Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for category History

HISTORY : Altaf Hussain caught escaping to South Africa?

Altaf Hussain caught escaping to South Africa?

London: Altaf Hussain self exiled leader of MQM-A caught escaping to South Africa by the authorities. According to sources, ‘Altaf Hussain was hiding in the Wrexham area close to Slough in Berkshire for the past few days. He was stopped when was going to Heathrow Airport in a private taxi. Interestingly the taxi driver was a Pakistani whom Mr Hussain thought as an English man due to his appearance.

According to sources Altaf Hussain told the authorities that, ‘he is leaving UK and going to South Africa for security reasons and personal protection’. According to sources he was told that, ‘security can be provided to him in the UK’. It is not yet clear if Mr Hussain detained or taken in protective custody. Mr Altaf Hussain is a British Citizen and living in self imposed exile since 1992.  He is never been to Pakistan since 1992, not a registered voter now and never voted in any elections ever since.

Earlier yesterday it was reported that British police raided two addresses including an office of  MQM-A in London in connection with the on going murder investigation of Dr Imran Farooq. It is reported that police took the crucial evidence in custody including the carpets for forensic investigation.   According to reports 35 well trained officers of the Scotland Yard took part in the operation on Thursday 24th August 2011”.

It is reported that those MQM-A terrorists arrested in Karachi were actually coming from Colombo Sri Lanka and had connections with the murder of Dr Imran Farooq. The arrests took place as result of tip off from British authorities.

According to reports both Khalid Shamim and another MQM-A terrorists who were arrested in Karachi while arriving from Colombo actually called in to be eliminated in Karachi by their own party MQM-A.   They had crucial information related to Dr Imran Farooq’s murder as well as target killing cells in various countries including South Africa. They knew too much about the MQM-A illegal and terrorist activities and needed to be eliminated that is why they were called in Karachi. They are lucky to be alive in the custody of Pakistani authorities than killed by their own death squad.

 

By Special Correspondent 
Friday 26 August 2011

Reference:http://www.thelondonpost.net/Aug262011000117.html

No Comments

PFARRER: BISSONNETTE DID NOT SHOOT BIN LADEN

Pfarrer: Bissonnette did not shoot Bin Laden

Chuck Pfarrer

The retired Navy SEAL officer, and author of “SEAL Target Geronimo: The Inside Story of the Mission to Kill Osama bin Laden,” in an exclusive interview with Human Events, said inconsistencies in Matt Bissonnette’s memoirs of the raid on Bin Laden tell him Bisonette was not part of the entry team that shot Bin Laden.

In connection with the release of his book, Bissonnette, writing under the name Mark Owen, gave a lengthy interview on the CBS “60 Minutes” program, complete with a scale model of the Abbottabad compound.

After watching the “60 Minutes” interview and reading “No Easy Day,” Chuck Pfarrer, a former commander of the Naval Special Warfare Development Group, known as SEAL Team 6, the same team credited with the May 2 raid on Bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, said he is unconvinced and confused.

Bisonette’s description of coming up the stairs to the third floor and killing Bin Laden’s son Kalid Laden and then reaching Bin Laden himself does not make sense, he said.

The Pakistanis say Kalid was shot from a higher position, he said. Two bullets hit him above the eyes that came out at the bottom of the back of his head. “There were no foot prints in the blood on the stairs,” he said. No one came up the stairs past Kalid on to the third floor.

“I am convinced he was not part of the entry team,” he said.

An equally glaring falsehood in Bissonnette’s book, “No Easy Day,” involved how and when the entry team reached Bin Laden and the book’s bizarre account of the helicopter crash, Pfarrer said.

Bissonnette claims the Black Hawk carrying the insertion team crashed upon its approach on one of the interior walls in the compound, he said. There is no way the Black Hawk landed with its tail on the wall with front and back rotors continuing to spin as the assault team members and flight crew egressed for the mission without rotors hitting the ground or personnel.

“An object 77 feet, six inches perched on a 15-foot wall would certainly have a rotor strike,” he said.

“It is simple trigonometry.”

“Saying that this thing landed with its tail on the wall and its nose in the dirt and that miraculously — and he uses that word, didn’t have a rotor strike, that is completely implausible,” he said.

Pfarrer said he cannot understand why Bissonnette would make up key parts of the story.

“I honestly don’t know what the motivation could be,” he said.

“Let’s not even talk about my sources, Mohamed Bashir, Bin Laden’s closest neighbor, said he saw the helicopter land on the roof and he saw people jump out of the helicopter off the roof into the third floor terrace,” he said.  “Bissonnette’s story differs from every from every single person I have spoken to, and every person the Pakistanis spoke to.”

In addition to speaking to members of SEAL Team 6, who were on the raid, Pfarrer, a retired SEAL officer, had accessed to the 150-page report produced by Pakistani security forces, he said. The White Paper by a very well-respected Pakistani Army general is the basis for much of the new information he included in the soon to be released edition of “SEAL Target Geronimo.”

Urban warfare doctrine calls for taking a building from the top down when possible, he said.

“Everyone I talk to, the assaulters, they all say the same thing,” he said. “Successful insertion on the roof, and bin Laden’s business was over in 90 to 120 seconds.”

Instead of fast roping, the Black Hawk landed the assaulters directly on the roof, he said. The assaulters then crashed through a two windows onto the Bin Laden’s compartments on the third floor.

“The helicopter remained on the roof for 10, 12, 18 minutes — it was on there,” he said. Then once the shooting was over, the helicopter was supposed to then move park in the compound yard, staged to pick people up and take them out.

It was moving from the roof to the staging position that the helicopter crashed, he said.

The only possible explanation for Bissonnette’s narrative is that out of respect for the Task Force 160 pilots and flight crew, Bissonnette concocted his version of the crash, putting the crash as part of the insertion, so as to deflect from the obvious pilot error that cost the mission one of its aircraft, he said.

“The Task Force 160 guys are the best,” he said. “Even in my own book, I tried to treat the crash as gently as possible.”

“Here’s the other outstanding thing in Bissonnette’s story, he’s trying to say it was 15 minutes before they got to the third floor,” he said.

“How is possible that Bin Laden would wait in his room 15 minutes for the attackers to come get him,” he said. “It can’t happen that way”

“Are we really supposed to think that his shots are the ones that got Bin Laden, and it was 15 minutes after his boots hit the ground that he finally made it to the third floor and engaged?” he said.

Pfarrer said he agrees with Bissonnette’s account that Bin Laden had a pistol and rifle in his room, but it is bizarre that after a helicopter crash, three explosive breeches and a firefight coming up the stairs, Bin Laden had not yet reached for his firearms.

“That’s where the whole thing falls apart,” he said.

“I have a hard time explaining any of this,” he said. “I’ve been on missions, and I don’t talk about where I was and when I engaged people, I don’t know, it’s unfathomable.  He is now making himself the biggest target in the world.”

 

 

 

Reference

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/09/10/pfarrer-bissonnette-did-shot-bin-laden/

No Comments

INTERVIEW ‘Gandhi Was A Wily Politician, Jinnah Remained A Secularist Till His Death’ Patrick French

INTERVIEW
‘Gandhi Was A Wily Politician, Jinnah Remained A Secularist Till His Death’
Patrick French: Jinnah and the Muslim League were pushed into an extreme political position during the 1930s and ’40s, largely through the intransigence of the Congress in meeting justifiable demands by Muslims and by the refusal of Nehru, Gandhi and Patel in particular to accept that Jinnah had the democratic support of a substantial minority of the Indian people.

Patrick French’s fascination with the Indian subcontinent began when he was 12 years old. In those days General Zia-ul-Haq was harbouring plans to assassinate Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.
Intrigued by the situation, Patrick French wrote letters to newspapers in London arguing that one shouldn’t execute a political opponent. Of course, none of them were printed. The current book itself was sparked off by a quote by Andre Malraux that the British decision to quit India was “the most significant fact of the century” and reduced Britain to a ‘third-rate power’.

You mix first-person narratives with the telling of history. Many people feel it hasn’t jelled.

I do not believe that it is possible to write scientific history. All historians have subjective views, and it is better to be open about that, which is why I have included my personal journeys. I decided to mix other people’s first-person narratives with pure factual history in order to give some sense of the human impact of the events of 1947. In my opinion, the personal consequences of those events, even today, on individuals and their families are extremely significant and lasting. Take, for instance, the plight of Biharis or stranded Pakistanis in Bangladesh, the rise of Hindu nationalism in Indian politics, or the civil war in Karachi between the MQM and the state—not to mention those people in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh who are still suffering the loss of their friends and families in the violence of 1947 and 1948.

You seem to have overplayed the importance of intelligence documentation, given the disproportionate space you have devoted to it?

The newly-released documentation of Indian Political Intelligence (IPI) is crucial to understanding why the British lost control over India during the period 1944-1946. It is probably the most significant historical archive ever released by the British intelligence or security agencies, and therefore I have made full use of it. I have not, however, made a full examination of the entire archive, and there is enough material there—especially from the 1920s— to keep ambitious graduate students occupied for a number of years.

You have been very kind to Lord Mountbatten, who many feel was instrumental in the misery of Partition? Was it because his family gave you access to his papers?

I am amazed that you think I have been ‘very kind’ to Lord Mountbatten. Have you read what I have written about him? I may have been fair to him, but that is all. The point I make about him is that although he made mistakes, and was biased against the Muslim League, he did a reasonably good job in very difficult circumstances. However, he was a minor figure—a bit-part player—in the story of Indian independence and the creation of Pakistan. He was Viceroy of India for fewer than five months, and all the crucial decisions relating to the settlement of 1947 were taken by other people before he even reached India.

He does bear some of the responsibility for the misery of 1947 and 1948, but it is a responsibility that has to be shared with the leadership of Congress and the Muslim League, and with the politicians back in London who made so many foolish mistakes during the 1930s and ’40s.

Mountbatten’s family did not provide me with any access to his papers, I used the papers that are already publicly available in the India Office Library in London.

There’s a whole Freudian interpretation of Gandhi, linking his personal fads to his public conduct and strategy. A little farfetched?

I do not provide a Freudian interpretation of Gandhi in my book. I do believe, however, that you cannot detach Gandhi’s personal psychological peculiarities from his conduct as a politician.

Did you take a revisionist view of Gandhi and Jinnah just to draw attention to your book?

Mahatma Gandhi was always one of my greatest heroes. It was, therefore, a profound personal disappointment to me when I began to research his life and activities in more detail, and to discover that the popular version of Gandhi is very far from the truth. If you believe that Gandhi was a blameless saint, try reading what he actually said and did at crucial points in the freedom movement—such as 1921, 1942 or 1946—and you will soon change your mind. He was an extremely wily politician, who failed to listen to the opinions of his opponents.

As for Jinnah, again I should say that my personal opinions on him changed significantly while researching Liberty or Death. Like most people in Britain and in India, I originally saw Jinnah as a bitter fanatic who had broken up the subcontinent. On closer study I came to see that he was a far more complex figure, who remained an Indian nationalist and secularist until his death. Jinnah and the Muslim League were pushed into an extreme political position during the 1930s and ’40s, largely through the intransigence of the Congress in meeting justifiable demands by Muslims and by the refusal of Nehru, Gandhi and Patel in particular to accept that Jinnah had the democratic support of a substantial minority of the Indian people. If my book is revisionist, that is as a direct result of my research in the archives—nothing else.

How did your opinions change?

I had the safe view of Gandhi as the father of the nation, etc. That changed. My new view came essentially from the archives of the IPI and the Transfer of Power documents. You see, British policy was based on complete ignorance and was chaotic. The effect you got was that Pakistan was not inevitable till 1945.

You say Jinnah was pushed into a corner and had no choice but to demand Pakistan?

There was so little accommodation of Muslim demands that Partition was inevitable. After the 1940 Lahore resolution Jinnah didn’t really give a vision for Pakistan. Right till 1946 he accepted a position put forward by Cripps, of Pakistan not being an autonomous nation. It’s quite clear that Jinnah was flexible. The Calcutta killings hardened stands on both sides. There’s no book that argues what I have argued here.

You have obviously disappointed the older generation.

Yes. But not the younger one, which says that even Gandhi and Nehru were human and had to make mistakes.

You might also have cleared once and for all the doubts about Subhas Bose’s death.

Yes, the book proves the matter conclusively. The IPI investigated the matter and a Captain Turner in Formosa was put on the case. He managed to locate a Captain Taneyashi Yoshimi who was the last person to have seen Bose alive. His statement should resolve the matter.

What documents still remain with the India office?

The papers released were screened by the foreign office and the MI 5. They held back details about intelligence methods, for some of them are apparently still in use.

 

No Comments

Priceless Urdu Speech by A Pakistani Student

 

The current situations in Pakistan, the rumors the crisis and the fear about many of us quitting amid the turmoil. In between all the mayhem a nation has forgotten its roots. Ideologies once founding a nation have been deemed too philosophical. Among all this I know I must resist to survive, I must strive to find my purpose. Pakistan is about me and all of us, its a mutual relationship that cant be neglected upon will. While many of us loose hope ,I stand by the few who wish to remain steadfast. Pakistan is an identity I cant let go of and for everything that I am and I will become it is important that I have firm hope in Pakistan’s survival and existence just like I hope for my own.

Pakistan Ka Matlab Kya?
What Does Pakistan Mean?

Roti, kapda aur dawa
Ghar rehne ko chhota sa
Muft mujhe talim dila
Mein bhi Musalmaan hoon wallah
Pakistan ka matlab kya
La Ilaha Illalah…

Bread, clothes and medicine
A little house to live in
Free education, as may right be seen
A Muslim, I, too, have always been
What does Pakistan mean
There is no God, but God, The Rab-al-alameen

Amrika se mang na bhik
Mat kar logon ki tazhik
Rok na janhoori tehrik
Chhod na azadi ki rah
Pakistan ka matlab hai kya
La Ilaha Illalah…

For American alms do not bray
Do not, the people, laugh away
With the democratic struggle do not play
Hold on to freedom, do not cave in
What does Pakistan mean
There is no God…

Khet waderon se le lo
Milen luteron se le lo
Mulk andheron se le lo
Rahe na koi Alijah
Pakistan ka matlab kya
La Ilaha Illalah…

Confiscate the fields from the landowners
Take away the mills from the robbers
Redeem the country from its dark hours
Off with the lordly vermin
What does Pakistan mean
There is no God…

Sarhad, Sindh, Baluchistan
Teenon hain Panjab ki jaan
Aur Bangal hai sab ki aan
Aai na un ke lab par aah
Pakistan ka matlab kya
La Ilaha Illalah…

Sind, Baluchistan and Frontier
These three are to Panjab most dear
And Bengal lends them splendour
Anguished should not be their mien
What does Pakistan mean
There is no God…

Baat yehi hai bunyadi

Ghasib ki ho barbadi
Haq kehte hain haq agah
Pakistan ka matlab kya
La Ilaha Illalah…

This, then, is the basic thing
For the people, let freedom’s bell ring
From the rope, let the plunderer swing
Truly they speak, who the truth have seen
What does Pakistan mean
There is no God, but Allah..

 

 

Forgotten:Pakistan ka matlab kya? -Habib Jalib

No Comments

JASHN-I-AZADI MUBARAK TO ALL PAKISTANIS & THEIR GLOBAL FRIENDS AND WELL WISHERS

ON OUR COVER

TODAY

WE REMEMBER

OUR BABIES, OUR WOMEN, MEN, AND OUR ELDERS, WHO ARE DRONE VICTIMS.

 

JOYOUS AND BLESSED

65 th INDEPENDENCE DAY

JASHN-I-AZADI MUBARAK

FROM

PAKISTAN THINK TANK

TO

THE PLUCKY,

SABIR,

RESILIENT,

RESOURCEFUL,

TRUSTING,

DREAMERS

AND

ACTUALIZERS OF DREAMS

THE COURAGEOUS 180 MILLION PAKISTANIS, WHO HAVE BRAVED ALL STORMS AND MANY CUTS BY FOREIGN AND INTERNAL DAGGERS. THOUGH SO BADLY WOUNDED,

THEY STILL STAND TALL

AND

READY TO FACE CHALLENGES OF THE PRESENT

AND

THE FUTURE
WITH
UNITY,FAITH, AND DISCIPLINE

 

RAMADAN MUBARAK AND A VERY JOYFUL 14th OF AUGUST INDEPENDENCE DAY, A DAY OF THANKSGIVING TO ALLAH ALMIGHTY, WHO GRANTED THE MUSLIMS OF SOUTH ASIA, A HOME, THEIR VERY OWN SOHNI DHARTI
OUR BALOCHISTAN
OUR SINDH
OUR KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
OUR GILGIT BALTISTAN
IN SUM
OUR
PYARA PAKISTAN

 

 

No Comments