Altaf’s threat to the news anchors.
Bhai ab nahi chalein gi yeh dramay baziyan. The nation is awake now! They know how to stand against unjust.
WE ARE NOT SCARED ANYMORE!
Our Announcements
Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.
Posted by farrukh in MURDERERS QAUMI MOVEMENT on June 28th, 2013
A DEADLY KILLER KILLED A NASTY KILLER
We know that the chronic culprit, gangster, horrible tyrant and mass murderer Altaf Hussain ordered the assassination of his hunting dog, Imran Farooq, himself a mass murderer of Karachi in the 1990s.
Almost everyone knows the killing prowess, history of, and murder spree of this most deadly and despicable barbarian known as Altaf “Bhai”. “JO QUAID KA GHADDAR HAI – WOH MAUT KA HAQDAR HAI”, has been an old slogan of Altaf’s ‘chamchas’. Quit MQM and lay your life.
Altaf is on a highly objectionable asylum in the UK while he should have been handed over to the Pakistan government as a dangerous criminal, the most wanted man on record in 1992. The British government keeps him as a stooge to be used at the most appropriate time. Did you notice the fake ‘grief’ of Altaf on TV? Did you notice the composed though stern face of Imran Farooq’s father? He knows.
It is rumoured that Scotland Yard have got the assassin since day one. They are using delaying tactics trying to save the neck of the criminal Altaf.
The national cricketing hero-turned-politician Imran Khan can now file a case against Altaf and the London Metropolitan Police. We will support him to the hilt.
Now see what they are trying to hide.
http://www.chowk.com/articles/who-killed-dr-imran-farooq-saeed-qureshi.htm
Who killed Dr Imran Farooq?
saeed qureshi September 18, 2010
The London Metropolitan police known as the New Scotland Yard would be able, in due course, to unravel the assassins of the founder member, former convener, and deputy convener of MQM, Dr. Imran Farooq who was stabbed to death in Mill Hills locality in London last Thursday 5:30 PM London time..
But presently it is an incident shrouded in mystery. The culprits cannot be captured so soon by any mechanism until the London police gathers enough evidence and connects strings related with the murder. In the meantime, the police has shifted Dr Imran’s wife to an undisclosed place for either safety or for investigation.
Presently, media and other sources are expressing and analyzing various aspects and motives behind Dr. Imran’s assassination, a high profile member of the MQM though presently estranged and rather disgruntled with MQM. One of the fingers being pointed out are towards the high command of MQM that may have been wary of Dr. Imran’s being the repository of many crucial secrets of this party that if spilled could land this organization in deep trouble.
It is a well know fact that Dr Imran was not having quite cordial or even normal relations with the top leadership of the MQM for quite some time. This strained and sour nature of relationship can be gauged from his expulsion from the MQM two times and suspension four times. He was under suspension and cut off from the party and its leadership for over two years until his death.
While living in exile that he chose with Altaf Hussain simultaneously, he kept a distance from his overbearing boss in the last several years and according to reports, they hardly spoke with each other except on very few occasions. He was an asylee like Altaf Hussain and was leading a low profile and modest life in London.
There is no gainsaying that there is certainly a sinister plot and well laid out conspiracy behind the murder of Dr. Imran whose role during the pioneering stages of MQM (previously Mohajar Qaumi Movement) was that of an ideologue, a planner, and an architect. But the leading cause for his estrangement or disenchantment with the party was its paradigm of functioning as a closely-knit mafia organization that tolerated no dissention or even criticism on the party boss.
It is also being rumored that perhaps after being in political limbo for such a long time, Dr Imran was in the process of launching his own political party although he was still a member of the party though under suspension.
The conditions, under which Dr Imran who came to London in 1992 was killed, are murky and appear to be intriguing. If he was safe and lived normal life for about 18 years how come that all of a sudden, he was put to death at a stage when he was like a spent force as far his political career was concerned.
If it is true that before his death he had participated in a special meeting convened in connection with the celebration of MQM chief Altaf Hussain’s 57th birthday, then there seems to be more than meets the eye. Although a grief, stricken and sobbing Altaf Hussain looked to be totally devastated by the tragic death of a very close former colleague, yet if the occurrence of the meeting is established then the case will take a new turn.
There is also another possibility that gang war that has been simmering between the rival Mohajar factions, (MQM Haq Prast led by Altaf Hussain and MQM Haqiqi led by Afaq Khan), all these years has spilled over to England. Dr. Imran’s murder might have been also committed by perpetrators and elements that might be hoping that it would somehow implicate the MQM, especially this party’s chief so that their revolutionary mission of rooting out feudalism and reaching out to the rest of Pakistan is nipped before it comes to a full bloom.
Dr. Imran was from Bihar and therefore was known as a Bihari Mohajar with sizeable backing within MQM. It has not yet been established if he had been meeting with MQM’s (Haq Prast) rival group Haqiqi headed by Amir Khan and Afaq Ahmed now in jail for quite some time. That one clue if proven would give a new dimension to the death mystery of Dr. Imran Farooq.
Since it is too early to preempt or predict anything even for the best of future tellers, let us wait which way the investigation of Scotland Yard goes and how the layers of this very cold-blooded murder of a high profile political figure are peeled off. But keeping in view the past outstanding performance of British police there is every possibility that finally the real assassins and their backers would be unearthed.
Who killed Dr Imran Farooq?
saeed qureshi September 18, 2010
Reference
WRITER: NAILA KHAN
COURTESY: OUR BEACON FORUM
The London Metropolitan police known as the New Scotland Yard would be able, in due course, to unravel the assassins of the founder member, former convener, and deputy convener of MQM, Dr. Imran Farooq who was stabbed to death in Mill Hills locality in London last Thursday 5:30 PM London time..
But presently it is an incident shrouded in mystery. The culprits cannot be captured so soon by any mechanism until the London police gathers enough evidence and connects strings related with the murder. In the meantime, the police has shifted Dr Imran’s wife to an undisclosed place for either safety or for investigation.
Presently, media and other sources are expressing and analyzing various aspects and motives behind Dr. Imran’s assassination, a high profile member of the MQM though presently estranged and rather disgruntled with MQM. One of the fingers being pointed out are towards the high command of MQM that may have been wary of Dr. Imran’s being the repository of many crucial secrets of this party that if spilled could land this organization in deep trouble.
It is a well know fact that Dr Imran was not having quite cordial or even normal relations with the top leadership of the MQM for quite some time. This strained and sour nature of relationship can be gauged from his expulsion from the MQM two times and suspension four times. He was under suspension and cut off from the party and its leadership for over two years until his death.
While living in exile that he chose with Altaf Hussain simultaneously, he kept a distance from his overbearing boss in the last several years and according to reports, they hardly spoke with each other except on very few occasions. He was an asylee like Altaf Hussain and was leading a low profile and modest life in London.
There is no gainsaying that there is certainly a sinister plot and well laid out conspiracy behind the murder of Dr. Imran whose role during the pioneering stages of MQM (previously Mohajar Qaumi Movement) was that of an ideologue, a planner, and an architect. But the leading cause for his estrangement or disenchantment with the party was its paradigm of functioning as a closely-knit mafia organization that tolerated no dissention or even criticism on the party boss.
It is also being rumored that perhaps after being in political limbo for such a long time, Dr Imran was in the process of launching his own political party although he was still a member of the party though under suspension.
The conditions, under which Dr Imran who came to London in 1992 was killed, are murky and appear to be intriguing. If he was safe and lived normal life for about 18 years how come that all of a sudden, he was put to death at a stage when he was like a spent force as far his political career was concerned.
If it is true that before his death he had participated in a special meeting convened in connection with the celebration of MQM chief Altaf Hussain’s 57th birthday, then there seems to be more than meets the eye. Although a grief, stricken and sobbing Altaf Hussain looked to be totally devastated by the tragic death of a very close former colleague, yet if the occurrence of the meeting is established then the case will take a new turn.
There is also another possibility that gang war that has been simmering between the rival Mohajar factions, (MQM Haq Prast led by Altaf Hussain and MQM Haqiqi led by Afaq Khan), all these years has spilled over to England. Dr. Imran’s murder might have been also committed by perpetrators and elements that might be hoping that it would somehow implicate the MQM, especially this party’s chief so that their revolutionary mission of rooting out feudalism and reaching out to the rest of Pakistan is nipped before it comes to a full bloom.
Dr. Imran was from Bihar and therefore was known as a Bihari Mohajar with sizeable backing within MQM. It has not yet been established if he had been meeting with MQM’s (Haq Prast) rival group Haqiqi headed by Amir Khan and Afaq Ahmed now in jail for quite some time. That one clue if proven would give a new dimension to the death mystery of Dr. Imran Farooq.
Since it is too early to preempt or predict anything even for the best of future tellers, let us wait which way the investigation of Scotland Yard goes and how the layers of this very cold-blooded murder of a high profile political figure are peeled off. But keeping in view the past outstanding performance of British police there is every possibility that finally the real assassins and their backers would be unearthed.
QATIL BHATTA BHAYYA ALTAF HUSSAIN
This is a great article dear Sister Naila and Journalist Brother Qureshi, Thank you.
Born at Karachi in 1960 to parents from Rampur India, I was a strong young high ranking officer in the middle of things in the Karachi of 1980s and 90s. Note that I am an Urdu-speaking son of Mahajir parents, but I am a Pakistani first.
Altaf Hussain Bhatta ‘Bhayya’ and Killer Imran Farooq were commanding target shootings of non-Urdu people at a mass, no, a massive scale. They ran the most cruel torture cells ever, worse than those of Nazis. “REHEM HARAM, REHEM HARAM” (NO MERCY, NO MERCY) was the slogan I had heard from both of these criminals.
These traitors wanted an independent Jinnahpur and yet they had no soft corner for the unfortunate 100,000 Biharis stuck in Bangladesh. Azeem Tariq was killed by their stooges for having some discipline and compassion so they killed him in cold blood. MQM Haqeeqi with Afaq were a much better organized party and good humans. Who got rid of them? I don’t need to tell you.
For every Firauon there is a Musa. What a wonderful man was Gen. Naseerullah Babar, just a Musa of the times. He gave the BHATTA criminals their own medicine. I was assigned the responsibility of dismantling 50 torture cells and to this day I thank Allah for wiping out those cells, getting rid of about 100 killers and throwing “Doctor” Imran Farooq on the ground and then sending him underground. The general’s plan swept away 1700 plus Bhatta-collectors to hell in the first week of operations alone. Sohrab Hussain is proud and grateful to his Creator to this day for bringing sanity back to our beautiful Karachi along with my 1,000 plain clothes law enforcement personnel.
QATIL BHATTA BHAYYA ALTAF HUSSAIN ran to London and lives on public charity and Bhatta to this day. It appears that time is up for the fatty khinzeer-faced beggar-killer. I still enjoy my ten forceful slaps on the face of the Bhatta Bhayya before letting him live as the top class General commanded me. Bhatta Bhayya was crying down on the ground as you saw him crying on Thursday and Friday TV this week.
If Bhatta Bhayya is the killer of a killer, as it appears, I think MLP would not let him go except to the gallows. Our group of 130 officials have made calls to the CTB of Scotland Yard.
Posted by AghaSaad in PORKY ATAF "BHAYON KA QATIL" HUSSAIN on May 17th, 2013
The MQM chief Altaf Hussain‘s conditional call for separating Karachi city from Pakistan comes closer to the independence of Singapore from Malaysia in 1965. The Singapore separation from Malaysia that it willingly joined in 1963, was the result of extreme strife, unbridgeable disagreements and ethnic bitterness between the Chinese origin population and the native Malayans mostly Muslims. Is it also the blue print of Jinnahpur that was later swept under the carpet?
Altaf Hussain the fiery and unbridled chief of MQM has enslaved or indoctrinated his Muhajir community, mostly settled in Karachi city after their migration from India in 1947. By his rigid and merciless authoritarianism, instead of integrating, he has isolated his community from the mainstream populace of Pakistan. MQM is basically a movement for the sake of Muhajirs as an ethnic entity and not for the Pakistani nation.
Since its formation in 1984 as Muhajir Qaumi Movement and later renamed as Muttahida Qaumi Movement in 1997, the imprint of MQM in the minds of the people is that of a kind of mafia or an entity of roughnecks or extortionists. It is believed that the special death and terror squads within MQM kill, kidnap and torture their rivals including the critics from within the MQM fold.
There has been also a prevailing impression that has gained ground, that the extortions or the obnoxious “parchi system” was first started by MQM to raise funds for the organization to become financially robust for carrying out its political and apolitical activities. Undoubtedly Altaf Hussain has proven to be a great and unassailable master and unbending and strict lord of his party.
He can summon the multitudes of Urdu speaking Pakistanis and Muhajirs within a matter of hours and with one call. They all gather at a venue with their heads down and hands motionless unless raised to cheer or clap for the scathing tirade of their great master. They sit rather motionless for hours together listening to his long, dreary and high pitched discourses as if they have been bewitched or mesmerized. There is a gossip that anyone who does not clap or come to the assemblage is dealt with vindictively.
Several pioneering cohorts and companions are alleged to have lost their lives in all these years ostensibly due to their opposition of the ruthless leader with symptoms of indiscretion. Their names are in the public knowledge. The MQM captures most seats in Karachi both for the National Assembly and for the Sindh provincial assembly. These seats in the distant past used to be shared by Jamaat-i-Islami and some other political factions. But for many years now these are exclusively bagged by MQM.
With a sizable number of seats in the federal and provincial parliaments, the MQM gathers enough bargaining clout and leverage to share the power at the center and in Sindh. The latest show of their bargaining power was brought to bear in case of their coalition with the PPP government in the national assembly for almost five years with some brief walkout periods.
The MQM has been playing its bargaining card with great dexterity and with a mix of pressure and fear hanging upon the main coalition partner. Thus it would be in a decisive position always to draw as many perks and concessions that it would place on the table for becoming the coalition partner.
The MQM’s political behavior for all these years has been to browbeat and flex its muscles whenever its hegemony was challenged by other groups within the context of Karachi and broadly in Sindh. A shrewd and Machiavellian person like president Zardari has always been going extra mile to accommodate MQM’s demands not matter how unreasonable or excessive those would be.
However, the May11, 2013 general elections seemed to have changed the turf, the ground realities, terms of engagement, and environment specifically in Karachi, Hyderabad and generally elsewhere in Sindh province. For the first time there have been aggressive contests with the MQM candidates. The PTI and JI have jointly put up candidates in the constituencies that were out of bound for non-MQM parties.
Yet those who lost in various constituencies alleged serious irregularities and indeed rigging in the areas inhabited by the Muhajir communities. The terror and revenge that is associated with the covert and overt activities of MQM, restrain the rival candidates and their supporters to canvass or carry out their electioneering campaigning.
Also, for the first time, there has been massive reaction from other political parties contesting the elections. As a result there could be a possibility that reelection or recounting of votes is disputed constituencies is considered by the Election Commission. That possibility has outraged Altaf Hussain so much that he has implicitly demanded separation of Karachi from the rest of the landmass.
By broaching the separation of Karachi from the rest of Pakistan, Mr. Hussain seems to be stepping into the shoes of Mujibur Rehman who was the architect, executor and proponent of cessation of East Pakistan. Although in all fairness, the West Pakistani politicians and the army was much to blame for the tragic dismemberment of one united Pakistan.
The latest address of Mr. Altaf Hussain is pregnant with serious threats and warnings to those who according to him were trying to push the Muhajirs to the wall. If it happens he thundered, neither Pakistan nor its perpetrators would survive. He also lashed out at the media and those journalists who opposed MQM and dubbed them as barking dogs.
Altaf Hussain has the seeds of a great leader and in this role he has converted his thus far meek and marginalized community into a monolithic, united, formidable force that rose to prominence to the extent of becoming a shareholder in political power.
But instead that he himself should have looked upon as an apostle of peace and love, he came to be known as a dreaded and pitiless czar and a violent baron. The MQM itself bore the stamp of an ethic entity with a prevalent perception that it was like a mafia that mostly uses terror and intimidation to draw loyalty out of its cadres. Thus Altaf Hussain unwittingly or inadvertently isolated the MQM from being a party of the national standing.
In his latest tirade from London, while mentioning Mujibur Rehman and the break-up of Pakistan in 1971, he threw the idea of separating Karachi an independent unit if MQM”s mandate was not acceptable to the establishment. He warned that by giving one call he could create mayhem in Karachi. Does he want further dismemberment of Pakistan and is prepared to fight back by mobilizing the Muhajir community?
Does he know that the conditions behind the separation of East Pakistan in 1971 were drastically different from those related to Karachi? Does he mean India would replay her role of further truncating Pakistan and free Karachi for the migrated population to live independently? Can his statements no matter emotional, be interpreted as seditious and treasonable?
It would be absolutely preferable if MQM sheds its image of being a rogue entity and Altaf Hussain elevates his role from an ethnic boss to that of a national leader. Instead of donning an insidious role like Bal Thackeray or eyeing on what Sheikh Mujibur Rehman right or wrong achieved, he should liberate and unleash his own people from his fearsome stranglehold.
Regardless of what the press projects about him and the MQM, or what his questionable conduct has remained thus far, he should rise above the ethnic straight jacket and serve the entire Pakistani nations.
He should speak and represent the people of Pakistan and not exclusively Muhajirs. That role would endear him to the entire Pakistani nation and he would be venerated not as a clan lord but a lofty leader of national prominence. By way of suggestion, he should rename Muhajir Qaumi Movement ( MQM) as Pakistan Qaumi Movement(PQM).
The writer is a senior journalist and a former diplomat
This and other articles can also be read on www.uprightopinion.com.
Additional Reading:
TRUE FACE OF BRITISH TERRORIST BOSS OF MQM:
Altaf’s threat to the news anchors.
Bhai ab nahi chalein gi yeh dramay baziyan. The nation is awake now! They know how to stand against unjust.
WE ARE NOT SCARED ANYMORE!
.
Posted by admin in BOOT THE SCOUNDRELS OR SHOWDAZ, JUI (F), LIAR POLITICIANS on January 6th, 2013
Posted by admin in MQM Terrorism, Pakistan Fights Terrorism on December 29th, 2012
PAKISTANIS DREAM
While the West talks alot about terrorism, about how wrong it is and how fervently they are against it. But that’s all talk, their actions show them to be the biggest terrorists around. With lofty talk and great self-praise(and a media that greatly helps them in projecting that image) they bomb cities full of civilian non-combatants across the world from Libya/Afghanistan/Iraq and dozens of other countries, and they have been found funding, aiding, and abetting terrorists and death squads wherever it suits their objectives. And Al-CIAda magically appears in any country the US wants to instigate crises in. And, along with all this, the west frequently provides a safe sanctuary for terrorists and mass-murders, like Altaf Hussain.
Altaf Hussain fled Pakistan when the murder cases against him began piling up. And the UK gave him sanctuary, do you seriously think the British don’t know who he is? Ofcourse they do. He is in their pocket, and the leverage they have over him – offering him protection for obedience, is a great deal for both of them. They don’t care about the millions suffering in Karachi. This video below is of British Member of Parliament George Galloway, who raised the issue of Altaf Hussain being a terrorist who is making the lives of millions of people miserable, from under UK protection. Sadly, their government and media quietly brushed this under the carpet and nothing came of it.Which makes it likely that, unless it suits their objectives to dispose of Altaf Hussain, this investigation of Scotland Yard will be a sham as well, theatre to please the public. It was probably George Galloway’s questions like these that made his political career unfeasible for these folks. He is no longer a Member of Parliament there.
Awami National Party (ANP) leader Afrasiab Khattak on Saturday said Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) chief Altaf Hussain had the blood of Pashtun on his hands. PHOTO: EXPRESS/FILE
ISLAMABAD / PESHAWAR: Awami National Party (ANP) leader Afrasiab Khattak on Saturday said Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) chief Altaf Hussain had the blood of Pashtun on his hands.
Responding to Hussan’s allegations of the ANP misleading Pashtuns, Khattak said “aap ka Pashtun-duhsman chehra sab kay samnay hay.” He said the MQM chief should consider what the people think of him looking at the number of Pashtun bodies coming to Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, FATA and Balochistan from Karachi.
“Nobody has killed more Pashtuns than the MQM,” said the ANP leader.
Speaking on the MQM chief’s allegations of US funding of the ANP during elections, Khattak said that the number of assets the MQM and its people owned in the United Kingdom and the letter written to then Prime Minister Tony Blair was something to be questioned.
“Where is the MQM getting the money for all this?”
Khattak said that the ANP would not rest until the killers of May 12 have been arrested.
The ANP leader said that Altaf Hussain had “verbally abused” all political parties during his press conference except for the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and this was because the MQM could get “seats” from them.
No ethnic fighting in Karachi: Shahi Syed
ANP leader Shahi Syed said there was no ethnic fighting in Karachi and it was the MQM that was targeting workers of his party, PPP, Jamaat-e-Islami and other political parties.
Speaking to the media in Karachi, he said the MQM should focus on national politics and not blackmail the government.
Syed said Altaf Hussain’s allegations had come because the ANP lawyer had provided solid facts to the chief justice during the suo motu hearing.
He said the MQM should speak with evidence and respond to the allegations made by Zulfiqar Mirza.
Syed said Mirza had placed the Holy Quran on his head when he made the allegations and Hussain had “danced and disrespected” the Quran during his address.
Speaking on the bus burning incident in Kemari, the ANP leader said that the MQM’s claim of only Urdu-speaking being killed was false. He said two Pashtuns and three Katchi community members had also been killed.
The ANP leader then brought forward witnesses who he said were relatives of the two men killed. He said the purpose of bringing forward the witnesses was to prove that Urdu-speaking people were not the only ones who had been killed.
“ANP does not need a certificate of patriotism from Altaf Hussain”
ANP leader Zahid Khan, speaking to the media earlier in Islamabad, said his part did not need a certificate of patriotism from Altaf Hussain or anyone else.
He said if anyone had any allegations against the ANP they should come to the courts.
Khan said everyone had seen the way Altaf Hussain had acted during the press conference yesterday.
“First he reference the Holy Quran, then he spoke about the Prophet (pbuh). I am a layman, but if the muftis keep quiet on the way he spoke, it will be damaging for the religion and society.”
The ANP leader said there was shadow of fear around Altaf Hussain during the press conference and he acted like “a person who does not know what to say.”
He alleged that the MQM leader had tried to impress the judiciary and had tried to create pressure by saying he would set his workers free in Karachi.
Khan said his party supported freedom for the media and that his party had never taken action against anyone who had spoken against them.
The ANP leader said none of the MQM leaders were able to respond to the allegations against them and Altaf Hussain did not want to respond to them.
Responding to Altaf Hussain’s statement on “foreign powers” working against Pakistan, Khan said that the MQM leader was a national of one of the powers he had mentioned and that he should tear up his passport and documents and return to Pakistan if there was such a conspiracy.
On the map shown by the MQM chief during the press conference, the ANP leader said the map had already been printed by the media in 1998.
“If you look at the press conference, he had nothing to say. He did not warn the nation and did not tell them anything.”
Khan said that it would be better for the country if a judicial committee is formed for an inquiry on which political parties are running on foreign aid.
Responding to the MQM chief’s statement that his party did not put up containers in the city on May 12, Khan said the MQM had its own home minister in place at that time and that the ports and shipping minister was from their party too.
“The containers were taken from Port Qasim. The ports and shipping minister was from the MQM at that time too,” said Khan.
The ANP leader said the powers given to the Rangers should be stay.
He said the notice taken by the chief justice and the operations in Karachi had helped improve the situation in the city.
Tumhain yaad ho ke na yaad ho….humain yaad hai sab zara...Hassan Nawaz Bilawal Bhutto Hamza Shahbaz and Bakhtawar are brothers and sisters.…Was Zardari not corrupt when this was happening????
Posted by admin in MQM Terrorism on December 24th, 2012
|
Members of the Senate |
|
1 | Ahmed Ali | |
2 | Babar Khan Ghauri | |
3 | Nighat Mirza | |
4 | Abida Saif | |
5 | Allama Abbas Kumeli | |
6 |
Prof. Saeed Siddiqui | |
7 | Dr Muhammad Ali Brohi | |
Members of National Assembly of Pakistan |
||
1 | Abdul Waseem | NA 240 |
2 | Nisar Panwar | NA 243 |
3 | Hyder Abbas Rizvi | NA 244 |
4 | Kanwar Khalid Younus | NA 245 |
5 | Abdul Qadir Khanzada | NA 242 |
6 | Abid Ali Umang | NA 246 |
7 | Israrul Ibad | NA 247 |
8 | Dr. Amir Liaquat Hussain | NA 249 |
9 | Saffwan Ullah | NA 251 |
10 | Nawab Mirza Advocate | NA 254 |
11 | Iqbal Mohammad Ali Khan | NA 256 |
12 | Shamim Siddiqui | NA 257 |
13 | Prof. Khalid Wahab | NA 219 |
14 | Dr. Farooq Sattar | NA 255 |
15 | Devdas | (Reserve Seats for Minority) |
16 | Shabina Talat | (Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
17 | Afsar Jehan | (Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
18 | Shamim Akhtar | (Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
|
Names of Ministers for Federal Cabinet |
|
1 | Saffwan Ullah Federal Minister for Housing | |
2 | Baber Ghori Federal Minister for Ports andShipping | |
3 | Shamim Siddiqui Federal Minister for Communication | |
Members of Provincial Assembly of Sindh |
||
|
|
|
1 | Abdul Sattar Ansari | PS 92 |
2 | Abdul Qudoos | PS 94 |
3 | Anwar Alam | PS 95 |
4 | Iqbal Qadri | PS 96 |
5 | Mohammed Hussain | PS 97 |
6 | Sardar Ahmed | PS 98 |
7 | Qamar Mansoor | PS 99 |
8 | Adil Siddiqui | PS 100 |
9 | Bilquis Mukhtar | PS 101 |
10 | Immam Uddin Sheikh | PS 102 |
11 | Idrees Siddiqui | PS 103 |
12 | Mohammad Moeen | PS 104 |
13 | Rehana Nasreen | PS 105 |
14 | Kanwar Naveed Jamil | PS 106 |
15 | Shoaib Bukhari | PS 107 |
16 | Dr. Aziz Bantwa | PS 110 |
17 | Syed Tayyab Hussain | PS 111 |
18 | Syed Shakir Ali | PS 112 |
19 | Akhtar Bilgarami | PS 113 |
20 | Rauf Siddiqui | PS 115 |
21 | Mustafa Kamal | PS 117 |
22 | Faisal Sabzwari | PS 118 |
23 | Abbas Jaffri | PS 119 |
24 | Dr. Ali Bin Hamid | PS 120 |
25 | Hameed uz Zafar | PS 121 |
26 | Jarrar Haider | PS 123 |
27 | Talib Imam | PS 124 |
28 | Amir Moen Pirzada | PS 125 |
29 | Arshad Shah | PS 46 |
30 | Naeem Ishtiaq | PS 48 |
31 | Aslam Pervaiz | PS 49 |
32 | Shabbir Qaimkhani | PS 64 |
33 | Ponjomil Bheel | (Reserve Seats for Minority) |
34 |
Yaqoob Ilyas |
(Reserve Seats for Minority) |
35 |
Farheen Ambreen |
(Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
36 |
Aasma Sherwani |
(Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
37 |
Fareeda Balouch |
(Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
38 |
Aziz Qazalbash |
(Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
39 |
Shumailla Nazar |
(Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
40 |
Heer Soho |
(Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
41 |
Farzana Saeed |
(Reserve Seats for Ladies) |
42 | Yousuf Munir Shaikh | |
|
|
|
|
Names of Ministers for Sindh Province |
|
|
|
|
1 | Rauf Siddiqui ( Home Minister) | |
2 | Shabbir Qaimkhani ( Cultural and Tourism) | |
3 | Mustaf Kamal ( Information Technology) | |
4 | Sardar Ahmed ( Finance Minister) | |
5 | Adil Siddiqui (Labor and industries) | |
6 | Shoaib Ahmed Bukhari ( Planning and development) | |
7 | Qamar Mansoor ( Sports) | |
|
Names of Advisors for Chief Minister of |
|
1 | Fatima Surray Bajiya | |
2 | Manzoor Hussain | |
3 | Mumtaz Hameed | |
4 | M.A. Jalil ( Excise and Taxation) | |
5 | Faisal Gabol ( Health) | |
6 | Salahuddin Hyder ( Information) | |
7 |
Waseem Akhtar ( Local Government) | |
8 |
Noman Saigal ( Envronment) | |
|
|