Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for March, 2014

The Magnificence of Malik ul Quddus: The Fine Tuning of the Universe

Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on March 24th, 2014

 

There is no evolution in the Qur’an

 

 

http://media-cache-cd0.pinimg.com/736x/cd/ea/52/cdea525264bdca2ba89b67ff6b823279.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Harun Yahya Facebook
 

 

 

 

What is the matter with you that you do not hope for honour from Allah,when He created you by successive stages?(Surah Nuh, 13-14)

Has man ever known a point of time when he was not something remembered? (Surat al-Insan, 1)

We created man from a mingled drop to test him, and We made him hearing and seeing. (Surat al-Insan, 2)

His companion, with whom he was debating, said to him, ‘Do you then disbelieve in Him Who created you from dust, then from a drop of sperm, and then formed you as a man? (Surat al-Kahf, 37)

Mankind! if you are in any doubt about the Rising, know that We created you from dust then from a drop of sperm then from a clot of blood then from a lump of flesh, formed yet unformed, so We may make things clear to you. We make whatever We want stay in the womb until a specified time and then We bring you out as children so that you can reach your full maturity. Some of you die and some of you revert to the lowest form of life so that, after having knowledge, they then know nothing at all. And you see the earth dead and barren; then when We send down water onto it it quivers and swells and sprouts with luxuriant plants of every kind.  (Surat al-Haj, 5)

It is He Who created you from earth,then from a drop of sperm,then from a clot of blood, then He brings you out as infants, then so you may achieve full strength, then so you may become old men –though some of you may die before that time –so that you may reach a predetermined age and so that hopefully you will use your intellect.(Surat Ghafir, 67)

out of a sperm-drop when it spurted forth; (Surat al-Najm, 46)

Your Lord said to the angels,‘I am going to create a human being out of clay. (Surat al-Sad, 71)

When your Lord said to the angels, ‘I am putting a khalif on the earth,’ they said, ‘Why put on it one who will cause corruption on it and shed blood when we glorify You with praise and proclaim Your purity?’ He said, ‘I know what you do not know.’ (Surat al-Baqara, 30)

He created you from a single self,  then produced its mate from it, and sent down livestock to you – (Surat az-Zumar, 6)

Those who reject their Lord will have the punishment of Hell.What an evil destination! (Surat al-Mulk, 23)

and placed the moon as a light in them and made the sun a blazing lamp?  (Surah Nuh, 16)

Allah has spread the earth out as a carpet for you (Surah Nuh, 19)

He said, ‘Your Lord and the Lord of your forefathers, the previous peoples.’ (Surat ash-Shu‘ara’, 26)

There is no god but Him –He gives life and causes to die –your Lord and the Lord of your forefathers, the previous peoples.(Surat ad-Dukhan, 8)

Or were you present when death came to Ya‘qub and he said to his sons, ‘What will you worship when I have gone?’ They said, ‘We will worship your God, the God of your forefathers, Ibrahim, Isma‘il and Ishaq –  one God. We are Muslims submitted to Him.’(Surat al-Baqara, 133)

Allah caused you to grow from the earth then will return you to it and bring you out again.(Surat an-Nuh, 17-18)

Your Lord creates and chooses whatever He wills. The choice is not theirs. Glory be to Allah! He is exalted above anything they associate with Him! (Surat al-Kasas, 68)

Praise be to Allah, the Bringer into Being of the heavens and earth, He who made the angels messengers, with wings – two, three or four. He adds to creation in any way He wills. Allah has power over all things. (Surat al-Fatir, 1)

You are well aware of those of you who broke the Sabbath. We said to them, ‘Be apes, despised, cast out.’We made it an exemplary punishment for those there then, and those coming afterwards, and a warning to those who have taqwa. (Surat al-Baqara, 65-66)

Say: ‘Shall I tell you of a reward with Allah far worse than that: that of those whom Allah has cursed and with whom He is angry – turning some of them into monkeys and into pigs – and who worshipped false gods? Such people are in a worse situation and further from the right way.’ (Surat al-Maida, 60)

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 4d310_c7632141_L
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Fine Tuning of the Universe

An amazing array of scientists are bewildered by the design of the universe and admit a possibility of a designer.

(See the full presentation of this and other themes on the 2001 PrincipleWebsite.)

According to growing numbers of scientists, the laws and constants of nature are so “finely-tuned,” and so many “coincidences” have occurred to allow for the possibility of life, the universe must have come into existence through intentional planning and intelligence.

In fact, this “fine-tuning” is so pronounced, and the “coincidences” are so numerous, many scientists have come to espouse The Anthropic Principle, which contends that the universe was brought into existence intentionally for the sake of producing mankind.

Even those who do not accept The Anthropic Principle admit to the “fine-tuning” and conclude that the universe is “too contrived” to be a chance event.

In a BBC science documentary, “The Anthropic Principle,” some of the greatest scientific minds of our day describe the recent findings which compel this conclusion.

Dr. Dennis Scania, the distinguished head of Cambridge University Observatories:

If you change a little bit the laws of nature, or you change a little bit the constants of nature—like the charge on the electron—then the way the universe develops is so changed, it is very likely that intelligent life would not have been able to develop.

Dr. David D. Deutsch, Institute of Mathematics, Oxford University:

If we nudge one of these constants just a few percent in one direction, stars burn out within a million years of their formation, and there is no time for evolution. If we nudge it a few percent in the other direction, then no elements heavier than helium form. No carbon, no life. Not even any chemistry. No complexity at all.

Dr. Paul Davies, noted author and professor of theoretical physics at Adelaide University:

“The really amazing thing is not that life on Earth is balanced on a knife-edge, but that the entire universe is balanced on a knife-edge, and would be total chaos if any of the natural ‘constants’ were off even slightly. You see,” Davies adds, “even if you dismiss man as a chance happening, the fact remains that the universe seems unreasonably suited to the existence of life—almost contrived—you might say a ‘put-up job’.”

According to the latest scientific thinking, the matter of the universe originated in a huge explosion of energy called “The Big Bang.” At first, the universe was only hydrogen and helium, which congealed into stars. Subsequently, all the other elements were manufactured inside the stars. The four most abundant elements in the universe are: hydrogen, helium, oxygen and carbon.

When Sir Fred Hoyle was researching how carbon came to be, in the “blast-furnaces” of the stars, his calculations indicated that it is very difficult to explain how the stars generated the necessary quantity of carbon upon which life on earth depends. Hoyle found that there were numerous “fortunate” one-time occurrences which seemed to indicate that purposeful “adjustments” had been made in the laws of physics and chemistry in order to produce the necessary carbon.

Hoyle sums up his findings as follows:

A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintendent has monkeyed with the physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. I do not believe that any physicist who examined the evidence could fail to draw the inference that the laws of nuclear physics have been deliberately designed with regard to the consequences they produce within stars.

Adds Dr. David D. Deutch:

If anyone claims not to be surprised by the special features that the universe has, he is hiding his head in the sand. These special features ARE surprising and unlikely.

UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE OF FINE-TUNING

Besides the BBC video, the scientific establishment’s most prestigious journals, and its most famous physicists and cosmologists, have all gone on record as recognizing the objective truth of the fine-tuning.

The August ‘97 issue of “Science” (the most prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journal in the United States) featured an article entitled “Science and God: A Warming Trend?” Here is an excerpt:

The fact that the universe exhibits many features that foster organic life—such as precisely those physical constants that result in planets and long-lived stars—also has led some scientists to speculate that some divine influence may be present.

In his best-selling book, “A Brief History of Time”, Stephen Hawking (perhaps the world’s most famous cosmologist) refers to the phenomenon as “remarkable.”

“The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers (i.e. the constants of physics) seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life”. “For example,” Hawking writes, “if the electric charge of the electron had been only slightly different, stars would have been unable to burn hydrogen and helium, or else they would not have exploded. It seems clear that there are relatively few ranges of values for the numbers (for the constants) that would allow for development of any form of intelligent life. Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty.”

Hawking then goes on to say that he can appreciate taking this as possible evidence of “a divine purpose in Creation and the choice of the laws of science (by God)” (ibid. p. 125). Dr. Gerald Schroeder, author of “Genesis and the Big Bang” and “The Science of Life” was formerly with the M.I.T. physics department. He adds the following examples:

1) Professor Steven Weinberg, a Nobel laureate in high energy physics (a field of science that deals with the very early universe), writing in the journal “Scientific American”, reflects on

how surprising it is that the laws of nature and the initial conditions of the universe should allow for the existence of beings who could observe it. Life as we know it would be impossible if any one of several physical quantities had slightly different values.

Although Weinberg is a self-described agnostic, he cannot but be astounded by the extent of the fine-tuning. He goes on to describe how a beryllium isotope having the minuscule half life of 0.0000000000000001 seconds must find and absorb a helium nucleus in that split of time before decaying. This occurs only because of a totally unexpected, exquisitely precise, energy match between the two nuclei. If this did not occur there would be none of the heavier elements. No carbon, no nitrogen, no life. Our universe would be composed of hydrogen and helium. But this is not the end of Professor Weinberg’s wonder at our well-tuned universe. He continues:

One constant does seem to require an incredible fine-tuning—The existence of life of any kind seems to require a cancellation between different contributions to the vacuum energy, accurate to about 120 decimal places.

This means that if the energies of the Big Bang were, in arbitrary units, not:

100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000,

but instead:

100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000001,

there would be no life of any sort in the entire universe because as Weinberg states:

the universe either would go through a complete cycle of expansion and contraction before life could arise, or would expand so rapidly that no galaxies or stars could form.

2) Michael Turner, the widely quoted astrophysicist at the University of Chicago and Fermilab, describes the fine-tuning of the universe with a simile:

The precision is as if one could throw a dart across the entire universe and hit a bulls eye one millimeter in diameter on the other side.

3) Roger Penrose, the Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, discovers that the likelihood of the universe having usable energy (low entropy) at the creation is even more astounding,

namely, an accuracy of one part out of ten to the power of ten to the power of 123. This is an extraordinary figure. One could not possibly even write the number down in full, in our ordinary denary (power of ten) notation: it would be one followed by ten to the power of 123 successive zeros! (That is a million billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion zeros.)

Penrose continues,

Even if we were to write a zero on each separate proton and on each separate neutron in the entire universe—and we could throw in all the other particles as well for good measure—we should fall far short of writing down the figure needed. The precision needed to set the universe on its course is to be in no way inferior to all that extraordinary precision that we have already become accustomed to in the superb dynamical equations (Newton’s, Maxwell’s, Einstein’s) which govern the behavior of things from moment to moment.

Cosmologists debate whether the space-time continuum is finite or infinite, bounded or unbounded. In all scenarios, the fine-tuning remains the same.

It is appropriate to complete this section on “fine tuning” with the eloquent words of Professor John Wheeler:

To my mind, there must be at the bottom of it all, not an utterly simple equation, but an utterly simple IDEA. And to me that idea, when we finally discover it, will be so compelling, and so inevitable, so beautiful, we will all say to each other, “How could it have ever been otherwise?”

, , , , ,

No Comments

Time to Target Nuclear Pakistan Again!

Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on March 24th, 2014

Time to target nuclear Pakistan again!
 
  
February 13, 2014

 

 
 

 It happens every year without fail – come January and the expectation of the new work plan of the CD in Geneva, that a campaign is launched targeting Pakistan’s nuclear programme, spearheaded by the US through its media and the support of dollar dependents in Pakistan. 2014 has continued that trend but with a difference: this time Pakistan’s quest for energy through nuclear power has been targeted also; probably because the targeting of the nuclear weapons was becoming a trifle passé. After all, the same hackneyed attack on the short range missile Nasr was losing ground, given that the need for this SRBM, as a tactical not battlefield weapon, has been explained ad nauseum and I will do so again.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One: the dynamics of maintaining a credible minimum nuclear deterrence altered with the Indo-US nuclear deal and its fallout, especially India’s enhanced weapons grade fissile stockpiles.

 

PAKISTANS  DETERRENCE TO INDIA’S COLD START DOCTRINE

 

Two: India’s development of a Missile Defence capability also directly impacted Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence. Three: India’s Cold Start Doctrine, now renamed and sustained conceptually in terms of the use of rapid deployment of armed brigades and divisions in surprise and rapid attacks into Pakistan created a gap in the credibility of Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence premised on MRBMs. The Nasr plugs that gap. Its deterrence value is precisely to deter such “rapid deployment” conventional attacks.
Equally important is the fact that the Nasr has not yet been inducted, so it allows both countries to bring the issue of doctrines to the table of a strategic dialogue, along with other issues. So far, the Nasr is a technology-demonstrative missile – that is, signalling the acquisition of tactical missile capability and miniaturization technology. This will allow our already developed cruise missiles – the Hatf VIII (Ra’ad) which is air-launched cruise missile (ALCM)and the Hatf VII (Babur) which is a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) – to be miniaturised for sea-launched submarine capability in order to move on to second-strike capability.  This capability stabilises nuclear deterrence by removing the need for pre-emption.
So with the Nasr critique losing ground, especially in the face of India’s expanding nuclear programme aided and abetted by the US through the 123 Agreement and NSG waivers, a new line of attack has been resorted to in the form of criticising Pakistan’s nuclear energy development. Many years earlier the IAEA-safeguarded Chashma reactors were targeted by a particular Anti-Pakistan’s Nuclear Programme Group (APNPG) – theirs is not a critique on principle but is Pakistan-specific – and the arguments proved invalid. Now their guns are fired at the K2 and K3 nuclear power reactors being planned along the coast, near KANUPP, outside of Karachi city.

 

IAEA 

 

From the safety issue to environmental issues to the budget allocations – attacks based on conjectures have been launched while basic facts have been ignored. For instance all of Pakistan’s power reactors are subject to IAEA safeguards and the sites are selected after IAEA consultations regarding safety and security practices and studying data relating to seismic, oceanic and underground features. Pakistan is not new to building power plants and even in earlier ones all this safety data was incorporated into the design of the plant. Ironically nuclear accidents have happened in developed states like the US or the old Soviet Union where carelessness seems to have played a role; or where a combination of an earthquake and Tsunami caused the disaster as in Japan. Interestingly Japan had failed to implement recommendations of the IAEA relating to nuclear safety and emergency preparedness. Also, unlike Pakistan which now has an independent nuclear regulator, the PNRA, Japan has no such independent regulatory body. Incidentally, the Sindh Environment Protection Agency was on board for the K2 and K3 projects and the Chairman PAEC apparently invited concerned civil society groups and NGOs to visit the Karachi Coastal Power Project (KCPP) and discuss their concerns on the project.
The APNPG seems totally unconcerned about the growing energy crisis Pakistan is facing which will become more acute unless nuclear energy is developed. Selective information is also being disseminated about how states are moving away from nuclear energy when the facts show that according to the IAEA at least 30 new countries are either planning to or already constructing nuclear power plants. China has 29 nuclear power plants under construction. While Germany is planning to phase out its nuclear energy, it will buy electricity from France which has the bulk of its power generation coming from nuclear energy.

 DISINFORMATION BY INDIA & ZIONIST PRESS & MEDIA

Disinformation is also being spread about the K2/K3 reactor design being experimental which is not the case. China is itself constructing an ACP-1000 reactor and so far China has had an excellent reactor safety record and vast experience in reactor construction. Having checked with the PAEC, I was informed that the lessons of Fukushima are also being incorporated in the safety design of these reactors which are based on an advanced Chinese version of French pressurised water reactors – a technology which China acquired in the 1990s and has now had two decades of developing and safely operating.   

 

 

APNPG

 

The final whine of the APNPG is to try and show that the Pak-China civil nuclear agreement is not in keeping with NSG guidelines. Fact is that the NSG is not an international treaty, but a supplier cartel which has no international law credentials. Nevertheless since China is a member of the NSG it has chosen o comply with NSG guidelines. The 1986 agreement with Pakistan predates China’s membership so it is in line with NSG requirements and is protected by the grandfather clause. Ironically, the NSG has circumvented its own guidelines in its India waiver.
If the APNPG was really concerned about nuclear safety or viability they would be focusing on the US with its faulty command and control system (2007an USAF plane took off with live nukes and no authorization); and on seeking answers as to why the NSG is encouraging India’s nuclear weapons development through NSG waivers. That would be genuine commitment not simply a dollar-dependent “Get Pakistan” agenda.

 

Courtesy

, , ,

No Comments

SEXUAL ADDICTION OF SHARIF FAMILY DESTROYING PAKISTAN

Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on March 24th, 2014

SEXUAL ADDICTION OF SHARIF FAMILY DESTROYING PAKISTAN

Nawaz Sharif is a little bit slow in his intellectual capacities. Even, at the UN, he kept Sartaj Aziz next to explain to him the proceeding of the General Assembly. This dim witted but corrupt to the core industrial wadera is back in the spotlight.

His main addiction is sex.

Shahbaz Sharif shares this trait of Sexual addiction with Nawaz Sharif.

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

Shehbaz Sharif porn business – The fruits of his government, keep it up
 
 
 
Hamza Shahbaz is habitual sexual animal. He, his Father Shahbaz Sharif and His uncle Nawaz Sharif are famous for short marriages with innocent girls and then leaving them after full filling their desires : Victim Ayesha Malik 

 

What do you say about this latest scandal of PML-N Leadership?

 
Family Profession of PMLN Leaders – Sexual Animals

www.youtube.com

Hamza Shahbaz is habitual sexual animal. He his Father Shahbaz Sharif and His uncle Nawaz 

 

A Pakistani Readers Comments

M Ahmed's avatar

M Ahmed· 25 weeks ago

Brothers, I will tell you the truth about the Nawaz shreef and his family. 
I live in London and I know in and out about shreefs. I know this family from 1965, they are the one who Introduced Money laundering (which is the process of concealing the source of money obtained by illegal means). Shreef are the one Taught Zardari how to looting Pakistani people’s money. Please note I personally not against with them I am telling you the truth. They are the most corrupt and dishonest family. Shreefs are the ones responsible the people dying with hunger in Pakistan furthermore they don’t know how to respect the relations as Shabaz forcefully got the wife one of his highly designation police officer and keeping her in London. Please please people of Pakistan awake up and get rid from these fake, fraud leaders like Nawaz, shabaz and Zardari

 

 

Shahbaz’s public liason’s have produced 5 known marriages, but very well hidden are the sexual forays in the underground high class sex prostitutes of Lahore and Islamabad.

He “hits” on any good looking woman, who comes within range. He crudely and directly offers to bed them down. 

Along with shopping for watches done in a stealth mode, this google eyed puppet of United State will “take his Matha at the White House. He will ask his god, Obama to keep all his blessings flowing his way. After that he will meet his half-brother Man Mohan Singh to hand over keys to Pakistan’s Nuclear secrets. Unfortunately for him, that will be tainted information, because, even though Gen.Kayani walks around in a nicotine induced stupor; he would never feed Nawaz a.k.a Waja, the truth about the program.

From his school days in Aitchison College  & Government College Lahore, where he got admitted, not on merit but, Abbajee’s Sifarish, he has been known for slow thinking, lack of intelligence, but masterful cunning to cover his weakneses.

 

He is a stealth attacker. His prey (usually who oppose him within his perceived enemies within his PML(N) or in Pakistan’s establishment will never his his fingerprint in his conspiratorial attack.

He is cunning and his Cheshire Cat smile hides his chicanery 

He is a Master of Deception and will let an opponent sell his own mother.

He is a TOTAL CONTROL FREAK.

He is what in Management Sciences is called a Control Freak or a Boss from Hell.

Nawaz Sharif has not named an Army Chief, because he is searching for a weak willed sycophant among the ranks of Pakistan Army Generals

He will bargain with the Devil and Sell his soul, if it Serves his Lust for Power.

 

Gen. Musharraf;s biggest mistake in life is NOT to hang this whole tubbur of Kashmiri ghadaars.  He was too soft on them, while they plotted his overthrow for years, along with their half brother Man Mohan Singh.

along with his platoon of Kashmiri biradari “naurattans or sycophants. with Kashmiri names like Dar, Butt,Sultan etc.

, , , ,

No Comments

A REALITY CHECK ON AMAN KI ASHA & ISLAMOPHOBIA ALERT: Carlotta Gall’s Revenge After Expulsion from Pakistan & Mandir Based Anti-Pakistan RSS Hindu Writing Clubs

Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on March 23rd, 2014

Face the Truth: Pakistan Is Not An Ally

ISLAM=PAKISTAN=NUCLEAR ISLAMIC POWER->WATCH OUT FOR ISLAMOPHOBIC BIGOTS=ZIONIST ROBERT SPENCER=VICIOUS PROPAGANDA ON HIS HATE SITE

 

March 20, 2014 by  56 Comments
 
AN ANTI-PAKISTAN PROPAGANDA PORTAL
 
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/robert-spencer/face-the-truth-pakistan-is-not-an-ally/#disqus_thread
 
SET-UP BY A ISLAMOPHOBE
 
ROBERT SPENCER
 
 Nawaz Sharif Shown Below Wants  “Inn Kay Gurdoon May Ghus Raha Hai, Apnay Mafaad Aur Daulat Key Khatir Pakistan Kay Nuclear Aur Strategic Assets Bachnay Brussels Aaj Phoncha Hai”

 

 

 

 
 

pak

 

The Lies of Zionist Reporter Carlotta Gall in Zionist Family Sulzberger Owned Newy York Times

 

Carlotta Gall of New York Times-Courtesy Siasat.pk 

 

Carlotta Gall & other biased & Anti-Pakistan NYT journalist were expelled from Pakistan.

 

Vengeful Carlotta Gall, who reported from Afghanistan for the New York Times for twelve years, reported Wednesday that

“soon after the Navy SEAL raid on Bin Laden’s house, a Pakistani official told me that the United States had direct evidence that the ISI chief, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, knew of Bin Laden’s presence in Abbottabad. The information came from a senior United States official, and I guessed that the Americans had intercepted a phone call of Pasha’s or one about him in the days after the raid. ‘He knew of Osama’s whereabouts, yes,’ the Pakistani official told me. The official was surprised to learn this and said the Americans were even more so.”

 

He shouldn’t have been. It has been obvious for years that the Pakistanis have been aiding the same jihadists that the U.S. government has been giving them billions of dollars to fight.The New York Times reported on that at length back in 2008. And now we learn that not only did Ahmed Shuja Pasha, the head of the Pakistani government’s spy service, knew the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden, but also that so did many other top officials in the Pakistani government.

Those who are genuinely surprised by this news probably also think that Islam is a Religion of Peace that has been hijacked by a Tiny Minority of Extremists. After all, this is the country where the jihad terror leader Hafiz Saeed, on whom the U.S. has placed a $10 million bounty, lives openly and comfortably. International Business Times reported in early March that Saeed “lives as a free man in Lahore,” even though he is “chief of Jamaat-ud-Dawah (JUD), a parent organisation of banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LET). The organization was implicated in the 2008 attacks on Mumbai in India, which claimed 166 lives.” Not only that, but “Pakistan had twice placed Saeed under house arrest since 2001, but had let him go under suspicious circumstances.” And today, “JUD operates quite visibly in parts of Pakistan, with its own website and a twitter page.”

Meanwhile, Sky News reported in January that “Pakistani officials have reportedly used a secret counter-terrorism fund to buy wedding gifts, luxury carpets and gold jewellery for relatives of ministers and visiting dignitaries.” This is better than funneling to the terrorists themselves the money that the Pakistani government received from the U.S. to fight terror, but it shows how seriously the Pakistani authorities have taken their role in the “war on terror”: not seriously at all.

But they do take some things very seriously indeed. Last November, after Pakistani Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud was killed in a drone strike, the Pakistani government was furious, and summoned the U.S. ambassador to protest. The Pakistani foreign minister, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, said the killing of Mehsud was “not just the killing of one person, it’s the death of all peace efforts” and warned that “every aspect” of Pakistan’s relationship with Washington would be reexamined.

And last summer, Pakistan’s Abbottabad Commission, which was an investigation into the U.S. raid that killed bin Laden, denounced the United States as “arrogant” and said that the killing of bin Laden was the “greatesthumiliation” that Pakistan had suffered since the 1971 declaration of independence by East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).

None of this should be a surprise to anyone. Last summer the Associated Press reported of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif that “critics worry that Sharif, who is known to be personally very religious, is soft on Islamic extremism and won’t crack down on militants that pose a serious threat to Pakistan and other countries — chief among them the Taliban and al-Qaida-linked groups.”

But he has shown that he knows how to keep the gravy train flowing from Washington. Despite all the evidence above and much more that Pakistan is not a reliable U.S. ally and not even really an ally at all, last November the U.S. and Pakistan agreed to continue their “counter-terrorism co-operation” even after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. A joint statement declared:

“Affirming their mutual commitment to a strong defence relationship, the delegations agreed that Pakistan-US defence partnership is vital to regional and international security and that it should continue to endure and grow in the years ahead. Both delegations welcomed continued efforts to strengthen bilateral cooperation based on mutual interests and trust.”

 

Mutual interests? Trust?

The U.S. government is in dire need of an intervention: its friends need to get it to seek professional help for its addiction to shoveling huge amounts of money to old Cold War allies that aren’t really allies at all. The problem is that the only friends who could stage such an orchestrated effort are just as far gone themselves.

 

 

 COMMENTS  ON THIS ARTICLE:
 
 
A MAJORITY NEGATIVE COMMENTS FROM ZIONISTS OR RSS MANDIR WRITING CLUBS INDIANS LIVING IN US
 
 
  •  
    Avatar
    Sharps Rifle • 3 days ago

    NO muslim country is an ally. Ever. Period.

  •  
     
    Avatar
    herb benty • 4 days ago

    Pakistan and all Muslim Nations are enemies of the USA. Borrowing to give to your enemies is insanity.

  • Avatar
    Softly Bob • 3 days ago
    INDIANS & ISRAELI JEWS MASQUERADING AS AMERICANS, USING AMERICAN HANDLES & NAMES TO SKEWER PAKISTAN

    Pakistan is a rogue nation that should never have been formed. It should have stayed part of India, but of course the whinging Muslims wouldn’t have that.
    Pakistan is also an enemy nation and Western leaders who give money to an enemy state should be tried for treason.

  •  
    Avatar
    keith(INDIAN US MANDIR BASED WRITING CLUB HINDU)) • 3 days ago

    The time is fast coming for the US to fully support India – and to a lesser degree, China – as a counterweight to the emerging rogue nation of Pakistan.

    Start with cutting off aid and restricting immigration from Pakistan. 

     
    •  
       
      Avatar
      Drakken  keith • 3 days ago

      The Brits have an open corridor to pakiland. About time they cut off the tap and stem the flow.

       
    •  
      Avatar
      objectivefactsmatter  keith • 3 days ago

      India, most certainly, China, perhaps later. Definitely not now.

       
       
      •  
         
        Avatar
        keith  objectivefactsmatter • 2 days ago

        (THIS IS A US MANDIR BASED WRITER FROM ANTI-PAKISTAN MANDIR WRITING CLUBS)Right, lead with India as the first mover. Follow on with China as things develop. Still, always have a backup plan, or three.

      •  
      •
    •  
      Avatar
      jscumm  keith • 2 days ago

      china! think twice. china wants to be number one super power and that partnership will conflict with american game plan 

      •  
         
        Avatar
        keith  jscumm • 2 days ago

        It’s called Realpolitik son. US global position can’t threaten Pakistan so you go with proxies. Two big countries on Pakistan’s border with workable relations with the US are India and China.

  •  
    Avatar
    ObamaYoMoma • 3 days ago

    The U.S. government is in dire need of an intervention: its friends need to get it to seek professional help for its addiction to shoveling huge amounts of money to old Cold War allies that aren’t really allies at all. The problem is that the only friends who could stage such an orchestrated effort are just as far gone themselves.

     

    HINDU COMMENTS TO WIN ZIONIST SUPPORT

    The unbridled truth is Pakistan and in fact all Muslim countries throughout the world are not our allies but our eternal mortal enemies, as the sole fundamental purpose of mainstream orthodox Islam is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) to ultimately make Islam supreme.

    Thus, what should we do about the situation? How about first banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP because it is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the strategic purposes of mass Muslim infiltration and demographic conquest. Then lets work to form an international coalition from within the collective non-Muslim infidel world to not only render the Islamic world into total abject poverty, but to also isolate it. So that Islam as a force will in time become discredited among its adherents and eventually cease to exist.

    Indeed, because of the very totalitarian nature of Islam and Islamic society, it is incapable of producing anything of value on its own. Hence, in a matter of time if isolated it will collapse and die on its own, and being rendered into total abject poverty will help to accelerate that process.

    As a matter of fact, it almost happened in the early part of the 20th century until oil was discovered in the Middle East, which helped to rejuvenate it back up again. Nevertheless, unless Islam is destroyed utterly as a force, then there will always be jihad waged by Muslims against non-Muslim infidels, because, again, that is the sole fundamental purpose of Islam.

    Sorry GWB lied about Islam and when he did, it was a lie just as profound as the lies Obama told about Obamacare and to win reelection.

    Moreover, Pakistan’s claim that it acquired nukes to protect itself from India is utterly absurd, as India is a legitimate democracy and legitimate democracies never fight wars aggressively but only in self-defense. The truth is the Pakistanis are playing the Palestinian role in the greater Islamic world’s perpetual jihad being waged against the Hindu infidels in India to ultimately make Islam supreme in India and to render the Hindu infidels into harsh and degrading dhimmitude. As a matter of fact, as in Israel with the Jewish infidels, it is just another jihad (holy war) being waged on the world stage against infidels to ultimately make Islam dominant.

    see more

     
     
    •  

       

       
      Avatar
      kikorikid  ObamaYoMoma • 2 days ago

      GWB put forth misstatements out of ignorance and
      naiivete. WAS NOT as profound as OBAMAS lies to
      win a election. A good deal said here is close to
      truth but throwing out the equivalency arguement
      ,here, between GWB and Obama sours the whole
      deal on credibility. “Render the Hindu infidels into
      harsh and degrading Dhimmitude” There will be NO
      “Hindu Kush II” India, with expected provocation,
      will give Pakistan a Nuclear knuckle sandwhich.
      Soon would be good.

    •
      •  
         
        Avatar
        ObamaYoMoma  kikorikid • 2 days ago

        WAS NOT as profound as OBAMAS lies to win a election.

        Whether he is incompetent or not, Bush’s lies were far worse and far more destructive than Obama’s lies. Just because you don’t comprehend all the ramifications, doesn’t mean they weren’t as bad as Obama’s lies. Indeed, Bush’s lies led to the two biggest strategic blunders ever in American history. They also led to the greatest expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government since the FDR era. The truth is although Bush was a Republican President, he didn’t have a conservative bone in his exceedingly leftwing body. Indeed, he is easily the worse Republican President ever in U. S. history and easily one of the worse of all time.

        As for the remainder of your analogy as is usual for you, it is incredibly unhinged to say the least.

         
         
        •  
           
          Avatar
          kikorikid  ObamaYoMoma • a day ago

          and you,as usual, cannot post a dialogue without
          a string of ad hominums thrown in because, I guess,
          it makes you feel superior. May you smother in
          dog flatulence. You are just more Leftist
          “Talking Points”.

           
           
  •  
     
    Avatar
    UCSPanther • 4 days ago

    No big surprise. Pakistan is an asylum that has long since been run by the inmates.

    It has been that way since the days of General Zia ul Haq’s dictatorship…

     
     
  •  
     
    Avatar
    1Indioviejo1 • 3 days ago

    We pay Pakistan Jizzyyah or our submission tax, according to the Koran. Our CIA, our S.D., and even our military know, or should know that Islam is out to conquer us, by hook or crook. Can we get out of this mess? I think it would take a statesman. A visionary willing to break a dozen eggs in order to make an ommelet. Part of it would be to stop all aid to Pakistan and go with India, stop all foreign aid and pay down our national debt, and ultimately become tha superpower we were meant to be. That the Pakistanis have engaged in Taqqiyyah is only a mystery to the stupid ones in our government.

     
     
  •  
     
    Avatar
    kevinstroup • 3 days ago

    Virtually all the Islamic terrorism in the world is funded by Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Pakistan. You eliminate those 3 countries and you will seriously slow down the ongoing Jihad.

     
     
  •  
     
    Avatar
    popseal • 3 days ago

    …but, but, everybody loves and respects our DHIMMI presidential dilettante.

     
     
  •  
     
    Avatar
    Bklyn Farmer • 3 days ago

    Time to start supporting India with military equipment, pay back is hell.

     
     
  •  
     
    Avatar
    SCREW SOCIALISM • 3 days ago

    Robert Spencer AKBAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
     
  •  

     

     
    Avatar
    Geoffrey_Britain • 4 days ago

    “The U.S. government is in dire need of an intervention: its friends need to get it to seek professional help for its addiction to shoveling huge amounts of money to old Cold War allies that aren’t really allies at all.”

    Mr Spenser, please a bit less naivete. Both the Bush and Obama administration KNOW that Pakistan is NOT our ally. They know that the Pakistani sympathies and allegiances lie…with radical Islam. (a bit of a misnomer, there is only Islam)

    The huge amounts of money being given to Pakistan is bribe money.

    What is it that separates Jordan, who receives much less from the US… from Pakistan? Nukes… The bribe money the US pays Pakistan is to keep Pakistan’s nukes secure and to keep in place a corrupt minority of Pakistanis who hold power, so that the nukes will remain secure. So, that Pakistan’s nukes will NOT ‘find their way’ into the hands of al Qaeda and the Taliban. That’s what our ‘foreign aid’ to Pakistan is all about. And, it’s far cheaper (in the short term) than the alternative.

     
     
    •  
       
      Avatar
      ObamaYoMoma  Geoffrey_Britain • 3 days ago

      The huge amounts of money being given to Pakistan is bribe money.

      Actually, thanks to that bribery money, i.e., jizya, paid by our government, the Pakistanis have been able to tremendously build up their nuclear arsenal in anticipation of Shi’a Iran eventually acquiring nukes, and when that inevitability eventually reaches fruition, Pakistan will be positioned nicely to become the nuclear supermarket for the Sunni Islamic world and will reap an enormous economic whirlwind as a result. Indeed, watch how fast the Sunni Islamic world becomes armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons once Iran acquires nukes. Don’t blink, as you’ll miss it. Indeed, they are literally running circles around the losers in our government that are supposed to be protecting our national interests.

       
       
      •  
         
        Avatar
        Geoffrey_Britain  ObamaYoMoma • 3 days ago

        Fully agree with the caveat that “the losers in our government that are supposed to be protecting our national interests” do not actually want to protect American interests. They’re diligently 
        working to either “fundamentally transform” America or if unsuccessful in that transformation, destroy it.

         
         
      •  
         
        Avatar
        T800  ObamaYoMoma • 3 days ago

        Saudi Arabia also helped fund Pakistan’s nuclear weapons,with the understanding that they would be able to buy some if it became necessary. Sorta like a down payment or lay-away.

         
         
    •  
       
      Avatar
      Khushi  Geoffrey_Britain • 3 days ago

      That is not true.
      America gave money to pakistan even before it had any nukes on the scene.

       
       
      •  
         
        Avatar
        Geoffrey_Britain  Khushi • 3 days ago

        It is true and is by far the greatest reason for our current ‘aid’ to Pakistan. America gave money to Pakistan before she had nukes in hopes that it would dissuade Pakistan from developing nukes and secondarily to encourage regional stability. Plus, the aid was much less before Pakistan had nukes.

        Other than natural disaster aid and health programs, most all of our ‘aid’ is given with an ulterior motive.

         
         
  •  

     

     
    Avatar
    Bamaguje • 2 days ago

    It’s not just Pakistan.
    Saudi Arabia is another such treacherous ally. 14 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were Saudis. The Wahabi kingdom funds Jihadist mosques in the U.S. and around the globe that preach hate, and nuture terrorism

     
     
  •  

     

     
    Avatar
    Aaron • 3 days ago

    That Pakistan is not only not a friend but an enemy is the reason we need to stay in Afghanistan … perhaps the only deterrent to their nuclear ambitions.

     
     
    •  
       
      Avatar
      Drakken  Aaron • 2 days ago

      Asscrackistan is land locked and the shortest route is through Pakiland, logistics, logistics, logistics.

       
       
  •  
     
    Avatar
    Jahil hamid • 3 days ago

    US has been funding and arming pakistan against India for last six decades. It is the paki funded taliban and other terrorist groups which kill US and NATO forces in Afghanistan and elsewhere. The Afghans have been telling the world and US that pakistan has been sheltering the highest echelons of taliban in its territory and has been funding and arming them. Unfortunately Americans are too stupid. US deserve its soldiers killed and the deserve pakis like Aafia and Shehzad bombing their cities and their people. I hope the Americans gets their balls kicked just like they have been trying to do to India via pakis and other terrorists.

     
     
  •  
    Avatar

    This comment was deleted.

     
     
    •  
       
      Avatar
      SCREW SOCIALISM  jummirt • 3 days ago

      “Delicious, we know that the painting is a complex issue. If, in this case you do not have the time or simply have the ability to paint your mixing – kindly invite you to take advantage of the services developed by our corporation. In our painting Warsaw is a pleasure!”

       
       
  •  

     

     
    Avatar
    Raja Kayani Badmash • 4 days ago

    well pak has got its own interst doesn’t have to serve others in it’s region.

     
     
  •  
    Avatar
    USARetired • a day ago

    Our intelligence community always knew of his location, but because of the sensitive nature of our relationship with Pakistan did nothing for years.

     
     
  •  
     
    Avatar
    AuroraAronsson • 2 days ago

    Pakistan has NEVER been an ally. Just the anti-communist obsession has made it possible to help them against India. Helping a bloody dictator like Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq was only possible if no regard for freedom and democracy was really present in our State Department. We helped create an ISLAMIC NUCLEAR POWER just as Obama is helping Iran get nukes, to which Saudi Arabia will follow. IDIOTS. The same idiocy which brings us to be in the Ukrainian issue on the side of muslim Tatars, of people whose flags are the flags of nazi-allies like Stepan Bandera, and nostalgic fascists.

  •
  •  
    Avatar
    Dyer’s Eve • 4 days ago

    My enemy’s enemy is not necessarily my friend. Islam loves a bet each way.

  •
     
     
 
 
 
 

, ,

No Comments

Pakistan’s Nuclear Submarine Development

Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on March 23rd, 2014

 

Pakistan’s Nuclear Submarine Development 

Pakistan’s sole adversary at sea is India. Pakistan maintains five submarines of the French Agosta class: two are of the original Agosta class built in the 1970s, while the other three are of the modernized Agosta 90B class. The three Agosta 90B submarines displace between 1,760 and 2,010 tons submerged, are equipped with four 533mm bow-mounted torpedo tubes capable of firing torpedoes and Exocet missiles.By 2014 all three Pakistan’s Augusta Class Submarines will feature an air-independent propulsion system, making them among the most sophisticated submarines in Asia.

According to Pakistan Think Tank Sources, Pakistan Navy has Developed Capability to Fire Miniature Tactical Nuclear Warheads (Sea to Land Second Strike) Missiles through modifications in current Submarine Fleet.Chinese engineers have helped Pakistan in modification of Pakistan’s Submarine assets. That is why India used its Saboteurs Against Pakistan’s Naval Assets. But, they failed to reach the highly protected PN Dockyards.  Pakistan’s Naval Leaders have convinced the current government to focus on development of second strike capability.

Indian Aircraft Carriers Are the Key Targets of Pakistan’s Navy’s Strategic Focus. Deployment of Pakistan Naval Air Force in collaboration of PAF are part of this Enhanced naval capabilities program.

This capability received a boost with the recent development of short range missiles like Nasr and Raad which can also be used as battlefield weapons against India’s Strike Corps. 

 

Pakistani defence forces , specially Pakistani Navy has been quite vocal of arrival of Russian Nuclear powered submarine to Indian shore mid of this month . Pakistan Navy chief has already told US Defence Magazine that arrival of Russian Nuclear powered submarine and India’s own Indigenous development ,will have adverse effect on its operational capability in Indian ocean . and also mentioned that Pakistani navy is already working on plans to counter this latest threat put forward by Indian Navy .

Indian Defence Experts believe that Pakistan is already working on a counter plans and might just surprise Indian pretty soon in future by producing or acquiring a Nuclear powered submarine . Pakistan always has a quieter way of weapons acquisition and even managed to keep many defence project low key affair .

Rakesh Sharma Indian Defence Expert told idrw.org that “General Musharraf way back in 2006 had mentioned to a Pak daily that technology for development of a Nuclear Submarine existed in Pakistan”, but its seems help will come from its tried and tested friend china .

China has per media will be supplying 6 conventional attack submarine of Qing class , which will be equipped with a Stirling-cycle AIP system and will be able to carry up to three nuclear warhead-carrying CJ-10K LACMs each. The double-hulled Qing-class SSK, with a submerged displacement close to 3,600 tonnes, bears a close resemblance to the Russian Type 636M SSK, and features hull-retractable foreplanes and hydrodynamically streamlined sail.

Experts suggests that Pakistan’s nuclear submarine is likely to be based on the Qing Class Chinese SSK. highly advanced electric propulsion system of Qing Class Chinese SSK will able Pakistan to replace diesel engine power generation with a nuclear power plant.

Pakistan also has the expertise of submarine construction , with potential help may have been the transfer of technology from France with the Agosta 90B submarine purchase. A number of key technologies were transferred including design and development skills and tools. Building of hulls and experience with Western subsystems, many of which are used in the French nuclear submarines would help the Pakistani SSN / SSBN.

Pakistan with expertise and transfers of technology from China , will be able to field their first nuclear submarine in next 5 to 8 years and brand it “Indigenous “. But experts have difference of opinion on usage of this submarine in both forces , While Nuclear Submarine in Indian navy will complete Nuclear 2nd strike option for India , but Pakistani nuclear submarine might be built to attack prized Indian Aircraft carriers in case of conflict . India who will have 3 or more fleet of aircraft carriers in near future will always be Pakistani navies prime target , even in 1971 Indo-Pak war , Indian aircraft carrier was always a prize target for them .

Reference

 

Pak set to get Chinese submarines: Indian newspaper

MARCH 1, 2014 BY 
2009-PLAN-Type094-02

An Indian newspaper, Times of India, on Saturday said that China has begun arming its two neighbours, Pakistan and Bangladesh, with submarines. China has also introduced new nuclear submarines that have caused a flutter in Washington, the paper said.

Jane’s weekly, quoting a senior Pakistani official, said China is set to sell up to six submarines to Pakistan by the end of 2014. China has also signed an agreement with Pakistan to sell two Type-035G ming-class diesel-electric submarines to Bangladesh, reports from Dhaka said recently. The New Age newspaper said the deal was valued at $206 million. China has promised to deliver the submarines to Bangladesh Navy by 2019.

“Technical details are almost done. The present discussions are mainly about the financing details,” a senior Pakistan official told Jane’s. The journal said a second Pakistani official confirmed that “the contract is at an advanced stage and discussions won’t linger on for too long. Realistically, we should have a deal by the end 2014”.

Islamabad is expected to buy China’s S20 or Yuan-class diesel-electric submarine (SSK). At present, Pakistan Navy operates five French submarines; three Agosta 90B (Khalid-class) submarines purchased in the 1990s and two ageing Agosta 70 (Hashmat-class) boats dating from the late 1970s.

Myanmar is also using Chinese experts to train its submarine personnel. It also sent a contingent of its navy personnel for submarine warfare training in Pakistan in mid-2013, the Times of India claimed.

 

Reference

 


The French-built Agosta 90B Class Attack Submarine.

The French-built Agosta 90B Class Attack Submarine.

Pakistan’s sole adversary at sea is India. Pakistan maintains five submarines of the French Agosta class: two are of the original Agosta class built in the 1970s, while the other three are of the modernized Agosta 90B class. The three Agosta 90B submarines displace between 1,760 and 2,010 tons submerged, are equipped with four 533mm bow-mounted torpedo tubes capable of firing torpedoes and Exocet missiles. By 2014 all three will feature an air-independent propulsion system, making them among the most sophisticated submarines in Asia.

, , ,

No Comments


© 2024, All Rights Reserved by Pakistan Think Tank.