Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for October, 2010

Zardari said, “Pakistani Civilian Deaths (collateral damage) Did Not Worry Him,”The secrets of Pakistani leaders, revealed by

The secrets of Pakistani leaders, revealed by

No Comments

Obama’s War Against Pakistanis

I watched an interview with Bob Woodward about his new book, Obama’s War. It was mostly inside-dopsterish Woodward at his worst. But at the end a young anchor asked him what the U.S. attacks in Pakistan were going to produce in the near future. He smiled in his all-knowing and impish way, said he could not really say [of course], but “I think you should strap yourself in!” Translation: you ain’t seen nothing yet, so hang on Sloopy and fasten your seatbelt for a wild ride ahead.

This time he was right. In the last few days since then the U.S. has openly attacked Pakistan twice and today the enraged and humiliated Pakistani military shut the vital U.S. supply lines from the Pakistani ports into Afghanistan. Supplies are the carotid and aorta of U.S. and Nato forces in Afghanistan where they are already losing the nine-year-old war.

I doubt the Pakistanis will actually launch military attacks on the U.S. at this point. But they are showing they mean business. They don’t plan to be another victim of American imperialism any more than they already have been. They are not a defenseless Cambodia or Afghanistan the U.S. can bomb into the stone age without serious fighting.

I have said for the past few years that the U.S. was pushing Pakistan into civil wars and disintegration that would lead to the overthrow in some way of the totally corrupt puppet regime there. Several days ago the Pakistani military told the regime they’ve had enough and now demand effective action to deal with all of Pakistan’s ghastly problems.
The U.S. is already fighting the vast Pashtun nation of roughly 40 million in fierce and effective fighters in the whole Afpak region who have finally gotten some of their vast forces well enough trained and armed to defeat U.S. and Nato forces piecemeal in the ancient guerilla ways they use. They are already defeating the U.S., which is why Obama et al. have increased the drone murders of Pakistani Pashtun drastically and are now openly attacking with Special Ops and helicopter gun ships.
 

 

 
The U.S. is blinded by Hubris and wounded Vanity and cannot see that no one but the criminals getting U.S. payoffs support the U.S. regime in Kabul. Everyone is attacking the  U.S., Nato, and the Kabul Criminal Regime. The now open cyber-warfare against Iran will encourage Iran to secretly ship more weapons to the guerillas and they may unite with Pakistan to crush the U.S. between them. They can each field many millions of trained and armed young men who loathe the U.S. Everyone in Pakistan except the criminals now loathe the U.S., who used to be their trusted ally.
The U.S. fortress in Baghdad, the Green Zone, is now a free fire target for Shia Iraqis. Their mortars have hit the Green Zone on at least 22 days in Sept., a vast new record, especially for the Shia. The Americans say the Iranians are sending weapons to the Shia.
If the U.S. forces the Pakistanis, the Pashtun, the rest of Afghanistan, Iran, and the Iraqis into an alliance of sorts against the U.S. in the whole region, they could send tens of millions of young men into battle against the tiny U.S. forces, They have a population of around 300 million and an average age that is very youthful and gives them an immense numerical superiority over the U.S.
If anyone can unite them against us, it’s Obama and his mickey mouse strategists at the Pentagon and White House and State Department.
The Pashtun have a favorite strategy of suddenly uniting in the hills to surround and annihilate an invading army. The “Pakis” and Persians and Arabs in Iraq are good at that too.
Stay tuned and tighten your seat belt.
 
 
October 1, 2010
Jack D. Douglas  is a retired professor of sociology from the University of California at San Diego. He has published widely on all major aspects of human beings, most notably The Myth of the Welfare State.Credits
 
 

No Comments

Beautiful Poem by a Hindu Poet to open the eyes of Muslims :Al-Qur’an:

Al-Qur’an:

No Comments

Why Musharraf was removed? Gen.(Retd) Ziauddin Butt’s version

Sharif removed Musharraf after a phone call: Gen Butt

Tuesday, 12 Oct, 2010

No Comments

Ex-Pakistan spy chief: Afghanistan war ‘lost cause.’State of Afghanistan

U.S.’s Afghanistan war has been lost. This was the opinion of Gen,(Retd) Hamid Gul, when he was interviewed by former Indian President’s son, Fareed Zakaria.
But, like a person drowning in a swamp, President Obama, keeps swinging away, and getting deeper and deeper in the Afghan quagmire. There is no face saving way to get out of this unwinnable situation, except, to keep sacrificing the lives of ISAF soldiers for a lost cause. Pakistan can play a key role in extricating U.S. out of without losing any more lives. Does Mr.Obama have the courage to ask Pakistan for help in negotiations? Time will tell. This war is begining to look like another Vietnam War. As they say, “Deja vu, all over again.”

The U.S.-led war in Afghanistan is a “lost cause,” said a former Pakistani intelligence chief, and the United States needs to negotiate peace with Taliban leader Mullah Omar. “You have to talk to him, and I’m sure it will work out very well,” Lt. Gen. Hamid Gul told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria in an interview to air Sunday. 

U.S. intelligence documents published last week by WikiLeaks cited Gul and implicated Pakistani intelligence as supporting al Qaeda. Gul has denied the allegations. “I’m quite a convenient scapegoat,” he said. “I don’t support any one faction in Afghanistan. I support the Afghan nation.”

The career military officer, who supported the U.S.-backed Taliban resistance against Soviet occupation during the 1980s, called the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan “unjust” and said he sees legitimacy in the Afghan insurgency against Western forces. “This is a national resistance movement. It should be recognized as such,” he said. “They are Mujahedeen of Afghanistan as they were during the occupation of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union.”

The attacks of September 11 were a pretext to a war already under consideration, Gul said. “I think some of the neocons, who were very close to President [George W.] Bush, they wanted that he could embark on a universal adventure of Pax Americana, and they thought that the world was lying prostrate in front of them,” he said. The 2001 terrorist attacks helped win the public support for the neocon plans, he said.

There was no legitimate reason for the United States to attack Afghanistan, Gul said, because the FBI had no solid evidence that Osama bin Laden was involved in the attacks on New York and Washington. “Why has not a single individual connected to 9/11 been caught in America so far, and why hasn’t Osama bin Laden been charged?” With no evidence anyone in Afghanistan was involved, there is no way to legitimize the U.S. occupation, Gul said.

The hunt for al-Qaeda does not justify the almost 9-year-old war either, because the global terrorist movement has moved on, Gul said. “The American strategists, the military thinkers, have got to wake up to the reality that al-Qaeda has succeeded in exhausting, drawing out into the wrong direction, to the wrong place, all the allied forces,” Gul said, citing Yemen, Somalia and Africa. “For al-Qaeda the center of gravity all along was the Middle East.”

The United States and its allies won’t win the war in Afghanistan, said Gul, who referred to U.S. NATO allies as “pallbearers.” Supply lines through Pakistan are shaky, said Gul, who blamed U.S. ally India for contributing to his country’s destabilization. Combined with what Gul termed poor U.S. intelligence and a home-field advantage for the Taliban, it all adds up to a losing combination for the United States in his estimate. “Time is on the side of the resistance,” he said.

“In such a situation, to hope to win would be absolutely hare-brained,” Gul said. He expressed concern the U.S. military would never be willing to admit defeat. “I would advise President Obama – please, do not listen to your military, because militaries have [the] unfortunate tendency never to accept their defeat. They will say if we receive more proceeds, if we receive more logistics, if we receive more funds, then we will be able to overcome. This is a psychological problem.”

The only solution would be peace negotiations with Taliban leader Mullah Omar, not with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Gul concluded. “There is only one man who can give the guarantee that there will be no terrorism exported from Afghanistan,” Gul said. “Don’t talk to Karzai; he’s a puppet.”

Omar represents the entire insurgency, Gul said. “There are other factions of resistance fighters coming under the banner of Mullah Omar.” Scale down goals, negotiate with Omar, then move on and out of Afghanistan, was Gul’s advice to the United States.

Eight years after 9/11 Taliban now has a permanent presence in 80% of AfghanistanIn wake of widespread election review onset of winter could delay second round of voting until springContingency plans needed to address constitutional vacuum in presidency

The Taliban now has a permanent presence in 80% of Afghanistan, up from 72% in November 2008, according to a new map released today by the International Council on Security and Development (ICOS). According to ICOS, another 17% of Afghanistan is seeing

No Comments