Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for category Nawaz Sharif Massive Corruption

Oscar Nomination For Daughter of Pakistan : Parveen Obaid Chinoy-End Honour Killings NOW

Pakistan

Oscar-Nominated Pakistani Filmmaker Talks About Battle To End ‘Honor Killings


Pakistani director Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy poses for photographs with the Academy Award she won in 2012 for a documentary on acid attacks on Pakistani women. Her latest movie tackles the subject of 'honor killings' in Pakistan, which she says claims the lives of hundreds of women every year.

Pakistani director Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy poses for photographs with the Academy Award she won in 2012 for a documentary on acid attacks on Pakistani women. Her latest movie tackles the subject of ‘honor killings’ in Pakistan, which she says claims the lives of hundreds of women every year.

 

 

 

By Bashir Ahmad Gwakh
The first Oscar-winner in Pakistan’s history is back in the Hollywood limelight this weekend as Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy’s unflinching new documentary about ‘honor killings,’ A Girl In The River: The Price

The 37-year-old Chinoy’s previous film about acid-attack victims, Saving Face, won the top prize for a documentary short in 2012.

Chinoy spoke via e-mail with RFE/RL’s Radio Mashaal correspondent Bashir Ahmad Gwakh about her shortlisted film, which revolves around Saba Qaisar, a 19-year-old girl from Pubjan Province whose father shot her in the head after she married without the family’s permission. She also talked about the tribal pressure that eventually forced Qaisar to withdraw charges, the 1,000 or so honor killings a year that plague Pakistani society, and the Oscars.

RFE/RL: Tell us about the case of Saba Qaisar? How did you find her and where does the case stand?

Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy: I read about Saba’s story in the newspapers shortly after the incident took place and I knew I had to share her story with the world — her only “fault” was falling in love. I then contacted the head of the hospital where she was being treated and went to visit her. At the time, I wasn’t sure what would happen with her case, but ultimately she ended up forgiving her father after being pressurized by the village elders.

RFE/RL: What does your documentary find? Tell us about the status of women going through domestic violence and families whose loved one was killed in ‘honor killings’?

Chinoy: The film really brings to reality the kind of patriarchal and conservative mindset that women are up against. I went to speak to Saba’s father after he was arrested and he had so much hatred in him. He was still adamant that Saba was in the wrong and he felt justified trying to kill his own daughter. He felt it was his duty as a father and husband to protect his family from the “dishonor” that Saba brought upon them by falling in love and getting married. The interaction that I had with him spoke volumes about the kinds of choices we women have in the world and how our lives are impacted by the decisions taken by others.

The very fact that women are currently unable to make their own policy decisions in certain parts of the country is an alarming reality, and pushes us further away from being the owners of our own stories and fighters for our own rights.

Ever year, hundreds of women are killed in the name of honor; and although honor killings are prevalent in Pakistan, they are considered a taboo subject by many. There is a perception that somehow these murders fall under the purview of the family and that they shouldn’t be questioned or challenged. To me, they have always been premeditated, cold-blooded murders justified under the guise of culture or religion.

I wanted to tell the story of a victim of honor killing because I wanted to start a national discourse about this issue and build momentum to garner support for key legislation that better protects women from such violence.

RFE/RL: Do you think Pakistan needs to strengthen laws to prevent honor killings? What are your recommendations for lawmakers and the government?

Chinoy: The law, as it stands, sees honor killing as an offense against the individual and not the state, and hence the victim can choose to “forgive” the perpetrator. If the victim is killed, which is often what happens in such cases, the family of the victim has the right to forgive the perpetrator. So when a father kills his daughter, his wife can forgive him; and when a brother kills his sister, his parents can forgive him. This is how the current law is being misused.

After the screening of A Girl In The River: The Price Of Forgiveness at the [Pakistani Prime Minister’s] House, the Prime Minister [Nawaz Sharif] asked his team to redraft laws on honor killings to help ensure that perpetrators are punished and victims are protected.

RFE/RL: Why do we see an increase in honor killings? How can it be prevented?

Chinoy: The prevalence of such attacks stems partly from structural inequalities that make it difficult for women to access the judicial system in addition to longstanding cultural practices that support gender discrimination. The perpetrators know that they will only serve a few years in jail if they are found guilty. The lack of liability coupled with an embedded patriarchal system allows for honor-killing crimes to run rampant — and this is exactly what we need to tackle in order to get justice for the victims of honor killing and prevent it from occurring again.

RFE/RL: How do you feel about your documentary being nominated for an Academy Award? What’s your next project?

Chinoy: I am proud to be representing Pakistan on such a prestigious platform — that [it is also] for the second time. I am grateful that the SOC Films production was able to share the untold story of A Girl In The River: The Price Of Forgiveness with a global audience. Since the start of my career, I have always endeavored to share the stories of those who cannot do so themselves. To be acknowledged for this work is always very humbling, and on such a giant platform like the Oscars makes it surreal.

But for me personally, it will be an even bigger win if we, as a nation, take this opportunity to acknowledge that we have a problem and pass the Anti-Honor Killings Laws (Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill 2014. It is time we change the law and stand up for the victims of this heinous crime.

(Editor’s note: The bill was passed by the provincial legislature on February 25.)

Currently, we are working on a sequel to 3 Bahadur, which was an animated feature film that we released in the summer of 2015.  In order to continue its legacy and further inspire the children of Pakistan, we are hoping to release 3 Bahadur Part 2 in cinemas nationwide in December 2016!

RFE/RL: How was your meeting with Prime Minister Sharif? What did you discuss and what was his response on honor killing?

Chinoy: The prime minister of Pakistan, Nawaz Sharif, has vowed since the Oscar nomination to eradicate honor killings. As a father and a grandfather, it is important for him to make that gesture, not only to the women of Pakistan but also to the women of his own family.

The support that we have received from the prime minister of Pakistan, Nawaz Sharif, will help change the mindset of society. If we can begin to amend the law and address loopholes in the current legislation, then we can slowly begin to protect the women of Pakistan and send out a strong message that this practice is nothing but a stain on our society.

Courtesy

http://www.rferl.org/content/pakistan-director-chinoy-oscar-hinor-killings/27574195.html

, , ,

No Comments

Why Illegal PM Nawaz Sharif is Angry with National Accountability Bureau?

1- Jinnah vs Nawaz (1)

 

 

 

 

 

Why PM is Angry from #NAB

 

No Comments

#GoNawazGo Pakistan Judiciary Should Prosecute & Hang Killers Nawaz & Shahbaz Sharif

 

 

  • Go Nawaz Go « The Revolutionary's Tale
     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wake-Up Pakistanis

#GoNawazGo

Every Pakistan Should Make it their Mission to Boot this Corrupt and Seditious Regime of Nawaz Sharif & Sharif Dynasty. If they are not removed Pakistan may cease to exist. Nawaz Sharif is Sh.Mujib of Pakistan.He has a hidden agenda to destroy all state institutions of Pakistan,including the Pakistan Army. Nawaz Sharif has sent feelers to many senior officers of Pakistan Army to join hands with him in benefiting from sale of Pakistan state assets. In return, Nawaz has asked for iron clad guarantees of loyalty to him and not to the state of Pakistan.  Nawaz Sharif is furiously searching for seniors officers of Kashmiri background who will support his dynastic ambitions. Nawaz Sharif is making every effort to weaken the discipline, unity, and cohesiveness of Pakistan Army. He considers Pakistan Army the biggest hurdle in his ambition of Akhand Bharat, where he is promised Presidency with full powers by Narendra Modi. Nawaz Sharif is a clear and present danger to existence of Pakistan,Unless, Nawaz Sharif is removed by the Judiciary, Pakistan faces serious existential danger.

No Comments

Damn the Corruption & Bad Governance of Dictatorial Ruler Nawaz Sharif

 

Our worthy Prime Minister addressing a  press conference in Bhawalpur  today, said that he never lies, probably he was promising for the future not to lie anymore, because for his past it would be a  joke of the decade to say he never lied.Probably he was joking, as he knows well that his entire life is based on varied nature of lies. I must hit at people of Pakistan as well, as to why & how they find out that Prime Minister lied. The question arises what made him to say he never lie, knowingly that he is lying. This remains to be a mystery. All of his life poor guy had been like that. 

 
 
 
 
 
1- Jinnah vs Nawaz (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We saw him strongly refuting of any deal with General Musharraf while leaving for Saudi Arabia, later it turned out that he had signed a deal not to return before 10 Years. 

 
Thanks for reminding people of Pakistan, especially, the hard core PML(N) voters and supporters. If they want a liar for Prime Minister of Pakistan, then I should say “Good Luck”. The Sharif Brothers’ motto in life is ,”WO VAHDA HI KIA JO WAFA HO GAYA”?
 
Now it is for the people of Pakistan to judge whether lies or not. 

,

No Comments

Perception by Ayaz Fakir

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Perception

 

by

Ayaz Fakir

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Editor’s Note:
 
Pakistan’s Enemies may mis-read the Army’s bystander attitude towards Nawaz Sharif’s Tsunami of money laundering,transferring assets stolen from Pakistan to S.Arabia, UAE, UK, US, and EU.
 
 
 
 
The perception about the Army seems to have undergone a sea change in the last six months. From  revered saviours as they were seen by a huge majority, they are increasingly being viewed as “neutrals” as the state they are sworn to defend is being brought to its knees by just a few hundred people. And if things keep going the way they are, “neutral” will be the least offensive epithet to be slapped on the Army by the people of this country.
What if India attacks Pakistan today, and our Army adopts a position of neutrality? What should the Army be called then?? For what is happening today is unobstructed plunder of national wealth of a scale so frightening that the “enemy” will have done us in without the need to fire a single shot. And this corruption is surely reflected in our national debt whose figures cannot be denied, and which has put a lien on our sovereignty. How can the Army, the ultimate guardian of our state look impassively on, as the very foundations of the state are being eroded? What should the people, who sustain the Army, call such neutrality?
This is a strange scenario where the people who are destroying the country are hiding behind the Constitution, and where the Army which can bring about an end to this horror is also citing the same Constitution for its inaction and passivity.
Indeed, this was the very aim of this mangled Constitution i.e to give immunity to the robber barons of the land, while counting on the pusillanimity of those who lead its Army. This was the perfect legal recipe for the success of an operation designed to take down the state.
In states with a slightly higher quotient of patriotism, it is clearly understood that when it is a choice between the state and the constitution, it is for the state that a patriot stands. 
This is what Ataturk did not need being schooled about in 1919, while the German Generals of the Second World War needed to be schooled in a lot earlier than 20 July 1944.
When every solution for the salvaging of the state lies exhausted, and the last solution is the only one that remains, not resorting to this solution does not make one a “constitutionalist”, it makes one a deserter at a time when he was most needed by his country.

 

Indeed, this was the very aim of this mangled Constitution i.e to give immunity to the robber barons of the land, while counting on the pusillanimity of those who lead its Army. This was the perfect legal recipe for the success of an operation designed to take down the state.
In states with a slightly higher quotient of patriotism, it is clearly understood that when it is a choice between the state and the constitution, it is for the state that a patriot stands. 
This is what Ataturk did not need being schooled about in 1919, while the German Generals of the Second World War needed to be schooled in a lot earlier than 20 July 1944.
When every solution for the salvaging of the state lies exhausted, and the last solution is the only one that remains, not resorting to this solution does not make one a “constitutionalist”, it makes one a deserter at a time when he was most needed by his country.

, , , ,

No Comments