Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for category Zionist-Hindutva axis of evil

BREAKING: Clashes BEGIN in Israel As IDF Deploy Troops First time in History!

Based on recent news and analyses from June 2025, there are varying perspectives on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s actions and policies.

Criticisms and Controversies:

  • Handling of the Gaza War: Netanyahu faces mounting criticism both domestically and internationally for his handling of the war in Gaza.
  • Political Manipulation: He has been accused of manipulating the war for political gain, potentially endangering hostages held in Gaza.
  • Gaza Strategy: There is criticism regarding the effectiveness of his Gaza strategy, with some questioning whether he has a clear plan for the future of the region after the conflict.
  • International Isolation: Israel has become increasingly isolated internationally, with criticism mounting from various countries.
  • Domestic Discontent: Netanyahu’s actions have led to increased anger and protests within Israel, particularly regarding the handling of hostage release efforts.
  • Health and Psychological Fitness: Concerns have been raised regarding his mental health and fitness for office, although these claims are contested.
  • Judicial Overhaul: His push to reshape Israel’s judicial branch has faced significant opposition.
  • Actions Regarding Aid: There have been reports and accusations regarding Israeli actions that have impacted humanitarian aid distribution in Gaza. 

Actions and Political Manoeuvring:

  • Potential Shift in Priorities: Recently, there have been indications that Netanyahu is prioritizing the return of hostages over the complete defeat of Hamas, which could signify a shift in his approach to the war.
  • Support for Anti-Hamas Factions: Netanyahu has admitted to supporting an armed group in Gaza that opposes Hamas.
  • Handling of Corruption Cases: The war has provided him with a strategic opportunity to delay court proceedings related to corruption charges against him.
  • Navigating Coalition Politics: Netanyahu is maneuvering to maintain the stability of his coalition government, which includes far-right elements.
  • Engagement with Regional Challenges: He has taken actions against Iran and the Syrian regime, which some analysts interpret as efforts to strengthen Israel’s position in the region. 

Overall Situation:

  • Netanyahu is currently facing significant domestic and international pressure.
  • While his actions have led to increased tensions, he continues to navigate a complex political landscape.
  • His future political survival is uncertain, with many factors potentially influencing the situation. 

No Comments

Surprising TRUTH Revealed by Indian Defence Expert: Pakistan’s Growing Power in Iran-Israel Tensions -Israelis Beg for Pakistan’s Support. Pakistan stands with our Iranian Brothers.

  • Military Strength: Global Firepower ranks Pakistan’s military as the 12th strongest globally. The Asia Power Index also places Pakistan at 16th in terms of comprehensive power. 
  • Middle Power: Pakistan is generally considered a middle power, with a relatively strong military and some influence in regional affairs. 
  • Superpower: While Pakistan possesses a notable military and some diplomatic influence, it does not have the global reach and dominance associated with superpowers like the United States, China, or Russia. 
  • Regional Influence: Pakistan is a significant player in South Asia and has some influence in the broader Asian region. 
  • Pakistan defeated number 12 India many times..according to Facebook rating of nations.
  • 2025 Pakistan Military Strength – The GFP index denotes Pakistan as a Top 15 global military power. For 2025, Pakistan is ranked 12 of 145 out of the countries.
  • Pakistan is considered a middle power nation, with the world’s seventh-largest standing armed forces.

    Pakistan’s Democracy: A Familiar Drama With The Same Power Players – OpEd
    By Saad Hafiz
    Elections are held. Parliaments are sworn in. Civilian governments take their seats. On paper, democracy in Pakistan looks alive and well.
    But scratch the surface, and a different story emerges.
    The real power doesn’t lie in parliament. It never has. It rests with the military, the judiciary, senior bureaucrats, and a small elite. They operate behind closed doors, far from public scrutiny. And they’ve been doing so for decades.
    That’s why democracy here often feels like a performance. The script changes. The actors rotate. But the directors stay the same.
    This imbalance shapes more than just politics. It affects the country’s biggest decisions—from nuclear policy to foreign relations, and from internal security to major economic projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Civilian leaders, no matter how popular, are rarely in the driver’s seat.
    Why does this happen? One major reason lies within the political parties themselves.
    Most aren’t built on democratic principles. They revolve around powerful families and loyal followers. Leadership is passed down like an inheritance. Dissent is discouraged. Debate is rare. In many ways, parties act more like exclusive clubs than vehicles for real change.

    This vacuum of leadership gives the military more space to step in, without even taking over officially. They don’t need to. Their influence is already baked into the system. Civilian governments often defer to generals, out of habit or fear. Parliament, meanwhile, sits quietly on the sidelines.
    To understand why, we need to look back.
    Pakistan inherited a centralised colonial system. It was built for control, not for inclusion. After independence, that system remained intact. A small class of generals, landowners, and business elites kept it running. They had no reason to share power. And they still don’t.
    The result? Public services that fail. Corruption that thrives. And citizens who feel ignored—except during elections. For many, democracy exists only in those brief, hopeful moments at the ballot box. After that, it vanishes into a fog of frustration.
    Yet the desire for democracy is real. It’s deep. It’s persistent.
    People still vote. They protest. They speak up. Movements like the lawyers’ protests in 2007 showed what’s possible. The 18th Amendment in 2010, which gave more power to provinces, was a hard-won gain.
    But progress has been slow—and uneven.
    Local governments, which should be the foundation of democracy, are often the first to go. Provincial leaders see them as a threat. Without strong grassroots institutions, democracy can’t grow from the bottom up. It stays distant. It stays elite.
    Frustrated citizens often turn to other power centres—judges, technocrats, even the military. These players might offer short-term fixes. But they rarely offer lasting solutions. And every time they step in, they weaken democratic institutions a little more.
    Pakistan’s history is full of these detours—military coups, judicial interventions, backdoor deals. None have solved the root problems: weak governance and a lack of representation. Civilian governments, for their part, have struggled to present a credible alternative.
    So where do we go from here?
    The first step is political reform. Parties must open up. They need fresh voices, real debate, and a break from dynasties. Parliament must reclaim its power—especially on security and foreign affairs.
    The military must return to its professional role. The judiciary must stop acting like a political force.
    Local governments need real authority. People need to feel their voices count—not just during elections, but every day. Education should teach critical thinking, not just rote learning. And the media must stay free and fearless.
    The international community also has a role. Too often, foreign governments focus only on security or investment. They should also support civil society, push for reforms, and invest in democratic institutions—not just strongmen.
    Pakistanis have shown incredible resilience. They vote. They organise. They fight for change, even when the odds are against them. That’s the country’s greatest democratic strength.
    But now the real question is this: Are those in power—civilian and military alike—willing to let go, share authority, and trust the people?
    The future depends on that answer.
    Reference:
    This article was published at The Friday Times


    Saad Hafiz
    Saad Hafiz is an analyst and commentator. He can be reached at shgcci@gmail.com.

Pakistan is considered an emerging power and a middle power in Asia, it’s not generally viewed as an emerging superpower. Pakistan has a strong military, including nuclear weapons, and is recognized as a key player in regional security, particularly due to its role in counterterrorism efforts. However, its economic development and influence in global affairs are not yet on par with what is typically associated with a superpower. 

  • Middle Power Status: Pakistan is often categorised as a middle power, meaning it possesses significant regional influence and capabilities but doesn’t wield the global reach and influence of a superpower. 
  • Military Strength: Pakistan has a large and well-equipped military, ranking among the top 15 global military powers, and possesses nuclear weapons. 
  • Regional Influence: Pakistan’s strategic location, particularly its role in counterterrorism efforts, gives it significant regional influence, especially in South Asia. 
  • Economic Development: Pakistan’s economy is developing, and while it has seen growth, it’s not yet at the level of major global economic powers. 
  • CPEC: The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a major infrastructure project that is expected to boost Pakistan’s economy and connectivity, potentially increasing its regional influence. 
  • Balancing Act: Pakistan navigates complex geopolitical relationships, balancing its ties with the US, China, and other regional powers. 
  • No Superpower Status: While Pakistan has strengths and potential, it faces challenges in terms of economic development, social progress, and achieving a truly global influence that would be necessary to be considered a superpower. 
  • Emerging Power: The term “emerging power” generally refers to countries that are experiencing rapid economic growth and increasing global influence, and in this sense, Pakistan can be considered an emerging power. 

Key Points in Isreal – Pakistan Relations Past. Present, and Future

The history of Israel-Pakistan relations is complex and includes instances of both cooperation and tension. 

  • Early Attempts at Diplomacy: David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, attempted to establish diplomatic ties with Pakistan in 1948, but the effort was unsuccessful.
  • Intelligence Cooperation: Despite their lack of formal diplomatic relations, Pakistan and Israel have engaged in intelligence cooperation, particularly during the Cold War.
  • Potential for Mediation: Some Israeli leaders see Pakistan as a potential mediator between Israel and the Muslim world, including Arab states.
  • Unofficial Contacts: There have been reports of unofficial and covert contacts between Israeli and Pakistani officials over the years.
  • Recent Discussions: Recent reports suggest that the US has discussed with Pakistan the possibility of promoting peace between Israel and Iran. 

It is important to note that:

  • Pakistan’s official stance remains one of non-recognition of Israel until a viable solution is reached with Palestine.
  • Any suggestion of engagement with Israel often faces political and public backlash in Pakistan

No Comments

Hundreds of Iranian Missiles DESTROY Tel Aviv – ISRAEL Under Heavy Attack

Tel Aviv residents left homeless after Iranian missiles cause massive destruction

Explosions also tear through Petah Tikva, Bnei Brak and Haifa, destroying buildings and shattering lives

 1

The scene where a ballistic missile fired from Iran hit and caused damage in Tel Aviv, June 16, 2025. (Erik Marmor/Flash90)

Buildings three blocks away from the site of an overnight Iranian missile impact in Tel Aviv showed signs of damage, including cracked windows, on Monday.

Closer to the impact site, businesses and apartments were largely bombed out. A 15-story high-rise overlooking the impact site over a parking lot was left entirely windowless.

Despite the paucity of safe rooms in the area, only four people were hurt in the attack and treated for light to moderate injuries, Tel Aviv’s Ichilov Hospital said.

Two buildings were completely destroyed by the blast. Emergency services were still working to clear the rubble early Monday afternoon as officers, soldiers and a large group of curious civilians milled about.

Nearby, a mobile municipality command center coordinated the evacuation of affected residents to hotels.

Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Editionby email and never miss our top storiesNewsletter email addressGet it

By signing up, you agree to the terms

As anguished-looking residents waited on the sidewalk with bags and suitcases, one resident with a large black suitcase asked to retrieve valuables from his apartment within the cordoned-off zone, just across from buildings being razed. A security guard told him it would be impossible until the demolition was over.

“It could take 20 minutes, it could take three hours,” said the guard.

Dorit and Ofer, who live about five buildings down from the fall site, said they heard a huge boom as they sheltered in the packed community safe room during the attack. Their own apartment escaped relatively okay, they said.

Advertisement

Israeli security and rescue forces stand where a ballistic missile fired from Iran hit in Tel Aviv, June 17, 2025. (Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90)

“Some windows broke, walls cracked,” said Dorit. “But it’s not like that,” she added, pointing across the street to a newly windowless apartment building.

Business owners in the area swept up glass, taking stock of what remained.

A sex shop, a liquor store and a Russian restaurant were among the businesses that were all but destroyed.

Elsewhere, eight people were killed and dozens were injured overnight as Iranian missiles struck central and northern Israel for a third straight night, with direct hits in Petah Tikva, Bnei Brak, and Haifa, in addition to the significant damage to Tel Aviv’s city center.

The barrage shattered windows, punched holes through apartment buildings, and left streets across the area littered with glass and debris.

In Petah Tikva, four people were killed when a missile slammed into a residential building, collapsing part of the structure and igniting a fire that tore through multiple floors.

Advertisement

“We were in the [protected room] and luckily weren’t physically harmed,” Dor Tzun, who lived with his family in the building, told Ynet. “Suddenly, we heard a huge boom. We knew the building was hit, and I immediately told my mother, ‘There’s been a hit,’ because the house was flying.”

“I had a panic attack for at least half an hour — it took me a while to get my bearings. I was shaking — I’ve never had this happen to me in my life. The living room was destroyed. The bathroom, the entire hallway.”

Responders inspect a damaged building following a strike by an Iranian missile in Petah Tikva on June 16, 2025. (Jack GUEZ / AFP)

However, their shelter room was unscathed, he noted. “Nothing happened to it.”

Another man was killed in neighboring Bnei Brak after shrapnel from an intercepted missile struck him near his home.

The ALEH rehabilitative campus in Bnei Brak, devastated by an Iranian missile, June 16, 2025 (Eliezer Feinstein / ALEH)

The same missile struck the ALEH rehabilitative campus in Bnei Brak — Israel’s leading center for children with severe physical and cognitive disabilities. The blast shattered windows, collapsed parts of the structure, and destroyed essential therapy rooms and equipment, leaving the facility inoperable.

The building’s public bomb shelter, intended to protect local residents, was locked at the time of the attack, and dozens were forced to flee elsewhere, narrowly escaping the collapse.

The ALEH rehabilitative campus in Bnei Brak, devastated by an Iranian missile, June 16, 2025 (Eliezer Feinstein / ALEH)

“We were met with destruction in every corner,” said Rabbi Yehuda Marmorstein, founder and CEO of ALEH, which serves 300 children.

“Classrooms, mobility equipment, therapy rooms — all gone. But the greatest pain is knowing that these children, who need around-the-clock treatment, are now left without it.”

Israeli security and rescue forces at the scene where a ballistic missile fired from Iran hit and caused damage in Bnei Brak, June 16, 2025. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

The overnight attacks brought the total number of people killed in Israel since the Iranian missile campaign began Friday to 24.

Though most incoming projectiles were intercepted, Israel’s multi-layered air defense system was unable to prevent all of the damage. Authorities warned that further attacks may follow, and urged residents to remain near shelters as rescue and recovery efforts continued into the day.

Israel targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and senior military brass early Friday morning at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran, which vows to destroy Israel, from attaining nuclear weapons.

In response, Iran has launched massive, deadly barrages totaling hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel.

No Comments

Deadly Iranian Wave of Attacks on Israel – Hundreds of Ballistic Missiles Hit Tel Aviv and Haifa: No Escape for Israel from Iran’s HellFire

Residential areas in Israel take ‘direct hit’ after series of Iranian drone and missile attacks

The death toll from Iranian strikes on Israel continue to rise overnight as Israel and Iran exchange more missile and drone strikes. Israel’s national emergency service Magen David Adom (MDA) reported a “direct hit” on a residential building in the Palestinian-Israeli town of Tamra, killing at least three women and a 13-year-old girl. A later wave of strikes struck buildings in a residential area in the central Israeli city of Bat Yam, killing at least four.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/15/world/video/iran-strikes-israeli-residential-digvid

Mr. Inbar, the space and missiles expert, said that Israel was not surprised by Iran’s missile capabilities, having already been the target of large barrages of similar projectiles in April 2024 and October 2024, when Iran retaliated for Israeli strikes on its territory and interests.

The Houthi militia, an Iran-backed group based in Yemen, has also been firing ballistic missiles at Israel, saying it is acting in solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza.

But the Houthis tend to fire a single missile in a day, and most of them have been intercepted by Israeli and American air defense systems.

The difference this time, Mr. Inbar said, was the quantity of missiles that Iran fired simultaneously, in an effort to overwhelm air defenses, and the fact that some impact sites have been in densely populated areas, where just the shock waves cause extensive damage.

He said some footage released by the Israeli military on Saturday showed at least one type of missile that Iran had not fired at Israel before. Named the “Shahed Haj Qassem,” it has a range of nearly 1,000 miles.

It is a solid propellant missile that does not need to be refueled before launching, Mr. Inbar said, meaning that it can sit underground for years and become operational within minutes.

Excerpt from The New York Times

Isabel Kershner, a Times correspondent in Jerusalem, has been reporting on Israeli and Palestinian affairs since 1990.

No Comments

Undiminished Scars of 1971 Tragedy Part-3 by Brig.Gen(Retd) Asif Haroon Raja

Undiminished Scars of 1971 Tragedy

Part-3

 

“Refusal to learn from history is not unique to a particular ruler: It is a general failing of governments and people”. George Hegel

 

Asif Haroon Raja

 

UN Resolutions vetoed by USSR

After 4 Dec, all the resolutions moved in the UNSC were vetoed by the Soviet Union. On 8 Dec, Bhutto as Vice PM had been sent to New York to find a diplomatic solution to the East Pakistan (EP) crisis by arranging a ceasefire. He took a circuitous route and reached there in 3 days. He chose a leisurely course and took things lightly when EP was falling. On 14th December Poland presented a draft resolution that obviously had the backing of the USSR. It called for the transfer of power to the elected representatives, followed by a ceasefire, withdrawal of forces and later evacuation of Pakistani forces.

On 15 Dec, Bhutto made an emotional speech that was hardly relevant and then rejected the Polish resolution in a theatrical fashion, tore his notes and walked out of the meeting in a huff. Lt Gen Jacob stated later on that passage of the Polish resolution would have been disastrous for India and that it was Bhutto who saved the day for India. (Lt Gen Joseph Jacob, Surrender at Dacca, p 146).

Dying Moments

Indian Eastern Command intercepted the flurry of confusing signals transmitted between GHQ and Dacca from Dec 7 onwards and directed Commander Communication Zone, Maj Gen Nagra on 15 Dec to race for Dacca and pull a fast one on Gen Niazi that the game was over. All the major Indian formations were behind the rivers. Not a single Pakistani formations/units fighting the war had capitulated.  

Nature had given Gen Niazi a chance to stand up to the threat and enter his name in the golden Islamic history as a real tiger. He chose to give up under the plea of saving the lives of thousands of soldiers. Maj Gen Tajammul Hussain, my Brigade Commander on the Hilli front, who had given me a smashing war report, wrote is his book, “The Story of My Struggle, 1991, p 159, “Niazi was basically not a coward but he was made a coward by the cowards around him”.

No results could be achieved by the counter offensive launched on the western front where a ceasefire came into place.

“No General can vindicate his loss claiming that he was compelled against his better judgment to execute an order that led to the defeat”. Field Marshal Von Manstein

East Pakistan

 

 

 

     

The Aftermath

 

Biharis Abandoned

 

After the surrender, 35000 Pak Army all ranks and non-combatants serving in units and HQs, 13000 EPCAF and Police personnel and 48000 non-Bengali civilians including their families were taken into safe custody of the Indian Army and later shifted to already established PoW camps in India. The Biharis were left to fend for themselves. Gen AA K Niazi and his negotiating team didn’t insist on including them in the repatriation list. They were left at the mercy of marauding Mukti, Qadri, Mujib and several other Bahinis who massacred them brutally and raped their women. The occupying Indian Army made no effort to stop the bloodshed since they were busy in looting, in carnival pleasures and nocturnal merrymaking. Hundreds of mass graves were dug to dump their bodies. The dried wells were filled with their dead bodies. Brutalities of the MBs were lumped on Pak Army.

 

10% Bengalis wanted independence

 

According to Professor G.W Choudhury, a Bengali member of Yahya’s cabinet and a fellow of Columbia University writes in his book, (The Last Days of United Pakistan, Oxford University Press, p. 167), ‘The vast majority of the Bengali Muslims were not prepared to see Pakistan dismembered and their homeland become again a target of domination by the ‘Bhadralok (elite) from Calcutta. They were interested in having genuine regional autonomy. In fact, their basic demand was for the improvement of their economic lot. Mujib captured their imagination because he promised them a ‘golden Bengal’ if they would only vote for his six points —‘

 

Propaganda War

 

The bizarre figures of 3 million Bengalis killed and 300,000 women raped by Pak Army in 9 months were dispelled by several western and Bengali authors including Sharmila Bose in her book ‘Dead Reckoning. She said that during her ground investigations, despite her best efforts she couldn’t get any evidence that soldiers of Pak Army had targeted Bengali women and children. In her view the highly exaggerated figures were given to arouse the sentiments of the public. She also negated the story of mass killings of students in Dacca University saying her probe revealed that all schools, colleges and university were closed and no one was living in the university hostel except for AL militants who had stacked big dumps of arms and ammunition and used to impart military training to the students.  

 

R.J. Rummel in his book ‘Death by Government’, writes about the atrocities committed by militant Bengalis against on-Bengalis: “In the whole of EP, non-Bengalis were attacked and were subjected to torture and ethnic cleansing. Thousands of Muslim families were wholly eliminated; women were raped and their breasts were cut with specially carved knives. The children of the victim women were also not spared. Thousands of surviving children had to live a torturous life. In Chittagong, Khulna, and Jessore, dead bodies of 20,000 Biharis were discovered. A cautions guess gives a figure of 2.50 lacs non-Bengalis killed at the hands of MB”.  

 

Between 1972 and 1974, Indian military and civil writers with the assistance provided by the Indian government published 270 books on the 1971 War and this trend continued over the years. The purpose was to justify Indian military’s intervention into EP, hide their crimes against humanity and build a narrative to prove that the myths of slaughter of 3 million Bengalis and rapes of 300,000 Bengali women by the Pak Army were true, and that the numbers pitched against Indian Army were 93000. 

 

Sustained Indo, Russian, Western propaganda together with publication of large numbers of books by Indian, western and Bengali authors helped India in portraying the Pak Army soldiers as bloodthirsty monsters and rapists and in convincing the world that Gen Yahya Khan’s regime and Pak Army were responsible for the dismemberment of united Pakistan and creation of Bangladesh (BD).

 

Their false narrative gained authenticity since Pakistan first remained mum over the slaughter of Biharis and non-Bengalis in March 1971, fearing that disclosure of the news would result in a backlash in West Pakistan (WP). After the surrender, Pakistan again chose to remain tightlipped till the leakage of Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report in 2001. Our silence helped India to convert their lies into truth. Our muteness and absence of authentic information gave rise to speculation, fabrication and distortion of facts by vested interests.

 

Looting by Indian Army

 

Soon after the creation of BD, the Indian Army went on a looting spree like hungry parasites. They took away war munitions, heavy guns, army vehicles, private cars of West Pakistanis, household items including bathroom fittings, fridges, ceiling fans, TVs, radios, electronic items, factories machinery, food grains, jute, yarn, canned food etc. Trains and thousands of trucks were looted and it was estimated that the loot was valued $ 2.2 billion. (Martin Woolla cott. The Guardian, Jan 22, 1972). Others who wrote in detail about the plunder were Sunil Gangapadhyay in his novel Purbha Pashchin, Maj MA Jalil MB 9 Sector Comd in his book (Araksmita Swadhinata-e-Paradhinata), Maj Shawkat Ali, MB 5 Sector Comd, Zainal Abedin in his book Rape of Bangladesh, J.N. Dixit in his book Liberation of Bengal: Indo-Bangladesh Relations.   

 

In the truncated Pakistan, Lt Gen Gul Hassan and Air Marshal Rahim Khan forced Gen Yahya to resign and Bhutto sitting in New York was given a call to come and take over the reins of power. After taking over, Bhutto wore three hats of President, CMLA and Chief of Armed Forces. Yahya was interned and a probe under chief justice Hamoodur Rahman ordered the mandate of which was confined to the military debacle in EP, making the postmortem controversial. Mujib was released from jail on 8 Jan 1972 and sent to Dacca. Lt Gen Gul Hassan was appointed COAS but he and Air Marshal Rahim were sacked four months later on charges that they had Bonaparte tendencies. Superseded Lt Gen Tikka Khan replaced Gul. After fascist rule of Bhutto, he was ousted by Gen Ziaul Haq in a military coup in July 1977 and Bhutto was hanged to death on 4 April 1979. After General Zia’s death in a C-130 crash in Aug 1988, Benazir Bhutto was elected, but the ten-year democratic era saw power changing between the PPP and the PML-N under Nawaz Sharif four times. Gen Musharraf’s 9-year rule couldn’t upturn the economic fortunes of the country. Thereon, the 5-year each rule of PPP under Zardari and of PML-N under Nawaz dipped all the economic indicators of the country and exacerbated moral and social issues. So far the incumbent PTI regime has been unable to cure the diseases of Pakistan and the economy is declining and provincialism has gained ground.         

 

In Bangladesh, Sheikh Mujib carried out witch-hunting of Bihars and patriotic Bengalis favoring One-Pakistan, and sought trial of 195 WP officers in alleged war crimes. He could survive for a few years only and on Aug 15, 1975, he along with 22 other family members were killed in a military coup led by Maj Farooq and Maj Rashid. Khondkar Mushtaq after remaining in the president’s chair for two months was deposed in another coup on Nov 3, 1975 which brought Brig Khalid Musharraf to power. After 4 days, he was toppled in a military coup and Maj Gen Ziaur Rahman was chosen to lead the country. After ruling for six years, he was assassinated and Gen Hussain Ershad ruled the roost till he was defeated by Mrs. Khalida Zia in elections in 1991. In the 1997 elections, Sheikh Hasina Wajid won and ruled for the next five years. She sentenced 15 army officers to death in Nov 1998. After another stint of Khalida, Hasina again came to power in 2008. She is still in the chair and has made impressive socio-economic improvements.         

 

To be continued

 

The writer is Brig, war veteran, defence analyst, international columnist, author of five books, sixth book under publication, Chairman Thinkers Forum Pakistan, Director Measac Research Centre. asifharoonraja@gmail.com

  

 

, , , , , ,

No Comments