Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for March, 2014

Pakistan – How Did It All Go Wrong? (Part I)

Pakistan – How Did It All Go Wrong? (Part 1)

Mohammad Soukat Ali

The fourth quarterly magazine Critical Muslim of 2012, published by the London based Muslim Institute, is devoted solely to Pakistan. In the introduction editor Ziauddin Sarder raises many pertinent questions about the present state and survival of Pakistan. I have no doubt that Pakistan will see through her present predicaments and survive for a long time. The question still remains ‘in what state’? One can easily discount the doubt of her survival, expressed by US journalist Robert Kaplan, unless the US harbours other motives after withdrawal from the ill-fated adventure in Afghanistan. On 26 November 2012, a cultural evening was held in the Pakistan High Commission London during which, along with other cultural activities, some of the articles from the magazine were partially reviewed. I was fortunate enough to be invited as a result of my association with the Muslim Institute.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Whether Pakistan will recover from her present predicaments or not depends primarily on her feudal landlords, political and military leaders, and to a lesser extent on ordinary people. They need to understand why this highly resourceful country is the way she finds herself now. Before I proceed further I would like to narrate an anecdote occurring around the year 1967-68 when during weekends I would go to Speakers Corner at Marble Arch. I heard three Pakistani nationals delivering speeches on various subjects. Among them there was one dynamic vibrant young man, probably studying for the bar or a doctorate, exuding hope, vigour and depicting a glorious future of Pakistan; the second was a well educated and well attired person in his forties, wearing western clothes, castigating the Americans for all major ills prevailing at that time in the world; the third was a sturdy heavily built person in his mid fifties wearing a Sherwani coat and a Kashmiri hat pouring scorn and venom on the ‘abominable’ Indians, the Hindus. The ambience of the evening of 26 November 2012 at the Pakistan High Commission did not seem to be as lively as the aspirations and the glorious future of Pakistan the vibrant young speaker was depicting in 1967-68. How did it all go wrong?

 

 

 

 

 

Wrong Ideology(Bismllama-me Galad)

The present chaotic condition of Pakistan has its root at her very beginning. The concept of the two-nation theory on whichPakistan (pure or sacred land) was founded, was largely based on Muslim nationalism. Though Jinnah advocated that it must be an Islamic country it should at the same time be secular, a contradiction which later leaders of Pakistan soon abandoned. The fact that this ideology is inherently faulty will gradually become clear as we progress through this article.

 Tehreek-e-Pakistan 

 

 

 

 

How did an intelligent and sophisticated person like Jinnah believed in the Two-nation Theory? The answer lies in his family history, his legal training, failures in his personal family life, the illness which he did not disclose to others that killed him soon after he achieved independence and the obstinacy he was reputed for. All these factors shaped the unique personality of Jinnah that led to his failure to show the brinkmanship needed to safeguard the interest of the Muslims of undivided India. The first sign of chasm in the ideology became apparent during the Bengali Language Movement in 1952 when, following orders from the government of Pakistan, police killed many students of Dhaka University. Finally thetwo-nation theory dismally failed, when after the 1970 general election Bengalis realised that they would never be recognized as equals by the people of West Pakistan and separated themselves by declaring independence in 1971. The two-nation theory created three nations, Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.

 

 

 

 

 

 

My father a moderately educated and basic Islamic-trained village imam, influenced by our veteran local Alem, Maulana Ruhal Amin, now locally recognized as a Sufi, used to say ‘Pakistan is for people with weak iman (faith in Islam). How can we relinquish the country where Muslims came from outside to preach Islam and where the heritage and the burial places of our ancestors lie?’ So we stayed in India. I realised a long time ago that the creation of a separate state in any part of undivided India is not a solution for the Muslims of this vast country, a sub-continent, where many races of diverse ethnicities, languages, cultures and religions are intermingled.

I shall however add the following comment in favour of Jinnah.  For a long time after independence most Indians believed that the partition of India was due to Jinnah. Except a few of his enemies Nehru, to his supporters, was a demigod next only to Mahatma Gandhi. Belatedly many people in India have recognised that Nehru carried the greater portion of the blame that led to the partition of India.    

Early History of Pakistan

Jinnah’s presidential address to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, August 11 1947 emphasising his secular views, is partly quoted below:

“I cannot emphasize it too much. We should begin to work in that (secular) spirit and in course of time all these angularities of the majority and minority communities, the Hindu community and the Muslim community, because even as regards Muslims you have Pathans, Punjabis, Shias, Sunnis and so on, and among the Hindus you have Brahmins, Vaishnavas, Khatris, also Bengalis, Madrasis and so on, will vanish. Indeed if you ask me, this has been the biggest hindrance in the way of India to attain the freedom and independence and but for this we would have been free people long long ago.”

Unfortunately Jinnah died in September 1948. Since then no leader of his stature emerged in Pakistan to guide her through the diverse and complex problems cropping up one after another. The mantle fell on his deputy Liaquat Ali Khan whose personality was not as strong as Jinnah’s. Though he himself believed in the democratic principles he failed to resist the pressure of Islamisation of Pakistan. The two faced Maulana Maudidi’s influence (Footnote 1) gradually became overwhelming. It is noteworthy that Khan’s cabinet included Jogendranath Mandal, a Hindu, as Pakistan’s first Law ministerVictor Turner, a Christian as Pakistan’s first Finance and Statistics minister, and Minorities Minister, a Woman, Sheila Irene Pant. 

The foremost task before the First Constituent Assembly was framing the Constitution for the Nation, and work on it started from the very beginning. The first big step the ‘Objectives Resolution’ in the framing of a constitution for Pakistan was introduced by the first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan, and later adopted by the Constituent Assembly on March 12, 1949. Following the complicated Rawalpindi conspiracy and assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan in 1951 progress towards framing the constitution received a series of setbacks. Due to many other disagreements between the leaders having diverse interests it was not completed until 1956. The then PrimeMinister Suhrawardy and his legal team imposed the 1956 Constitution of Pakistan, replacing the official title of Governor-General of Pakistan by the President of Pakistan who happened to be Iskandar Mirza. Until then for almost nine years the country’s political system was driven by an unstable ineffective and ramshackle parliamentary democracy. The secular constitution was not to the liking of the traditionalist ulama; their position was a legalistic one based on the unity of religion and politics in Islam in line with Maudidi’s.  In 1974, the Pakistan parliament made a constitutional amendment that declared Ahmadiyya Muslims as ‘non-Muslims’. In protest, Dr Salam (who later became the only Nobel laureate of Pakistani origin) left Pakistan for London. Nevertheless, the government was not given powers of legal interpretation of the constitution until the Zia ul-Haq military regime of 1977-88; from then Islamisation of Pakistan moved further ahead and the situation of the minority communities (Hindus Christian and Ahmadiyyas) became precarious.

 

 

 
 
 

Like
 

   
 

Enjoy the Tehreek-e-Pakistan and the early Pakistan with brightsky2020

 

ALL OF THESE HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS  COURTESY    

http://pak101.com/brightsky2020

 

 

 
 

  Enjoy the Tehreek-e-Pakistan and the early Pakistan with brightsky2020

 

Like
 

   
  Enjoy the Tehreek-e-Pakistan and the early Pakistan with brightsky2020

Like

 

 

 

 

 

 

The establishment backed the military trained President Mirza; but he dismally lacked the parliamentary spirit, and the ability to run a democratic government. He failed to show respect for civil administration and distrusted civilians to ensure the integrity and sovereignty of country. His presidency was marked by great political instability, civil unrest, and immigration problems. The electricity problems in West Pakistan brought his government nearly to an end. President Mirza was an outspoken supporter of the“One Unit Programme” — a programme of integrating the nations of West Pakistan and East Pakistan, i.e. present Bangladesh, into one single nation. This programme was initially a success in East-Pakistan, but met with harsh criticism led by the nationalists’ (Sindhi, Beluchi, Pakhtoon, Punjabi) movements in the West. While he forcefully integrated all the nationalities in West Pakistan into one province, they fiercely opposed his scheme. The pressure from both West and East Pakistan forced him to hold new general elections where the Awami League Party came to power under the founding fathers of Pakistan. This created an imbalance in power politics, as weak Bengalis without any military strength acquired political power because of their numerical superiority; because of the heterogeneous nature of the population ofWest Pakistan no one party received more votes than the Bengali dominated Awami League. Thus Mr. Jinnah’s Two Nation theory came under extreme strain. By 1956 the One Unit Programme collapsed. The provinces retained their current status; nationalists also forced Mirza to give the states recognition of their languages as well as in the constitution. Under his presidency, Mirza dismissed his elected prime ministers, including Suhrawardy also a Bengali from East Pakistan, who crossed the floor to join Awami League.

Ascendancy of the Military

The shortcomings of Mirza and the proud heritage of his ancestry bequeathed by the traitor (of Battle of Plessey) Mir Zafar Ali Khan of Bengal, made him unsuitable to run a civilian administration. This led him to declare martial law by abrogating the 1956 Constitution in October 1958. In no time he himself was overthrown by his own appointed Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces and Chief Martial Law Administrator, General Ayub Khan. One can say that before democracy anchored its root in Pakistan it was undercut from which it never fully recovered.  

Mohammad Soukat Ali was educated in the sciences and embarked upon a career in agricultural economics in West Bengal, India, before working in the UK civil service. He writes articles and essays on Islamic reform and history.

 Acknowledgements:

 

Please Visit to Thank

http://www.musliminstitute.org/blogs/front-highlight/pakistan-how-did-it-all-go-wrong-part-ii

Please Visit to Thank

http://pak101.com/c/forum/topic/9229/5/Photography/The_Colors_of_Pakistan

, , ,

No Comments

GLOBAL SILENCE ON INDIAN ARMY KASHMIR GENOCIDE: The truth lies six feet under

The truth lies six feet under

2,156 unidentified bodies in north Kashmir. The families want answers, but the J&K government is trying to give the issue a quiet burial. Baba Umar reports

If India is a Democracy, it should start by trying Indian Army Officers & Soldiers involved in extrajudicial killings, genocide, rapes, and torture of Kashmiri people under Indian Occupation.

Thousand of Missing People have been unaccounted. Democracies functions successfully,if they follow the laws of the land and respect Human Rights of people under occupation.

India is a sham democracy. It rather masquerades as one.

 

Graveyard shift Atta Mohammad was a farmer before the security forces made him bury 200 unidentified bodies in the hills of Bimyar

Photos: Abhijit Dutta

NOT TOO long ago, Kashmiris saw a ray of hope when Chief Minister Omar Abdullah announced that he would revoke the draconian Armed Forces Special Powers Act. However, he failed to walk the talk. The interlocutors’ report met the same fate. Now, the issue of thousands of unmarked graves dotting the meadows and mountains of the state has reached a similar conclusion.

When the mass graves were discovered in 2005, Omar had agreed to use DNA tests to identify the corpses. But in a report published on 13 August, the Home Department (of which Omar is in charge) has not only declined DNA testing, but also labelled those buried as “combatants” amid pleas from hundreds of families that their relatives may have been buried in unmarked graves after fake encounters.

The government’s action-taken report (ATR) was filed in reply to the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC), following the latter’s April 2012 finding of 2,156 unidentified bodies at 38 burial sites in north Kashmir, of which 574 were identified as those of local residents. The SHRC had demanded DNA testing of the corpses. However, the government said DNA testing would be done only when the complainant could locate the graveyard and the grave in which their relatives might be buried with a “fair amount of certainty” — a rider ridiculed by human rights activists and the families of the missing.

It’s pertinent to note that the government’s ATR is entirely based on police FIRs, thus making it a contentious report.

“The government’s report is aimed at burying the past,” says Razia Sultana, 36, whose 22-year-old quest to find her missing father ultimately led human rights groups to the unmarked graves. She started searching for Raja Ali Mardan Khan (then 55) of Bela Boniyar village, located 90 km from Srinagar, after he didn’t return home on 13 May 1990. The last time he was seen was at a provision store with a bag of sugar and a pack of cigarettes in his hand.

“I lodged a missing persons report but the police’s reaction was that he might have crossed the LOC (Line of Control). I was shocked. He didn’t need to because he had a government job. Anyway, he was too old to go for gun training,” she says.

Sultana’s mother and sister made a trip to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK), but they failed to locate Khan. Since then, she has visited many graveyards, police stations, torture cells and militant hideouts.

It was during the October 2005 earthquake when a team of human rights activists led by the J&K Coalition of Civil Society (JKCCS) and the Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) reached Bela Boniyar with relief that Sultana disclosed the presence of mass graves.

Four years later, in November 2009, the JKCCS and the International People’s Tribunal on Human Rights and Justice in Kashmir came out with their preliminary report called ‘Buried Evidence’, which revealed the presence of 2,700 unmarked graves spread across 55 villages of Kupwara, Baramulla and Bandipora districts.

TEHELKA TREKKED to Bimyar, perched on a mountain overlooking paddy fields and the gushing Jhelum beneath the foothills, located 20 km away from Baramulla town.

In 2003, Atta Mohammad, 65, a farmer, was forced by the police and the Indian Army to become a gravedigger on what was until then a wasteland. “I wasn’t a professional. It took me four hours to dig a grave,” he recalls. “But as the body count rose, I was digging graves at a faster rate.”

He remembers burying the first body. “That night, I vomited. I couldn’t sleep at all. The mutilated face kept haunting me,” he says. The experience made Mohammad decide not to dig any more, but the bullet-ridden bodies started to come in threes and fours; one day the toll was nine. Just like cops and soldiers, families too started pouring in, but very few were successful in identifying the graves of their relatives.

Out of 200 graves, only six bodies have been identified. Relatives would confirm from Mohammad about the clothes and appearance of the body he had buried. The next day, they would come with marble tombstones with the names of the victims etched on them. “At least for some, the struggle would end there. But there are many who came and left dejected. They think their kith and kin are buried here. But there’s no way to prove it,” he says.

Mohammad narrates a chilling incident when a body came for burial and he wanted help in shifting the body. He asked Ghulam Mohiuddin Dar, an electricity board employee working in Bimyar, to assist him. Dar refused. “The next day, Dar came with tears in his eyes. He told me the boy that I had buried was his son,” he recalls.

In fact, when Mohammad went to POK to visit his relatives in 2006, nine bodies were brought to Bimyar for burial. One of the buried, he would later learn, was his nephew Mohammad Saleem, who had gone missing. The old man never tried to open any of the graves to locate his body.

There are bones beneath the Kichama earth too, located 8 km from Baramulla town. Of the skeletal remains of 105 people, not a single body has been identified.

“Each body bears bullet marks. Some are surely not from Kashmir, but the others seem to be local youth,” says Ghulam Mohammad Mir, 42, who oversees the graveyard. “The security forces say they were killed in gunbattles. They would dump the bodies and we would oblige them.”

Mir shows a grave that contains three bodies. According to him, the police and the army had brought the partially burnt bodies, who they claimed were militants. The villagers buried them in a single grave after removing their tattered clothes. Even today, the clothes remain tied to the tree trunks waiting for anyone to identify them.

AMONG THOSE who called the government report “an insult to the families of the disappeared” is lawyer Parvez Imroz of the JKCCS. While demanding DNA testing of the unmarked graves, he compares the situation with Pakistan’s violence-hit Balochistan. “We slam Pakistan for its poor human rights record, but even they have allowed a UN team to visit the conflict-ridden state. Pakistan has also appointed a three-member parliamentary committee to look into missing person cases that run into hundreds. But when it comes to Kashmir, where the figures are in the thousands, the government not only refuses to identify the dead, but also asks families of the disappeared to identify the grave.”

Even the SHRC’s Division Bench member Rafiq Fida criticises the official stand: “There are cases when a person from south Kashmir was found to be buried in the north. The government’s decision to do DNA profiling only when someone can tell with a fair amount of clarity where his relative is buried is ridiculous. If people knew where their missing are buried, why would they knock on the government’s doors?”

Then there are several cases that puncture the government’s claims that all those buried were combatants. Kashmir already has fake encounter cases such as Pathribal, Ganderbal and Machil in which the dead were dubbed Pakistani militants and buried in unmarked graves before their exhumation and DNA profiling indicated that they were local youth killed for promotions and rewards.

Reyaz Ahmad Bhat’s death is one such example. On 29 April 2007, the army’s 47 Rashtriya Rifles (RR) and the police’s Special Operations Group claimed to have killed four Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba militants, who were then buried at Sedarpora in Kupwara. Later, three of the bodies were identified as those of locals killed in fake encounters: Bhat, Manzoor Wagay and Sartaj Ganai. The identity of the fourth body was never ascertained. The bodies of Wagay and Ganai were exhumed and buried in Shopian and Pulwama, respectively.

At Kailashpora in Srinagar, where Bhat lived before disappearing on 4 April 2007, Safina and Javaid Ahmad Bhat are seeking DNA testing of the other two graves to ascertain which of the two graves contains their brother’s body. “We learnt about the death eight months after his disappearance when an anonymous caller said that our brother has been killed. The police showed us a picture of our dead brother, a copy of the FIR declaring him a Pakistani terrorist and the graveyard he was buried in. But we are still not sure in which grave,” says Safina.

In fact, there are cases in which the lack of DNA testing has seen several families claiming one body. For example, when the army’s 18 RR claimed to have gunned down two militants during an encounter in Kupwara on 24 April 2004, Noor Mohammad Shah and Syed Mustafa of Waliwar village in Ganderbal district claimed the bodies and approached the Kupwara District Magistrate for exhuming the bodies. Permission was granted and the bodies were buried again in Ganderbal.

The case took a U-turn on 2 October 2005 when Madan Lal of Nangocheck lodged a written report in Lalpora Police Station saying that Major Vijay Char of 18 RR had taken his son Bhushan Lal on 13 April 2004 along with three other Jammu-based labourers to Kupwara. Madan Lal alleged that the youth were killed in a fake encounter and demanded DNA tests.

‘If people knew where the missing are buried, why would they knock on the government’s doors?’ asks Rafiq Fida

A three-member forensic team from New Delhi was invited to take the samples. However, villagers of Waliwar refused to allow the process, saying reopening the graves would amount to “insulting their religion and the dead people”.

There was another twist in 2005 when an anonymous letter informed Madan Lal that his son was killed in a fake encounter. The letter named a Colonel and a Major as being responsible. When Madan Lal tried to find out more, he reportedly came across Captain Sumit Kohli, who told him that “the person who wrote the letter to you will make sure you get justice”.

A few months later, Captain Kohli was found dead. The army said that Kohli had committed suicide, but his family said the Shaurya Chakra winner was murdered “because he was going to blow the lid off some fake encounters”. The case is being heard in the Punjab and Haryana High Court while human rights activists continue to demand DNA tests to establish who is buried in the graves, which could help solve Captain Kohli’s mysterious death.

BUT THE state prefers to stay silent on the issue. Although Principal Secretary (Home) Braj Raj Sharma agreed at first to be interviewed, he backed off, citing a busy schedule. The chief minister didn’t respond to TEHELKA’s request for comments, despite his personal secretary Asghar Ali agreeing to fix a brief interview. No other senior civilian official would agree to discuss the government’s policy on the issue.

But reliable sources within the police’s human rights cell confirm the presence of unmarked graves in all the districts of Kashmir. TEHELKA has also learnt that officials have found 6,000 persons to have gone missing in the past two decades, a figure all the governments have denied in the past, while human rights groups have maintained that more than 8,000 people have disappeared while in custody.

Although the ATR says no person has come forward despite Omar’s announcement last year that families can lodge complaints for DNA profiling with the police’s CID department, police sources confirm that no such circular was published in any of the leading Kashmiri newspapers. Families who spoke to TEHELKA also pleaded ignorance about the existence of such a cell.

The government’s position is that DNA profiling of all the graves will take many years and requires plenty of resources. But world-renowned forensic anthropologist Dr Mark F Skinner of Simon Fraser University, Canada, told TEHELKA in an email interview that DNA testing a body per se is not expensive (“a few hundred dollars, I think”). “The expense arises from the need for excavation, data tracking and contacting relatives for comparative DNA.”

“This is why I suggest taking the help of the International Commission on Missing Persons to deal with such situations,” says Dr Skinner, who was part of the UN team that probed Afghanistan’s mass graves when it was under Taliban rule.

Even as human rights activists have sought the intervention of international agencies in the probe of unmarked graves, those TEHELKA met are left with a strange dilemma. Sultana wants to end her struggle by finding a grave that contains her father, which she says is only possible if all the graves are DNA tested. Safina too says a DNA test is a must to establish which grave contains her brother’s remains. But the emotional Mohammad doesn’t want any grave to be reopened. “How can you hand over to anyone a father a son or a brother represented by a skull, headless torso or a limbless carcass? After burying 200 such bodies, I can guarantee that they won’t withstand the suffering,” he says.

 

Courtesy:

Baba Umar is a Senior Correspondent with Tehelka. 
[email protected]

, , , , ,

No Comments

INCOMPETENT PM NAWAZ SHARIF’S BUNGLINGS PILE-UP

SLEEPING WITH THE ENEMY: ARROGANT BADZAAT KASHMIRI NAWAZ SHARIF WANTS TO BACKSTAB PAK ARMY

&

HAND OVER THAR COAL FROM DR.SAMAR MUBARAKMAND TO INDIA: HE SAID IT, WE DID’NT!

 
 
 
rimages-21.
 
I will be Pakistan army chief’s boss, says Nawaz Sharif to Indian News Interviewer
 
 
He wants to invite Hindus to take over Thar Coal Project, which is right now under the honest Leadership of Dr.Samar Mubarakmand
PTI
 
 
Islamabad, May 06, 2013
 
Shaikh Saadi Said about Nawaz Sharif’s Race:
 

Agar Qaht-e-Rajal Bashad zeeshaan az aun na geree

Yak Kamboh, Doyam Afghan, Soyam Bad zaat Kashmiri

 

 

Translated: 

Never trust three castes/creeds:

1. Awal Afghan ( First: Afghanistan )

2. Do-am Kamboh ( Second: Kaboh )

2. So-am Badzaat-E-Kaashmeeri ( Third: Inferior & felonious Kashmiri )

 Throughout History Kashmiris have backstabbed their benefactors. Even, US will find one day Nawaz Sharif, the Scion of an Amritsari, Kashmiri Family will back stab them. These are felonious people, who have been punished by God and put under the slavery of Hindu (115000 gods)
 
This aphorism from a Muslim Sage, Saadi Shirazi,alludes to the untrustworthy and backstabbing nature  of Kashmiri psyche. Nawaz Sharif is a Kashmiri Trojan Horse for US. He will act as if he is a friend of China, he will work against Chinese interests. His first stealth act of treachery against China, will be in the form of foot-dragging on the Gwadar Port Agreement. He will delay Chinese help on the Reko Diq Project. He will also use dilatory tactics in the Power Sector, and do his utmost to politically sabotage the chashma III IV projects. He will appear overly friendly to China, but, he carries a dagger to stab China in the back.
 
 

Refusing to play second fiddle to the powerful military, former Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif has said he will be the army chief’s “boss” if voted back to power in the May 11 general elections. A combative Sharif, whose party PML-N is widely expected to form the next government here, hinted that the current army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani would be replaced by the “senior most” when he retires in November.

 

“All I know is when I was a Prime Minister, the policies were being formulated by federal government, by the civilian head of the state and then of course executed by the institutions,” Sharif said in an interview to Karan Thapar on CNN IBN’s Devil’s Advocate.

“I want that to continue and I’m very clear on that, that everybody must remain in their respective domain,” he said.

He was replying to a query if under his rule, the Army would continue to control Pakistan’s relations with US, India besides security policies of the government.

Asked if that means the Prime Minister will be Army chief’s boss, he said, “He is. The Army is an attached department of the federal government and of course the Chief of Army staff works under the federal government and implements the policies of the federal government”.

Replying to a query if he would give an extension to Kayani, he said, “I don’t think he will ask any further extension or he will be interested in any further extension. I will go by the book; I will go by the merit. Who so ever is the senior most, will have to occupy this…the next one, the next in line”.

Sharif who spoke on a wide range of issues also stressed on the importance of a combination of dialogue and armed intervention as the answer to combat terror in Pakistan.

He also said he has no vendetta against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf but said he will bring a treason trial against him for imposing martial law twice in the country.

“I think this problem has to be solved on priority basis, there is no doubt about it. And you can’t really solve all the problems through guns and bullets, you got to also explore other options.

“Options of engagement, may be those options work, in many countries problems have been solved by sitting across the table…I think all the options would have to be exercised,” Sharif said.

“We will have to have all the stakeholders sitting on the table, discuss the matter with them openly, candidly and very frankly and arrive at a policy and a strategy that is workable.

“And I think all those forces inside Pakistan, outside Pakistan will also have to be invited and we must then listen to each others concerns, address them and them pave the way for a solution to this problem,” he said.

Speaking about Musharraf, Sharif said he did not have any personal vendetta to settle.

“He has imposed martial law twice in Pakistan, first in 1999 and again in November 2007. He abrogated the constitution, he fired the judges, he dissolved Parliament unconstitutionally. I think he has to pay for that,” he said.

Asked if that meant he will sanction a treason trial against Musharraf, Sharif said, “That is not a crime that I can forgive, I think the nation will have to decide as to what the nation wants against him and then it will be left to judiciary and the judges to try and to decide”.

Speaking about his economic revival plans, Sharif said he would float an international tender for generating power from Thar coal mines.

“Indian businessmen are getting power from this coal, they are generating power from coal in India. Why can’t we do it? I think we will float an international tender, bidding and may be Indian businessmen can come and invest in Thar coal in Pakistan. We will be happy to welcome them”.

A POEM In Nawaz Sharif’s Honour on Facebook

 

https://www.facebook.com/IKJanisar.Official/posts/458332577580788

 

NAWAZ SHARIF GHADDAR
QADYANIYON KA PIYAR
INDIA AUR ISRAEL IS KI SARKAR
IS KUTTAY KO HAI HAKOMAT KA BUKHAR
O MARJA LANTI KIRDAR
TUJH PER LANAT BESHUMAR
BAAP KA KAAM TO PATA NAHI
PER DAMAAD CHOWKIDAAR
KEHTA SHAIR KHUD KO YARON
MANZOOR NAHI HAI HAAR
BUS ISSI LIYE HAI MAGHRIB KA TABAYDAAR
NAAM MUSALMANO KA RAKHA
KAFIROON KA PARASTAAR
JHOOT, MAKAR, FAREEB KI AADAT
SAB HO GAI BEKAAR
IMRAN KAY AAGAY NAI CHALNI TERI
DAAL DAY AB HATYAAR
O MARJA LANTI KIRDAR
TUJH PER LANAT BESHUMAR 

, , , ,

No Comments

Fast changing global and regional dynamics

Fast changing global and regional dynamics

 

Asif Haroon Raja

 

When the Taliban captured Kabul in 1996 and took over power, Indian influence in Afghanistan waned. Consequently, India in league with Iran and Russia started supporting Northern Alliance (NA) comprising Afghan Uzbeks, Afghan Tajiks and Afghan Hazaras, which retained control over Panjsher Valley in the north. Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE recognized the Taliban regime while the US maintained friendly ties with the new rulers. Taliban fell from the grace of the US when the former refused to accept UNICOL pipeline deal on its terms in 1997 and thereon adopted a highly hostile posture. Afghanistan was put under harsh economic sanctions and subjected to vicious propaganda. Major theme of propaganda revolved on usurpation of women rights, medievalism and freedom of speech.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iran which enjoyed considerable influence in western, central and northern Afghanistan felt deeply perturbed over the imposition of Sunni Shariah in Afghanistan by the Taliban regime and its closeness with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States. Considering it as a threat to Shiaism in Afghanistan, Iranian military carried out massive deployment of its forces along the Iran-Afghan border and threatened to wage a war. Mullah Omar’s stern warning that the invaders would sink in the glue of Afghanistan restrained Iran from undertaking a military adventure and it pulled back its forces. Taking advantage of Iran-Afghanistan ideological hostility, Indian military undertook training and equipment of NA forces. Iran that had given refuge to all the NA leaders provided requisite facilities to the Indian trainers to launch fighters inside Afghanistan. It was owing to Indo-Russo-Iran all out support that NA forces were able to hold on to 8% of Afghan territory.    

 

Pakistan had been ditched by the US in 1989 after its objectives were achieved in Afghanistan and it was put under tough sanctions. Pak-US relations remained strained till the occurrence of 9/11. Pakistan’s assistance was needed to enable the US and its allies to capture Afghanistan. The US pretended that its flame of love for Pakistan had rekindled and assured that it would not leave Pakistan in a lurch again. Gen Musharraf badly needing legitimacy of the west caved in to the US pressure and willingly fell into the US lap. He readily accepted all its seven demands on a phone call. Thereon Pakistan was taken for granted.

 

It was during his eight year one-man rule that the US influence for the first time penetrated into each and every department of Pakistan enabling Washington to micro-manage Pakistan’s internal and external affairs. Governed by the nauseating mantra of ‘do more’, Pakistani leadership complied with each and every demand of Washington slavishly. Pakistan was turned into a compliant State, and some called it the 51st State of USA. Despite Pakistan suffering the most in fighting the US dictated war on terror, the US gave it a raw deal. Rubbing salt on its wounds, the US kept feeding its arch rival India with all its material needs. Pakistan has mercifully survived and retained its integrity despite concerted efforts of CIA to snatch its nukes and make it subservient to India.

 

The neo-cons in USA under George W Bush had devised a comprehensive plan to neo-colonize the Muslim world and steal its resources. It is widely believed that 9/11 was an in-house drama stage-managed to give shape to the sinister plan. Future unfolding of events in quick succession lend weight to the argument that 9/11 was engineered to be able to justify military action against radical Muslim States, viewed as threat to capitalism and US monopoly. Doctrines of pre-emption and shock and awe and new laws on terrorism were devised to clobber the so-called Muslim irreconcilables. This can be gauged from the fact that the whole brunt of so-called Global War on Terror (GWOT) was solely confined to the Muslim world only. Ironically, the governments of Muslim countries including Pakistan were roped in to fight the Muslim extremists.  

 

Afghanistan was chosen as the first target for devastation on the excuse that Mullah Omar and his Shura had sheltered Osama bin Laden (OBL) and his fighters allegedly involved in 9/11 and Omar had refused to hand over OBL unless proof of his involvement in 9/11 attacks was furnished. After occupying Afghanistan and ousting Mullah Omar led Taliban regime from power in November 2001 with the assistance of Pakistan and installing a puppet regime of Northern Alliance (NA) under string-puppet Hamid Karzai, the occupied country was made into a US military base. Biggest intelligence centre was established at Sehra Naward, north of Kabul for launching covert war against Russia, China, Central Asia, Pakistan, Iran and Middle East. CIA assisted by RAW, Mosad, MI-6, BND and RAAM embarked upon the biggest clandestine operations ever undertaken in the world history. Afghanistan was turned into the world’s leading narcotic State so as to generate funds for the covert war.

 

RAW was made in-charge of Pakistan front and tasked to destabilize, denuclearize, de-Islamize and Balkanize it. For the achievement of this aim, the two extreme flanks, FATA in the northwest and Balochistan in the southwest were chosen to subvert Pakistan. CIA led the assault by opening outposts in FATA and creating Spider Web outfit in 2002 under the garb of eliminating Al-Qaeda operatives. The real purpose was to eliminate pro-Pakistan tribal Maliks and clerics and create space for anti-Pakistan elements disguised as Pakistani Taliban. Over 600 pro-Pakistan tribal elders were killed.  

 

Likewise the Sardars of Bugti, Marri and Mengal tribes in Balochistan were taken on board and instigated to start an insurgency against the State. In order to give fillip to the two insurgencies, while Gen Musharraf was coerced to launch military operations in South Waziristan in 2004, Nawab Akbar Bugti, Sardar Attaullah Mengal and Sardar Khair Bux Marri were prompted to start an insurgency in the same year in interior Balochistan on the pretext of socio-politico-economic grievances and to resist mega projects like development of Gawadar. Terrorist outfits like BLA, BRA, BLF, BLUF and Baloch Lashkar emerged from nowhere. They started blowing up gas pipelines, electricity grid stations and pylons, railways and other installations and attacked convoys/check posts of security forces. Capital city of Quetta was frequently rocketed. Settlers, especially Punjabis became the chief targets of target killers.

 

An Army operation in Dera Bugti forced Nawab Akbar to flee to the mountains where he ultimately died in August 2006. His death gave a good reason to the schemers to further heat up Baloch nationalism and to convert insurgency into a separatist movement. The movement was controlled first by Balach Marri in exile in Kandahar and after his death by Brahamdagh Bugti duly supported by foreign powers. In Balochistan where the separatists fully supported by external powers are being effectively contained by the Frontier Corps and the Army has taken up a back seat, the nationalists led provincial government under Dr Abdul Malik is determined to redress grievances of the Baloch and bring the misled back into the mainstream of Pakistan’s political culture. He has called an All Parties Conference on Balochistan. 

 

In FATA, Pakistani Taliban under Baitullah Mehsud were helped to form TTP in December 2007. The two extreme flanks of Pakistan were then systematically stoked to intensify the scale and level of insurgency. Series of major operations in 2009 helped the Army in wresting initiative from the TTP and gaining an upper hand. Pak government and TTP are poised to hold peace talks and hopefully arrive at a political settlement. Situation across the Durand Line is however different where Afghan Taliban have gained an edge over ISAF, forcing it to plan its exit by December 2014.         

 

After Afghanistan, the US led forces then ravaged and captured Iraq with the assistance of Iraqi Shias and Iraqi Kurds and with the blessing of Arab neighbors. Although the US-NATO troops abandoned Iraq in 2010, the country is engulfed in sectarian war and hardly a day passes peacefully without a bomb blast or suicide attack claiming several lives. Islamic State of Iraq & Levant (ISIL) linked with al-Qaeda has become very active while Iran has increased its influence over Iraqi Shias and so has Syria. Kurds in the north are also creating trouble for the Nurul Maliki regime.

 

In the largest Muslim State of Sudan, insurgency by SPLA under Col John Garang in oil rich and Christian/Animist heavy South Sudan was instigated by the West in 1983 and assisted by Ethiopia. Gen Jaafar Nimeiry’s only fault was that he had imposed Shariah in Sudan that year and his successors Sadiq al-Mahdi and Gen Omar al-Bashir followed suit. Bashir negotiated an end to one of the longest and deadliest wars of the 20th century by granting limited autonomy to South Sudan in 2005 for six years followed by a referendum. No sooner this front started to subside, western province Darfur heated up because of interference by French oil companies working in Chad. South Sudan became an independent Christian State in 2011 because of heavy intervention of the UN, US and the West. Bashir is the first sitting President to be indicted by International Court of Justice on charges of war crimes in Darfur.

 

The US arrogance and policy of interventionism together with US backed Israel’s cruelties against Palestinians and passivity of Arab leaders led to Arab Spring. The first revolt occurred in Tunisia in December 2010 which ousted the regime of Zainul Abedine. Soon after, the entire Middle East and part of Africa got infected. Emulating the example of the uprising in Tunisia, it took the secular-liberal protestors assembled in Tahrir Square of Cairo on January 25, 18 days to bring down Hosni Mubarak led autocratic regime on February 12, 2011. The leaderless people’s revolution was however hijacked by Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and it captured power through fair and free elections in June 2012 and elected Muhammad Morsi as the President.

 

This change came as a surprise to Egyptian military, seculars and Coptic. Within one year of takeover by the Islamist government, another assemblage of seculars and Coptic at Tahrir Square was engineered by CIA-Mosad and Egyptian military under Field Marshal Fattah al- Sissi and supported by the judiciary and secular parties on 01 July 2013. Two days later, Morsi and his regime was deposed and put behind bars. Martial law was imposed and an interim setup put in place. It sparked large scale protests in reaction to which three protesters were shot dead on 5 July and 51 Islamists massacred by Army soldiers on July 8. Ever since members of MB, Salafist al-Nur Party and a new Islamist group called Ansar-al-Shariah are being hounded and persecuted while the latter have started an insurgency against the military in Sinai Peninsula. Sissi supported by the west and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is all set to take over as elected President.   

 

Northerners and Southerners in Yemen are at war with each other since 1962. In the 1962-1970 civil war in the north, Egypt’s President Gamal Abdel Nasser had sent 70,000 troops to support rebellious Republicans. KSA and Jordon supported the Royalists. Yemen was united for the first time in 1990 by Ali Abdullah Saleh. Arab uprising in 2011 infected Yemen as well and protests started in January 2011 to bring down Saleh. Al-Qaeda added fuel to fire by making Yemen its HQ for Arab Peninsula. Mansural-Hadi took over but the change has not lessened the antagonism between the warring tribes. Shia Houthi rebels in the north wish separation.

 

Next in the firing line was Libya. Disgruntled Libyans in exile were instigated by CIA to revolt against Qaddafi regime. Thereon, NATO fully aided the rebels by carpet bombing the government forces, defence infrastructure, Benghazi and Tripoli and within months the regime was toppled and the leader lynched to death. Although the regime has been changed in Libya and US-western companies have taken control over Libyan oil, the country is wracked in turmoil and is likely to remain restive for a considerable length of time. Islamists are gradually gaining strength.    

 

Encouraged by the outcome of its Libyan venture, CIA embarked upon another undertaking in Syria in early 2011 to overthrow Bashar al-Asad regime, which is anti-Israel and pro-Iran and also allied with Hezbollah. Syria’s Sunnis which are in majority were instigated to wage a war against Shiite government forces and were promised all out support. KSA, Qatar, some Gulf States and Turkey also pledged support to get rid of Shia minority regime. Unlike Libya to which no country came to its rescue, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah stoically stood behind Asad. Once the military balance started to tilt in favor of government forces, the US threatened to employ force.

 

Russia got a wind of gun running operation organized by the US Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi to assist Syrian rebels in toppling Assad regime. CIA had opened a control room close to the US Embassy to manage gun running operation. Moscow saw it as a direct threat to Russia’s security interests. It is believed that Russia’s FSS (successor of KGB) planned the terror attack on US Embassy in Benghazi in which Steve was killed. Obama was blamed by his opponents in USA for not dispatching rescue team, and for mishandling the Benghazi planned attack by Russia.

 

NATO deployed cruising missiles and was ready to target the Syrian defence infrastructure so as to weaken the Syrian military, but before the military action could be undertaken, Russia defused the highly volatile situation by making an offer that Damascus would destroy its stockpiles of chemical weapons. With its hands full in the Afghan misadventure and its economy in tailspin, Obama agreed to call off strikes in Syria and thus averted the crisis. Notwithstanding NATO’s withdrawal, CIA’s support to Sunni rebels is continuing. Civil war of late has taken a new turn because of the involvement of ISIL along with al-Qaeda which is pitched against rebel forces in northern Syria. Syrian internal strife has spilled over into neighboring Lebanon where Lebanese Sunnis aligned with al-Qaeda and supported by CIA and Mosad are pitched against Hezbollah.

 

Iran was isolated and put under four rounds of economic sanctions to force it to abandon its nuclear program. The US-UK navies kept harassing Iran by deploying aircraft carriers and warships closer to the Persian Gulf and threatening to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities through aerial strikes. The country was also subjected to massive covert war, which ultimately succeeded in affecting a regime change in June 2013. The new leader Hasan Rouhani is US friendly and has struck a nuclear deal in November 2013, agreeing to roll back Iran’s nuclear program in return for easing some of the sanctions. The deal has ended 34 years old Iran-US hostility and has paved the way for warmer relationship in the future.

 

Obama’s backing off from striking Syria and warming up with Iran has offended KSA and brought frostiness in their relations. Yet another development is dilution of Qatar’s extraordinary warm relations with KSA, Bahrain and UAE since it has refused to desist from supporting MB in Egypt and elsewhere. This will cause further fissures in the already divided Arab League, much to the delight of Israel. Fast changing security environment in the Middle East impels KSA to lean heavily upon Pakistan for its security. Grant of $1.5 billion by Riyadh to Islamabad without strings is a proof that KSA has always come to Pakistan’s aid in difficult times. Besides Afghanistan and Syria, Ukraine is turning into another flashpoint which may re-ignite US-Russia cold war.

 

It is encouraging that Pakistan is fast coming out of the woods because of constructive policies of the government. It has broken its isolation and is today in great demand. All economic indicators are steadying, which is a good sign. However, real progress can be achieved once the insane war on terror comes to an early end.  PML-N – PTI close alignment backed by the Army and Ulema can achieve the breakthrough. On the external front, Pakistan should stay clear of internal strife of Arab States and Arab-Iran rivalry and strive to maintain cordial relations with all.   

 

The writer is a retired Brig, defence analyst, columnist, researcher and author of several books[email protected]            

 

 

, , ,

No Comments

THE LAST ARGUMENT OF KINGS

DEALING WITH COMPLEX SITUATION OF BALOCHISTAN: INDIA, US AND ISRAEL COVERT AGENDA

On July 3, 2013
by
stratagem
 

Source: The Frontier Post

Although endless wave of terror-attacks continues in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Karachi, yet complex situation of Balochistan also needs special attention. On June 30, this year, terrorists once again attacked the Hazara town of Shia community, in Balochistan, and killed 28 persons in a suicide bombing.
Recent incidents of terrorism in Balochistan, which targeted Quaid-e-Azam residency in Ziarat, replacing Pakistan’s flag with that of Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), murdering daughters of the nation in Sardar Bahadur Khan Women University, and assault Bolan Medical Complex, killed several persons—created sense of distress among masses. Separatist outfit, BLA and the extremist sectarian group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) felt pride in claiming responsibility for these brutal acts. While terror-acts still keep on going in Balochistan, but without grasping reality, anti-establishment and anti-law-enforcing persons, which include some politicians, ministers, lawyers, human rights activists and media anchors are issuing false statements, thus conducting false propaganda against Pak Army and country’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) including other law-enforcing agencies.

 

It seems ridiculous when some of them allegedly say that law-enforcing agencies are behind terrorist activities in Balochistan. They are misguiding the general masses by shifting the blame game towards country’s security agencies regarding the intricate phenomenon of Balochistan by diverting the attention from ground realities. While driven by the foreign conspiracy, the other aim of these internal entities is to create a perception among the masses that security agencies are solely responsible for all the chaos, carnage and disorder in Balochistan and hence punitive measures should be taken to restrict their authority by empowering those elements which are well-reputed for their anti-armed forces perspective. The divisive psychological campaign is being run to widen the gulf between civil-military leadership and spoil civil-military relations.
In fact, like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the foreign-backed separatist groups such as BLA, Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) and Baloch Republican Party (BRA) had accelerated their terror-activities by targeting the leaders, offices of Balochistan National Party (BNP) and the National Party (NP) including independent candidates to sabotage the elections 2013. But, despite their boycott-call, BNP and NP including several independent candidates and Baloch nationalists participated in the polls in wake of threats and violent assaults on the polling stations. The purpose behind the latest bombings especially by the BLA were to give a message to the new Balochistan government led by the nationalist and moderate Baloch Chief Minister Abdul Malik that their insurgents would fail his elected regime in the province, while the latter wants to address the Baloch discontent within the federation of Pakistan.
No doubt, based in Afghanistan, secret agencies like American CIA, Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad which have already been arranging terror-assaults on various places of Pakistan, security forces, sectarian violence etc. through TTP, BLA and other similar militant groups, intend to destabilize Pakistan so as to complete the secret strategic designs of their countries. Particularly, RAW has hired the services of Indian Muslims who have well-penetrated in BLA, TTP, Jundollah, (God’s soldiers) and LeJ, have been conducting subversive acts in various provinces, particularly Balochistan.
Pakistan’s civil and military leadership has repeatedly disclosed that militants along with huge cache of arms are being sent to Pakistan, especially in Balochistan from Afghanistan. In this regard, on July 23, 2008, Brahmdagh Bugti had told the BBC that they had the right to accept foreign aid and arms from anywhere including India.
Notably, India, US and Israel have also been internationalizing the Balochistan issue in accordance with their covert agenda. In this respect, in connivance with the Baloch separatist leaders who have taken refuge in Switzerland, Sweden, US, London and some other western countries, these external elements use media, various NGOs and human rights organisations for false propaganda against Pak Army and ISI including Frontier Corps (FC) in relation to extrajudicial killings, mutilated bodies and the missing persons.
The truth behind human rights violations, the missing persons and aggravated law and order situation of Balochistan is that militant groups like BLA, BLF, BRA and Jundollah which have been fighting for secession of Balochistan kidnapped and massacred many innocent people who include teachers, professors, lawyers, Shias and the security personnel in the province.
Many persons in Balochistan have also been killed in suicide attacks and bomb blasts, planted by these foreign-backed outfits. On a number of occasions, these insurgents groups claimed responsibility for their criminal activities. In the past few years, they kidnapped and killed many Chinese and Iranian nationals in Pakistan. Besides targeting Punjabis and other ethnic minorities in the province, they also arranged subversive acts in the Iranian Sistan-Baluchistan. In this context, Tehran had directly named CIA for funding of terrorist attacks.
A majority of the disappeared individuals are also in the detention centres (Farrari Camps) which are being run by Baloch feudal lords (Sardars). With the assistance of US-led India and Israel, these Sardars are fighting for their so-called prestige, status and influence, and want to continue old system of feudalism in the province.
As regards the complex phenomenon of the province, our internal elements must also know that Balochistan’s geo-strategic location with deep Gwadar seaport, connecting rest of the world with Central Asia has further irked the eyes of the US and India because Beijing has already invested billion of dollars to develop this seaport. Notably, by rejecting US growing pressure, on March 11, 2013 Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari inaugurated the gas pipeline project with Iran. Meanwhile, Pakistan has handed over the control of Gwader seaport to China. During the trip of Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang to Islamabad, Pakistan and China signed several agreements on May 22, this year to strengthen and diversify cooperation in various fields. Beijing would also provide financial aid to Islamabad to complete the Gwader seaport. Premier Li Keqiang supported Pakistan’s proposal of China-Pakistan economic corridor to improve connectivity between Pakistan and China, saying that both sides decided on a long term programme—a strategic idea, assuring that Beijing was also ready to upgrade Karrakuram Highway and to sign Sino-Pak civilian nuclear deal.
Meanwhile, a day before Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrived in Islamabad; Chinese engineers being driven through Clifton Block-1 in Karachi escaped a major bomb attack. Besides, on June 23, the TTP militants killed nine foreign mountain-climbers in the Nanga Parbat, Gilgit-Baltistan, which also included five Ukrainians and a number of Chinese nationals. It clearly shows that the US and India intend to disrupt Pak-China growing relations by backing their affiliated-insurgent groups.
However, Pakistan’s law-enforcing and intelligence agencies have thwarted many terror attempts of the militants in Balochistan, while several personnel of the security forces have sacrificed their lives for improving situation in the province. But they were discouraged and demoralized when speaking in the tone of foreign enemies, some anti-Pakistan prominent personalities and media anchors start maligning these agencies without any logic.
Another hurdle is that these key agencies’ actions were being challenged in the courts. The insurgents’ lawyers availed the opportunity by indicating procedural penal flaws.
Thus many terrorists were freed by the courts due to lack of solid evidence in legal terms, though reality of their subversive activities existed. Due to this practice, efficiency of law-enforcing agencies drops to zero level, making the concerned official insecure.
Terrorist presently under custody, if released by the court due to judicial discourse will certainly join their main terrorist networks, thereby strengthening terrorist groups. Consequently, this ‘new style war’ will turn in favor of terrorists instead of law-enforcing and intelligence agencies which may suffer more in the hands of terrorists.
Nevertheless, in these adverse circumstances as to how law-enforcing agencies and security forces will cope with the complex situation of Balochistan. It is also the responsibility of the federal and provincial governments to restore peace in Balochistan. The best way is that top political leadership and government functionaries must support the security and intelligence agencies and encourage them for their future performance and should stop supporting the cause of terrorists and separatists indirectly.

 

 

, , ,

No Comments