Our Announcements
Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.
Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on April 2nd, 2014
LETTER TO EDITOR
April 1st, 2014
Standing up for One’s Rights
It was quite heartening to watch over a private TV channel transporters of Hafizabad thrashing a Police traffic ASI left and right who had booked one of them allegedly for not paying him the illegal gratification. Well done the transporters for standing up for your rights. It is sincerely hoped that the Hafizabad Police will not take any reprisal and retaliatory action against the transporters on the ‘pretext’ of their taking the law in to their own hands but in the process in order to actually protect the ASI of the corruption and misuse of his authority. As a matter of fact an impartial judicial inquiry be held and the ASI, if found guilty, must be dismissed from the service to serve as a deterrent to others.
At the same time, how do I wish that all Pakistanis emulate the Transporters of Hafizabad in standing for their rights and hand out the same treatment to any public servant – administrative, judicial or political -demanding illegal gratification for doing even the most legitimate work for the hapless and helpless public.
Pakistan Zindabad
Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
30 Westridge 1
Rawalpindi 46000
Pakistan
E.mail: [email protected]
Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on April 2nd, 2014
The lion was so happy and started thinking of a central A/c environment, a
goat or two every day. On its first day after
arrival, the lion was offered a big bag, sealed very
nicely for breakfast. The lion opened it quickly but
was shocked to see that it contained few bananas. The
lion thought that may be they cared too much for him
as they were worried about his stomach as he had recently shifted from India .
The next day the same thing happened. On the third
day again the same food bag of bananas was delivered.
The lion was so furious; it stopped the delivery boy and blasted at him,’
don’t you know I am the lion…king of the Jungle…, what’s wrong with
your management? What nonsense is this? Why are you
delivering bananas to me?’
The delivery boy politely said, ‘Sir, I know you are
the king of the jungle … but… you have been brought here on a
monkey’s visa!!! ‘
Moral of the Story ….
Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on April 2nd, 2014
Anusha Rehman’s Husband Gets Job as Board Member in PTML
Mr. Shabbir Ahmed Khan (second from right), during his official visit to GSMA Mobile World Congress in February 2014 as board member of PTML. Anusha Rehman, Dr. Ismail Shah, Mr. Yasir Qadir, Mr. Ikhlaq Tarar and Brig. Sami is also seen in the picture
Anusha Rehman, State Minister for Information Technology and Telecom, has managed to get her husband inducted in PTML’s board as a member, The News has reported.
Mr. Shabbir Ahmed Khan, who is the husband of Anusha Rehman, is reportedly appointed as member of the board of directors at PTML, cellular arm of PTCL.
The news of Mr. Shabbir’s appointment first surfaced in January, however, it was only today that Mr. Akhlaq Tarar, who is Federal Secretary for IT & Telecom and also the Chairman of PTCL Board, confirmed the appointment.
Anusha Rehman opted to not to comment anything on the matter, while Mr. Tarar said that appointment was made after government persuaded Mr. Shabbir to take the responsibility.
Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on April 2nd, 2014
Posted by admin in Pakistan-A Nation of Hope on April 1st, 2014
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan’s former military ruler, pleaded not guilty to treason charges on Monday after being formally indicted by a special court here, according to lawyers in the case.
The indictment was a turning point for Pakistan, where the military has long dominated the civilian leadership and no military ruler has ever been tried for abuse of power.
But the court proceedings on Monday might also have a silver lining for Mr. Musharraf, who requested that the special court panel allow him to travel abroad to seek medical treatment. The three-member panel did not reject his request outright, suggesting that Mr. Musharraf could approach the government about having his name removed from the list of people barred from leaving the country.
Muhammad Farogh Naseem, a lawyer for Mr. Musharraf, said the former leader had already asked the Interior Ministry for permission to leave. Earlier, Mr. Naseem urged the court to allow Mr. Musharraf to travel to the United Arab Emirates to visit his ailing mother in a hospital, and to be allowed to go to the United States for his own treatment.
Publicly, government officials dismissed the idea that Mr. Musharraf would be allowed to travel. But for months there has been speculation that Mr. Musharraf might eventually be allowed to leave the country as a way to defuse a case that could bring the military into conflict with the judiciary and the civilian government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.
Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif told the Pakistani Parliament on Monday that the government could arrange an air ambulance to ferry Mr. Musharraf’s ailing mother to Pakistan. Mr. Asif also said that the country’s military and civilian leadership were “on the same page.”
However, despite a studied silence from the military over Mr. Musharraf’s treason case, there have been rumblings within the ranks and among former army officials, who view the spectacle of their former commander being dragged through the courts as deeply insulting.
During the court proceedings, Mr. Musharraf, dressed in traditional garments, stood defiantly as charges were read out, then pleaded not guilty.
“I fought two wars for the country,” he told the court during an impassioned speech that lasted just under half an hour. “I gave 44 years of my life to Pakistan’s army. The country was nearing default in 1999 when I assumed power, but I restored the country’s honor.”
“Is it treason?” he asked several times as he enumerated the successful economic policies while he was in office. “I regret that despite all this I am being called a traitor.”
Mr. Musharraf is accused of subverting the Constitution in 2007, when he imposed emergency rule and fired high-ranking judicial officials in an attempt to maintain his grip on power. He resigned under threat of impeachment in 2008 and left the country.
He returned to Pakistan in March 2013 to revive his political career, but instead found himself ensnared in court cases. The treason charge is the most serious one Mr. Musharraf faces; if convicted, he could be sentenced to death.
Proceedings in the case began in December, but Mr. Musharraf’s appearance Monday was only his second in 37 scheduled hearings. His lawyers have cited security and health concerns for past absences.
On Jan. 2, Mr. Musharraf was on his way to court but went instead to a military hospital in the neighboring garrison city of Rawalpindi, after complaining of heart trouble.
Since then, the justices on the panel hearing the case have expressed their unhappiness with Mr. Musharraf’s continuing absence. The panel, headed by Justice Faisal Arab, issued an arrest warrant for Mr. Musharraf that would have gone into effect had he failed to attend the hearing on Monday.
Late Sunday, Mr. Musharraf’s lawyers said he had been admitted to intensive care at the military hospital, suggesting that he might again fail to appear. But on Monday morning, a contingent of police officers arrived at the hospital, and Mr. Musharraf, for whom arrest would have been a deeply humiliating possibility, agreed to go to Islamabad.
Elaborate security arrangements were made for the proceedings on Monday. At least 2,100 police officers and paramilitary troops stood guard on the route from the military hospital in Rawalpindi to the court in Islamabad, officials said.
Mr. Musharraf adopted a different legal strategy on Monday, as none of the lawyers who had represented him earlier in the case attended the court hearing. Instead, Mr. Naseem, a lawyer with a good reputation, took up his case. Mr. Musharraf’s earlier legal team had adopted a combative approach, often trading acerbic comments with the prosecution lawyers and even bitterly arguing with the justices, accusing them of bias.