Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for April, 2014

Foreign Control of News Media

Foreign Control of News Media

 

Inam Khawaja

 

 

 

 

 

In 1961 Syed Wajid Ali a prominent industrialist in a joint venture with Nipon Electric Company (NEC) started the TV in Pakistan shortly after a few test transmissions by the joint venture Ayub Government took over the project in “national interest”. The first TV Station of Pakistan Television Corporation (PTV) was started on 26, November 1964 from Lahore set-up by Aslam Azhar and Zaka Durrani, followed by Dhaka in 1965, shortly thereafter in 1965 the third station was set up in Islamabad/Rawalpindi, and the fourth in Karachi in 1966. Stations were set up in Quetta and Peshawar by 1974 and in 1976 PTV began colour transmission.

In October 1999 when Musharraf usurped power by a coup d’ etat Pakistan had a single TV network PTV and a few private channels. In 2002 Musharraf permitted private channels to operate and even broadcast their own news and current affairs content and in his superior wisdom even permitted foreign ownership in the name of freedom of expression!!

As a result of this disastrous blunder today several TV channels are almost fully or partially foreign owned. No one can deny that the policy of the media reflects the interests of its owners.

The Jung/New Group set up The Independent Media Corporation. The ownership of this media group is reported on the internet to include; Anil Ambani (of India), an American Group and the Mir Shakilur Rehman family. One wonders why the Jung does not contradict this internet report.

Mir Ibrahim Rehman was awarded the Robert F. Kennedy award for public service at Harvard University.He is the first Muslim and only the second person from South Asia to receive this coveted award. The award was given for his work in getting Pakistan an independent judiciary and for working for peace between Pakistan and India—The Aman-ki-Asha program. His Paper covered the idea of changing the public narrative. The question is which public was Mir Ibrahim serving? American, Israeli or Pakistani? Geo TV seems to serve Indian agendas – the Indian theme of “common culture”.

I am afraid to say that there is no such thing as “South Asian Culture”. However there are two totally different Hindu and Muslim Cultures. There is hardly anything common between these cultures: language, script (left to right versus right to left), literature, poetry, music, architecture, dress, food (even the method of serving food is different), method of greeting, all the rituals i.e. birth, marriage, death, and finally the way of thinking.

As far back as 1934 The Joint Select Committee on Indian Constitutional Reforms of the House of Commons Session stated;

“Two third of its inhabitants profess Hinduism in one form or another as their religion, over seventy five million are followers of Islam; and the difference between the two is not only in religion in the stricter sense but also of law and culture. They may be said to indeed represent two distinct civilizations. Hinduism is distinguished by the phenomena of its caste which is the basis of its religion and social system. The religion of Islam on the other hand is based upon the concept of the equality of man”. (House of Commons UK 1933-34, Volume1, para 1).

I am afraid that in spite of what Indians, Aman-ki-Asha and Geo TV may say for political or economic reasons the facts on the ground are what has been enumerated and stated above.

The International Herald Tribune (IHT) is the international edition of The New York Times, and the Pakistani newspaper The Express Tribune is in partnership with the IHT which they state on their front page. We are given a copy of the IHT daily with The Express Tribune but people foolishly ask no questions! How can a newspaper of the quality of International Herald Tribune be printed and distributed for Rs 19.00 (19 cents) all over Pakistan?

The electronic media in their entertainment programs are promoting Hindu culture (Bollywood) and highly objectionable programs like “JALWA”. My question to the owners of these TV channels is would they like their daughters or sisters to perform these dances?

Furthermore one would like to know why the Pakistan Censor Board is allowing the free uncensored broadcast of films and programs with objectionable content on various TV channels.

One would like PEMRA to disclose in public interest the exact ownership of all the TV channels. The viewers must be aware as to who is paying for and thus controlling the policy of these talk shows and programs on various TV channels.

August 3, 2013

Business Recorder – 14, August 2013.

 

, ,

No Comments

HAMID MIR ATTACK, A BLACK OPS TO DEMONIZE ISI GLOBALLY, GEO AND HAMID MIR FAMILY OF KASHMIRIS SERVING FOREIGN INTERESTS

INDOPHILE GEO & HAMID MIR FAMILY TRYING TO PIN HAMID MIR ATTACK 

ON PAKISTAN 

INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ISI

Hamid Mir said ‘hold ISI Chief responsible in case of attack’: Amir Mir

 images-1

HAMID MIR’S BROTHER CONTINUES TO DEMONIZE ISI

 



“This visit has provided me so much inside knowledge of United States and also given me direction to gain more knowledge about USA. It will ultimately help me during my documentaries, reports, talk shows and newspaper articles to discuss issues of both countries in a more balanced way and with new approach as I will always compare the situation with my new perspective which I gained during this visit.” Shabbir Ahmad, Producer, Geo TV, Islamabad

 

 

GEO has been a Trojan Horse of India and US in Pakistan Media. It is the most admired channel in India and depicts Indian culture as a heritage of Pakistan. However, that is far from the truth. If it was so, then Pakistan should have stayed as a part of Colonial Empire and never opted for Independence.

As soon as Hamid Mir incident happened, GEO launched a frontal attack on Pakistan’s Intelligence agencies, particularly the ISI. Since, the time of the incidents, non-stop parade of media personalities, anchors, commentators, talking heads, and pro-India media gurus like Absar Alam are appearing on GEO and either blatantly or obliquely blaming ISI. Hypothetically speaking, what has ISI to gain from shutting-up Hamid Mir? Nothing! It is India’s RAW which will use its media agents comprising of every Hindu Media person to propagandize and demonize ISI 24/7 on TV Channels in India. 

 

Pakistan is currently ruled by a foreign imposed regime led by Hamid Mir’s fellow Kashmiri Nawaz Sharif, who is going to use Hamid Mir attack as another weapon against Pakistan Army and its Intelligence agencies. Already virulently anti-Armed Forces Anchors have taken over programs on GEO, the Trojan Horse of RAW and promoter of Aman Ki Asha propaganda. The host of “JIRGA,” a Pro-Afghan and Anti-Pakistan Army anchor, Saleem Safi has launched a diatribe implicating, “Hidden Forces,” obliquely implying the role of Pakistan’s Intelligence agencies in attack on Hamid Mir. The denizen in South Block of New Delhi must be working feverishly to play this canard to international media. Why so many attacks on ISI in the media? Nothing beats success. ISI is a victim of its success. Nothing beats success. Today it is rated as the No.1 Intelligence Agency in the world, by even its enemies in the West. Its rivals, CIA, Mossad, and RAW and trailing far behind, but trying their utmost to destroy this Pakistan’s wall of steel through its agents not only within Pakistan media but also through the ruling political coterie which feed off the billions of dollars pumped into their Cayman Island and Dubai Bank Accounts. The only ones who can defend ISI are the 180 M people of Pakistan and the rank and file of its Armed Forces. A tsunami of propaganda against ISI has been launched from foreign enemies through their Trojan horse agents like Saleem Safi and Absar Alam of GEO. It is a sacred duty of every Pakistanis at home and abroad to stand like an impregnable wall to Pakistan’s first line of defence, namely, ISI.

 

HAMID MIR’S BROTHER CONTINUES TO DEMONIZE ISI

 

 

Senior journalist Amir Mir, brother of Hamid Mir, has accused Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Chief Lt. Gen. Zaheerul Islam of involvement in today’s attack on Geo News anchorperson of international fame.

 

 

 

Talking to Geo News, Amir Mir said his brother Hamid Mir had already disclosed to him as to where to point finger in case of an attack on the latter.

 

 

 

“ISI Chief had worked out my assassination plot,” he quoted Hamid Mir as saying, and added, ‘in case of an attack ISI Chief Zaheerful Islam and some other officials of ISI will be responsible”.

 

 

 

Further quoting the words of his seriously injured brother, who is currently fighting the battle of his life in Agha Khan Hospital, Amir Mir said: “Some elements of ISI harbor extreme hostility against me for my opinion, views and stance on Pervez Musharraf and issues of Balochistan.”

 

 

 

Amir Mir said that Hamid Mir had greater threats from the ISI than from the terrorists.

 

 

 

He said his brother had recorded a video message and dispatched it to the Committee to Protect Journalists. Hamid Mir had also in advance informed Jang Group, government, army as well as his family members (about the threats), he added.

 

 

 

Amir Mir said he had advised Hamid Mir to migrate to Dubai.

 

 

Additional Reading

 

VIDEO ON PAKISTAN MEDIA PROSTITUTES ON FOREIGN PAYROLL: ARE THEY THREAT TO PAKISTAN’S NUCLEAR SECURITY?

A SOUL-SCATHING REMARKS OF A US ATTORNEY GENERAL, WHO ONCE SAID: PAKISTANIS WILL SELL THEIR MOTHERS FOR 100 DOLLARS.

PAKISTAN-UNITED STATES JOURNALISTS EXCHANGE;
Some Pakistani Journalists are
Presstitutes

 

NAMES OF PRESSITITUTES

Mr. Shabbir Ahmad, Producer, Geo TV Network, Islamabad

Mr. Mahboob Ali, Correspondent, Geo TV Network, Mingora, Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Mr. Sajid Hussain, Assistant Editor, The News International, Karachi

Mr. Abdul Ghani Kakar, Chief Investigative Reporter, Daily Awam, Quetta, Balochistan 

Mr. Azam Khan, Reporter, Radio PakistanCharsadda, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Ms. Aneela Khalid Khan, Freelance Reporter, Radio Mashaal, Islamabad

Ms. Sumeera Riaz, News Producer, Express News TV, Lahore

Ms. Imrana Saghar, Reporter, Daily Express, Multan, Punjab

Mr. Mushtaq Sarki, Reporter, Sindh TV News, Karachi

Ms. Hafsah Syed, Executive Producer/Head of Features, Dawn News TV, Karachi

 

These pressititutes can also serve as agents during secret operations by Delta Force in Pakistan. They are familiar with Pakistan’s nuclear sites and high security areas. in times of need, like Dr.Afridi,spy, who used his vaccination program as cover, they can act as guides for foreign forces to Pakistan’s secret sites, where nuclear weapons are stored. That will spell the end of Pakistan as we know it.
Definition:
Press Prostitutes, who sell their conciences and their nation for a price)
 
The Going Price for Press Prestitutes of Pakistan
 
A trip to Hawaii, USA
Free wine and liquor at Western Embassy parties in Islamabad
Bribes- and a few dollars given under the table,
these fifth columnists will sell their own mothers, let alone Pakistan.
Who are the biggest enemies of Pakistan? They are a few Pakistani journalists and media personalities from Duniya and Express News, who will sell their souls to the devil, in their view, “to hell with Pakistan, what is in it for me.”

The Pakistan-United States Journalists Exchange program is designed to increase and deepen public understanding (code words for propaganda) of the two countries and their important relationship, one that is crucial to regional stability and the global war on terrorism. While there have been many areas of agreement and cooperation, deep mistrust remains between Americans and Pakistanis, who rarely get opportunities to engage with each other and thus rely on media for their information and viewpoints. Unresolved issues continue to pose challenges for both countries.

 

A PROPAGANDA SPIN MAKER PROGRAM WITH LOLLIPOPS FOR SHOPPING & VISITS TO US TO PAKISTANI PRESS PROSTITUTES

This exchange offers U.S. and Pakistani journalists an opportunity to gain on-the-ground insights and first hand information about the countries they visit through meetings with policymakers, government and military officials, business and civil society leaders, and a diverse group of other community members.All participants meet at the East-West Center in Hawaii before and after their study tours for dialogues focused on sensitive issues between the two countries; preconceived attitudes among the public and media in both the United States and Pakistan; new perspectives gained through their study tours; and how media coverage between the two countries can be improved. Ten Pakistani journalists will travel to the United States and ten U.S. journalists will travel to Pakistan.

THE BAIT

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry and National Intelligence Service must ban such free junkets to nurture future spies and agents from Pakistani journalist community.

Pakistani public should become aware of the foreign agents in Pakistani press and media.

This East-West Center program is funded by a grant from the U.S. Embassy Islamabad Public Affairs Section.

The program provides journalists with valuable new perspectives and insights on this critically important relationship, a wealth of contacts and resources for future reporting, and friendships with professional colleagues in the other country upon whom to draw throughout their careers.

“The briefings in Honolulu, and especially the trip to Pakistan, put the disparities between the Pakistani and American narratives in high relief. This more textured understanding of the underlying causes of the tensions will help me in my analyses of U.S. policy in this critical part of the world. It also will have me better prepared to anticipate, identify and consider the implications of the scheduled U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2014.” John Diaz, Editorial Page Editor, San Francisco Chronicle

“This visit has provided me so much inside knowledge of United States and also given me direction to gain more knowledge about U.S.A. It will ultimately help me during my documentaries, reports, talk shows and newspaper articles to discuss issues of both countries in a more balanced way and with new approach as I will always compare the situation with my new perspective which I gained during this visit.” Shabbir Ahmad, Producer, Geo TV, Islamabad

Click on the following links to view slideshows from the 2012 program: U.S. journalists in Pakistan and Pakistani journalists in the U.S.

2013 PAKISTAN-U.S. JOURNALISTS EXCHANGE

Program Dates: March 6-23, 2013

Study Tour for Pakistani Journalists (March 8-20):  Washington, D.C., New York City and Columbia, Missouri*

Pakistani journalists will have an opportunity to explore U.S. policy toward Pakistan and learn more about the U.S. system of government and democracy during a visit to Washington, D.C. The New York City program will feature discussions about media coverage of Pakistan and the residual effects of 9/11 on U.S. relations with the Muslim world and the experience of Muslim Americans in the United States. Finally, participants will see a very different part of America in Columbia, Missouri. The prestigious Missouri School of Journalism will host a program that includes discussion sessions covering media topics such as roles and responsibilities of media in a democracy; the media’s relationship with government, military and business; and the use of new media and new technologies for newsgathering. It also will provide unique opportunities to experience small town and rural Midwestern American life and a chance to interact with American citizens from diverse backgrounds. The program will include several public forums for Pakistani participants to share their perspectives with American audiences.

*Please note: Due to travel time, Pakistani participants will need to depart Pakistan March 5 and will return on March 26. All journalists will return through Islamabad for a debriefing session with the U.S. Embassy Islamabad staff on March 27. Pakistani participants will return to their home cities from Islamabad on March 27 in the afternoon. Please see draft Travel Calendar for Pakistani journalists for details.

Study Tour for the U.S. Journalists (March 9-19): Islamabad and Lahore, Pakistan

American journalists will have a chance to better understand the situation on the ground in Pakistan and explore Pakistani attitudes and perspectives toward the United States. Meetings will focus on Pakistan’s system of government and democracy, its economic and development challenges, the war on terrorism and rising extremism, as well as the role of the United States and its policies in Pakistan. Additionally, they will have a chance to observe Pakistan’s media environment and discuss coverage of the United States. The program will start in the capital city of Islamabad for meetings with policymakers, political leaders, analysts, students, civil society organizations and others who can provide journalists with a deeper understanding of Pakistan. Journalists will then travel to Lahore, Pakistan’s cultural capital, to explore economic and development issues, religion, and politics, and to better understand Pakistan’s history and culture. The program will also feature home visits with Pakistani families and an opportunity to engage with a wide range of Pakistani citizens.

Draft Travel Calendar for American journalists

Honolulu Program (March 6-8, and March 21-23)

The program opens with two-days of briefings and discussions for the Pakistani and American journalists at the East-West Center in Honolulu (March 6-8. Journalists will engage in dialogue sessions on the key issues and challenges in the Pakistan-U.S. relationship. After their respective study tour programs, the journalists will return to Honolulu (March 21-23) to share their new perspectives on the relationship and one another’s countries based on their on-the-ground meetings and visits, and will discuss ways to improve media coverage of the issues and of one another’s countries.

Who Can Apply:

Pakistan: Professional print, broadcast (radio and TV), and online journalists in Pakistan who meet the following eligibility requirements:

  • Working in Urdu or local language media;
  • No previous travel experience in the United States;
  • Minimum five years working experience;
  • Ability to communicate in English in a professional, multi-cultural environment;
  • Citizen of Pakistan.

American: Professional print, broadcast (radio and TV), and online journalists with a minimum of five years experience. Must be an American citizen. Preference will be given to journalists who have not previously traveled to Pakistan.

Funding: Round trip airfare to Honolulu and for the study tour travel, lodging, visa expenses and per diem to cover meals and incidentals are provided by the East-West Center through a grant from the U.S. Embassy Islamabad Public Affairs Section.

Application Deadline: Wednesday, August 29, 2012

How to Apply:

Please submit the following:

  • Pakistan-U.S. Journalists Exchange Application Form. (When using the form, please be sure to save a copy to your computer using “save as” before typing in any content)
  • Resume or CV (maximum two-pages, but which includes work experience and education background);
  • Cover letter (maximum two-pages) outlining your interest in the program; a brief introduction to your news organization, your role in the organization and how it relates to the program; and what you expect to accomplish by participating in the program. For Pakistani journalists, please comment on your particular areas of interest for the journalism sessions in Columbia, Missouri.
  • For the dialogue in Honolulu, you will be asked to provide a perspective from your country on one of the following aspects of the Pakistan-US relationship. Please choose the topic of greatest interest to you andwrite a paragraph(maximum one page) sharing your perspective on and interest in that topic.

– Fighting terrorism and extremism in Pakistan;
– U.S. aid to Pakistan;
– Economic cooperation between the U.S. and Pakistan;
– Challenges faced by the media in the U.S. or Pakistan in reporting U.S.-Pakistan relations.

  • Letter of recommendation from a supervisor describing your suitability for the Exchange and the benefit your organization hopes to derive from your participation in the program. Freelance or non-traditional journalists should send a reference from a professional familiar with their work. Letter should be on organization letterhead with signature.
  • Names, titles and contact information of two people who may be contacted by the Center as references. They should be professional contacts who can talk about your work as a journalist.

Please do not send materials other than what is requested. Please send applications by fax or email to:

ATTN:  Pakistan-U.S. Journalists Exchange

E-mail: [email protected]

Fax: 808 944-7600

If you do not receive confirmation of your application within 5 days, please check back.

For questions about your application please contact:
Ms. Marilu Khudari, Secretary, East-West Seminars: 808 944-7384, [email protected]

Application Process:

All written applications will be reviewed by an East-West Center Selection Committee. After the first round, applicants may be contacted for a phone interview with one or several members of the Committee. Phone calls may also be made to supervisors and references. After all phone interviews have been conducted, the Selection Committee will reconvene to make its final decisions. Typically the process takes 6-8 weeks. We will inform journalists of the results by October 30, 2012.

2012 PAKISTAN-U.S. JOURNALISTS EXCHANGE

The 2012 Pakistan-U.S. Journalists Exchange was held from April 6-22 and provided nine Pakistani and six American journalists the opportunity to visit each other’s country and learn firsthand the complexities of the relationship between their two countries.

Both groups met at the East-West Center before and after their study tours for two days of dialogue sessions. In pre study tour sessions, journalists shared perspectives from their country on some of the key issues in the Pakistan-U.S. relationship: fighting terrorism and extremism, U.S aid to Pakistan, the economic relationship and media coverage. After their study tours, journalists shared their new insights. American journalists gained an appreciation of the complex challenges facing Pakistan and the significant impact of the war on terror on daily life, and the Pakistani journalists emphasized their new understanding of America’s system of governance and people.

The Pakistani journalists started their 9-day U.S. visit in Washington, D.C., where they met with officials at the U.S. State Department, shared lunch at the Pentagon with soldiers who had served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and participated in a press conference with Congressmen Dana Rohrabacher and Louie Gohmert on their controversial proposals for Baluchistan’s right to self-determination.Through meetings with analysts and visits to America’s monuments and institutions, including a special night tour of the U.S. Capitol by former Congressman Jim Moody, the Pakistani journalists gained insights into the American system of government that helped them to better understand American policy and decision-making in Pakistan. American businesses already in Pakistan or hoping to invest there shared the difficulties in dealing with Pakistan’s bureaucracy. The next stop was New York City, where they had a round table with editors at the New York Times; met with Jewish and Muslim leaders about religious rights and dialogue in America; talked with Muslim-American youth and activists about life in America since 9/11; and observed how Americans continue to mourn their lost loved ones at the newly opened National September 11 Memorial and Museum. Their last destination was Columbia, Missouri where they had a rich program coordinated and hosted by the prestigious Missouri School of Journalism. They learned the latest media trends and tools from media experts and experienced life in the US heartland, participating in a Palm Sunday service at a Methodist church, visiting a farm, talking with students at a local high school, and being hosted by local host families.

The American journalists started their travel in Islamabad, Pakistan’s capital, with a program organized by PILDAT. They explored the Pakistan-U.S. relationship with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Pakistan’s army, the U.S. Embassy, analysts, aid workers, and politicians. They gained first hand perspectives on U.S. aid through visits to projects funded by the U.S., hearing from beneficiaries of USAID projects, and talking with other NGOs working in Pakistan. Meetings in Karachi, Pakistan’s bustling business center and port, juxtaposed Pakistan’s contrasts; the journalists visited a secular school in a slum set up by The Citizen’s Foundation that requires families to send daughters to school if they are to admit their sons, followed by a visit to Jamia Binoria, a conservative madrassah. A discussion with heads of American companies doing business in Pakistan and a visit to a factory struck a hopeful tone for Pakistan’s economic future with its large youth population and huge untapped market despite the major energy, security and stability challenges, which journalists were experiencing firsthand. Rolling black outs were a regular part of life, and on the journalists’ first day in Karachi the city was shut down by a strike called by the main political party, MQM, in response to recent political killings. The journalists met with leaders of MQM to ask questions about these tactics and were able to explore public attitudes through dinners with local host families, meetings with university students, and discussions with members of Pakistan’s Youth Parliament. Pakistan’s harsh realities, especially for journalists, also were brought home to the Americans when an editor they met in a round table with senior staff at Dawn newspaper was killed two weeks later (see links to related stories below).

In their stories that resulted from the program and in public presentations along the way, journalists offered unique insights into relations between the United States and Pakistan; the wars in Afghanistan and against terrorism; on-the-ground perspectives of Americans and Pakistanis about each other’s countries; difficulties and dangers faced by Pakistan’s media; and how their perspectives had changed after traveling in the two countries.

“My perception towards the real state of affairs between Pakistan and the U.S. has changed a great deal. These kinds of exchange programmes and people-people contacts are of immense importance to bridge the ever-widening gap between the two sides.” (Pakistani journalist, 2012 program)

“I can already feel how beneficial the deeper perspective on Pakistan and the complications to the US-Pak relationship that I gained from this trip will be to my editing. The questions that I’ll ask my writers, the stories that I’ll assign, the context that will be there have all just gotten a power boost.” (American journalist, 2012 program)

Pakistani journalists shared their perspectives at a forum in Washington, D.C. and in interviews with Global Journalist at the Missouri School of Journalism.

Pakistani and American journalists shared their experiences from the program at a public forum in Honolulu.

 

 

,

No Comments

ANGRY STUDENT IN INDIA CRUSHES HINDU god SHIV’S PENIS, AFTER FAILING COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAM (SSC):SHIV LOSES HIS IDOLHOOD

OUCH! OUCH! OUCH! SHIV LINGAM (PENIS) CRUSHED BY ANGRY STUDENT IN INDIA, AFTER

FAILING SSC EXAM:SHIV LOSES HIS IDOLHOOD

 PENIS WORSHIP IN INDIA:

Shiv Lingam (Shiv’s Penis) Crushed By an Angry Student Munikumar Tirupati (23) in India. He is Arrested for Causing Mortal Pain to Hindu god Shiva 

Man stamped on Shiva lingam after failing SSC exams (link)

 

 

PICTURES OF SHIV LINGAM, A ROCK PENIS WORSHIPPED IN INDIA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

1600 × 1200 – wayfarersandpathfinders.blogspot.com

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

Two brothers from Panvel have been arrested for uploading a photograph on a social networking website depicting one of them desecrating a Shiva lingam. According to the police, the accused, Munikumar Tirupati (23) had committed the act because of his fourth consecutive failure in his SSC exams, despite ardently praying to lord Shiva each time.
Why cannot we take things in our hands? We ought to blame god and scriptures for everything? What kind of belief is that?

 

Mumbai: Man desecrates Lord Shiva idol after failing SSC exam

ibnlive.in.com

Frustrated after failing despite praying to Lord Shiva, the accused had uploaded a photograph of himself desecrating the idol. He and his brother were arrested after the picture went viral.

 

 

  

Two brothers from Panvel have been arrested for uploading a photograph on a social networking website depicting one of them desecrating a Shiva lingam.

Police had arrested the duo while they were at a relative?s house in Panvel on Thursday. Both the accused were laying low after the photo they uploa..

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2012/aug/020812-mumbai-Man-stamped-on-Shiva-lingam-after-failing-SSC-exams.htm
 
 
 

, ,

No Comments

NOAM CHOMSKY: UNDER CORRUPT AND REGRESSIVE NAWAZ SHARIF, PAKISTAN HAS NO FUTURE

NOAM CHOMSKY:

UNDER CORRUPT AND REGRESSIVE NAWAZ SHARIF,

PAKISTAN HAS NO FUTURE

On recharge of 100 Rupees, 34.5 tax will be deducted in the form of Tax.

 

 

Dekho Dekho Kon Aya

 

 

Ghidar Aye, Kargil Ka Bhagora Kughoo Ghidar Aya 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a93dab9e3aa136198a26ae7b4308-grande

 

 

 

 

Noam Chomsky: Under corrupt and regressive Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan has no future Professor Emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Noam Chomsky, is without doubt the most widely heard and read public intellectual alive today. Although trained in linguistics, he has written on and extensively critiqued a wide range of topics, including US foreign policy, mainstream media discourses and anarchist philosophy. Chomsky’s work in linguistics revolutionised the field and he has been described as the ‘father of modern linguistics‘. Professor Chomsky, along with other luminaries such as Howard Zinn and Dr Eqbal Ahmad, came into prominence during the anti-Vietnam War movement in the 1960s and has since spoken in support of national liberation movements (and against US imperialism) in countries such as Palestine, El Salvador and Nicaragua. In fact, his prolificacy in terms of academic and non-academic writing has earned him a spot among the ten most cited sources of all time (alongside Aristotle, Marx and Plato). Now in his mid-80s, Professor Chomsky shows no signs of slowing down and maintains an active lecturing and interview schedule. Here we caught up with him to get his views on upcoming Pakistani elections, American influence in the region and other issues. As a country which has spent almost half of its existence under some sort of direct military rule how do you see this first ever impending transition from one democratically-elected government to another? Noam Chomsky: Well, you know more about the internal situation of Pakistan than I do! I mean I think it’s good to see something like a democratic transition. Of course, there are plenty of qualifications to that but it is a big change from dictatorship. That’s a positive sign. And I think there is some potential for introducing badly needed changes. There are very serious problems to deal with internally and in the country’s international relations. So maybe, now some of them can be confronted. Coming to election issues, what do you think, sitting afar and as an observer, are the basic issues that need to be handled by whoever is voted into power? NC: Well, first of all, the internal issues. Pakistan is not a unified country. In large parts of the country, the state is regarded as a Punjabi state, not their (the people’s) state. In fact, I think the last serious effort to deal with this was probably in the 1970s, when during the Bhutto regime some sort of arrangement of federalism was instituted for devolving power so that people feel the government is responding to them and not just some special interests focused on a particular region and class. Now that’s a major problem. Another problem is the confrontation with India. Pakistan just cannot survive if it continues to do so (continue this confrontation). Pakistan will never be able to match the Indian militarily and the effort to do so is taking an immense toll on the society. It’s also extremely dangerous with all the weapons development. The two countries have already come close to nuclear confrontation twice and this could get worse. So dealing with the relationship with India is extremely important. And that of course focuses right away on Kashmir. Some kind of settlement in Kashmir is crucial for both countries. It’s also tearing India apart with horrible atrocities in the region which is controlled by Indian armed forces. This is feeding right back into society even in the domain of elementary civil rights. A good American friend of mine who has lived in India for many years, working as a journalist, was recently denied entry to the country because he wrote on Kashmir. This is a reflection of fractures within society. Pakistan, too, has to focus on the Lashkar [Lashkar-i-Taiba] and other similar groups and work towards some sort of sensible compromise on Kashmir. And of course this goes beyond. There is Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan which will also be a very tricky issue in the coming years. Then there is a large part of Pakistan which is being torn apart from American drone attacks. The country is being invaded constantly by a terrorist superpower. Again, this is not a small problem. Historically, several policy domains, including that of foreign policy towards the US and India, budget allocations etc, have been controlled by the Pakistani military, and the civil-military divide can be said to be the most fundamental fracture in Pakistan’s body politic. Do you see this changing with recent elections, keeping in mind the military’s deep penetration into Pakistan’s political economy? NC: Yes, the military has a huge role in the economy with big stakes and, as you say, it has constantly intervened to make sure that it keeps its hold on policy making. Well, I hope, and there seem to be some signs, that the military is taking a backseat, not really in the economy, but in some of the policy issues. If that can continue, which perhaps it will, this will be a positive development. Maybe, something like what has happened recently in Turkey. In Turkey also, for a long time, the military was the decisive force but in the past 10 years they have backed off somewhat and the civilian government has gained more independence and autonomy even to shake up the military command. In fact, it even arrested several high-ranking officers [for interfering in governmental affairs]. Maybe Pakistan can move in a similar direction. Similar problems are arising in Egypt too. The question is whether the military will release its grip which has been extremely strong for the past 60 years. So this is happening all over the region and particularly strikingly in Pakistan. In the coming elections, all indications are that a coalition government will be formed. The party of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif is leading the polls with Imran Khan’s (relatively) newly-emerged party not far behind. Do you think an impending coalition government will be sufficiently equipped to handle the myriad problems facing the country that you have just pointed out, such as civil-military imbalance, drone attacks, extremist violence etc. NC: Well, we have a record for Nawaz Sharif but not the others. And judging by the record, it’s pretty hard to be optimistic. His [Sharif’s] previous governments were very corrupt and regressive in the policies pursued. But the very fact that there is popular participation can have impact. That’s what leads to change, as it has just recently in North Africa (in Tunisia and Egypt). As far as change goes, significant change does not come from above, it comes through popular activism. In the past month or so, statements from the US State Department and the American ambassador to Pakistan have indicated quite a few times that they have ‘no favourites’ in the upcoming elections. What is your take on that especially with the impending (formal) US withdrawal from Afghanistan? NC: That could well be true. I do not think that US government has any particular interest in one or another element of an internal political confrontation. But it does have very definite interests in what it wants Pakistan to be doing. For example, it wants Pakistan to continue to permit aggressive and violent American actions on Pakistani territory. It wants Pakistan to be supportive of US goals in Afghanistan. The US also deeply cares about Pakistan’s relationship with Iran. The US very much wants Pakistan to cut relations with Iran which they [Pakistan] are not doing. They are following a somewhat independent course in this regard, as are India, China and many other countries which are not strictly under the thumb of the US. That will be an important issue because Iran is such a major issue in American foreign policy. And this goes beyond as every year Pakistan has been providing military forces to protect dictatorships in the Gulf from their own populations (e.g. the Saudi Royal Guard and recently in Bahrain). That role has diminished but Pakistan is, and was considered to be, a part of the so-called ‘peripheral system’ which surrounded the Middle East oil dictatorships with non-Arab states such as Turkey, Iran (under the Shah) and Pakistan. Israel was admitted into the club in 1967. One of the main purposes of this was to constrain and limit secular nationalism in the region which was considered a threat to the oil dictatorships. As you might know, a nationalist insurgency has been going on in Balochistan for almost the past decade. How do you see it affected by the elections, especially as some nationalist parties have decided to take part in polls while others have decried those participating as having sold out to the military establishment? NC: Balochistan, and to some extent Sindh too, has a general feeling that they are not part of the decision-making process in Pakistan and are ruled by a Punjabi dictatorship. There is a lot of exploitation of the rich resources [in Balochistan] which the locals are not gaining from. As long as this goes on, it is going to keep providing grounds for serious uprisings and insurgencies. This brings us back to the first question which is about developing a constructive from of federalism which will actually ensure participation from the various [smaller] provinces and not just, as they see it, robbing them. It is now well-known that the Taliban’s creation was facilitated by the CIA and the ISI as part of the 1980s anti-Soviet war. But the dynamics of the Taliban now appear to be very different and complex, in both Afghanistan and Pakistan, as they attack governments and mainstream parties. Some people say that foreign intelligence agencies are still behind the Taliban, while others consider this a denial of home-grown problems of extremism and intolerance. How do you view the Taliban in the context of Pakistan? NC: I can understand the idea that there is a conspiracy. In fact, in much of the world there is a sense of an ultra-powerful CIA manipulating everything that happens, such as running the Arab Spring, running the Pakistani Taliban, etc. That is just nonsense. They [CIA] created a monster and now they are appalled by it. It has its roots in internal Pakistani affairs. It’s a horrible development and phenomenon which goes back to radical Islamisation under Zia and taking away the long standing rights of people in the tribal areas (who were left largely alone). The Pashtuns in particular are kind of trapped. They’ve never accepted the Durand Line nor has any Afghan government historically accepted it. Travel from what is called Pakistan to Afghanistan has been made increasingly difficult and people are often labelled terrorists, even those who might be just visiting families. It is a border which makes absolutely no sense. It was imposed by the needs of British imperialism and all of these things are festering sores which have to be dealt with internally. These are not CIA manipulations. Actually, US government policies are continuing to do exactly the same thing [produce terrorism]. Two days after the Boston marathon bombings, there was a drone strike in Yemen attacking a peaceful village, which killed a target who could very easily have been apprehended. But of course it is just easier to terrorise people. The drones are a terrorist weapon, they not only kill targets but also terrorise other people. That is what happens constantly in Waziristan. There happened to be a testimony in the Senate a week later by a young man who was living in the US but was originally from that village [in Yemen which was bombed]. And he testified that for years the ‘jihadi’ groups in Yemen had been trying to turn the villagers against the Americans and had failed. The villagers admired America. But this one terrorist strike has turned them into radical anti-Americans, which will only serve as a breeding ground for more terrorists. There was a striking example of this in Pakistan when the US sent in Special Forces, to be honest, to kill Osama Bin Laden. He could easily have been apprehended and caught but their orders were to kill him. If you remember the way they did it, the way they tried to identify his [Osama’s] position was through a fake vaccination campaign set up by the CIA in the city. It started in a poor area and then when they decided that Osama was in a different area, they cut it off in the middle and shifted [the vaccination campaign] to a richer area. Now, that is a violation of principles which go as far back as the Hippocratic Oath. Well, in the end they did kill their target but meanwhile it aroused fears all over Pakistan and even as far as Nigeria about what these Westerners are doing when they come in and start sticking needles in their arms. These are understandable fears but were exacerbated. Very soon, health workers were being abducted and several were murdered (in Pakistan). The UN even had to take out its whole anti-polio team. Pakistan is one of the last places in the world where polio still exists and the disease could have been totally wiped out from this planet like smallpox. But now, it means that, according to current estimates, there will be thousands of children in Pakistan at risk of contracting polio. As a health scientist at Columbia University, Les Roberts, pointed out, sooner or later people are going to be looking at a child in a wheelchair suffering from polio and will say ‘the Americans did that to him’. So they continue policies which have similar effects i.e. organising the Taliban. This will come back to them too.

 

 

 

 

Noam Chomsky

NOAM CHOMSKY

Institute Professor & Professor of Linguistics (Emeritus)
Linguistic Theory, Syntax, Semantics, Philosophy of Language

Linguistic Articles (pdf)
Linguistic Books (pdf)

Mailing Address:
MIT Linguistics and Philosophy
77 Massachusetts Avenue, 32-D808
Cambridge, MA 02139
USA

 

 

“In a war situation, the civilian govt. has to play much more important roles. Our civilian leadership was absolutely incompetent. The military generals did not estimate the incompetence of the civilian leadership. That was their blunder. Nawaz Shariff was not an intelligent civilian leader like ZA Bhutto.”Pakistani Reader in PKPolitics : Hussain Farooqi

 

,

No Comments

Our defenders are hurting By Shaukat Qadir

 

 

 

I can see the pain and I can feel it too. Shoukat Qadir has touched the heart and soul of all defenders whose services to the State are on record. It is sad that on the contrary, the Army at present and in particular, is being maligned and even abused. This is unbearable and warrants serious and immediate attention.

In this respect, the COAS has shown the concern of all officers and other ranks during a talk at Ghazi. We should be able to see that an effort is being made to create a wedge between the serving and the retired officers. I am sure such nefarious designs can never succeed. 
Lastly a word about Gen Pervez Musharraf. He is being harassed and is not being tried justly. This is called selective justice and should be visible to the whole world. We must raise our voice against it and provide him with every opportunity to defend him.

 

Jak

=====================================================================================

—– Original Article—–

 

  Our defenders are hurting  By Shaukat Qadir

 

For the last couple of days, the army chief’s comment in response to a question by an angry young officer has reverberated in every drawing room, every office, every daily, and every electronic media outlet.

Admittedly, in a country like ours, where the army continues to wield political power even if from behind the curtains, any statement by the army chief does merit analysis. Admittedly also, the background in which this question and response was made, was one which could point in many directions; each one of concern, and a perceptive analysis was necessary.

But, equally true is the fact that our emerging media is in cut-throat competition and, some outlets specialize in sensationalizing news items. They therefore, create controversies, even if none exist. They do not advert to the damage they might cause by creating conflicts where none exist.

Having said that; our defenders from the army, police, rangers, Frontier Corps, Constabularies, even our youth, of the likes of Aitzaz Hassan, and their families are hurting. I am hurting. 

I have nothing special to boast of in my career as a soldier. No distinctions. No awards. No recognitions; nothing. I was just an ordinary soldier; a very ordinary soldier. When I look back at my career, perhaps the one credit I can claim is that in my generation of soldiers I might number among the very few who spent the greatest amount of time in conflict zones—in conflict zone(s). Not in conflict.

When I total my time in conflict zones spread over my decades of service, until my culminating rank, I cannot go beyond three and a half years. In our army today, the young officer of ten years service has more years in conflict zones than I! I was an infantry officer. But in today’s army, my comparison does not apply to infantry soldiers alone, but to soldiers of all fighting arms.

Our army has always had the highest (or close to the highest) officer to soldier casualty ration in the world. When I last knew it, our officer to soldier casualty rate was 1:11. One officer among every dozen soldiers casualties. I am sure it must be as much, if not higher today.

There are two ways of viewing this report: a) that our young officer is foolhardy and b) that he leads from the front. I have always adhered to the latter view and been proud of it. Soldiers follow leaders; not those who ‘send’ them to die.

Never before in our 67 year lifespan, has our soldier been tested, like he has been for the last decade or more.  They have seen more death and destruction than most soldiers, except those who saw the World Wars, will ever see. More comrades in arms wounded, losing limbs, organs, incapacitated for life. And yet these injured soldiers smile at the ruined future ahead of them, as others smiled at death when she embraced them.

They smile at a ruined life because they ruined their own life to protect their fellow citizens; the duty they had sworn to.

Let me state unequivocally that there is no lack of respect, admiration, gratitude, affection, even love, of the common citizens for their defenders; in any uniform. And yet, our soldier hurts, and I too am in agony.

In all these years, Gen Raheel was the first to manage to get the PM to visit injured soldiers in hospital. No elected leader visited injured soldiers for years past.

Our cowardly elected leaders and ministers shed crocodile tears at the execution of Hakimullah Mahsud; the coward who corrupted hundreds of children’s minds, made suicide bombers of them, killed hundreds if not thousands of innocent Pakistani citizens, and half as many soldiers.

Self-styled “Maulanas” of the like of Munawwar Hassan called Hakimullah a Shaheed (martyr). Fazlur Rahman, the Grand Maulana, went even further; stating that if a dog was killed by Americans, it would be a martyr too.

I am not a scholar of any subject, least of all, religion. But even I know that the US was not discovered when the Holy Quran was written. Moreover, Shahadat (martyrdom) is a consequence of the deceased’s intent, not of who killed whom.

I wonder where these people acquired their titles of “Maulanas”. If these were bestowed on them, shame on the one who bestowed them this title. Whether or not these titles were bestowed on them; shame on us, the citizens of this country including the media, for accepting their right to this title and continuing to address them as Maulanas, even after they utter such absurdities.

I number among those who think that the law should run its course on Musharraf. But don’t the comments of our ministers; the duo of Khawaja’s smack of a vendetta rather than justice? Let justice take its course, but justice, must also be seen to be done. And yes, in such cases, perceptions are more important than realities.

No politician attended the burials of Chaudhry Aslam or that brave teenager, Aitzaz Hassan, whose father’s words ring constantly in my ears. He stated, “I have one son left and will be proud to see him die the same way, saving the lives of others”, from the murderous ilk of Hakimullah—the martyr?

It did me proud to see the army paying homage to the police officer and that valiant Aitzaz.

Beware you blind fools. Beware. Aitzaz is our future. Not Hakimullah. Don’t bet on the wrong horse, unless you have no political future.

Yes; our defenders are hurting and I am in agony. ……………..Shaukat Qadir 

 

 

, ,

No Comments