Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for August, 2015

COAS’s REMOVAL–THE SOCIAL MEDIA NEWS:Badzaat Kashmiri Nawaz Sharif Up to his Old Tricks & Makaari

 

  

 

COAS’s REMOVAL–THE SOCIAL MEDIA NEWS.

 
The following email on the possible removal of Gen Raheel has been on the email circuit.Thrice earlier it has crossed my desk, and I have deleted it. But it is difficult to ignore it yet again. I was under the impression that it was the people of Pakistan, who were begging the Army Chief to save this country from the vultures. From there, now to make an about turn and hope the people of Pakistan must stand up to save their Army Chief is a breathtaking change in the location of the qibla.  To even be able to imagine such a change in positions is to first concede that ours has been a case of collective barking up the wrong tree.
 
And yet recklessness is always a possibility, and becomes more of a probability when Nawaz Sharif’s past record is kept in view. He has an unblemished record of making a grab for total power each time he has had the opportunity to do so. He was absolutely committed to having himself declared Ameer ul Momineen not too far back. And he did not have any qualms to plan and execute a physical assault on the Supreme Court of Pakistan to hold on to power. His zest for total power is not debatable. Having successfully subverted the police, the bureaucracy, and the judiciary towards his own ends, he has tried unsuccessfully to do the same to the army at least three times in the past. Pure chance has so far stood in his way. But “chance” may give way on his next attempt.
 
Yet now that the army has, however reluctantly, come to the rescue of the country it is honour bound to defend, one hopes that it has first made clear to itself that its own security lies in very clear resolve on two issues:
a. That it will not allow a coup against itself.
b. And that it will go to the logical conclusion of the operation that it is now conducting, and will go to the ultimate extent to see this operation successfully completed, and will resort to any and all measures within its capability to achieve this goal.
 
Nawaz Sharif Bharti KutaHowever, this resolve has practical value only if first this has been debated within the army and a formal decision on this score is taken, and secondly, all those who can be identified as having a vested interest in upsetting this apple cart, have been duly warned. This formal communication of intent is important because fools can all too often rush in where angels fear to tread, and PML-N is entirely capable of trusting stupidity for counsel. They have done this in the past, and will do so again.
 
There was a rumour doing the rounds a couple of months back that one Corps Commander was approached by PML-N to examine the possibility of coup against Gen Raheel, but that the officer so approached spilled the beans. Because of Nawaz Sharif’s previous track record this received some traction. After this failure, it was rumoured that the soft approach was adopted  and some very expensive shawls were sent to Gen Raheel’s house, only to be returned from the gate.
 
The new rumour that another coup is being planned finds currency because of the following:
a. that unheard of sums of money are leaving Pakistan without impediment, and what is more, any number of crooks responsible for farming these funds have also been allowed to leave the country. The belief is that this could only have been possible if the army’s wings have been clipped. And if this could happen, the next logical step would be to chop off the head of the Army Chief and regain total control.
b. the allegations made by no one other than the Defense Minister that General Zaheer, the last D.G ISI was behind an attempt to oust the government, something that would only have been done behind closed doors in any other country, is being seen as an indication of a push back against the army. And the conclusion is that if the army is willing to be pushed back, there must be a chink in its armour. So the next logical step has to be to exploit this chink and remove the Army Chief.
 
The Army’s previous forays in the political realm have been both selfish and dishonourable. Each intervention though, was accompanied by huge public applause. This was due directly to the mess made by the politicians, and the hope that the army would clean the mess up. But the army stayed to dinner each time and refused to leave. A measure which was supposed to be a temporary response to an emergency situation became a permanent solution. The army started to rule, per force using the same tools to do so which the ousted politicians were using. And it got the same results, was tainted in the same way, and garnered the same unpopularity.
 
But never in the past has the demand for the army to intervene been so loud and so widespread as it is today because never before has the mess created by the politicians been so egregious [ with no dearth of help from Musharraf’s NRO ] so as to have become an existential threat to the country. This time it was a collective decision by all the political parties to move in concert and to first immunize themselves against unobstructed plunder of national resources through judicial decisions and the 18nth Amendment to the Constitution. This Amendment also guaranteed the parties in power a monopoly over rigging of elections to retain their power. Thus empowered they moved in for the kill. Entirely fortuitously an obstruction materialized in the path of a smooth extinction of Pakistan in the unlikely shape of the Pakistan Army, which was thought to have been abundantly shackled by the 18nth Amendment and rulings of the Supreme Court on the law of necessity. 
 
A huge majority of the people of Pakistan want to see their country saved instead of standing with a Constitution which, as it now stands, was designed specifically to immunize the two largest political parties of the country against any possibility of accountability for their crimes. With the courts, police, and the bureaucracy having been made totally subservient to their purposes, they thus also gave themselves legal cover to keep at bay the army, which was the only institution which had the power to stop them.
 
The Army has so far achieved the following:
a. Severely mauled the infrastructure of militant terrorists holding the country hostage. It must be emphasized that this is an achievement which belongs solely to the armed forces of Pakistan, particularly of the Army. The government has merely been reluctantly dragged into this operation. Had it been for the government, we would still have been negotiating with the terrorists.
b.It has also made Karachi substantially safer and also undermined Altaf Hussain’s ability to hold the city hostage by undermining his command and control infrastructure. This is why in his helplessness Alfaf is so frequently foaming at the mouth.
c.Though tons of money has been successfully evacuated, sufficient fright has been put into the evil menace of Zardari so as to make him flee the country.
d. The combined effect of all of the above has been to restore the credibility of at least one institution of the country i.e the Army, and thus the restoration of some hope to the people of Pakistan.
 
What the army has to decide now is whether this hope which it has ignited, was justified, or is this hope to be a mere whistling in the dark for the people of Pakistan. And if it is to be merely the latter, the question which then naturally arises is, what was the Army’s compulsion to initiate a half measure? It should have no doubt whatever that a good part of the huge amount of money taken out of Pakistan will now come back and fund terrorism and crime in Pakistan. Terrorism and massive crime leading to create instability in Pakistan will have many foreign sponsors who cannot abide a stable pro-China Pakistan whose territory will partially allow China to circumvent its containment by Western powers. This will be the single most powerful dynamic which will decide Pakistan’s relationship with the West. Towards this end we already see a coalition of MQM and PPP. And Hussain Haqqani is well placed to coordinate their overall effort. And no one should have any doubt where Haqqani is coming from. The writing should thus be on the wall, but the question is whether the Army is seeing it? And if it is seeing it, is it reaching the conclusions it must?
 
No, once again Martial Law is not the answer, but intervention is unavoidable. For a period of time rule by a National Government with total support by the Army with an emergency imposed, and military courts functioning and trying people for mega corruption,will have to be resorted to. There is no other way of moving forward. For once the Army should break with tradition, eschew the urge to rule, empower the best in the country, and give them total support. And along the way as it will have to step on many toes and will need legal cover for this, it will be able to get such cover ex post facto by ordinance, later ratified in the assembly after elections are held. And this any assembly will be happy to do if for naught else, then because of the realization that the army still retains the option of imposing Martial Law.
 
But China will have to be central to any such plan. Inevitably any course correction by Pakistan which stabilizes it and is therefore to be of benefit to China, will meet great resistance from the West. It is the financial and economic segments of such resistance which Pakistan will not be able to bear. Will China be willing to pick up this slack? This would need to be cleared with them. And if they refuse, then as the old nursery rhyme says, ” we all fall down.

No Comments

America is selling out on its principles Israel continues to imprison and murder Palestinian men, women and children

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Image Credit: Luis Vazquez/©Gulf News

 

db2e1b451404a3c4

 

 

 

 

America is selling out on its principles

Israel continues to imprison and murder Palestinian men, women and children, while US politicians continue to seek Zionist dollars.

Tariq Al Maeena, Special to Gulf News
Published: 17:24 August 8, 2015

Gulf News

The United States is gearing up for the 2016 general elections. Candidates from both the Democratic and Republican parties have been making some items on their agenda public. Fuelled by the dollars provided by special interest groups and powerful lobbies, these potential victors are in the process of selling out their country.

Hillary Clinton, one of the candidates running for president in the Democratic Party, is hankering after dollars from deep pocketed American Jews and Zionist sympathisers.

Like virtually every current candidate who is looking for donors, Clinton is well aware of the economic muscle of the Israeli lobby and in order to get on their most favoured status, she recently sent a letter to billionaire Haim Saban, a man known to spend lavishly on political figures for favours in return.

Saban is an Israeli-American and a staunch Zionist who had previously gone on record to state that his ‘greatest concern is to protect Israel’. Speaking sometime back at a conference in Israel, Saban explained to the audience how he was going to achieve his objectives. His three ways to influence American politics were to “make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets”.

Hillary asked for his input on how to fight the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) movement that is gaining ground on US campuses and among those contemplating and doing business with Israel. This is part of a global response against the illegal Israeli occupation and annexation of Palestinian land.

Demanding the right to return

The BDS is also asking for full equality and freedom for Palestinians in Israel who are currently treated as second-class citizens. It also demands the right to return for those who fled Israeli atrocities over the years. One would think that such democratic principles that the US is founded on would ring a bell and find favour with Hillary Clinton, but sadly, she’s too busy trying to sell US foreign policy to those with money.

In the letter to the wealthy Zionist, Hillary asked Saban for his advice “on how leaders and communities across America can work together to counter BDS”. She stresses the need to contest the BDS campaign “with information and advocacy and fight back further attempts to delegitimise Israel”. In her spiel she also adds that “from Congress and state legislature to boardrooms and classrooms, we need to engage all people of good faith in order to explain why the BDS campaign is counterproductive to the pursuit of peace and harmful to Israelis and Palestinians alike”.

But her pandering for Zionist favour and dollars doesn’t simply end there. The two-page letter that was released to the press by Saban’s office demonstrates the level of solicitation the former US secretary of state has reached. She is very alarmed she says by such movements which are anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist. She is concerned about the ‘murderous attacks on French Jews,’ forgetting the thousands of innocent Palestinians killed by Israeli bullets, and she continues with how she first fell in love with Israel when she and her husband visited occupied Jerusalem’s old city more than 30 years ago, which is part of Palestine.

“Hillary Clinton has definitely chosen to take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

-Tariq Al Maeena

Tweet this

 

Choosing to take sides

“I am also very concerned by attempts to compare Israel with South African apartheid. Israel is a vibrant democracy in a region dominated by autocracy, and it faces existential threats to its survival. Particularly at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise across the world, especially in Europe, we need to repudiate forceful efforts to malign and undermine Israel and the Jewish people.”

Clinton has definitely chosen to take sides where the bread is being buttered. Forget democratic principle … it is the greenback instead. Clinton pens that “the Palestinians cannot unilaterally declare a state, and no one can impose a solution on Israel”. She boasts of her record as a US senator and secretary of state on Israeli issues, stating that she had opposed dozens of anti-Israel resolutions at the UN. She reminds Haim that she supported Israel after the “biased” Goldstone Report. She concludes that “time after time I have made it clear that America will always stand up for Israel, and that’s what I’ll always do as president”.

This blatant and servile stance by a candidate running for the office of the most powerful position in the world should be indeed alarming to foreign policy analysts and those who believe in justice and equality. Israel continues to imprison and murder Palestinian men, women and specially children, while US politicians continue to hanker after Zionist dollars.

Selling out the principles a great country like the United States was founded on is tantamount to prostitution.

 

Tariq A. Al Maeena is a Saudi socio-political commentator. He lives in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

, , ,

No Comments

Hindu Propaganda Against Muslim Women:Show Hindu Women & Men Speaking Indian Language As Muslim Pakistanis

 

imgres

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planted Indian Lies

RAW Story

S.Indians Portrayed As Pakistanis

Pakistani Girls caught for prostitution

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4yOPpm0U1k

, , ,

No Comments

SHOCKING KANJARS ON TV : SHAMELESS TRENDS ON CABLE TV AND FEMALE MEDIA PRESENTERS:

 

This particular video which is part of the live Morning Show is by far the sickest thing that any of us has watched on television this Ramazan. First of all there was no reason at all to invite a person like Mathira to a Ramazan special Morning Show and if she was invited the host could have made sure that no controversial topics were discussed in the show in order to show respect to this month. Not only this, a Morning Show is a family show or a show which usually women watch. No one wants to see Mathira discussing her condom advertisement and all the other cheap stuff on the show.Letter to the Editor:

 

 

 

SHAMELESS TRENDS ON CABLE TV AND FEMALE MEDIA PRESENTERS:

 

– S Roman Ahsan.

It is ironic that our female media persons come on TV dressed in shameless attire and then they think they are being good Muslimahs by uttering “Ma Sha ALLAH” and “In sha ALLAH”. Dupatta is carelessly worn on shoulder only OR not even there. Now don’t ask me why I look at them if I am so dejected by their getup because I am currently a writer having media and research background, so I have to turn on TV and study the news and reporting. The media policy is basically to be blamed and the organizers have no fear of hereafter. During Late General Zia’s tenure, the female newscasters and presenters on PTV were required to wear dupatta properly covering their heads. Everything has gone bizarre now and Qur’anic values are openly being violated. Islamic values are timeless – if the world is following Godless trends, we don’t have to pursue them necessarily. We should carve our own niche on the face of this world and be confident of Islam as the final religion !!

 

<

p style=”text-align: center;”> 

, , , , ,

No Comments

THE NIGHT OF OUR TRIALS COMING TO AN END: Pakistan: The Next Colombia Success Story?

 

light-shining-through-clouds-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pakistan: The Next Colombia Success Story?

Pakistan has the potential to be a global turnaround story. I recently spent time in-country listening to a wide range of perspectives and I am convinced that U.S. policymakers and business leaders need to look at Pakistan beyond the security lens. Getting our relationship right will require deeper thinking and action on issues around trade and investment, education, and broader economic development. The United States ought to be Pakistan’s preferred partner given its 70-year relationship. But in order to participate in the upside of the Pakistan story, the United States will need to view Pakistan not as a problem to be solved but as a potential partner. There are several changes that suggest the United States should soon act on this opportunity.

Daniel Runde
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contributor

Pakistan Think Tank & its Members Thank Mr.Daniel Runde to See the Potential in the People & Nation of Pakistan

 

I cover the opportunities for the US coming from the developing world.full bio →

 

The Pakistan of today is similar to that of Colombia in the late 1990s. Back then, words like “drugs, gangs, and failed state” were freely associated with the Andean country. Today, Colombia has a free trade agreement with the United States, a stable 3.5 percent annual GDP growth, and security is vastly improved. Similarly, Western headlines on Pakistan today gloss over the progress on the security front, the increased political stability, and incremental progress on the economic front. In spite of this potential for Pakistan, it continues to suffer from a terrible country brand that has not caught up with realities on the ground.

Action Against the Taliban

Pakistan’s improving security dynamic is the first change to note. It is hard to understate the before-and-after effects of the Taliban’s horrendous December 2014 attack on a military-owned elementary school in Peshawar that killed 145 people, including 132 schoolchildren aged eight to eighteen. Almost immediately after the attack, the military responded in force by taking out 157 terrorists via air strikes and ground operations in the North Waziristan and Khyber tribal areas adjacent to Peshawar.

What has not sunk into international perceptions about the country is the tangible consensus among government, military, and Pakistani citizens against violent terrorists including the Pakistani Taliban and the alphabet soup of other terrorist groups in and around the country. Pakistan will continue to experience attacks by fringe groups, but policymakers and investors need to stop operating as if the Pakistani Taliban is at Islamabad’s doorstep.

Political Stability

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is governing with a competent cabinet, a majority coalition, and is working in tandem with the military to deliver peace and security. Sharif was elected in Pakistan’s transition of power between democratically elected governments in April 2013 and so far, he has demonstrated enough of a commitment to democracy.

For much of last year, Sharif exercised restraint against an active opposition that led a crippling 162-day sit-in in front of the National Assembly to contest the 2013 election results. Instead of opting for an aggressive approach, Sharif wisely deferred to an independent election mission to verify the results, which recently ruled in favor of his party. The military, at the request of the Prime Minister, encouraged the crowds to disperse peacefully. The military’s decision not to use force against protesters – or the sitting prime minister – suggests that Pakistan could be on its way to further consolidating its fragile democracy.

Better Luck Around the Corridor

Chinese investment is another reason why the United States should reassess its Pakistan calculus. Since Xi Jinping first announced the $46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in 2014, the project has quickly become the centerpiece of diplomatic relations between the two countries. CPEC will include highways, railways, and oil and gas pipelines – all constructed via Chinese companies.

The CPEC project aims to connect China and Pakistan, ending in Pakistan’s Gwadar Port on the Arabian Sea.
The CPEC project aims to connect China and Pakistan, with an outlet to Pakistan’s Gwadar Port on the Arabian Sea.

Even the possibility of the scheme’s partial achievement has injected optimism in a country starved for infrastructure and energy investment. The deal has also greatly incentivized the government to clamp down on terrorist groups. Economic success is by no means guaranteed especially given China’s checkered track record of investing in infrastructure projects abroad. Still, China’s bet on Pakistan could overshadow US contributions unless we rethink our mix of engagement.

Similar to its approach in Kazakhstan, China is interested in leveraging Pakistan – in the words of Dan Twining – as a “launching pad” for greater connectivity with energy producers in the Gulf and Middle East, as well as markets in the West. The good news is that Pakistani businesses still prefer the allure of technology transfer and innovation offered by U.S. companies. But make no mistake: for Pakistanis, Chinese investment is better than no investment.

 

Pakistan: The Next Colombia Success Story?
Continued from page 1
Comment Now Follow Comments

A New Development Story

Pakistan has a population of 182.1 million people and is the 6th largest country in the world. Sixty percent of the population is of working age. By 2050, Pakistan’s total population will be nearly 300 million, making it roughly ten times the size of Afghanistan. Pakistan is also among the world’s fastest urbanizing countries with half its people projected to live in cities by 2050. Twenty years ago, Islamabad, a planned city much like Brasilia, had a population of 400,000; today, it has a population of around 3 million including the peri-urban areas. Many Pakistani cities are undergoing a similar urbanization process, and this will create massive demands on food, energy, water, and consumer goods.

At the same time, macroeconomic and structural reforms over the last several governments have narrowed the budget deficit and raised GDP growth to a stable 4.5 percent despite large energy deficits, and built foreign reserves up to over $17 billion. Low oil prices and the $14 billion in annual remittances the country receives from its 6 million-strong diaspora have also helped. There has been substantial progress in reducing poverty, which has fallen to 13.6 percent in 2011 from 35 percent in 2002; in rural areas, poverty has dropped from 40 to 15 percent during the same period. While there is some debate on the accuracy of these numbers, there has been clear progress. In May, Standard and Poor upgraded Pakistan’s credit rating from stable to positive.

Pakistan is the world’s 26th largest economy in terms of purchasing power parity. Its national economic growth plan, Vision2025, aims much higher. With 90 percent of the country employed through SMEs, Pakistan has one of the most entrepreneurial economies in the world. Complete foreign equity is permitted in the infrastructure and manufacturing sectors, helping drive FDI to $1.45 billion in 2013, a 76 percent increase over the previous year but still far too small for such a big country.

Next Steps for International Engagement

As Pakistan gradually improves on a number of fronts, so should its relationship with the United States. Clearly, Pakistan wants more than just traditional foreign aid. During my visit, a prominent Pakistani intellectual and influencer told me that “if the United States isn’t going to build stuff, then it shouldn’t don’t bother.” Given the smaller budget envelope for U.S. infrastructure projects (the largest infrastructure project built by the United States in the last decade is the new U.S. embassy), assistance should be geared towards facilitating infrastructure investment particularly in the water and energy sectors.

Specifically, the United States should encourage regulatory and policy reform and encourage greater US investment using specialized agencies including Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the U.S. Trade Development Agency and USAID’s Development Credit Authority. Negotiations for a U.S.-Pakistan Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) have stalled due to reservations on both sides, but a successfully concluded BIT would be a strong signal of certainty and stability for US based investors interested in deeper engagement in Pakistan. This might be a good topic for discussion when Prime Minister Sharif visits DC in October.

A high level Pakistani official told me of their need for at least Pakistani 10,000 PhDs from the US in the near future. The United States should find more ways to increase educational opportunities for Pakistani students especially in critical areas such as urban planning, public administration, agriculture, and STEM.

Currently, the U.S. relationship with the country has been limited to a risk mitigation paradigm. However, the changes outlined above warrant a reframing of the way countries such as the United States engage with Pakistan’s government and especially its private sector. Pakistan is on a hopeful path and with the right mix of assistance and private investment, the United States can participate in Pakistan’s upside and remain a strategic partner.

 

This article previously stated that projections indicate Pakistan’s population will approach 300 million by 2025. It has been edited to indicate this will occur by 2050.

forbes.com
Pakistan: The Next Colombia Success Story?

Original URL:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielrunde/2015/08/03/pakistan-the-next-colombiasuccess-story/

, , , , ,

No Comments