Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for category Politics

Why the US Will be the Ultimate Loser Destroying Democracy in Pakistan

Why the US Will be the Ultimate Loser

Destroying Democracy in Pakistan

by BRIAN CLOUGHLEY

 

During the few years of its existence in which Pakistan has experienced elected governments there was little if any social improvement. The politicians were tossed out by the army in bloodless coups with the approval of the vast majority of the population. But then the military men tasted political power and relished it and wanted to remain top boys.  They were all supported by the United States,  but failed entirely to prepare the country for workable democracy, and when they left, either in disgrace (General Yahya Khan), through a mysterious air crash (General Zia, whose friend the US ambassador died with him; bad call by someone), or by losing a constitutional battle with the judiciary (General Musharraf), the ensuing civilian administrations were, naturally, unskilled in leading a nation and exercising authority.

The present government in Islamabad continues to flounder, but not all the lack of direction is its fault.  Beset by bigoted fanatics whose suicide bombings are indiscriminately savage, and besieged by international preachers, mainly from Washington, who lecture Pakistan about “not doing enough” to combat terrorism, the government has a hard row to hoe. The worldwide economic collapse caused by avaricious banksters in the US and Europe has not helped an economy that looked as if it was getting off its knees before it suffered the double whammy of internal insurrection and external battering by the casino crooks of Wall Street and the City of London.

Sure, it’s depressing to know that so many of Pakistan’s parliamentarians have become dollar millionaires since they were put in power by their impoverished electors, although they’re only following the habits of, for example, the squalid bunch of Members of Parliament in London who have been ripping off the taxpayer for years with fraudulent claims for non-existent ‘expenses’. But the other day the Members of Islamabad’s National Assembly and its Senators took up their patriotic cudgels and decided it was time that Pakistan should assert itself against foreign domination.

In an admirable and unprecedented display of solidarity a joint session of Pakistan’s politicians of all parties  “Strongly asserted that unilateral actions, such as those conducted by the U.S. forces in Abbottabad, as well as the continued drone attacks on the territory of Pakistan, are not only unacceptable but also constitute violation of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, international law and humanitarian norms and such drone attacks must be stopped forthwith . . .”

Now this is the parliament and people of Pakistan speaking to the most powerful country in the world in blunt terms.  These democratically elected politicians were telling Imperial America that they objected to cowboy killings within their country.  Geronimo was germinal.

They declared that as from 14 May 2011 there must be no more illegal slaughter inside Pakistan by the US.  And the Constitution of the United States is precise about such action.  It is clear from the Articles of Confederation that there can be no attacks on foreign countries by US forces “except it be after a declaration of war by the United States in Congress assembled, and then only against the kingdom or state, and the subjects thereof against which war has been so declared.”

Whamming missiles into Pakistan and blowing people to smithereens, no matter who the target might be, is a criminal act.  And Pakistan’s legislators thought it time to tell the United States that enough is enough.  The weak were answering the strong,  and the weak thought that this time they might get a hearing.  The mighty empire to whom they were appealing just might permit a pause, discussions, negotiations, concerning the expression of disquiet by a democratically elected parliament. They thought that international democracy and diplomacy might be given a chance to work.

Not a hope.

Because then, predictably enough, came the smash in the face.  The US decided to deliver the ultimate insult to Pakistan’s Parliament and people.

Less than 48 hours after the statement by Pakistan’s National Assembly that there should  be consideration given to a sovereign country’s democratic pleas,  “Two US drone strikes targeting a militant compound and a vehicle in Pakistan’s lawless tribal district of North Waziristan killed at least nine people on Monday [16 May] . . . the drones fired two missiles into a militant compound, and minutes later another drone fired two missiles at a vehicle nearby.”

Get the message?

The message is clear, in that the elected representatives of  Pakistan can pass whatever resolutions they wish, but the United States of America will ignore them.  Not only was Pakistan humiliated over the Davis affair, when that CIA thug killed two citizens of Pakistan and got away with murder and was spirited out of the country instead of facing criminal charges, but the US is intent on grinding Pakistan’s dignity even further into the gutter. The 16 May drone strike was followed next day by yet another whoopee yippee missile-blasting attack on two Pakistan army checkpoints near the Afghan border by US helicopters. Two soldiers were injured.  No apologies, of course.

The United States cares not a fig for Pakistan’s democracy, or for any other democracy, come to that.  The Obama administration has shown that it is preposterously hypocritical by attacking Libya, which is ruled by a whacky dictator who persecutes some of his citizens, while maintaining the US Gulf Fleet Headquarters in Bahrain, which is ruled by a whacky dictator who persecutes most of his citizens. The only difference between these two places is that the western publicity machines concentrate on Libya and ignore anything adverse about Bahrain’s unelected monarch, whose rule enslaves 80 per cent of his subjects. If ever there was a candidate for democracy, it’s Bahrain. But forget it, because the King is a Washington Best Buddy.  Soldiers from other Arab states have marched into to Bahrain to help subjugate its citizens, with the approval of the US and the rest of the west, while in Libya the zooming jet jockeys of Nato have fun trying to assassinate Gaddafi.

Likewise, Pakistan’s Parliament is powerless against the arrogant might of the United States.  It can pass resolutions until the drones come home, and nobody in Washington will pay the slightest heed.  It seems that for Pakistan legislators to declare “such drone attacks must be stopped forthwith” is a direct invitation to increase the carnage.  Pakistan can’t do a damn thing about this blatant provocation.  The indignity inflicted on Pakistan  as a nation is not only insolent and illegal, it is lip-smackingly, sneeringly triumphal.

Pakistan’s democracy is shaky.  It needs all the help it can get both domestically and internationally if its government is to prove that Pakistan can look after itself properly and for the long term. But on the international scene Pakistan’s democracy is being torn to bits. It’s not being ignored ? it’s being contemptuously ripped to shreds by drone-fired missiles and the rockets and bombs from foreign aircraft sweeping illegally over its borders.

Economically it would be disastrous for Pakistan to cut ties with its savage and arrogant paymaster. But these kill-crazy video-game cowboy desperadoes who merrily bombard the world without fear of retaliation just might take pause if Pakistan did one thing :  stop, instantly, the entire flow of war material passing through Pakistan to Afghanistan, and forbid all flights in Pakistan’s airspace by any US aircraft.

Another option could be to issue orders to the Pakistan Air Force to shoot down the drones, which it is quite entitled to do under international law. (Imagine what the US would do if a Mexican or Venezuelan drone were to zoom over Arizona, targeting drug smugglers who were US nationals  . . . )

These might seem extreme retaliatory measures. But a country can’t just sit back and be treated with the derision, disrespect, and insolent contempt that Pakistan is suffering at the moment at the hands of a supposed ally.  Enough is enough. If democracy is to survive in Pakistan ? and heaven forbid there be a rerun of past years of military rule ? then its government  must be seen to be supported by the world’s most expansive democratic state.

Confrontation looms.  And the US will be the eventual loser.

 

 

 

No Comments

ABID SHER ALI: The lion roars

 

Ch. Abid Sher Ali
(Video Below)
Chaudhry Abid Sher Ali was born in Faisalabad on November 21, 1971. He was elected MNA for his first term as a PML(N) candidate.
A businessman by profession, he completed an MBA in 1994 from University of the Punjab, Lahore and has travelled to the U.S.A and several countries in the Far East and European Union.
Married, he is father of a daughter. His hobbies include watching T.V and social work.
Candidate’s Party Affiliation
Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz Group (PML N)
Competitors as per Elections 2002
Constituency: NA-84
Badar ud Din Chaudhry • Fazal Hussain Rahi • Fazeelat Qamar • Qari Muhammad Ghulam Rasool • Muhammad Qasim Ghafari ` • Muzzamal Raza Adovocate • Munawar Sultana • Mian Rifat Javaid Qadri Adv • Nawab Abid Hussain
Contact Information
P-290 St. 5 Kashmir House Khalil Abad Faisalabad
Phone No(res): 041-659397
Mobile No: 0300-8666111
In Power
He elected as member of National Assembly in 2002 elections from NA-84 , Faisalabad-X
Current Status
Areas of Legislative Interest
• Foregin Affairs
• Finance
• Housing
Membership of National Assembly Committees
• Standing Committee on House and library
Contact Information in Islamabad
House No.27, Nazimuddin Road, F-10/4
Islamabad
Phone No(off): 051-2107997

Ch. Abid Sher Ali
Chaudhry Abid Sher Ali was born in Faisalabad on November 21, 1971. He was elected MNA for his first term as a PML(N) candidate.A businessman by profession, he completed an MBA in 1994 from University of the Punjab, Lahore and has travelled to the U.S.A and several countries in the Far East and European Union.Married, he is father of a daughter. His hobbies include watching T.V and social work.
Candidate’s Party AffiliationPakistan Muslim League Nawaz Group (PML N)Competitors as per Elections 2002Constituency: NA-84Badar ud Din Chaudhry • Fazal Hussain Rahi • Fazeelat Qamar • Qari Muhammad Ghulam Rasool • Muhammad Qasim Ghafari ` • Muzzamal Raza Adovocate • Munawar Sultana • Mian Rifat Javaid Qadri Adv • Nawab Abid HussainContact InformationP-290 St. 5 Kashmir House Khalil Abad FaisalabadPhone No(res): 041-659397Mobile No: 0300-8666111In PowerHe elected as member of National Assembly in 2002 elections from NA-84 , Faisalabad-X
Current StatusAreas of Legislative Interest• Foregin Affairs• Finance• HousingMembership of National Assembly Committees• Standing Committee on House and libraryContact Information in IslamabadHouse No.27, Nazimuddin Road, F-10/4 IslamabadPhone No(off): 051-2107997

 

No Comments

Pakistan Taliban Leader Reportedly Killed in U.S. Drone Strike

Intercepted militant radio communications indicate the leader of the Pakistani Taliban may have been killed in a recent U.S. drone strike, Pakistani intelligence officials said Sunday. A Taliban official denied that.
The report coincided with sectarian violence — a bomb blast in eastern Pakistan that killed 14 people in a Shiite religious procession.
The claim that the Pakistani Taliban chief was killed came from officials who said they intercepted a number of Taliban radio conversations. In about a half a dozen intercepts, the militants discussed whether their chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, was killed on Jan. 12 in the North Waziristan tribal area. Some militants confirmed Mehsud was dead, and one criticized others for talking about the issue over the radio.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters.
Pakistani Taliban spokesman Asimullah Mehsud denied the group’s leader was killed and said he was not in the area where the drone strike occurred.
In early 2010, both Pakistani and American officials said they believed a missile strike had killed Hakimullah Mehsud along the border of North and South Waziristan. They were proved wrong when videos appeared showing him still alive.
The Pakistani Taliban is linked to attacks against U.S. targets. They trained the Pakistani-American who tried to detonate a car bomb in New York City’s Times Square in 2010 and is tied to a suicide bombing that killed seven CIA agents at an Afghan base in 2009.
There was no claim of responsibility for Sunday’s bombing that killed 14 people during a Shiite observance in Punjab province in the east — the latest of a series of sectarian attacks in volatile Pakistan.
Hundreds of Pakistani Shiites gathered in the town of Khanpur in Punjab province for a traditional procession to mark the end of 40 days of mourning following the anniversary of the death of Imam Hussein, a revered seventh-century figure.
The explosion went off as the mourners left a mosque, said District Police Chief Sohail Chatta. The bomb appeared to have been planted ahead of time in the path of the procession, he said.
The Pakistani Taliban and other Sunni extremist groups have in the past claimed responsibility for the bombings of Shiite religious sites and ceremonies. Many Sunni extremists in Pakistan regard Shiites as heretics.
The Taliban and other groups have carried out hundreds of bombings over the last five years that have killed thousands of Pakistani troops and civilians as part of a campaign to install a hard-line Islamist government.
The attacks are so common that the country’s interior minister in December actually thanked the Taliban for acting on what he said was a “request” not to stage attacks during the Shiite rituals of Ashoura that month.
Punjab law minister Rana Sanaullah said police investigators were still examining the area of Sunday’s bombing for clues. Security was provided for the procession, but it was breached, Sanaullah said.
The continuing strikes by presumed religious extremists come during a political crisis that pits the Pakistani civilian government against the military, sparking rumors of an impending coup.
Last week the military warned the government of possible “grievous consequences” ahead, and President Asif Ali Zardari took a one-day trip to Dubai that renewed speculation that he might flee the country.
Analysts say the military may be looking for the Supreme Court to push out Zardari rather than risk an outright takeover.

Intercepted militant radio communications indicate the leader of the Pakistani Taliban may have been killed in a recent U.S. drone strike, Pakistani intelligence officials said Sunday. A Taliban official denied that.The report coincided with sectarian violence — a bomb blast in eastern Pakistan that killed 14 people in a Shiite religious procession.The claim that the Pakistani Taliban chief was killed came from officials who said they intercepted a number of Taliban radio conversations. In about a half a dozen intercepts, the militants discussed whether their chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, was killed on Jan. 12 in the North Waziristan tribal area. Some militants confirmed Mehsud was dead, and one criticized others for talking about the issue over the radio.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters.Pakistani Taliban spokesman Asimullah Mehsud denied the group’s leader was killed and said he was not in the area where the drone strike occurred.In early 2010, both Pakistani and American officials said they believed a missile strike had killed Hakimullah Mehsud along the border of North and South Waziristan. They were proved wrong when videos appeared showing him still alive.The Pakistani Taliban is linked to attacks against U.S. targets. They trained the Pakistani-American who tried to detonate a car bomb in New York City’s Times Square in 2010 and is tied to a suicide bombing that killed seven CIA agents at an Afghan base in 2009.There was no claim of responsibility for Sunday’s bombing that killed 14 people during a Shiite observance in Punjab province in the east — the latest of a series of sectarian attacks in volatile Pakistan.Hundreds of Pakistani Shiites gathered in the town of Khanpur in Punjab province for a traditional procession to mark the end of 40 days of mourning following the anniversary of the death of Imam Hussein, a revered seventh-century figure.The explosion went off as the mourners left a mosque, said District Police Chief Sohail Chatta. The bomb appeared to have been planted ahead of time in the path of the procession, he said.The Pakistani Taliban and other Sunni extremist groups have in the past claimed responsibility for the bombings of Shiite religious sites and ceremonies. Many Sunni extremists in Pakistan regard Shiites as heretics.The Taliban and other groups have carried out hundreds of bombings over the last five years that have killed thousands of Pakistani troops and civilians as part of a campaign to install a hard-line Islamist government.The attacks are so common that the country’s interior minister in December actually thanked the Taliban for acting on what he said was a “request” not to stage attacks during the Shiite rituals of Ashoura that month.Punjab law minister Rana Sanaullah said police investigators were still examining the area of Sunday’s bombing for clues. Security was provided for the procession, but it was breached, Sanaullah said.The continuing strikes by presumed religious extremists come during a political crisis that pits the Pakistani civilian government against the military, sparking rumors of an impending coup.Last week the military warned the government of possible “grievous consequences” ahead, and President Asif Ali Zardari took a one-day trip to Dubai that renewed speculation that he might flee the country.Analysts say the military may be looking for the Supreme Court to push out Zardari rather than risk an outright takeover.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/01/15/pakistan-taliban-leader-reportedly-killed-in-us-drone-strike/#ixzz1jZbPYdoQ

No Comments

Pakistan Taliban Leader Reportedly Killed in U.S. Drone Strike

Intercepted militant radio communications indicate the leader of the Pakistani Taliban may have been killed in a recent U.S. drone strike, Pakistani intelligence officials said Sunday. A Taliban official denied that.
The report coincided with sectarian violence — a bomb blast in eastern Pakistan that killed 14 people in a Shiite religious procession.
The claim that the Pakistani Taliban chief was killed came from officials who said they intercepted a number of Taliban radio conversations. In about a half a dozen intercepts, the militants discussed whether their chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, was killed on Jan. 12 in the North Waziristan tribal area. Some militants confirmed Mehsud was dead, and one criticized others for talking about the issue over the radio.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters.
Pakistani Taliban spokesman Asimullah Mehsud denied the group’s leader was killed and said he was not in the area where the drone strike occurred.
In early 2010, both Pakistani and American officials said they believed a missile strike had killed Hakimullah Mehsud along the border of North and South Waziristan. They were proved wrong when videos appeared showing him still alive.
The Pakistani Taliban is linked to attacks against U.S. targets. They trained the Pakistani-American who tried to detonate a car bomb in New York City’s Times Square in 2010 and is tied to a suicide bombing that killed seven CIA agents at an Afghan base in 2009.
There was no claim of responsibility for Sunday’s bombing that killed 14 people during a Shiite observance in Punjab province in the east — the latest of a series of sectarian attacks in volatile Pakistan.
Hundreds of Pakistani Shiites gathered in the town of Khanpur in Punjab province for a traditional procession to mark the end of 40 days of mourning following the anniversary of the death of Imam Hussein, a revered seventh-century figure.
The explosion went off as the mourners left a mosque, said District Police Chief Sohail Chatta. The bomb appeared to have been planted ahead of time in the path of the procession, he said.
The Pakistani Taliban and other Sunni extremist groups have in the past claimed responsibility for the bombings of Shiite religious sites and ceremonies. Many Sunni extremists in Pakistan regard Shiites as heretics.
The Taliban and other groups have carried out hundreds of bombings over the last five years that have killed thousands of Pakistani troops and civilians as part of a campaign to install a hard-line Islamist government.
The attacks are so common that the country’s interior minister in December actually thanked the Taliban for acting on what he said was a “request” not to stage attacks during the Shiite rituals of Ashoura that month.
Punjab law minister Rana Sanaullah said police investigators were still examining the area of Sunday’s bombing for clues. Security was provided for the procession, but it was breached, Sanaullah said.
The continuing strikes by presumed religious extremists come during a political crisis that pits the Pakistani civilian government against the military, sparking rumors of an impending coup.
Last week the military warned the government of possible “grievous consequences” ahead, and President Asif Ali Zardari took a one-day trip to Dubai that renewed speculation that he might flee the country.
Analysts say the military may be looking for the Supreme Court to push out Zardari rather than risk an outright takeover.

Intercepted militant radio communications indicate the leader of the Pakistani Taliban may have been killed in a recent U.S. drone strike, Pakistani intelligence officials said Sunday. A Taliban official denied that.The report coincided with sectarian violence — a bomb blast in eastern Pakistan that killed 14 people in a Shiite religious procession.The claim that the Pakistani Taliban chief was killed came from officials who said they intercepted a number of Taliban radio conversations. In about a half a dozen intercepts, the militants discussed whether their chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, was killed on Jan. 12 in the North Waziristan tribal area. Some militants confirmed Mehsud was dead, and one criticized others for talking about the issue over the radio.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters.Pakistani Taliban spokesman Asimullah Mehsud denied the group’s leader was killed and said he was not in the area where the drone strike occurred.In early 2010, both Pakistani and American officials said they believed a missile strike had killed Hakimullah Mehsud along the border of North and South Waziristan. They were proved wrong when videos appeared showing him still alive.The Pakistani Taliban is linked to attacks against U.S. targets. They trained the Pakistani-American who tried to detonate a car bomb in New York City’s Times Square in 2010 and is tied to a suicide bombing that killed seven CIA agents at an Afghan base in 2009.There was no claim of responsibility for Sunday’s bombing that killed 14 people during a Shiite observance in Punjab province in the east — the latest of a series of sectarian attacks in volatile Pakistan.Hundreds of Pakistani Shiites gathered in the town of Khanpur in Punjab province for a traditional procession to mark the end of 40 days of mourning following the anniversary of the death of Imam Hussein, a revered seventh-century figure.The explosion went off as the mourners left a mosque, said District Police Chief Sohail Chatta. The bomb appeared to have been planted ahead of time in the path of the procession, he said.The Pakistani Taliban and other Sunni extremist groups have in the past claimed responsibility for the bombings of Shiite religious sites and ceremonies. Many Sunni extremists in Pakistan regard Shiites as heretics.The Taliban and other groups have carried out hundreds of bombings over the last five years that have killed thousands of Pakistani troops and civilians as part of a campaign to install a hard-line Islamist government.The attacks are so common that the country’s interior minister in December actually thanked the Taliban for acting on what he said was a “request” not to stage attacks during the Shiite rituals of Ashoura that month.Punjab law minister Rana Sanaullah said police investigators were still examining the area of Sunday’s bombing for clues. Security was provided for the procession, but it was breached, Sanaullah said.The continuing strikes by presumed religious extremists come during a political crisis that pits the Pakistani civilian government against the military, sparking rumors of an impending coup.Last week the military warned the government of possible “grievous consequences” ahead, and President Asif Ali Zardari took a one-day trip to Dubai that renewed speculation that he might flee the country.Analysts say the military may be looking for the Supreme Court to push out Zardari rather than risk an outright takeover.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/01/15/pakistan-taliban-leader-reportedly-killed-in-us-drone-strike/#ixzz1jZbPYdoQ

No Comments

Evil Twins:Zardari-Gilani Duo

 

Finally, the Supreme Court simply ran out of patience with the government’s successful filibustering for over two years to prevent the implementation of the NRO judgement taking effect. The indictment of the government by a five-member bench of the Supreme Court on Tuesday initiated the process of sending the corrupt Gilani regime packing. Even then, the Supreme Court bench must be commended for exercising judicial restraint in declaring the Zardari-Gilani duo unfit for office. The bench gave the government six days to ponder over six options before a final hearing on Jan 16 by a full bench.
The Musharraf-enacted NRO that gave Asif Ali Zardari immunity as president and he and cronies to run riot in Pakistan with impunity has come a full circle more than two years after the Supreme Court judgment declaring it null and void. “Dr” Babar Awan (of “Monticello Univesity” fame) is all fire and brimstone, but let’s see how long his bravado lasts.
Many things have come to a head, all at once. Whether on national security or on economics, the political games being played by Zardari and Gilani had only one motive, how to escape accountability and buy their way back into power in order to loot the public some more. Watching the parody Hum Sab Umeed Se Hain the day Hamid Mir’s interview with Zardari was to be aired on Geo TV, a short clip of the interview was shown in-between as a “promo.” When Hamid Mir brought his attention to the virtual meltdown of PIA, the Railways, Wapda and other organisations, Zardari dismissed each with a shrug: “It is your assessment, it has only become weak.” For one surreal moment one thought it to be part of the comedy show, and then I realised the mocking tone was vintage Zardari, and for real. Either the man had completely lost common sense, or the brazenness was reflective of the deep scorn with which with he treats Pakistanis for having elected a tainted man like him as head of state?
With both the judiciary and the Pakistani army serious about uncovering the truth about the Mansoor Ijaz-Husain Haqqani memo, the Memogate Commission is more than likely to come up with the facts in the near future. When Mansoor Ijaz arrives in Pakistan he will probably reveal much more. By dragging their feet on issuing Ijaz a visa and intimidating him to prevent his coming to Pakistan and appearing before the commission, the government was clearly following the strategy of sabotaging the process. Not getting a straight reply about Ijaz’s visa and his personal safety from the interior secretary, Justice Isa warned him that he would be charged with contempt of court: “Don’t make a mockery of the commission.”
Unlike Mansoor Ijaz, who promised to hand over his Blackberry and all related data, Husain Haqqani flatly declined to hand over his own Blackberry for investigation. Claiming initially that he was unaware of where the device was, he then volunteered it was somewhere in his home in Washington DC. Even without having anything to hide, as he insists, he categorically rejected the commission’s request to waive his privacy rights with the Canada-based manufacturer of Blackberry phones, “Research in Motion” (RIM). He said tongue-in-cheek: “I may require approval of the government as I am bound to observe the Official Secrets Act.” Refusing to submit the Blackberry data to the commission, he also declined to share the PIN of his old set with the commission. When Justice Isa politely asked Haqqani’s lawyer if the waiver would harm his client, he received an evasive answer. The chief justice of the Balochistan High Court rightly observed that if obstacles continued to be created “an adverse inference can be drawn.” That is quite damning. Could it be that Haqqani is desperately hiding something even worse than what was in the memo?
Three weeks after the army chief and the director general of the ISI had submitted their responses to the Supreme Court, Gilani chose a Chinese newspaper to make the “revelation” (meant to embarrass the army chief during his visit to China) that no official action can be taken by a government functionary without the prior approval of the government, and therefore their depositions in the Memogate case were unconstitutional and illegal.
Justice (Retd) Wajihuddin Ahmed said dozens of government servants submit their replies with the courts of law daily as a routine practice in various legal cases, and they do not get their replies vetted. The prime minister simply wanted to confuse and complicate things in order to sabotage the memo enquiry. The PPP government wanted “Shahadat” (martyrdom) to win people’s sympathies by choosing a confrontational path with the institutions.”
Neither the people of Pakistan nor the rank and file of the army want martial law, but they would also not tolerate any attack on the institutions of the army and the ISI. Any attempt by the government to sack Kayani and Pasha could well incite a mutiny. What prompted Gilani to ignite the fire by fuelling a controversy by virtually charge-sheeting the army chief while he was abroad but a deliberate attempt to incite reaction that would plunge the country into complete anarchy and chaos?
Having been caught red-handed in the Memogate case both Zardari and Gilani are trying desperately to become martyrs of democracy. By playing politics with national security to save his skin, Gilani is not only putting the system and democracy at risk but Pakistan as well. While his incompetence in the exercise of his authority as prime minister is well-documented, his attempt to try to achieve political goals threatened to demolish the entire system. Despite the deliberate provocation the army, let the Supreme Court implement the rule of law. The Supreme Court has done well by heading off the possibility of martial law or, even worse, a mutiny.
The army should exercise patience and remember Sun Tzu’s saying: “If you wait by the river long enough, you will see the corpse of your enemy go floating by.” Gilani and President Zardari mock at state institutions, including the judiciary and the military establishment, to further their regime’s misrule and corruption. They use their version of democracy selectively to camouflage and gloss over their wrongdoings.
Despite vehement and vociferous protests from my good friend of 48 years, 34th PMA course-mate and in-house lawyer Commander Kaifi, one has always liked and respected Adm Fasih Bokhari. However, failure to prosecute the outright crooks indicted by the Supreme Court was shocking and disappointing. Before his reputation suffers further damage, he would do his friends and admirers (and the uniform) a great favour by resigning as chairman of the National Accountability Bureau before facing the Supreme Court on Jan 16.
Notwithstanding the good faith behind the Supreme Court’s giving the government various options, the “Doctrine of Necessity” can never be really eradicated. It is like a chameleon, it will surface in both political and military forms. It made its appearance in its judicial image when the Supreme Court gave an option to the government to face disqualification or to go the electorate. Zardari and Gilani either violated their oath of office, or they did not. The rule of law in either case has to take its course, there is no third option.
The writer is a defence and political analyst. Email: [email protected]

 

No Comments