Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for June, 2012

Kamran Shahid Acted Like an Impudent Street Punk to Insult an Illustrious Son of Pakistan

Who the hell the street punk turned TV anchor Kamran Shahid thinks he is? This sifarishi lout acts smug and has his snout in air most of the time to take on a distinguished Jurist of  Pakistan, Justice Wajihuddin Ahmed.  Kamran has to be born again to reach the stature of Justice (R) Wajihuddin Ahmed. Is Kamran Shahid displaying his anti-Urdu speaking bigotry against the Honorable(R) Justice. Kamran Shahid has brought shame to all Ravians.  This insolent behaviour is to be expected from a noveau riche yokel. Kamran is in the same category, as Kamrans object of admiration, the national scum bag, Malik Riaz.

Kamran is way out of his league when dealing with  Justice (R) Wajihuddin Ahmed. Kamran’s faked anger and crocodile tears for the poor of Pakistan,  can  now be dismissed in light of his rude temperament. If nothing else, he should have stopped needling Justice (R) Wajihuddin Ahmed, when he realized the delicacy of the situation.  Heavens No! Kamran wanted to draw blood. His quest for “almighty buck,” and cheap race for ratings caused this furore.  Kamran showed his punkish rude-a-pest behavior ad infinitum, and continued to provoke the honourable Judge, until, he drew an emotional response.  This is an example of a well-planned verbal ambush.

Most likely, Kamran is sitting on the hot air of going to the University of Westminster. But, this episode has punctured his sanctimonius balloon. These days very few Pakistanis can even afford to go to college, let alone to Westminster. Only Malik Riaz and a few exception like Kamran Shahid can afford such exorbitantly expensive schools. As a Ravian, this writer feels really disappointed at the type of “kachra,” GCU is producing. Here is the list of Alumni of GCU, to whom “punks,” like Kamran Shahid cannot hold a match stick, let alone a candle.

Politicians
Government officials
Army officers
Nuclear scientists
Nobel Laureate
Actors
Poets
Authors/writers/novelists
Journalism
Judiciary
Sportsmen
Musicians
Scholars
Other notable alumni

 And for Kamran Shahid’s information, here is a biography of Justice (R)Wajihuddin Ahmed:

His Lordship Justice (R) Wajihuddin Ahmed (born December 1, 1938; Delhi) is a former member of Pakistan’s judiciary. He served as the Chief Justice of the Sindh High Court and then, as a judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. He gained more honor and respect when he resigned from the Supreme Court of Pakistan instead of taking oath of the office according to Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO). 

He has also been nominated by the lawyers community as a presidential candidate against Pervez Musharraf in 2007 elections in Pakistan. 

It is said that he could have become the Chief Justice of Pakistan had he not resigned against PCO.

Justice Wajih matriculated from Karachi’s Sindh-Madrasa-tul-Islam, did his BA at Forman Christian College, Lahore and went on to Sindh Muslim College to read law and gain an Honours Degree.

Son of highly-reputed Chief Justice of West Pakistan High Court and Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Justice Waheeduddin Ahmed, justice Wajih enrolled as an advocate of the Sindh High Court and remained Lecturer at the SM Law College for LL. B. and LL. M. classes. 

He was consecutively elected as president Sindh High Court Bar Association unopposed in 1977 and 1978 and elected President of Karachi Bar association in 1981. 

Advocate Wajih was appointed Standing Council for Federal Government in1984 and Advocate General Sindh on 19 November 1986 and elevated to the Bench of the SHC as a Judge in 1988. 

He became the Chief Justice of the Sindh High Court from 05-11-1997 to 04-05-1998 and moved to the Supreme Court in 1998. During his tenure as SHC CJ, most sou moto actions were taken. 

He acted as Returning Officer during 1997 Presidential Elections and then appeared as presidential candidate against Musharraf in 2007. 

Justice Wajih joined the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on January 10, 2011. Spearheaded by Imran Khan, PTI is Pakistan’s largest growing political party with high ranks in opinion polls especially amongst the youth.

Politicians
Government officials
Army officers
Nuclear scientists
Nobel Laureate
Actors
Poets
Authors/writers/novelists
Journalism
Judiciary
Sportsmen
Musicians
Scholars
Other notable alumni



No Comments

Crooked Pakistani Journalists:Mehar Bukhari a.k.a. “50 lakh salaami,” & Hypocrite “Mubashir Lukman trading Journalism on Dunya TV

Mehar Bukhari a.k.a. “50 lakh salaami;” &”Hypocrite”Mubashir Lukman trading Journalism on Dunya TV

Commentary

While a common Pakistani mazdoor, hari, kisan, coolie, rehri wallah, clerk, fauji sipahi, bus drivers, taxi wallahs, all in all almost 180 Million Silent Pakistani, never see Rs.1 lakh in a lifetime. Their lot is hunger, disease, corruption of “haves,” bus kay dukay, huspitaa ki jalee dawaiin, mazdoori ki linay, milawat ka doodh, bachon kay faqay, sisat danoon ka joonth, Zardari ka zulm, Gilani ki smuggling, Rahman Malik kay death squad, aasmani afatain, yeh hai kismet pyaree Pakistaniyon key.

Dard -i-dil Rakhnay walay Pakistaniyun kay liye humari dard bharey awaaz. Jago Hum watanoo, Jago! Inn Chooron ko Gharq kardoo. Innko neest aur naboodh kardo. Innkey jaraayan ukher doo. CJ kay samaney seesa pilayee huee dewar bun jawoo. Humaray Pyaray Bahudur Wakeeloo, CJ Ap key Izzat hain, Wo Pakistan Pay Allah key Inayat Hain. Inn key Izzat Aap Ki Izzat hay, Apnay Leader aur Apnay Pyarey Quaid or Shaheed-i-Millat Kay Pakistan koo Bachaoo. In lotaroon ko Sarko mehn laa kay munh lala karo. Innay Kadhay pay bethay kay sarkoon pay phiraoo.  Wakil Bhaiyoo aur Baheenoo, Quaid Bhi aik Wakil thay, Allah Do Nam bhi Wakaluth say munsalik hain, Al-Wakil Aur Al-Adl, Tumara Muqadas Pesha Hai, Iss Waqt Watan Koo Tum He Pak Karsaktay ho. Zardari ko Tang doh Ulta karka Gol Bagh mehn. Gilani Ko Tang do Ulta karka Multan mehn, Latif Khosa, Rahman Malik, aur PPP kay Jiyaloo ko Sarkoon Pay Jutay lagoo. Agli Nasloon Kay Liya Inhay Sabaq Sikhahoo.

Jago!Jago! Hoshiar!Khabar Daar!

Zardari Ik Ghadaar hai Is nay Pakistan ko Haqqani Kay hath Bechnay ki Koshish Key hai, Iss ko wo saza dow jo aik Ghadaar ko Detay Hain. 

 

Last night, an exclusive live interview of Malik Riaz was broadcast on Dunya TV, hosted by Mehr Bokhari and Mubashir Lucman.

Our sources in Dunya TV have shared offline conversation in which it is clear it was just a planted interview to make the audience fool.

Before the interview, Abdul Qadir Gillani, son of PM Gillani, also called Mubashir Lucman on his cell phone and then Mubashir Lucman handovered his cell phone to Malik Riaz.

Mubashir asked Qaadir Gillani to advice Malik Riaz to let discuss role of Hamid Mir.

Reports are circulating on the internet in which both anchors are accused for getting bribes from Malik Riaz; such as: Salaami of 50 Lac Rs on Mehr’s wedding with Kashif Abbasi.

 

Reference

Few Comments in Media:

کہتے ہین کھاتا چور ایک دن پکڑا جاتا ہے ۔ کچھ ایسا ہی آج کل پاکستان میں ہو رہا ہے ۔۔ تمام برے لوگ اور ان کے اعمال نامے عوام کے سامنے آرہے ہیں ۔ حیرت تو اس بات پہ ہے کہ ان کے یہ بھیانک کرتوت کسی کی محنت کے بغیر ان کے اپنے یا اپنے خیر خواہون کے ہاتھوں بے نقاب ہورہے ہیں ۔۔یہ پاکستانی عوام کو ہوش میں لانے کےلیے بہت کافی کہ ان جیسی بھیانک اور خوفنکا باتوں و رازوں کے عیاں پن کو دیکھتے ہوئے مجھ جیسے ” ٹن ” آدمی کی آنکھ کھل گئی ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ارے اب تو جاگ جا ستی عوام

آزاد عدلیہ ہی پاکستان واحد ادارہ ہے جو ابھی تک پاکستان کے مفاد میں چل رہا ہے جس پر عوام اعتماد کرتی ہے ۔جب مفاد پرست اور ملک دشمن لوگ اس ادارے کو بدنام کرنے کےلیے ننگے ہوگئے ہیں ۔۔۔اللہ تعالیی غارت کرے ایسے لوگوں کو

No Comments

Is a Pakistani Revolution justified? In Light of Similarities to The American Revolution.

The People of Pakistan have enough justification to remove the corrupt government of  Asif Zardari a.k.a. Mr.95 percent and Yousuf Gilani, a.k.a “Narco” convict from power. Here we reproduce from the US history, the justifications of American people to rebel against the British government. We will switch the words in this justification, instead of King, we will refer to Asif Zardari.

The Pakistani Revolution

OVERTHROW ZARDARI AND HIS CRIMINAL COTERIE: HISTORICAL PRECEDENCE IN US REVOLUTION & INDEPENDENCE



Period: 2012-2013

Did the Pakistani People have grievances against the Zardari government substantial enough to justify revolution?

In the Declaration of Independence from Corrupt Zardari government, the Pakistani people listed “a history of injuries and usurpations” designed to establish “an absolute Tyranny overthe four provinces of Pakistan.” What specific abuses did the people of Pakistan cite?

1. “Zardari has refused his Assent to Laws necessary for the public good.”

Zardari has pardoned his stalwarts convicted by the Pakistan Judiciary.

2. “He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of pressing importance.”

Zardari appointed provincial governors had rejected any provincial laws that did not have a clause suspending their operation until the Zardari (faderal Govt.& Governors) approved them.

3. “He has refused to pass Laws unless people would perpetuate PPP government .”

Zardari has failed to redraw the boundaries of legislative districts to ensure that Tehsils, Talukas and Provincial Boundaries areas were fairly represented in provincial assemblies.

4. “He has called together legislative bodies at places distant from the depository of their public records.”

5. “He has dissolved National & Provincial Assemblies (through governors like Khosa) repeatedly.”

Federal governors had dissolved Provincial legislatures for disobeying their orders or protesting PPP policies.

6. “He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected.”

Provincial governors had delayed in calling for elections of provincial assemblies.

7. “He has obstructed the Administration of justice.”

Invoked Presidential power to pardon criminals, convicted by High Courts.

9. “He has made judges dependent on his Will alone.”

Zardari has insisted that judges serve at the his pleasure and he wants them surrepitiously on his payroll.

10. “He has erected a multitude of New Offices to harass our people.”

Over 100 Federal and State Ministers have been appointed. 

 

12. “He has affected to render the Military independent of Civil power.”

Zardari Government extended the term of General Kayani for extra three years. 

13. “He has subject[ed] us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution.”

US and ISAF forces and governments can kidnap citizens from Pakistan, without due process.

14. “For quartering armed troops among us.”

Zardari had  stationed 3000 US military and intelligence personnel in Pakistan, until they were kicked out

15. “For protecting them from punishment for Murders.”

Raymond Davis, a foreign spy, who had killed 3 Pakistanis was let go scott free. 

16. “For cutting off our Trade.”

Pakistan’s trade and commerce is being hijacked by Zardari front or owned companies. Zardaris agents like Malik Riaz are partners in such companies as Bahria Town .

17. “For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent.”

PPP Parliament had imposed taxes (such as the GST) without the provinces consent.

18. “For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried.”

Pakistani citizens like Afia Siddiqui  accused of treason by US could be tried in US.


19. “waging War against us”

Zardari has authorized US drone attacks and to use force against the people of FATA.

20. “He has plundered our Treasury…destroyed our economy.”

21. “He has constrained our fellow Citizens to bear Arms against their Country.”

Zardari had forced PAF (to attack North Waziristan and FATA to serve in the US interests.

22. “He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us like promoting the Sindh card and the Saraiki Suba”

 

National Assembly seemed intent on slowing the provincial growth and protecting Zardari and PPP Jiyalas economic interests at thePakistani peoples expense.

 

 

 

HERE IS THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT

 

 

Back to Hypertext History: Our Online American History Textbook

The American Revolution

 

Was the Revolution justified?

Period: 1760-1780

 

previous next

Printable Page

Did the colonists have grievances against the British government substantial enough to justify revolution?

In the Declaration of Independence, the American patriots listed “a history of injuries and usurpations” designed to establish “an absolute Tyranny over these states.” What specific abuses did the delegates cite?

1. “He has refused his Assent to Laws necessary for the public good.”

The King had rejected laws passed by colonial assemblies.

2. “He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of pressing importance.”

Royal governors had rejected any colonial laws that did not have a clause suspending their operation until the King approved them.

3. “He has refused to pass Laws unless people would relinquish the right of Representation.”

The Crown had failed to redraw the boundaries of legislative districts to ensure that newly settled areas were fairly represented in colonial assemblies.

4. “He has called together legislative bodies at places distant from the depository of their public records.”

Royal governors sometimes had forced colonial legislatures to meet in inconvenient places.

5. “He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly.”

Royal governors had dissolved colonial legislatures for disobeying their orders or protesting royal policies.

6. “He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected.”

Royal governors had delayed in calling for elections of new colonial assemblies.

7. “He has endeavored to prevent the population of these States.”

The King had impeded the development of the colonies by prohibiting the naturalization of foreigners (in 1773) and raising the purchase price of western lands (in 1774).

8. “He has obstructed the Administration of justice.”

The King had rejected a North Carolina law setting up a court system.

9. “He has made judges dependent on his Will alone.”

The Crown had insisted that judges serve at the King’s pleasure and that they should be paid by him.

10. “He has erected a multitude of New Offices to harass our people.”

The royal government had appointed tax commissioners and other officials.

11. “He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies.”

The Crown had kept an army in the colonies after the Seven Years’ War without the consent of the colonial legislatures.

12. “He has affected to render the Military independent of Civil power.”

The British government had named General Thomas Gage, commander of British forces in America.

13. “He has subject[ed] us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution.”

The royal government had claimed the power (in the Declaratory Act of 1766) to make all laws for the colonies.

14. “For quartering armed troops among us.”

The Crown had required the colonies to house British troops stationed in America.

15. “For protecting them from punishment for Murders.”

Parliament had passed a 1774 law permitting British soldiers and officials accused of murder while in Massachusetts to be tried in Britain.

16. “For cutting off our Trade.”

Parliament had enacted laws restricting the colonies’ right to trade with foreign nations.

17. “For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent.”

Parliament had imposed taxes (such as the Sugar Act of 1764) without the colonists’ consent.

18. “For depriving us of the benefits of Trial by Jury.”

The royal government had deprived colonists of a right to a jury trial in cases dealing with smuggling and other violations of trade laws.

19. “For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried.”

A 1769 Parliamentary resolution declared that colonists accused of treason could be tried in Britain.

20. “For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighboring Province.”

The 1774 Quebec Act extended Quebec’s boundaries to the Ohio River and applied French law to the region.

21. “For taking away our Charters.”

Parliament (in 1774) had restricted town meetings in Massachusetts, had decided that the colony’s councilors would no longer be elected but would be appointed by the king, and had given the royal governor control of lower court judges.

22. “For suspending our Legislatures.”

Parliament (in 1767) had suspended the New York Assembly for failing to obey the Quartering Act of 1765.

23. “waging War against us”

The Crown had authorized General Thomas Gage to use force to make the colonists obey the laws of Parliament.

24. “He has plundered our seas…burnt our towns.”

The British government had seized American ships that violated restrictions on foreign trade and had bombarded Falmouth (now Portland), Me.; Bristol, R.I.; and Norfolk, Va.

25. “He is…transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries.”

The British army hired German mercenaries to fight the colonists.

26. “He has constrained our fellow Citizens to bear Arms against their Country.”

The Crown had forced American sailors (under the Restraining Act of 1775) to serve in the British navy.

27. “He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us.”

In November 1775, Virginia’s royal governor had promised freedom to slaves who joined British forces. The royal government also instigated Indian attacks on frontier settlements.

In the eyes of the American patriots, what rights or liberties had the British Parliament violated?

Parliament seemed intent on slowing the colonies’ growth and protecting British economic interests at the colonists’ expense. Royal officials had restricted westward expansion, levied taxes without the colonists’ consent, and stationed a standing army in the colonies in peacetime. In addition, the Crown had expanded the imperial bureaucracy, made the West a preserve for French Catholics and Indians, and infringed on traditional English liberties, including the right to trial by jury, freedom from arbitrary arrest and trial, freedom of speech and conscience, and the right to freely trade and travel. Parliament had also restricted meetings of legislative assemblies, vetoed laws passed by assemblies, billeted soldiers in private homes, and made royal officials independent of colonial legislatures.


No Comments

The Limits of Patience

The Limits of Patience
by BRIAN CLOUGHLEY
Distinguished soldier & Military Analyst

With respect to the Sudeten German problem my patience is now exhausted! I have made Mr Benes an offer, which contains nothing but the realization of what he himself assured us would be done. The decision is in his hands! Peace or war!

Adolf Hitler, Berlin, September 26, 1938

We are reaching the limits of our patience here, and for that reason it is extremely important that Pakistan take action to prevent this kind of safe haven from taking place [sic] and allowing terrorists to use their country as a safety net in order to conduct their attacks on our forces.

Leon Panetta, Kabul, June 7, 2012

So what is Leon Panetta going to do if militant attacks on US forces in Afghanistan continue? Of course it’s easy to blame Pakistan for the outcome of the war begun by America in Afghanistan. After all, somebody has to take the blame for the shambles, and it can’t possibly be Washington. But Mr Panetta and the rest of the blame-shifters had better take care, because if they try to do to Pakistan what Hitler did to Czechoslovakia in 1939 they will find rather stiffer opposition than that offered by the poor bullied Czechs.

Mr Panetta’s complaint is that militants based in Pakistan (mainly tribal Afghans, Arabs of various weird persuasions, and gangs of thugs from the Central Asian Republics) cross into Afghanistan and join their comrades there to conduct attacks on foreign and Afghan forces. But before the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001-2002 there were no Afghan Taliban or other foreign extremists in Pakistan. There were no militant bases in Pakistan’s tribal areas. The region was hardly tranquil, simply because the tribes continued to be as hot-blooded as they have been for centuries, but there was nothing approaching the insurgency that now exists — that was caused entirely by the US invasion of Afghanistan.

Before the US invasion of Afghanistan there had been one single suicide bombing in Pakistan (in 1995, and that was by an Egyptian loony). Last year there were over forty. And since the US invasion of Afghanistan the entire border region has been destabilized and Pakistan’s internal security situation has become dire. In the years after the US invasion of Afghanistan drove Taliban and other militants out of the country the Pakistan army and the para-military Frontier Corps have lost 3,019 soldiers killed in operations against them along the Afghan border. 9,681 have been wounded. (US deaths in Afghanistan: 2,002.)

There are over two million Afghan refugees being looked after in Pakistan which is host to the greatest number of refugees living in any country in the world. They are an enormous burden, culturally and economically, but they can’t go home because the US war has made it impossible for them to be assimilated in their own country. And Pakistan patiently accepts their presence and hopes for stability in Afghanistan so that they can go home.

Yet the limits of Mr Panetta’s patience are being reached. Does this fool not realize how much resentment and contempt is created by fatuous comments such as those he keeps making? Mr Panetta goes on threatening Pakistan with military action, and, to make things even worse he made such a threat during a speech to India’s Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses in New Delhi (before going on to Kabul and deliberately avoiding a visit to Pakistan). His choice of venue to deliver an anti-Pakistan diatribe could not have been more deliberately insulting and downright stupid. India and Pakistan are not friends, and for a prominent foreigner to make critical remarks in public about one country while enjoying the hospitality of the other is majestically moronic.

There are encouraging moves towards rapprochement between India and Pakistan, and relations have been improving of late, but the enmity between the countries is long-standing and deep-seated. So pronouncements like Panetta’s are fuel for extremists on both sides who seek to stoke tension and destroy progress towards mutual trust. The Indians, understandably, are laughing themselves sick about Panetta’s clumsy insult, and the Pakistanis are furious. But this doesn’t worry Panetta, he of the open mouth and closed brain cells. After an attack on Kabul by militants last September he blamed Pakistan for allowing it to happen and announced that “I’m not going to talk about how we’re going to respond. I’ll just let you know that we’re not going to allow these kinds of attacks to go on.” But of course they have gone on, and all that Adolf Panetta seems to be able to do is to repeat in Kabul that “as I said, we are reaching the limits of our patience.”

Last November five hours of US airstrikes killed 24 Pakistan army soldiers and wounded 13 others, the entire contingents of two posts well inside Pakistan. The slaughter caused enormous resentment throughout the country, as well it might, but there has been no apology from the drone-meister-in-chief, the Obama Hosanna, who we are told takes such a deep and personal interest in killing people. The attacks were a patent violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty, as are all the drone strikes on Pakistan and elsewhere in the world that are so cheerily conducted by USAF and CIA video-game players in their air-conditioned, finger-tapping amusement arcades, happy in the knowledge that their blitzes are enthusiastically approved by Hosanna himself.

So the hi-tech dweebs kill a few kids with the tap of a key? No problem — it’s all official. In January Obama Hosanna said that in Pakistan “drones have not caused a huge number of civilian casualties.” Sure, there wasn’t a huge number. Only sixty kids have been killed. That’s real patience, Hosanna.

Pakistan protested on June 5 that drone strikes in its territory are “unlawful, against international law and a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty”, but Washington ignores such trivial complaints . And why not? — It is a given that Obama Hosanna is above the law. What’s a few dead Pakistani kids, after all?

For the moment, Pakistan can do nothing about US drone strikes in its territory because if it shot one down — which it could do in a New York heartbeat — the US would cease to supply support and spares for all US equipment in the Pakistan defence forces. The effects of that denial would be serious for national defence. (Which should be a warning to any country considering military cooperation with the US.)

But there are limits to bearing arrogant insults. And after the US massacre of his soldiers last November Pakistan’s army chief, the redoubtable General Kayani, made it clear that “any act of aggression” against his country “will be responded to with full force, regardless of the cost and consequences.”

So, Adolf Panetta, you loud-mouthed bullyboy with eroding patience : Just what are you going to do? Take on the Pakistan army? If you do, you had better expect “full force” against you. I’ve known the Pakistan army for over thirty years and I tell you that every single member of it will fight to the death against any forays you order when you “reach the limits of your patience.”

It’s a pity that you and Obama Hosanna have not the slightest understanding of the front line of combat, with real soldiers. You might alter your views about patience if you had experienced actual fear. But you are both just bullies.

No Comments

The Politicized Workplace

The Politicized Workplace


Hardly someone could deny that Pakistan is suffering from a silent and deadly crisis that shows little evidence of abating. The cancer of corruption has reached fatal proportions. Many people believe much of the development and a significant portion of the operations allocations are lost due to bribery and other related illegal and unethical activities. Politics is the profession of service to the people. When politicians seek money to get rich the nation is bound to head for trouble. The civilian government’s inability to deliver basic services and good governance has in fact time and again provided military leadership the opportunity to intervene. The fact remains that Pakistan suffers from the most corrupt, nepotistic and money-hungry administration ever seen in its history. People who work on right principles are unrecognized and considered to be foolish in today’s Pakistan.

The extreme poverty and lack of infrastructure and basic services in the rural areas is in part fueled by bribery, influence peddling, extortion, and abuse of power. Higher level corruption in Pakistan is a result of the connection between bureaucrats, politicians and criminals. Bureaucracy in Pakistan is tasked with the maintenance of the political system in order to ensure the continuity of state policies, political stability, rule of law, promotion of economic development and enrichment of social and cultural cohesion, while staying apolitical. It is deeply mired in corruption, nepotism, cronyism, and is prone to political interference. As a result, it fails to provide good governance to the masses of the country despite claiming major share of the budget.

Today’s bureaucracy is highly partisan, incompetent, unqualified, and unprofessional civil servants contribute significantly to failures in development and force the country to remain essentially underdeveloped. Nobody amongst them thinks the collapse of governance would endanger democracy and the basic rule of law.

There is no doubt that so called elected governments make mistakes. Votes in the Parliament are bought, voter lists are manipulated, and supporters are given financial rewards. It is corruption and graft, but all political regimes have indulged in it freely on debatable level. In fact, the whole process of awarding such favours as bank loans, plots, permits to establish industrial projects, land grants and write-offs of bank loans has been made legal. The government controls all the above and much more, and makes laws to give itself the power it needs to do whatever it wishes. At times, bureaucracy in Pakistan was known as backbone of country`s executive structure and ‘the steel-frame’, on which the whole system of administration depended. It worked efficiently and effectively with utmost dedication and honesty. Now it has become a ‘spineless’ because of its ineffective way of working due to its rampant politicization and resultant corruption.

The people in bureaucracies are supposed to obey the rules. Instead, if the top bureaucrats are willing to go along with the PPP regime, that’s fine. Otherwise, they are replaced by people who are willing to obey their illegal orders. Admittedly the Officials with family responsibility cannot easily take on their corrupt political masters. Politicians could transfer officials, destabilize the education of their children, harass them in other ways, and even register false cases against them. However to meet the crisis in Pakistan sacrifice and courage are needed. The bureaucrats must summon such courage. More and more bureaucrats are getting sick of the excesses committed by politicians. It is time for the honest among them who constitute the vast majority to take a stand.

The question of the relationship between politicians and civil servants does not exist in a vacuum. On the contrary, it is hopelessly entangled with the game of politics and of power as it is played in our country. Inefficient bureaucracy in the current regime having close nexus with the politicians is largely responsible for most of the complaints including inadequate infrastructure and corruption, where officials are willing to accept under-the-table payments and companies are tempted to pay to overcome bureaucratic inertia and gain government favors. The very idea of bureaucracy, operating on the basis of merit and defined rules is intended to overcome the problems of corruption. But often the bureaucracy simply becomes a way to make corruption more efficient. Today a large number of people (most of them having relations with politicians) enter civil service only to enjoy position. Once they get through CSS exam and complete training they think they don’t have to do any thing but enjoy position and Power. Such Civil Servants become followers of dirty politicians and become their puppets.

Today, in public perceptions, civil servants in Pakistan are widely seen as unresponsive and corrupt, and bureaucratic procedures cumbersome and exploitative. The civil service’s falling standards impact mostly Pakistan’s poor, widening social and economic divisions between the privileged and underprivileged. Ruling party has decided to promote corruption in all segments of the Society, and has successfully spread corruption particularly in bureaucracy. How much time the honest bureaucracy could last against corrupt rulers depended upon various factors, such as the background the bureaucrats come from, the honor society, friends & relatives have for honest bureaucrats and so on. While some belonging to honorable families resisted; there were many others who lost the track. This may not be black & white, but it is a hard fact on ground that in general the rulers have forced a major segment of bureaucracy to join them in corruption. The politicians should realize the bureaucracy should not be used for short-term political ends, which undermines its functioning.

The existing channels for making complaints against corruption in the government departments have become ineffective. The people have to bribe at different levels in the bureaucratic set-up to have their genuine problems solved. The bureaucracy is even enjoying all powers otherwise supposed to be exercised by the Cabinet, has not been able to improve the public delivery system. The crux of the problem is that the so called Pakistani bureaucracy is controlled by the Politicians, while the back ground work and slogging is done by the bureaucrats the credit is invariably taken by Politicians and in event of any failure the bureaucrat is made accountable, besides there is no price for guessing that both Politics and the Bureaucratic system is highly corrupt that does not create an atmosphere for an honest officer to discharge his duties. The law makers have become the law-breakers. We, the citizens of Pakistan, are busy in our own work. It is pathetic to say that the politicians are elected by us and we don’t have control over them. But how many of us have really thought about what we can do in this regard? When we pledge our precious hours of every day to somebody else and we don’t have time to ourselves and our family, who has time to correct the system. Similarly The Government officials should obey only legal orders of their superiors and no illegal or improper orders issued by politicians should be accepted by officials if issued orally. They must insist upon written orders. If this practice is taken to heart by the bulk of the honest officials running the administration, the nefarious designs of the corrupt political class would be thwarted. If the vast majority of honest bureaucrats were to unite and follow the good principles corruption would end and governance would be restored.

In the last four years of Pakistan Peoples Party Government there has been no proper policy making to provide essential services to the masses and there has been an avalanche of attacks on the living standards of the already impoverished masses. Most of the bureaucrats remain busy to please their masters. They have no time to work on public interest projects. The cost of basic needs has sky-rocketed. There has been a far more rapid price hike of basic commodities in this period than any other period in the country’s troubled history. Unemployment and poverty have surpassed all records. Health, education, water, infrastructure, transport and other basic facilities are in a despicable state. The life of common people is but an agonised existence. And still these miserable conditions continue to deteriorate.

Unfortunately politics in the country has disregarded the rule of law and constitution for personal gain and gratification. Recruitments, postings and promotions in the bureaucracy are now made on the basis of personal contacts and political affiliation, instead of on merit. Bureaucracy has become an arrogant, corrupt, inefficient, over-bearing and self-perpetuating institution that lacks merit due to the poor educational standard and quality of the individuals that join the civil services. Bureaucrats are now believed to exploit their public positions to generate benefits for themselves, their families, and their ethnic or social cleavage. Incompetence and inefficiency among civil servants have been given as other institutional issues associated with bureaucratic corruption in Pakistan. Civil service positions should not be used as rewards for political support or swapped for bribes, or used to meet obligations to one’s personal benefits. The people are concerned at the total lack of seriousness on the part of the rulers.

In view of the prevailing atmosphere, the foremost requirement is the restoration of confidence in the bureaucracy and democratic institutions. Democracy has not been able to deliver development and good governance as expected. Of the many challenges, pervasive corruption, bad governance, deteriorating rule of law and weak state institutions are impediments to Pakistan’s successful transition to real democracy. A series of failed public institutions, deteriorating rule of law, fragile security, two-digit inflation, slumped economy, growing unemployment, rampant corruption, widening poverty, moribund development, rising trade deficit, unregulated market, politicized bureaucracy, poor service delivery, derelict public institutions and fractious politics are enough to choke up Pakistan’s democratization process. Change can come only from the elite that rule the nation. Good governance is largely dependent upon the upright, honest and strong bureaucracy particularly in written constitution wherein important role of implementation has been assigned to the bureaucracy, A consistent bureaucracy is a requirement for continuity of a national policy-bureaucracy implying the secretaries and those working under them to serve the minister in charge of a subject; such staff must not change with the change of a minister and such secretaries must be appointed for a permanent term by an independent body and not the minister; hence is the term permanent secretary in the days before the bureaucracy was politicized in the seventies traditionally as a policy measure.

In the modern state bureaucracy plays very significant role. A modern Civil Service, with its well-defined regulations, the duties they have to perform and their own rights regarding their salaries, their security in service and the like, is linked with democracy and the Rule of Law which is one of its prime functional features. This needs strong and enlightened leadership to address the emergent problems of divergent nature dealing with the aspirations of the people and requirements of the country. When those who make the laws and those who enforce the law are shamelessly corrupt, then the entire society is corrupted. These leaders are supposed to be the role models of the younger generations in Pakistan.

Everyone is equal under the law. But, this noble principle, however, does not apply in Pakistan when corruption or organized crime suspects are political party cadres, businessmen, high-profile bureaucrats or prominent politicians. Besides the politicians, bureaucrats and criminals; the voters are also responsible, to some extent, for the prevailing situation because they do not discharge their civic duty honestly. We can fight this challenge only when democratic institutions are strengthened and made vibrant in prosecuting corruption in all forms. The alarming increase of violence and money influence in the election process is a matter of grave concern which threatens the very survival of the democratic system. There is no accountability, cost-consciousness or consideration for the delivery of quality service in the bureaucracy. While the system is necessary it needs reform to introduce professionalism, accountability, efficiency and effectiveness to enable it to contribute to good governance.

Besides the frustration from political and administrative side, there has been a picture of near collapse of the judicial trial system. The delays and mounting costs of the cases have kept the general people away from justice, thereby causing frustration and blocking of their aspirations. The percentage of cases that go through the whole processes in courts is quite large which urgently need exploration of some other means. Political parties and their ally bureaucrats are rapidly losing their credibility, and gradual decay of their popular trust is detrimental to our democratic transition as well. A high probability of Pakistan becoming a failed state in current situation cannot be ruled out if deteriorating rule of law, corruption and bad governance as a result of bureaucracy-politicians nexus continue. Disappointed with present elected autocrats and frustrated with the graft of so called democracy, many middle-class people in Pakistan are now even longing for the old days of authoritarian rule. Systemic failure to effectively control corruption and provide good governance to 180 million people may cause the downfall of our democratic system ultimately. The ruling elite should understand when trust in governance is questioned and public confidence in such institutions is hollow, public anger flourishes at the cost of democratic system itself.

Apr 21st, 2012 •

No Comments