims can
call any court ‘supreme’ and that too in an Islamic state since in
Islam only the court of God is supreme because only God is supreme

and sovereign. That’s yet another discussion. No one will object
because our people, particularly of Sindh and southern Punjab, have
a proclivity to go to Sufis dead or alive for blessings and intercession
with the Almighty. That in Islam no one can intercede with God on
anyone’s behalf is forgotten. And – you guessed it – that’s yet
another discussion.

So off our president went with son, daughter, sage, ministers,
sycophants, journalists, media and staff in tow, enough to require

two aircraft, one executive jet (wonder which anointed ones got to sit in
that one with the ‘royal’ family) and an army C-130, the type in which
this ‘royal’ family’s nemesis General Zia ul Haq crashed and perished
with many others. That particular aircraft, legend has it, was the
same that transported Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s dead body half way to his
ancestral graveyard in Sindh before returning to Rawalpindi halfway
with engine trouble and the body had to be shifted to another C-130.
Not that it means anything; else the sage wouldn’t have kept quiet. By
the way, such is our attraction for graves that Bhutto’s mausoleum has
become another saintly shrine. Why do you think that some Muslims
level them off every few years?

It was good that Zardari’s private visit included a ‘sumptuous’
semi-official lunch with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Not
that a constitutionally ceremonial president and a weak proxy prime
minister amount to much in this land of dynastic rule with the fig
leaf of British parliamentary democracy. But it is precisely because
of dynasty that Zardari wields real power, being Bhutto’s son-in-law
and co-chairman of his party, with his young son the chairman and icon
of the Bhutto cult, a symbolic figurehead so far. As for Mr. Singh,
real power lies with the daughter-in-law of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty
who is also the leader of the ruling party. No matter: jaw-jaw is
better than war-war a la Churchill.

Be all that as it may, our media’s hysterical hoopla that accompanied
the visit last Sunday was shameful. So obsessed was it with Zardari’s
lunch and pilgrimage that it callously paid scant attention to the
worst peacetime tragedy our army has ever faced when 135 of soldiers
were buried alive in an avalanche in Siachen. The two oldest
civilizations in the world have been at each other’s throats for 28
years in what is called the “highest war in the world”. Stupid. Both
have lost more soldiers to the elements there than to bullets. It’s
about geo-strategy and water. To get news about the Siachen tragedy

we had to turn to foreign channels. Shows how wonky priorities can get
when the collective mind is wonky: the difference between right and
wrong, relevant and irrelevant or less relevant is lost.

Our media went overboard on the visit because we as a people are
merrily unaware of where the limits of respect for state office end
and the courtier’s pathological sycophancy begins; of where
constructive criticism ends and national damage begins. There was
daydreaming galore by anchors, clapped out ambassadors, bureaucrats
gone to seed, generals put out to pasture, all masquerading as
analysts, most in awe of America, many members of the Langley Club

or on its waiting list.

That the Supreme Commander of our Armed Forces chose to go to

India in the face of this enormous tragedy was of no consequence
to him or to our media. Symbolism is an important balm for broken
hearts and destroyed lives, more, dare I suggest, than the symbolism
of a spiritual pilgramage. Would the great Sufi of Ajmer have missed
Zardari’s presence? Would he have any use for the one million US
dollars offering? Only his progeny would. Custody of shrines by
progeny is a booming business because illiterate, desperately poor
and helpless devotees can go there for, if nothing else, therapy of a
soul in turmoil, even if they know that only God can answer prayers
and that the piety that lay with the Sufi did not enter his genes to be
passed on to his descendants. In Zardari’s mind – and he is our best
political tactician, mind you – the symbolism of his pilgrimage to
Ajmer would hold importance with Sindhi voters, what with elections
looming.

Shrines often become political constituencies of Sufi progeny whose
habits their exalted forebear would have looked at askance. Their
graves are where the credibility and constituencies of ‘Mukhdooms’

or custodians lie. It’s as primitive and predatory as feudalism and
tribalism since all three societal forms prey upon the illiteracy,
poverty and helplessness of the hapless. Pathetic. Sufis are people
of peace, of love, of poetry and sometimes of trance and dance,
which is why the ascetic disapproves of them.

Only those who cannot see God with their inner eye, in their hearts
and in His creations pray to mortals or ask them to intercede with
Him. Human beings find it difficult to think in the abstract. Go to
mausoleums, certainly, because very pious and God-loving people

used to live there, but don’t imagine that they can do for you that
which only God can do. Genuine Sufis and mystics were incredible
people for they saw beyond logic and came to their deductions
through feeling with the mind and thinking with the heart. But
their followers and adherents don’t understand this and ascribe
to them and their progeny qualities that only God has. Here I go
drifting off into another subject.

Moinuddin Chishti is regarded as the greatest Sufi of the subcontinent
for helping people, which is why is called ‘gharib nawaz’ or helper of
the poor. The fire of the huge cauldron in which food is cooked and
distributed free has been alight for centuries. It takes a ladder to
get to its lip.

Back to the visit: Pakistan wants to be seen to be trying to improve
relations with India, if for nothing else than to score brownie points
with America. India has had the bad habit of linking disparate issues,
particularly terrorism with everything. But now it seems that it is
breaking that habit. India should remember that it is state terrorism
that begets non-state terrorism. I will not say more. No point in
laboring the obvious. America and India shouldn’t forget that no
country in the world has suffered more at the hands of homegrown

and foreign terrorism than Pakistan has and no country has lost
more soldiers and civilians in fighting terrorists. Good luck. Peace
is better than war.

 [email protected]

 

Comments are closed.

(will not be published)