Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for February, 2016

Maqbool Bhat: The Pioneer of the Kashmir’s Struggle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maqbool Bhat: The Pioneer of the Kashmir’s By Sajjad Shaukat

 
The 11th of February is being celebrated as the martyrdom anniversary of Maqbool Bhat who
 
was hanged by the then Indian regime on February 11, 1984 in Tihar Jail as the reprisal
 
expressed by New Delhi. He was hanged to take the revenge of the killing of an Indian Diplomat
 
by some unknown organization claiming to be Kashmiri. It was an act of shame for a country
 
called India, as even after his death, his body was not handed over to his family and people,
 
rather buried in Tihar Jail complex.
 
People and civil society of Jammu and Kashmir do respect him for his legendary struggle for the
 
restoration of freedom in Kashmir. He is now a hero and pioneer of the Kashmiri nation.
 
In order to pay tribute to Maqbool Bhat, People of Srinagar have already built and reserve a
 
grave for him in Martyrs Grave Yard of Eidgah, Srinagar. However, his formal burial is still
 
Maqbool Bhat, also known as Maqbool Butt was a Kashmiri freedom fighter and co-founder of
 
the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front. He was a leading voice of the struggle for freedom among
 
the Kashmiris. In the year of 1962, Maqbool Bhat formed a movement called Kashmir
 
Independence Committee (KIC). This group was later merged into the newly formed Jammu
 
Kashmir Mahaz-Rayee-Shumari (Plebiscite Front) in Azad Kashmir, which was a crusade for
 
complete independence from India. He was sentenced to death for murder by the Delhi High
 
Court and hanged on 11 February 1984.
 
Prior to the publication of ‘Shaoor e Farda’ (the vision of tomorrow) by Saeed Asad and Safeer e
 
Hurriyat ( the ambassador of liberation) by Khawaja Rafiq, there was little known about the
 
events which shaped Maqbool Bhat’s life, struggle and Political thoughts. It appears from his
 
letters written from various Pakistani and Indian prisons and interviews with various journalists
 
at different times that life became a struggle from the age when children needed to be carefree
 
and playing with their peers and toys.
 
His politics came into conflict with the state machinery of the Indian occupied Kashmir when he
 
led several agitations for the political rights of the people of Kashmir. Subsequently, as it appears
 
from his interviews and Rafiq’s narration confirmed by some his colleagues, he went
 
underground and then in 1958 crossed over to Pakistan along with his uncle.
 
Maqbool Bhat got admission in Peshawar University to do Urdu Literature and joined a local
 
newspaper ‘Anjaam’ to earn living. At Peshawar University, he met such people as Ahmed
 
Fraaz, one of the big legends of romantic and radical or commonly called progressive Urdu
 
However, Maqbool Bhat formed Jammu Kashmir National Liberation Front (JKNLF) on August
 
13, 1965. Maqbool Bhat, Aurangzeb, Major Amaan Ulla and Kala Khan crossed the division line
 
to the Indian-held Kashmr in June 1966. The purpose was to explore the feelings of Kashmiris
 
there with the possibilities of forming some ‘cells’ there. It appears from the writings of such
 
activists as F. Rehman who was among those contacted during the three-month tour of NLF
 
guerrillas in different towns and cities that they managed to convince some people for national
 
liberation type of armed struggle as the only way to liberate Kashmir. 
 
Most of the Kashmiri record on the history of NLF and Maqbool Bhat shows that on their way
 
back, they were intercepted by the Indian intelligence agencies and in a clash with one of the
 
security teams Aurangzeb, who was from Gilgit, and the CID inspector Amar Chand was left
 
dead. Maqbool Bhat and Kala Khan were arrested on September 14, September 1966.
 
Two First Information Reports were registered against Maqbool Bhat. The first one lodged at
 
Police Station Sopore, Kashmir (F.I.R. 84/66) alleged that he crossed the ceasefire line without a
 
valid legal permit with an illegal purpose to overthrow the lawfully established government of
 
Jammu and Kashmir.
 
The second F.I.R. filed at Police Station Panzala, Kashmir (F.I.R. 38/66) charged Maqbool Bhat
 
with the murder of Amar Chand. It alleged that Bhat and accomplices first took cash; ornaments
 
and other documents from C.I.D. Inspector Amar Chand’s house then abducted and killed Amar.
 
He was also charged with the enemy agent.
 
In his defence Maqbool Bhat denied all charges except that he had without a valid legal permit
 
crossed the ceasefire line in June 1966. He said that he did not think it necessary to obtain a
 
permit for moving around in his own country.
 
The biased Indian court found him guilty and passed death sentenced on him, while others were
 
given the life sentence. It is also reported that upon announcement of the death sentence by
 
Judge Neil Kant Ganjo Maqbool Bhat said, “The Rope has not yet been made that can hang
 
Maqbool Bhat…if Indian authorities of occupation think that by hanging me, they can crush the
 
Kashmir struggle. They are mistaken. The struggle actually will start after my hanging.” 
 
Nevertheless, Bhat’s execution further contributed to the sense of alienation among most
 
Kashmiris, and he continues to be a major source of inspiration for the Kahmiri freedom fighters.
 
Bhat, like Afzal, was buried inside Tihar Jail. Kashmiri activists continue to demand Maqbool
 
Bhat’s remains, and in fact, a grave is kept vacant in Srinagar’s martyrs’ graveyard for his mortal
 
remains. He was the first Kashmiri to be judicially murdered on Indian soil-making him the first
 
authentic martyr of the Kashmiri independence movement. His execution day is celebrated as
 
Martyr Day every year.
 
By sacrificing his life, Maqbool Bhat played a key role in the struggle of Kashmiris, which has
 
continued unabated, despite Indian state terrorism. He infused a new spirit into their movement.
 
His martyrdom anniversary provides an opportunity to ponder over the fact that various countries
 
of the world got independence by sacrificing their precious lives. On this vary day, the best way
 
to pay homage to the pioneer of Kashmir’s struggle, Maqbool Bhat is that all the Kashmiris must
 
renew their pledge to take the war of liberation to its logical end.
 

, , , ,

No Comments

Kashmir Day: The Struggle Continues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kashmir Day: The Struggle Continues

 

                             By Sajjad Shaukat

 
Since 1990, the 5th of February is being celebrated by Pakistanis and Kashmiris as ‘Kashmir
 
Solidarity Day’ to pay homage to Kahsmiri martyrs and to show solidarity with the freedom
 
fighters who are demanding their legitimate right of self-determination, as recognized by the UN
 
resolutions.
 
During the partition of the Sub-continent, the people of the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K)
 
which comprised Muslim majority decided to join Pakistan according to the British-led formula.
 
But, Dogra Raja, Sir Hari Singh, a Hindu who was ruling over the State of Jammu and Kashmir,
 
in connivance with the Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Governor General Lord
 
Mountbatten joined India.
 
The design to forcibly wrest Kashmir began to unfold on August 16, 1947, with the
 
announcement of the Radcliffe Boundary Award. It gave the Gurdaspur District—a majority
 
Muslim area to India to provide a land route to the Indian armed forces to move into Kashmir.
 
There was a rebellion in the state forces, which revolted against the Maharaja and were joined by
 
Pathan tribesmen. Lord Mountbatten ordered armed forces to land in Srinagar.
 
When Pakistan responded militarily against the Indian aggression, on December 31, 1947, India
 
made an appeal to the UN Security Council to intervene and a ceasefire ultimately came into
 
effect on January 01, 1949, following UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite in Kashmir to
 
enable the people of Jammu and Kashmir to determine whether they wish to join Pakistan or
 
India. On February 5, 1964, India backed out of its promise of holding plebiscite. Instead, in
 
March 1965, the Indian Parliament passed a bill, declaring Kashmir a province of India-an
 
integral part of the Indian union.
 
The very tragedy of Kashmiris had started after 1947 when they were denied their genuine right
 
of self-determination. They organized themselves against the injustices of India and launched a
 
war of liberation which New Delhi tried to crush through various forms of brutalities.
 
It is notable that since 1947, in order to maintain its illegal control, India has continued its
 
repressive regime in the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK) through various machinations.
 
Nevertheless, various forms of state terrorism have been part of a deliberate campaign by the
 
Indian army and paramilitary forces against Muslim Kashmiris, especially since 1989. It has
 
been manifested in brutal tactics like crackdowns, curfews, illegal detentions, massacre, targeted
 
killings, sieges, burning the houses, torture, disappearances, rape, breaking the legs, molestation
 
of Muslim women and killing of persons through fake encounter.
 
According to a report on human rights violations in the Indian Occupied Kashmir, since 1989,
 
there have been deaths of 1,00000 innocent Kashmiris, 7,023 custodial killings, 1,22,771 arrests,
 
1,05,996 destruction of houses or buildings, 22,776 women widowed, 1,07,466 children
 
orphaned and 10,086 women gang-raped/molested. Indian brutal securities forces have continue
 
these atrocities.
 
In fact, Indian forces have employed various draconian laws like the Jammu and Kashmir
 
Disturbed Areas Act, and the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act and
 
Public Safety Act in killing the Kashmiri people, and for the arbitrarily arrest of any individual
 
for an indefinite period.
 
Besides Human Rights Watch, in its various reports, Amnesty International has also pointed out
 
grave human rights violations in the Indian controlled Kashmir, indicating, “The Muslim
 
majority population in the Kashmir Valley suffers from the repressive tactics of the security
 
forces.
 
In its report on July 2, 2015, the Amnesty International has highlighted extrajudicial killings of
 
the innocent persons at the hands of Indian security forces in the Indian Held Kashmir. The
 
report points out, “Tens of thousands of security forces are deployed in Indian-administered
 
Kashmir…the Armed Forces Special Powers Act allows troops to shoot to kill suspected
 
militants or arrest them without a warrant…not a single member of the armed forces has been
 
tried in a civilian court for violating human rights in Kashmir…this lack of accountability has in
 
turn facilitated other serious abuses…India has martyred one 100,000 people. More than 8,000
 
disappeared (while) in the custody of army and state police.”
 
In this respect, European Union has passed a resolution about human rights abuses committed by
 
Indian forces in the Indian held Kashmir.
 
It is of particular attention that in 2008, a rights group reported unmarked graves in 55 villages
 
across the northern regions of the Indian-held Kashmir. Then researchers and other groups
 
reported finding thousands of mass graves without markers. In this respect, in August, 2011,
 
Indian Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission officially acknowledged in its
 
report that innocent civilians killed in the two-decade conflict have been buried in unmarked
 
graves.
 
Notably, foreign sources and human rights organisations have revealed that unnamed graves
 
include those innocent persons, killed by the Indian military and paramilitary troops in the fake
 
encounters including those who were tortured to death by the Indian secret agency RAW.
 
And, as part of anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan approach, leader of the BJP and Prime Minister of
 
India Narendra Modi who is giving impetus to Hindu chauvinism not only accelerated
 
unprovoked firing at the Line of Control in Kashmir including Working Boundary in Sialkot, but
 
also suspended the Secretary level talks with Islamabad. Now, he has been raising baseless issue
 
like Pathonkot terror attack, (which was orchestrated by India), Mumbai mayhem and terrorism
 
as pre-conditions to advance the Pak-Indian dialogue. But, he ignored the fact that on July 19,
 
2013, the Indian ex-investigating officer Satish Verma disclosed that terror-attacks in Mumbai in
 
November 26, 2008 and assault on Indian Parliament in January 12, 2001 were carried out by the
 
Indian government to strengthen anti-terrorism laws.
 
It is noteworthy that Modi regime hurriedly decided to forcibly annex disputed territory of the
 
State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), uncovering its intentions to wrap up the article 370 of the
 
Indian constitution which ensures a special status to J&K. Therefore, United Nations Military
 
Observer Group India and Pakistan in New Delhi was asked to vacate official accommodation.
 
In fact, BJP government‘s long term strategy is to affect demographic changes in the Indian
 
occupied Kashmir by composition of the region—predominately with Hindu population.
 
During one year of People’s Democratic Party (PDP)-BJP alliance government in the Indian
 
Occupied Kashmir, BJP in aid of RSS has furthered its agenda of complete integration of
 
Kashmir into India. Though legal experts of India and IOK High Court have clarified the
 
permanent status of Article 370 of Indian Constitution, BJP’s agenda of trifurcations is still on
 
table. In this regard, BJP is in hot pursuit of Mission 44+in IOK Assembly elections 2020.
 
However, short of that, BJP and RSS are busy in changing religious identity of the State. For
 
example, special concessions were given to expand the horizon of Amarnath Yatra to project that
 
Hindus have greater stakes in IOK than Muslims.
 
Special efforts are being made for demographic engineering in the State. For instance, West
 
Pakistan Refugees have been recruited in the Indian Armed Forces from IOK quota. Allocation
 
of lands for separate cities for repatriating Hindu Pundits and allocation of INR 2 million for
 
rehabilitation of each Pundit family in the Valley are aimed at creating Hindu constituencies in a
 
thorough Muslim region of Valley through delimitations.
 
On the other hand, the sectors of health, education, local infrastructure, social support and rural
 
development are being controlled by BJP MLAs (Members of the Legislative Assembly). Major
 
projects of the State are being announced and are implemented in Hindu dominant-BJP
 
constituencies to give a message that only BJP’s voters are entitled to a standard living. Through
 
these tactics, BJP is longing for Mission 44+ in next IOK Assembly elections.
 
Kashmiri Hurriyat leadership has been suppressed by the PDP-BJP government by not allowing
 
them to organize rallies for demanding freedom and expressing love for Pakistan. Their leaders
 
were detained in Police Stations or kept under house arrests during all important events.
 
Detention of Masarat Alam, even after acceptance of bail by IOK High Court, exhibits coercive
 
mechanics of Indian forces/police in the State.
 
Indian malicious intent is evident from the blame game against Pakistan for every internal
 
security issue, merely to avoid serious dialogue on bilateral issues as well as the humanitarian
 
crisis in Kashmir. Pakistan is committed to the just and democratic solution of the Kashmir issue,
 
which is plebiscite, however, India has never been serious in resolution of the dispute, neither
 
through bilateral dialogue nor involving third party mediation nor by abiding by the UN
 
Resolutions.
 
In the wake of changing regional and global dynamics, resolution of the issue has become a top
 
most priority, but unsensitized international community is perhaps waiting for emergence of a
 
regional crises out of Kashmir dispute. As global players do not find any interest in resolution of
 
the dispute, it has become a humanitarian issue in the region.
 
As matter of fact, Indian authorities are not willing to talk with Kashmiri people on political
 
grounds. New Delhi reached to a conclusion that only bullet is the right way of dealing with
 
Kashmiris, demanding their right of self-determination. Surprisingly, Indian successive
 
governments are trying to ignore the dynamics of the freedom movement of Kashmiris for the
 
sake of their alien rule.
 
But, New Delhi is still showing its intransigence in order to resolve Kashmir dispute with
 
Pakistan by neglecting the fact that Kashmir remains a nuclear flashpoint between both the
 
neighbouring countries.
 
Meanwhile, Pakistan’s serious and sincere effort at the annual session of the United Nations in
 
December 2015—the speech of Pakistan’s prime minister and his meeting with the American
 
president, highlighting the Kashmir dispute and demanding its solution has infused a new spirit
 
among the Kashmiri people.
 
Nonetheless, by exposing the double standard of the US-led western countries which still remain
 
silent over the Indian injustices, Kashmiris, living both sides of the LoC observe the Kashmir
 
Day on February 5 to protest against the Indian illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir. On
 
this very day, Pakistanis and Kashmiris across the globe express solidarity with the freedom
 
fighters of Kashmir, demanding their legitimate right of self-determination from India which
 
continues various forms of state terrorism in order to suppress their popular struggle which
 
continues unabated.
 
Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants,
 
Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations
 

, , , , , ,

No Comments

BURNING KASHMIR by Eric Margolis

India cannot stand media neutrality on Kashmir border disputes

The problem was a cover story about the border dispute between India and Pakistan in Kashmir, one of the world’s most militarized regions. The report included a map showing the territory claimed by either side without taking a position on their territorial claims. The Indian authorities nonetheless insisted on a white sticker being placed over the map in each copy sold in India, depriving the country’s readers of a factual analysis of the border dispute.

L'article de The Economist censuré avec du sparadrap

Ever since the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947 and the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Kashmir’s border have been both a cause and symptom of the tension between India and its Pakistani and Chinese neighbours. Ever since the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947 and the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Kashmir’s border have been both a cause and symptom of the tension between India and its Pakistani and Chinese neighbours

Carte des fronitères entre l'Inde et le Pakistan

Anticipating the censorship of the regional map in its 21 May 2011 issue, The Economist added a box entitled “Missing map?” at the end of report. The box said:

Sadly India censors maps that show the current effective border, insisting instead that only its full territorial claims be shown. It is more intolerant on this issue than either China or Pakistan. Indian readers will probably be deprived of the map on the second page of this special report. Unlike their government, we think our Indian readers can face political reality. Those who want to see anaccurate depiction of the various territorial claims can do so using our interactive map at Economist.com/asianborders

Territorial disputes continue to be a highly sensitive subject for India’s government. When the Chinese foreign ministry issued new passports in November 2012 with a map of China on pages 8 and 46 showing territory claimed by Vietnam, Taiwan, Philippines and India as Chinese, all of these countries protested but India was the only one to respond by producing new visas for Chinese citizens with a map of India that showed its version of the Sino-Indian border dispute.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 20, 2010

The world’s longest-running international conflict – Kashmir – has burst once more into flames.

At least 69 Muslim Kashmiris protesting Indian rule have been shot down in the street by Indian paramilitary police in recent weeks. Scores more have been wounded as unrest spreads across the Himalayan mountain state. Kashmir’s capital, Srinagar, is under military curfew.

Indian and Pakistani military forces are on heightened alert as a result of the growing tensions.

A century ago, the great British geopolitician, Sir Halford Mackinder, called Kashmir one of the world’s primary strategic pivots – the nexus of continents, empires, and civilizations.

In my first book, `War at the Top of the World,’ which explores the Afghanistan and Kashmir conflicts, I described Kashmir as “the world’s most dangerous crisis.”

The danger still remains. India and Pakistan, now both nuclear-armed, have fought three major wars over Kashmir. They remain at scimitars drawn over the divided state. India keeps 500,000 troops and paramilitary police in Kashmir.

In 1999, Pakistani troops moved into the Indian-ruled Ladakh region of Kashmir, nearly provoking another war between the two old foes. Both sides put their nuclear forces in high alert. India and Pakistan have only a hair-trigger three minute alert window once they get warnings of enemy attack. This is almost launch on warning; the potential for an accidental war is enormous.

A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would kill and injure tens of millions – and produce clouds of radioactive dust that would pollute all of Asia’s major rivers and, eventually, the entire globe.

I have frequently been under fire on the tense Pakistani-Indian cease fire line, known as the Line of Control, that divided Kashmir into Indian and Pakistani-ruled portions. Border clashes between Indian and Pakistani troops have frequently threatened to escalate into a wider conflict in the south on the broad plains of Punjab.

Kashmir, some 92,000 sq miles (239,000 sq km), is roughly the size of Great Britain. It has 11 million people, which makes it larger than half the world’s nations. Eight million Kashmiris live in the Indian-ruled portion; 3 million in the Pakistani part. Another million people of Kashmiri origin live in Pakistan’s Gilgit-Baltistan region, which is part of historic Kashmir.

Like so many of our world’s problems, the Kashmir conflict harks back to the British Empire. In 1947, Imperial Britain divided the Indian subcontinent into India and the Muslim majority state of Pakistan. Millions of Hindus and Muslims died in the ensuing carnage of partition.

Kashmir was an independent princely state ruled by a Hindu maharajah. Seventy-seven percent of Kashmiris were Muslim; 20% Hindu; and the rest Sikhs and Buddhists. The Hindu prince wanted to join India, but most of his people wanted union with neighboring Pakistan.

Violence erupted. Pakistan and India went to war over Kashmir. By the time the UN imposed a cease-fire, India held two-thirds, including the Vale of Kashmir, and Pakistan one third of the beautiful mountain state. They have sparred and warred over Kashmir ever since.

Further complicating matters, during the 1950’s, China quietly occupied and annexed Kashmir’s 15,000 ft Aksai Chin region in order to build a military road linking its westernmost Xinjang province (the scene of the recent uprising by Muslim Uighurs) with Tibet.
China also claims the Indian-held Ladakh region of Kashmir as part of Chinese-ruled Tibet. Ladakh is also called “Little Tibet.”

Anti-Indian sentiment in Kashmir simmered until 1989 when full-scale rebellion or intifada by Kashmiri Muslims erupted. India battled for a decade to crush the uprising, often using tactics that Indian human rights groups and foreign rights groups condemned as brutal and violations of human rights. Massacres, torture, collective reprisals and gang rape became common. So did massacres of Hindus and Sikhs by Muslim insurgents.

Pakistan’s intelligence service, ISI, armed and aided Kashmiri mujahidin, and helped sustain the popular uprising, until 9/11 2001 when Washington forced Pakistan to mostly end its intervention in Kashmir.

After 40,000-80,000 deaths, most of them Muslims, India seemed in recent years to have extinguished the uprising. But now, it has sprung once more to life, sharpening Indian-Pakistani tensions and drawing China into the dispute.

In 1948, the UN Security Council ordered a plebiscite to determine if Kashmiris wanted to remain in India, or join Pakistan. India has adamantly rejected the UN resolution and insists Kashmir is a purely internal matter.

The uprising, asserts Delhi, is all due to “cross-border terrorism” from Pakistan. So the conflict has festered for 62 years – even longer than the dispute over Palestine. Further complicating matters, numerous Kashmiri Muslims are calling for an independent state and demand Pakistan return Gilgit-Baltistan (“Northern Territories” to Pakistan).

Now, the Kashmir conflict can no longer be avoided. It has become part of the arc of crisis that includes Afghanistan, Pakistan and India’s violence-plagued western regions. Recent murderous attacks on India by Pakistan-based extremists were motivated by the ongoing conflict in Kashmir.

Equally worrying, there are reports that Chinese troops have entered northern Pakistan, adjacent to Kashmir. Beijing says these troops are helping repair the fabled Karakoram Highway (KKH), the only land link between close allies China and Pakistan. I have been over this 15,000 ft-high marvel carved from the ever-shifting mountains, one of my most hair-raising, thrilling adventures.

China is just finishing a deepwater port and naval base on Pakistan’s western Arabian Sea coast at Gwadar. I first wrote about this highly strategic port in a 1980’s New York Times op-ed piece, predicting it would become a major strategic issue.

Gwadar will afford China’s expanding navy a supply base and safe haven that gives onto the Indian Ocean and Gulf. Today, 55% of China’s oil comes from the Gulf; in a few years, some 80%. Gwadar lies right on China’s vital oil artery.

New roads, a railroad, and a gas pipeline are building northeast from Gwadar to the KKH, then into China. India is increasingly alarmed by this strategic development, which it claims is part of China’s growing “encirclement” of India. Furthermore, India also warns that Chinese troops along the KKH are ready to intervene in Kashmir in the event of a new conflict between Delhi and Islamabad.

In spite of great reluctance, Washington is slowly being drawn into the Kashmir dispute. The US wants India and Pakistan to resolve their bitter Kashmir conflict so that the bulk of Pakistan’s army, now deployed against an attack from India, can be sent into action in Afghanistan and the Northwest Frontier (recently miserably renamed, Pakhtunkhwa). But this cannot happen so long as Kashmir burns, so Washington is tip-toeing into a new diplomatic mess in the Himalayas.

What a tangled web we weave…..Afghanistan can’t now be solved without stabilizing Pakistan. But Pakistan will remain unstable and angry so long as the Kashmir conflict continues. But the Bush administration allied the US with India, infuriating old ally Pakistan which sees India and now the US as its principal enemies.

Enter the dragon, China, Pakistan’s closet current ally, expanding its power westward towards the oil-rich Gulf. Sir Halford Mackinder, it appears, was quite right about Kashmir, which lies at the nexus of these great events.

Copyright Eric S, Margolis 2010

This post is in: Asia

, ,

No Comments

Quaid’s Vision on Kashmir Issue and Prevailing Situation

Round Table Discussion on 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quaid’s Vision on Kashmir Issue and Prevailing Situation 

Organized by
MUSLIM Institute

MUSLIM Institute organized a round table discussion on “Quaid’s Vision on Kashmir Issue and Prevailing Situation” at National library, Islamabad. Eminent scholars and political leaders from Pakistan participated in the discussion and expressed their views on the subject. Convener Tehreek-e-Hurriyat Jammu & Kashmir, Pakistan Chapter, Ghulam Muhammad Safi, Former Ambassador & Renowned Columnist Asif Ezdi, Renowned Columnist, Ms. Ayesha Masood and Research Associate MUSLIM Institute Mr. Tahir Mehmood, and others spoke on the event.

img

Honorable Speakers expressing their views observed as under:

Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah believed that without Kashmir, Pakistan is incomplete. He tried his best to liberate Kashmir from Indian illegal occupation. Quaid’s commitment with Kashmir and Kashmiri people was unfaltering. Quaid’s vision on Kashmir is unequivocal. Quaid knew very well the importance and significance of Kashmir for Pakistanis as well as for Kashmiris. He paid attention to the miserable conditions of Kashmiris even when there
According to Dr. Riaz Ali Shah’s diary, Quaid-e-Azam said, during his illness in Ziarat, “Kashmir is the Jugular vein of Pakistan and no nation or country would tolerate its Jugular vein remains under the sword of the enemy”. Not only the Jugular vein of Pakistan but also that of Kashmiri community in particular has been under the sword of the enemy for the last sixty eight years. Quaid-e-Azam’s interest in Kashmir is evident from the fact that he explained the significance of the name of Pakistan to Mountbatten on May 17, 1947 as “The derivation of the word Pakistan– P for Punjab; A for Afghan (i.e. Pathans of NWFP); K for Kashmir; I for nothing because that letter was not in the word in Urdu; S for Sindh and Tan for the last syllable of Baluchistan”. was no one to heed their hues and cries. Quaid vociferously condemned the Indian aggression on Kashmir. He wanted the peaceful settlement of the dispute but he was also determined to go to any extent to liberate Kashmir from Indian clutches, which is evident from his bold step to issue orders to the then Commander-in-Chief of Pakistan Army, General Douglas Gracey to dispatch troops to Jammu and Srinagar. 

img

Quaid-e-Azam supported the Kashmir cause even before the independence of Pakistan. It was his desire that Kashmiris especially Muslims should get their socio economic rights and justice. During the period of Dogra Raj in Kashmir Muslims were dealt in very cruel manner, women were treated like herd of animals. In 1926 when Quaid visited Kashmir he came to know that Kashmiri Muslim sent a delegation to the then viceroy and submitted a memorandum to take notice of the miseries of Kashmiri people. That delegation when returned they were tortured, their lands were snatched. When Quaid came back, a unanimous resolution was passed in the meeting of Muslim League at Lahore, which addressed maharaja to take care of the educational and economic rights of the Muslims. Allama Iqbal was also on the same footings as Quaid, taking notice of the maltreatment of Kashmiris, in 1931 president of Muslim League Allama Iqbal declared that Muslims of Sub continent should observe 14 August as the Kashmir day. 

Quaid’s three visits to Kashmir show that he had deep interest in Kashmir and its politics. Regarding Srinagar visit of the Quaid-e-Azam in 1944, Alastair Lamb says ”M.A. Jinnah, unlike Jawaharlal Nehru was extremely reluctant at this period of time to involve himself directly (or the Muslim League which he headed) in the internal affairs of the Princely State; such action would in his eyes have been constitutionally improper.

img

Quaid-e-Azam never took stand on any such issue which was unrealistic. When a leader after long experiences takes a decision, then such decisions are ideologically very strong. Quaid e Azam after long period of time took firm decision on Kashmir. As Quaid took resolute decision on the mission of Pakistan and then translated it into actuation and finally achieved his goal. After Quaid-e-Azam we can’t see any such sort of commitment in case of Kashmir. 

India was very particular to grab Jammu and Kashmir. ‘Two-Nation Theory’ is the basis of the Ideology of Pakistan but Indian Hindu leaders tried their best to negate it. They also tried to influence Quaid-e-Azam so that he may leave his stand on ‘Two-Nation Theory’ but Quaid remain rock-like on his stance. Therefore in a bid of disapproving ‘Two-Nation Theory’ India occupied Jammu and Kashmir by force as Jammu and Kashmir was Muslim majority state contiguous to Pakistan. People of Kashmir knew very well the importance of ‘Two-Nation Theory’ and are committed to it till date. Quaid cautioned Sheikh Abdullah of Kashmir that he is playing in the hands of congress and he would regret one day and the time proved Quaid’s words. India kept ill-treating Kashmiri people and sheikh Abdullah was also not rewarded for his services. Kashmiri leaders believe that sheikh Abdullah’s lust of power exacerbated the Kashmir issue. 

Quaid was man of principles. He succeeded because of his commitment and unwavering belief in mission of Pakistan and today we need same commitment and determination. Deviation from Quaid’s vision will be extremely detrimental to stability of Pakistan if Kashmir don’t integrate with Pakistan then Pakistan will have to face grave challenges in future.

img

Pakistani leadership should remain steadfast on its just and long held stance that Kashmiris should be given right of self-determination. Without resolving outstanding issue of Kashmir, peace and prosperity in south Asia could not be achieved. Our policy makers need to follow the Quaid’s vision on Kashmir. Pakistan should always give priority to the Kashmir issue in any dialogue process with India. On the basis of Quaid’s vision on Kashmir, today we also need to design a concrete national policy on Kashmir and successive governments should follow it consistently. The current government should take firm stand and boldly express its principle stance on every forum as Quaid did in his life to defend two nation theory and Kashmir issue.

India has eroded all the state nomenclature (independent institution) of Jammu & Kashmir to bring it at par with other Indian states and to remove its special status. India wants to settle the Hindu migrants in Jammu & Kashmir to change its demography to dilute the Muslim majority status; therefore Pakistan should raise voice against this blatant violation of Justice and fair play.

Interactive Session

img

After speakers expressed their views, interactive session was held and speakers answered various questions in detail. Gist of the same has been given as what follows:

Kashmir issue is not an issue of territory but the right of self-determination of people of Jammu and Kashmir. It is not merely an issue of brutalizing Kashmiri people though this problem is a part of Kashmir issue. Still if India stops brutalizing the people of Kashmir, political issue of independence remains unresolved. Including the above mentioned points, a national policy should be formulated and tabled in the cabinet. Approval of the cabinet is mandatory thus it may become a guiding principle and nobody shall have the right to deviate from it. As whoever comes to power, disregard previous policies and tries to evolve new strategies. Same is the case with the policy of Kashmir.

We should fearlessly express our support to the struggle of people of Kashmir. Emphasis on the fallacy that Hindu and Muslim has been living together in harmony thus ‘Two-Nation Theory’ has no ground, is not a reality. Thus, implications of tempering the history may be disastrous and it is obligation upon all of us to raise our voice against this. Actually, a tiny section which is promoting this misconception is well-financed and supported by foreign powers. They don’t highlight the British rule, that how British engineered the minds of Hindus to eliminate Muslims from subcontinent. There are two types of India: one before the imperialist British rule and one after that; in former Muslims and Hindus could live together but in the latter one it was made impossible. Narendra Modi is the living example of such kind of mentality. 

Indian forces entered the Kashmir before the maharaja of Kashmir signed the instrument of accession. India states that instrument of accession was signed on 26th October and the Indian forces attacked Kashmir on 27th October, but evidence is contrary to this. However, the Kashmir issue has surpassed these technicalities and right of self-determination is the talk of the time. The relevant issues are resolutions of Security Council to which both countries agreed, though India is using delaying tactics for the implementation of these resolutions. Right of self-determination is ratified through the resolutions of the Security Council. Even if resolutions were not conferring the right of self-determination, people of Kashmir still hold this right as it is stipulated in international laws that “all people” have the right of self-determination.

, , ,

No Comments

Gen Raheel Sharif Extension

LETTER TO EDITOR

January 26th, 2016

Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
30 Westridge 1
Rawalpindi 46000
Pakistan

 

 

 

 

Low profile: This undated handout photograph released by Pakistan's Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) on Nov. 27 shows a portrait of newly appointed Pakistani army chief Gen. Raheel Sharif. | AFP-JIJI

 

 

 

 

Gen. Raheel Sharif Extension

 

While it may be a source of comfort to a few yet, the most have shown concern over the announcement of Gen. Raheel declining any extension in service given to him. Their main concern is the unfinished task of eliminating terrorism in Pakistan.  If I may, let me assure them that anyone succeeding Gen. Raheel will have no other option but to continue with his policy(ies) in this respect. I think there is a strong overall feeling in the armed forces  that there is no alternative to “Pakistan First” and every other consideration is subservient to it.  Therefore, the army chief, who so ever he may be, would have to keep in view the such sentiments of the force that he commands. I am sure by now the authorities know that no three star general can reach that height in the army unless he has the requisite ability, years of practical experience and the overall merit to make it. They would also know that the matter of choice and preference seldom works in w! inning over personal loyalties – cases in study;  Zia hand picked by Bhutto  and Musharraf by MNS. It would, therefore, be just in order and most appropriate to pass on the command to the next senior most Lieutenant General in line.  No one should have any fears from anyone as long as he/she/they also keep in mind and work for “Pakistan First”.

 

Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
30 Westridge 1
Rawalpindi 46000
Pakistan
 
E.mail: [email protected]

 

 

 

 

,

No Comments