Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for January, 2012

Pakistan Navy shows it’s muscle. PNS Babur proves its might

 

Pakistan warship damaged part of Indian vessel: IN Naval chief

New Delhi: Days after the brush off incident between their warships in the Gulf of Aden, Indian Navy on Friday said Pakistani ship PNS Babur had damaged a part of INS Godavari by moving too close to it.
Naval Chief Admiral Nirmal Verma indicated that the matter had been taken up with the international coalition of naval forces operating against piracy.
He said PNS Babur, while escorting Egyptian merchant vessel MV Suez which had been released by Somali pirates, brushed off the Indian ship after moving close as it was coming from behind.
“Our ship was going at a particular speed and the other ship approached from the rear as it must have tried to pass at a certain distance… but it didn’t happen as it turned up very close,” Verma told reporters after the incident that occurred last week.
“We operate helicopters from ships and we keep the helicopter nets down (during landings). One of our helicopter nets got damaged,” he said.
The Naval chief said INS Godavari had been sent to reassure the Indian sailors on board the MV Suez after its release from captivity of Somali pirates.
“After that this incident took place where the Pakistani Navy ship came much closer than what is considered to be prudent by anybody operating ships in the seas,” he said.
Asked if the multi-national Combined Task Force 151, under whose command the PNS Babar was operating, had been informed about the incident, Verma said, “You can be sure that everybody knows about that.”
India has already lodged a protest with Pakistan over the incident and provided photographic evidence about the dangerous manoeuvres by PNS Babur.
Explaining anti-piracy operations, Verma said warships closest to the merchant vessels under attack or passing through piracy-affected areas provide help to them.
“Irrespective of which nationality a merchant ship belongs to, you find that whichever navy ship is available close it, comes for help. Similarly, the Suez was released by the pirates and was going for the next port of call and sought some escort,” he said.
The Navy chief said when ships such as MV Suez are released after long periods of captivity, there is a deep sense of fear among the seafarers on board that while they reach the next port of call, they might be hijacked again.
He said the Navy had advised that the ship be provided with a tug and a vessel protection team which was not followed.
The Navy chief, at the same time, said the Indian warship there was escorting two other ships which had 22 Indians onboard and could not have left them to be targeted by pirates.
“When it seemed that the families of the sailors were not sure of their safety, we decided to show the flag of the Indian warship and it means a lot. So we deployed the ship so that they could see the flag,” he said.
On allegations levelled by Pakistan that the Indian warship had postured aggressively and its crew had made obscene gestures against its ship, Verma said the Indian navy conducted itself in the most professional manner during the whole incident. Responding to allegations by the families of Indian sailors that the Navy didn’t help them, Verma said, “When MV Suez was going towards Salalah, there was French ship which was 80-90 miles away, we requested them that the crew is worried about pirate attack. The French Navy sent one of its helicopters over the ship, which was even seen by the crew of Suez.”
“When navies operate, they are not worried to take credit. We perform tasks that are assigned to us,” he added.
Verma said the Indian Navy has escorted over 1,600 merchant vessels through Gulf of Aden in the last two years but only 170 of them were Indian flagships.
“Irrespective of which nationality a merchant ship belongs to, you find that whichever navy ship is available close it, comes for help,” he said.
He said in a similar incident, INS Talwar had provided help to MV Asphalt Venture, which did not have a single Indian on board, after it was released by Somali pirates.
Terming the recent face-off between the navies of India and Pakistan in the Indian Ocean as “momentary confusion”, External Affairs Minister S M Krishna played down the incident and said there was “nothing substantial” in it.
“That was only a momentary confusion. I think there was nothing substantial about it,” Krishna said.
He was replying to a query on how India was reacting to the aggressive gestures shown by Pakistan Naval Ship (PNS) Babur while it was escorting MV Suez in the Indian Ocean.
Following criticism for its slow response to ensure safety of Indian crew member on-board merchant vessel MV Suez, which was released by Somali pirates, India had dispatched a
naval warship INS Godavari to mark its presence in the operation.
Asked about the course of action taken by India to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in the future, Krishna said, “Well, you know we have a navy ship there which
is patrolling the area. I think this is a recurring, continuing irritant.”
He refused to comment on the on-going Foreign Secretary level talks between India and Pakistan.
“It would not be appropriate for the Ministry to make any comment when Foreign Secretary (Nirupama Rao) herself is on a very important and delicate mission,” Krishna said.

 

 

Posted on: 24 Jun 2011, 10:27 PM

No Comments

Captain of frontline warship INS Talwar removed

Captain of frontline warship INS Talwar removed*


Captain of frontline warship removed

Captain of frontline warship removed

 

New Delhi: The Indian Navy on Tuesday removed the Captain of the frontline warship INS Talwar from his command responsibilities after a young officer under him died during an exercise at sea off the coast of Gujarat.

“There was an accident on INS Talwar on December 29 during sea swimming drill during which an under-training officer Sub Lieutenant Vipin Kumar died. After this the Commanding Officer of the warship Captain Rahul Parmar was relieved of his command,” Navy spokesperson said here.

A Board of Inquiry (BoI) is going on into the incident and its findings will be submitted with higher formations in due course and appropriate action will be taken, they said.

“The warship’s command has now been given to the second-in-command of INS Talwar,” the spokesperson said.

A sea swimming drill is part of survival training of young officers under which they are made to swim in sea.

INS Talwar is the lead ship of the Talwar class frigates of the Navy built in Russia and commissioned in 2003.

It is a stealth frigate and has participated in various operations and exercises since her commissioning, including anti-piracy operations off the coast of Somalia last year.

No Comments

Father goes to Pakistan to find missing Indian Navy officer

Father goes to Pak to find missing Navy officer

Bhopal: RP Singh, father of missing navy sub-lieutenant Vipin Kumar, is gearing to go to Pakistan in search of his son after five self-styled godman told him he is alive. The DNA had carried his story in its January 14 edition. They told the family that Vipin Kumar must be unconscious and would find his way home as soon as he regained consciousness.

Sub-lieutenant Vipin Kumar went missing during a swimming drill in the sea off Porbandar( Gujarat) coast from frontline warship INS Talwar on December 29.
The area, where the naval officer was asked to dive, is close to India’s northwestern maritime region along international maritime boundary line (IMBL) with Pakistan. “We are not getting a proper answer form the Navy. What we know is that he was asked to dive at a place which is hardly 250 km (34.98 nautical ) from Pakistan,” says Singh.

The last time he spoke to Captain Rahul Parmar, suspended commandant of warship INS Talwar, was on January 15. The Captain was suspended for negligence leading to the incident.

Vipin completed his training in 2009. He was one of the youngest officers on the Russian-built stealth frigate commissioned into the Indian Navy in 2003.

 

Last Updated 03:25(19/01/12)

 

No Comments

Responses to “Pakistani Nuclear Forces 2011”

Responses to “Pakistani Nuclear Forces 2011”

 

Distiller Says:

 

I’d set the 2020 warhead count at at least 250. For one they also have a learning curve, and then I think they want to reach ~350 warheads asap, as that’s about the number that would be needed to hold all Indian urban centres at risk.

 

And looking at their delivery vehicle programmes, I’d say they aim at sea-launched cruise missiles, air-launched cruise missiles, and surface-to-surface ballistic missiles. With the current free falling bombs being just a gap filler.

 

Btw, do you have any info about their capability to remake older warheads into newer smaller ones?

 

Also: Any indications that they are working in higher yield warheads?

 

Reply: Is it Pakistan’s policy to build enough warheads to hold all India urban centers at risk? What is the evidence that they’re working on a nuclear sea-launched cruise missile? I’m not aware of information about Pakistan’s capability to remake older warheads into newer smaller ones or work going on on higher yield warheads. HK

 

Pakistan has mastered all aspects of leveraging Nuclear Technology.  It is geared toward a defensive response to the massive build-up of Indian conventional forces.  The real cutting edge developments are never revealed for obvious reasons.

 

Pakistan has many enemies, including the so-called global “Super-Power,” to make such nemies think twice before launching any conventional adventure.

 

In Pakistan’s strategic thinking US-India-Israel Axis is  pivotal. Ra’ad, Ghauri, and Abdali are part of the defensive triad.

 

The recent reverse engineering of the stealth technology from Abbotabad has been a bonanza and Pakistan’s Defense Production thanks Allah for this gift.

 

In 2020, IA Pakistan will introduce new weaponary, which will keep the world guessing, in both Nuclear and Conventional fields.

 

Folk! You, ain’nt seen nothin’ yet. Stay tuned!  And, don’t let political turmoils lull you into thinking that Pakistan’s Defense Establishment does NOT have the eye on the ball.  More-so it is ever vigilant.  The new Corp Pakistan is raising is for Rapid AIR Deployment!

 

 

 

DANISH ALI AHMAD Says:

 

As far as i know, Pakistan has pre-targeted atleast 27 target inside inside india. Among them 18 are related to major military-airforce-naval and indian ordinance sites and 9 being the urban center. I dont think any country on this earth would have ~350 urban centers (unless otherwise your classification of urban center is limited to 5 km radius).

Until 2002 the major delivery system is based on modified F-16′s but succesful tests in MRBM change the delivery systems. it is now comprises on a- 40% surface to surface (srbm/mrbm). b- 25% Air dropped by F-16′s-migs. c- 20 % Air launched cruise missle- d- 5% precisely placed smuggled weapon inside urban centers. e- which is not developed and tested yet, 10% sea/submarine launch. note: all these weapons are placed and should be used tactically against the traget. examples- far east military targets are to be done by F-16 precise and confirm drop. far east non military sites be taken by surface to surface MRBM and so on.

The NASR system is designed specifically to counter the “COLD START” military strategy adopted by india. It is design to be light weight, precise and shock n awe to disrput, dismantle any cold start like action taken by indian forces.

Irony of the time is, that people and pundits, the most self acclaimed analyst call it a NUKE race but not as major as cold war. It is much more horrible scenerio then soviets vs US. They atleast had 28 minute reponse time to confirm and retaliate against the threat (being so far by each other). But India/Pakistan lies next to each other, there is no response time, not even for 30 seconds. IF a radars in Pakistan picks up a wrong signal or a fake threat, they do not have time To confirm the threat, but to retaliate in seconds. This is dooomed scenerio, and only big powers are responsible for it.

No Comments

Pakistani Nuclear Forces 2011 : Only a Guesstimate, by FAS

This article is only a guesstimate by foreign defense “pundits” Their number are no where close to reality, and a fiction of a wild imagination. Pakistanis rest assured, that it’s arsenal will not protect Pakistan, but is also a nuclear umbrella for all Islamic nations facing nuclear black mail.

Pakistani Nuclear Forces 2011*

Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal has doubled since 2004 and could double again in the next 10 years if the current trend continues, according to the latest Nuclear Notebook. Click on chart to download full size version.

The latest Nuclear Notebook on Pakistan’s nuclear forces is available on the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists web site. Since our previous Notebook on Pakistan in 2009 there have been several important developments.

Based on our own estimates, official statements, and fissile material production estimates produced by the International Panel of Fissile Materials, we conclude that Pakistan’s current nuclear weapons stockpile of 90-110 warheads might increase to 150-200 within the next decade. This would bring the Pakistani stockpile within range of the British stockpile, the smallest of the original five nuclear weapon states, but still far from that of France (despite some recent news reports to the contrary).

This development is precipitated by the anticipated introduction of several new nuclear delivery systems over the next years, including cruise missiles and short-range ballistic missiles. The capabilities of these new systems will significantly change the composition and nature of Pakistan’s nuclear posture.

India is following this development closely and is also modernizing its nuclear arsenal and fissile material production capability. The growing size, diversity, and capabilities of the Pakistani and Indian nuclear postures challenge their pledge to only acquire a minimum deterrent. Bilateral arms control talks and international pressure are urgently needed to halt what is already the world’s fastest growing nuclear arms race.

No Comments