Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for October, 2014

Must Watch VIDEO:BERMUDA TRIANGLE OF PAKISTAN–Fazal ur Rehman, Javed Hashmi & Talat Hussain

banker-pig-in-suit-counts-his-wealth-via-Shutterstock1-615x345

, , ,

No Comments

PAKISTANI BUSINESS PORTAL: Kaymu.pk participates in DigiMark Conference 2014

DIGIMARK

Kaymu.pk participates in DigiMark Conference 2014

[Lahore, 15th October 2014]:

Kaymu.pk, an online marketplace, participated in the recently concluded Digital Marketing Conference 2014 (DigiMark 2014) to help promote Pakistan’s digital and e-commerce industry. Kaymu’s Co-Managing Director Asia Region, Mr Ahmed Khan, was part of the panel discussing the role of digital media in retail branding.

Speaking at the event Mr. Khan commented, “Pakistan’s economy as a whole has finally started embracing digital and online platforms as a viable outlet to promote their businesses. While our ecommerce industry is still lagging behind compared to other nations in the region, the advent of 3G and 4G service has expedited the growth process. The future of ecommerce in Pakistan is bright.”

DigiMark 2014 was aimed at providing a platform to the giants of Pakistan’s digital landscape to express their views on this growing industry. A number of speakers from highly reputed organizations were present at the event giving them an opportunity to share ideas on how to boost the ecommerce and digital industry in Pakistan.

Some of the prominent participants at the event included Salman Mazhar, Head of Marketing at Wateen Telecom; Mr. Obaid Saleem, Director Strategy & Planning at Zong; Mobilink’s Director B2B Marketing Mr. Ehitsham Rao; Mr. Zeeshan Suhail, Manager Public Affairs for Nestle; and many others.

The event was also attended by aspiring students to gain an insight into the developments of the digital industry.

Ecommerce is a booming industry in Pakistan and it is believed that its contribution towards the country’s economy will increase significantly in the next few years.

                                                                        —End—

 

For Further Information Contact:

Name: Haseeb Malik

Designation: Manager Communication/Head of PR, Kaymu.pk

Phone: 0092 345 4992427

Email: [email protected]

 

Editor’s Note:

About Kaymu.com

 

Kaymu is the best online marketplace operating in close to 30 countries worldwide. On Kaymu you can buy products at the most affordable prices. Products available on the website include smartphones, computers, fashion and clothing, home appliances, cars and real estate and much more. Merchants wishing to sell their products can use Kaymu to expand their business and increase the outreach and profits without any hike in their overhead costs.

PAKISTAN THINK TANK DISCLAIMER:

WE PUT INFORMATION ON LEGITIMATE PAKISTANI BUSINESSES AT NO COST

HOWEVER, WE DO THIS TO PROMOTE PAKISTANI PRODUCTS. WE RECOMMEND THAT ANY COMPANY DOING BUSINESS WITH A PAKISTANI COMPANY MUST DO THEIR DUE DILIGENCE THROUGH PAKISTANI COMMERCIAL COUNCILLORS IN PAKISTAN EMBASSIES.

 

 

 

,

No Comments

Why stop at Isis when we could bomb the whole Muslim world? ​by George Monbiot

 

 

 

 

Why stop at Isis when we could bomb the whole Muslim world?

 

 

 

images-4

 

 

 

 

Humanitarian arguments, if consistently applied, could be used to flatten the entire Middle East

 

George Monbiot

The Guardian,

30 September 2014

 

​’Now we have a new target, and a new reason to dispense mercy from the sky, with similar prospects of success.’ Photograph: ASAP/ECPAD/Corbis

 

Let’s bomb the Muslim world – all of it – to save the lives of its people. Surely this is the only consistent moral course? Why stop at Islamic State (ISIS), when the Syrian government has murdered and tortured so many? This, after all, was last year’s moral imperative. What’s changed?

 

How about blasting the Shia militias in Iraq? One of them selected 40 people from the streets of Baghdad in June and murdered them for being Sunnis. Another massacred 68 people at a mosque in August. They now talk openly of “cleansing” and “erasure” once Isis has been defeated. As a senior Shia politician warns, “we are in the process of creating Shia al-Qaida radical groups equal in their radicalisation to the Sunni Qaida”.

 

What humanitarian principle instructs you to stop there? In Gaza this year, 2,100 Palestinians were massacred: including people taking shelter in schools and hospitals. Surely these atrocities demand an air war against Israel? And what’s the moral basis for refusing to liquidate Iran? Mohsen Amir-Aslani was hanged there last week for making “innovations in the religion” (suggesting that the story of Jonah in the Qur’an was symbolic rather than literal). Surely that should inspire humanitarian action from above? Pakistan is crying out for friendly bombs: an elderly British man, Mohammed Asghar, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, is, like other blasphemers, awaiting execution there after claiming to be a holy prophet. One of his prison guards has already shot him in the back.

 

Is there not an urgent duty to blow up Saudi Arabia? It has beheaded 59 people so far this year, for offences that include adultery, sorcery and witchcraft. It has long presented a far greater threat to the west than ISIS now poses. In 2009 Hillary Clinton warned in a secret memo that “Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida, the Taliban … and other terrorist groups”. In July, the former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, revealed that Prince Bandar bin Sultan, until recently the head of Saudi intelligence, told him: “The time is not far off in the Middle East, Richard, when it will be literally ‘God help the Shia’. More than a billion Sunnis have simply had enough of them.” Saudi support for extreme Sunni militias in Syria during Bandar’s tenure is widely blamed for the rapid rise of ISIS. Why take out the subsidiary and spare the headquarters?

 

The humanitarian arguments aired in parliament last week, if consistently applied, could be used to flatten the entire Middle East and west Asia. By this means you could end all human suffering, liberating the people of these regions from the vale of tears in which they live. Perhaps this is the plan: Barack Obama has now bombed seven largely Muslim countries, in each case citing a moral imperative. The result, as you can see in Libya, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan,Yemen, Somalia and Syria, has been the eradication of jihadi groups, of conflict, chaos, murder, oppression and torture. Evil has been driven from the face of the Earth by the destroying angels of the west.

 

Now we have a new target, and a new reason to dispense mercy from the sky, with similar prospects of success. Yes, the agenda and practices of ISIS are disgusting. It murders and tortures, terrorises and threatens. As Obama says, it is a “network of death”. But it’s one of many networks of death. Worse still, a western crusade appears to be exactly what ISIS wants. Already Obama’s bombings have brought ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra, a rival militia affiliated to al-Qaida, together. More than 6,000 fighters have joined Isis since the bombardment began. They dangled the heads of their victims in front of the cameras as bait for war planes. And our governments were stupid enough to take it.

 

And if the bombing succeeds? If – and it’s a big if – it manages to tilt the balance against Isis, what then? Then we’ll start hearing once more about Shia death squads and the moral imperative to destroy them too – and any civilians who happen to get in the way. The targets change; the policy doesn’t. Never mind the question, the answer is bombs. In the name of peace and the preservation of life, our governments wage perpetual war.

 

While the bombs fall, our (Western) states befriend and defend other networks of death. The US government still refuses – despite Obama’s promise – to release the 28 redacted pages from the joint congressional inquiry into 9/11which document Saudi Arabian complicity in the US attack. In the UK, in 2004 the Serious Fraud Office began investigating allegations of massive bribes paid by the British weapons company BAE to Saudi ministers and middlemen. Just as crucial evidence was about to be released, Tony Blair intervened to stop the investigation. The biggest alleged beneficiary was Prince Bandar. The SFO was investigating a claim that, with the approval of the British government, he received £1bn in secret payments from BAE.

 

And still it is said to go on. Last week’s Private Eye, drawing on a dossier of recordings and emails, alleges that a British company has paid £300m in bribes to facilitate weapons sales to the Saudi national guard. When a whistleblower in the company reported these payments to the British Ministry of Defence, instead of taking action it alerted his bosses. He had to flee the country to avoid being thrown into a Saudi jail.

 

There are no good solutions that military intervention by the UK or the US can engineer. There are political solutions in which our governments could play a minor role: supporting the development of effective states that don’t rely on murder and militias, building civic institutions that don’t depend on terror, helping to create safe passage and aid for people at risk. Oh, and ceasing to protect, sponsor and arm selected networks of death. Whenever our armed forces have bombed or invaded Muslim nations, they have made life worse for those who live there. The regions in which our governments have intervened most are those that suffer most from terrorism and war. That is neither coincidental nor surprising.

 

Yet our (Western) politicians affect to learn nothing. Insisting that more killing will magically resolve deep-rooted conflicts, they scatter bombs like fairy dust.

 

A fully referenced version of this article can be found at monbiot.com

 

George Monbiot is the author of the bestselling books The Age of Consent: A Manifesto for a New World Order and Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain, as well as the investigative travel books Poisoned Arrows, Amazon Watershed and No Man’s Land. His latest book is Feral: Searching for Enchantment on the ­Frontiers of Rewilding
Reference George Monbiot

, , ,

No Comments

Pakistani Poets: Hamesha Dair Ker Deta Hoon Mein By Muneer Niazi

 

 

 

 

 

 

pakistan-flag1


No Comments

The New York Times A ‘Homeland’ We Pakistanis Don’t Recognize By Bina Shah

The New York Times

Bina Shah

Bina Shah became a contributing opinion writer for The International New York Times in the fall of 2013. Ms. Shah is a fiction writer and journalist in Karachi, Pakistan. She is the author of four novels — “Where They Dream in Blue,” “The 786 Cybercafe,” “Slum Child” and “A Season for Martyrs” — and two collections of short stories. Her work has been published in English, Spanish, German, Chinese, Vietnamese, Urdu, Sindhi and Italian. She writes a monthly column for Dawn, the largest English-language newspaper in Pakistan, and a blog, 21st Century Woman. She has contributed essays to The Guardian, The Independent, the literary magazines Granta and Wasafiri, and the journal Critical Muslim.

 

 

 

 

Racism, Bigotry, & Islamophobia is Rampant in Western Press with New York Times & Washington Post in the Lead:EveryMuslim with a beard is Al-Qaeda: Its like saying,”Every Jew with a shull-cap is Netanyahu”:The Biggest Racists in Western Societies Are Journalists, whose mostly Jewish Backgrounds Make Them Perceive an Islamic Nuclear Nation as a natural threat to their Promised Land: Israel

India is the most Islamophobic Nation.It skillfully hides it Anti-Pakistan Viciousness by Perpetrating Acts of Terrorism By Proxy in Pakistan Via its Afghanistan Abdullah Abdullah Northern Alliance Portal of CAS

 

cartoon_indian-afghan-terror-in-pakistan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A ‘Homeland’ We Pakistanis Don’t Recognize

 

 

By

BINA SHAH

 KARACHI, Pakistan — When I heard that the fourth season of Showtime’s “Homeland” would be set in Pakistan and Afghanistan, I awaited its season premiere with anticipation and trepidation. A major American television show would be portraying events set in my country, but I knew those events would be linked to the only thing that seems to interest the world’s eye: terrorism and how Islamist extremism affects Americans and the West.
   As advertising for the season premiere was heating up, a short essay by an American writer and activist, Laura Durkay, appeared on The Washington Post’s website under the headline “Homeland Is the Most Bigoted Show on Television.” Ms. Durkay wrote, “The entire structure of ‘Homeland’ is built on mashing together every manifestation of political Islam, Arabs, Muslims and the whole Middle East into a Frankenstein-monster global terrorist threat that simply doesn’t exist.”
   The show’s reputation along those lines had kept me away, even as I longed to examine Claire Danes’s portrayal of Carrie Mathison as a conflicted C.I.A. agent immersed in a male-dominated world, and engaging with Middle Eastern and Muslim characters. How could the show’s creators have dreamed up such a complex protagonist, while depicting the sociopolitical milieu in which so many of its characters exist with so little nuance?
   Yes, Hollywood isn’t known for historical accuracy or impartial portrayals of any fictionalized “other.” But I still couldn’t resist trying to see what Pakistan, my homeland, looked like through its eyes. I’m a writer of fiction, so I know about imagined worlds. You look not for complete truthfulness, but for verisimilitude — the “appearance of being true” — so it can give your art authenticity, credibility, believability. And we in Pakistan long to be seen with a vision that at least approaches the truth.
   Pakistan has long been said to have an image problem, a kind way to say that the world sees us one-dimensionally — as a country of terrorists and extremists, conservatives who enslave women and stone them to death, and tricky scoundrels who hate Americans and lie pathologically to our supposed allies. In Pakistan, we’ve long attributed the ubiquity of these images to what we believe is biased journalism, originating among mainstream American journalists who care little for depth and accuracy. By the time these tropes filter down into popular culture, and have morphed into the imaginings of showbiz writers, we’ve gone from an image problem to the realm of Jungian archetypes and haunting traumatized psyches.
   Whenever a Western movie contains a connection to Pakistan, we watch it in a sadomasochistic way, eager and nervous to see how the West observes us. We look to see if we come across to you as monsters, and then to see what our new, monstrous face looks like. Again and again, we see a refracted, distorted image of our homeland staring back at us. We know we have monsters among us, but this isn’t what we look like to ourselves.
   There have been previous international attempts to portray Pakistan on film: “A Mighty Heart,” about the kidnapping and murder of Daniel Pearl; or “Zero Dark Thirty,” about the assassination of Osama bin Laden. The Pearl film was shot largely in India, with some scenes in Pakistan; the Bin Laden film was shot in Jordan and India; in these and other films, streets and shops in India were given nominal Pakistani makeovers, and Indian actors were hired to pass as Pakistanis. In them, I have seen India’s signature homemade Ambassador cars traveling down Pakistani streets; actors who play tribal Pashtuns but look Bihari; Western women wearing chadors where they don’t have to, or going around bareheaded when they should be covered.
   In the season premiere of “Homeland,” Carrie Mathison orders an airstrike on a terrorist compound in a Pakistani tribal area bordering Afghanistan. It is utterly surreal for a Pakistani to watch a fictional imagining of the dreaded strike from the viewpoint of the person ordering it in an American control room: the disconnection, the studied casualness, the presenting of a birthday cake afterward. It’s not clear who the monsters are in this scene, even before it’s revealed that the strike hit a wedding party, killing women and children. It’s a moment of obvious reversal, but also of nuance, when I wasn’t expecting it.
   Still, the season’s first hour, in which Carrie also goes to Islamabad, offers up a hundred little clues that tell me this isn’t the country where I grew up, or live. When a tribal boy examines the dead in his village, I hear everyone speaking Urdu, not the region’s Pashto. Protesters gather across from the American Embassy in Islamabad, when in reality the embassy is hidden inside a diplomatic enclave to which public access is extremely limited. I find out later that the season was filmed in Cape Town, South Africa, with its Indian Muslim community standing in for Pakistanis.
   I realize afterward that I’ve been creating a test, for the creators of “Homeland” and all who would sell an imagined image of Pakistan: If this isn’t really Pakistan, and these aren’t really Pakistanis, then how they see us isn’t really true.
   A verse in the Quran says, “Behold, we have created you all out of a male and a female, and have made you into nations and tribes, so that you might come to know one another.” Even after everything that’s happened between us, we in Pakistan still want you to know us, not as you imagine us, but as we really are: flawed, struggling, complex, human. All of us, in the outside world as well as in Pakistan, need art — film and television, story and song — that closes that gap between representation and reality, instead of prying the two further apart.
     Bina Shah  is the author of several novels, including “Slum Child,” and short-story collections.  ■

PUBLISHED OCTOBER 15, 2014

, ,

No Comments