Our Announcements

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.

Archive for December, 2013

SHAMELESS LOOT SALE IS ON, PAKISTAN’S CROWN JEWELS AT STAKE —FIRST TO GO PIA

PM Pakistan Nawaz Sharif and the cabinet Division, finally had decided and gave final approval to Close PIA prior June 2014. This decision was taken In the cabinet meeting held to night at late hours and was chaired by PM and in presence of MD PIAC and some other PIA officials. Three option were under discussions, one Totally close PIA, two, re-structuring of PIA, three Handing Over PIA to Private Sectors.

 

PIA-1 Head Quarter shall be established at Islamabad and PIA Head Office Karachi shall function as PIA-2 Head quarters till June-2014. MD PIA and other PIA officials are ordered and were yet given last opportunity till June 2014 to apart and establish initially Whole PIA in 02 Parts; PIA-1 and PIA-2. After complete privatization PIA-1 will be restored for private sector and initially selected business communities are being given 26% assets of PIA to Command and Control PIA-1 (The Operational area only) with help and support of Air blue, Air Indus, Shaheen and Royal Airport Services.

 

The competent and Aviation experts exists in PIA and from all the departments working only in operational areas and in shifts only will be merged in PIA-1 and the excess and free manpower working in Day Operations, shall be excluded from existing PIA strength and shall be merged in PIA-2.

 

Lists of that employees excess, useless are already maintained by 3rd Party team attached with PIA few months ago. Only 30 Pilots will be taken for PIA-1. The Ratio of Manpower of PIA-1 will be as under: 30% Daily wages and Contract services oriented employees from PG-I to PG-VIII, 30% Permanent and Service oriented employees from existing strength from PG-I to PG-VIII having aviation and field expertise, particularly at ramp side. 35% for Engineering, IT, communication, Flight Safety experts having Engineering and technical qualifications, Aviation Licenses, Approvals. 5% shall be from Corporate, Finance, Human Resources and for Management positions. Shall be normal Graduates of areas of particular fields with vast Experience and reputation related to aviation.

 

The Skilled Operation Officers and staff and Management selection of employees will be as under and shall be taken as per aircraft manufacturer approved specifications and for various 22 type aircraft in PIA, of which 18 are operational and rest 4 are under checks ABCD or routine repairs in Line-1 or Line-2.

 

Statistics provided in PM cabinet meeting conducted in PM House, shown that Including Daily wedges and contract employees today PIA is holding 22,000 Employees for 22 Aircraft.PIA one will be political and trade union free private Sector PIA and only Aviation trained and field experts will be merged who had good reputation and service record. In case of shorten such strength, retired or near retired reputed employees will be called on 3 to 5 years contract or those who are retiring but have recorded expertise shall be taken enhance their services up to age of 65 years.

 

 Most Travellers Do Not Trust Female Pilots: Survey

 

 

To overcome the issues it is decided that all those staff and officers working in office strengths at airports or head office since years or even at out stations but politically and against merit were promoted or selected shall be merged in PIA-2 which later will be closed after June 2014. All trade unions and Officers, other associations representatives are those who are out of duty, exampled also shall be merged in PIA-2. It will be later decided if these free and excess employees shall be given Golden Shake hand or not.

 

The strength of manpower of PIA-1 will be as under: One CEO (Aviation Experts From Business community), Only One Director (Aviation and Marketing experts), 03 General Managers (From Operational areas and Marketing Areas (Having Field and trade experience, and had worked from roots to top), 01 corporate Managers for each Operational areas had only Ramp expertise and gone through all field areas in service carrier from root), and Marketing areas, gone through fields and has acquired recorded revenue. and 3rd General Manager shall be IT experts . All IT or communication or reservation related functionaries whether at Airports, in Head Offices, in Marketing offices or any where, he will be responsible, manage and control. Accordingly all IT strength whether in Operation, Marketing, Engineering, other area will be under his supervision and control for fruitful results.

 

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (EXISTING) – PIA-2

 

The excess and free manpower against the 22 Aircraft’s in PIA, The all Officers and staff working in Day Pattern, All new inductions in PIA after year 1998 and inducted after resizing of PIA in 1998 on Suggestions of SABRE Consultants  and the all those Officers and staff, Daily wedges or Contractual or permanent employees,  and all those who were pre-designated or transferred from their parent departments to other with or without backdate seniority and who were rapidly promoted from year 2000 to 2013 without merit and any linguistic, religious creed, political, establishment or bureaucratic influences, any in-house / out house management, trade unions, officers associations support or influences, and those Officers/Staff facing disciplinary and misconduct charges will be filled in PIA-2.

 

The cases of all type of beneficiary of unmerited/out of turn, from 1998 to 2013, had already been investigated along with those all departmental or HR officials who had supported them are also enlisted by third party investigators confidentially and 3 months ago for real accountability, to get Govt. decide, whether after removal or termination of these all type of over-the-rule and merit beneficiaries shall be compensated, for Golden shake hand or other schemes in consideration or not and whether PIA losses shall be recovered from them for these foul activities, actions, decisions PIA reached to bankruptcy.

 

The rest excess employees if on merit parameters, sequence and series shall be offered Golden hand shake schemes, also shall be facilitated and supported to adjust in other Private Airlines like Air Blue, air Indus etc, provided they have 15 years or more aviation and ramp or field experience, aviation trainings, on-job trainings, PTC or CAA certifications, Licenses, Approvals and good reputation as well with service record during PIA Services.

 

Finally in Month of June-2014 all PIA-2 with excess employees will be out of PIA strength and identity and PIA-1 will continue as NATIONAL FLAG CARRIER as PIA (Pvt).

 

 

,

No Comments

H– — USEYN SHAHEED SUHRAWARDY- AND UNITED PAKISTAN

H– — USEYN SHAHEED SUHRAWARDY- AND UNITED PAKISTAN

Muhammad Shahbaz Thuthaal

 

 

 

It was almost 40 years ago that we lost major part of our country. Every year we write a few articles on that day and then forget it for the next year. We are not ready to learn the causes of this tragedy. East Pakistan was 54% of the total population of Pakistan, but was ruled by the minority. Why AK Fazal e Haq (Sher e Bengal) mover of 1940 Pakistan resolution at Lahore, was declared traitor? HS SUHRAWARDY, the mover of 1946 Delhi Resolution declared traitor, immediately after 14 August 1947. Many of the Books written about Fall of Dhaka do not give the whole truth. Lt Gen Kamal Matin in his Book ‘Tragedy of Errors’ and most of the books written after 1971 war in Pakistan could not write the truth firstly because the First Civilian CMLA himself was part of the conspiracy to dismember pakistan. The so- called ISLAMIC writers/intellectuals always wrote negatively about the Culture and Language of Bengal. Everyone has ignored the fact that H S Suhrawardy as CM of Bengal negotiated for united Bengal with the Congress on the Instructions of Quaid e Azam. HS Suhrawardy, who had correctly remarked, “English, PIA and ‘He,’ were the only links between East And West Pakistan.” Those journalists or writers who supported the transfer of Power to Sh Mujib were termed as Traitors. There is a need to study the life of this great Man of United Pakistan, Mr. H S SUHRAWARDY with an open mind. 5 Dec 2011 was the 48th death anniversary of Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy; not a single newspaper in Pakistan carried any news. I remember when I went to East Pakistan in 1966; every other shop in Dhaka, Commilla and Jessore displayed his pictures. He was very popular with People from all occupations in East Pakistan. In the West Pakistan, he was projected as Pro Congress links with Gandhi. No one ever bothered to learn the facts. No worthwhile written material was available about his life except in Government propaganda books, until the publication of his biography 24 years after his death in 1987. Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy was Born in Medinipore in the west Bengal on September 8, 1892. After finishing his education at Calcutta Alia Madrasa, he attended St. Xavier’s College, wherefrom he received a Bachelor of Science degree with Honours in Sciences. To fulfill his mother’s earnest request, he did another M.A., in Arabic Language and Literature from Calcutta University before his departure for England in 1913. He studied Sciences at Oxford University and received a Bachelor degree with Honours in Science. He also studied Law and Jurisprudence at Oxford University. He completed his Bar-at-Law from Gray’s Inn in 1918. He started his law practice at Calcutta High Court immediately after his return Page 1from England. Mr. Suhrawardy started his political career in 1920, with Khilafat movement. In 1924, he was elected as the Deputy Mayor of Calcutta Municipal Corporation (along with C.R. Das as the Mayor), and held that position until 1927. He worked tirelessly during the late spring and early summer months of 1926 to put an end to Hindu-Muslim riots in Calcutta. The leaders and newspapers of the Hindu community in Calcutta targeted him for his defense in the Courts of law for the falsely accused Muslim rioters. By the year 1927, he emerged as the most vocal and articulate defender of Muslim rights in the city of Calcutta; Organized numerous associations, labor unions, and trade unions in Calcutta. He was instrumental in organizing the All-India Khilafat Conference and All-Bengal Muslim Conference in 1928. As one of the emerging Muslim leaders of India, H.S. Suhrawardy was very critical about the lopsided recommendations of the Simon Commission Report. He was ardent critic of the Nehru (Motilal) Commission Report. He was actively involved in holding of the Conferences of the All-India Muslim Volunteers in 1931-32. With prominent Muslim leaders of Bengal, he formed Independent Muslim Party (IMP) in early 1936, and was elected its first general secretary. However, on the insistence of the provincial and All-India Muslim League leaders, he merged (IMP) in the later part of 1936 with the Bengal Provincial Muslim League (BPML).

H.S. Suhrawardy became the first general secretary of the BPML in 1936. From the end of 1936 through the end of 1943, he performed a yeoman’s task in the process of popularizing the moribund Muslim League party and the concept of Pakistan among the Muslim masses throughout the nooks and corners of the then Bengal. He played a dominant role in the process of recruiting a group of dedicated and capable party workers and later in the formation of the Muslim National Guards under the sponsorship of the BPML. He remained elected member of the Bengal Legislative Council ever since 1921. During the 1937 and 1946 elections, he won from two constituencies. He got Kh Nazimuddin elected from the second seat, which he vacated after the 1937 elections. He was a seasoned parliamentarian in the true sense of the term. His speeches in the legislative assemblies both before and after the partition are considered as classics in legislative debates. His relentless fight throughout his post-partition political life for establishing a federally anchored parliamentary form of government in Pakistan owed much to the robust legislative training and experience that he had gained during his pre-partition political years from 1921 to 1947 in the Bengal Legislative Council and the Bengal Legislative Assembly. After the formation of the Muslim League and Proja Party coalition ministry in Bengal under the leadership A.K. Fazlul Haq, H.S. Suhrawardy became, minister for labor. He was the most active member in Khawaja Nazimuddin cabinet, which was formed after the collapse of Sher e Bengal cabinet in 1943. H.S. Suhrawardy personally enlisted the support of industrial workers of Bengal in favour of the Pakistan movement. His popularity among the students and younger generation had motivated many to be the most vocal supporters of the Pakistan movement. Both H.S. Page 2Suhrawardy and Abul Hashim were in the forefront for a landslide victory of the Bengal Provincial Muslim League during the 1946 elections. As the Chief Minister of Bengal in 1946, H.S. Suhrawardy shouldered the responsibility of lending logistic support to the Pakistan Movement. He was personally requested by Quaid E Azam, to move the controversial Amendment to the original version of the historic 1940 Lahore Resolution at the Delhi Convention of the Muslim League Legislators in 1946. H.S. Suhrawardy, proposal for “Sovereign Bengal” did not gain much ground with the HINDUS because his reputation as a staunch defender of the Muslim rights in Bengal. His role before, during, and after the 1946 riots in Calcutta to safeguard the interest and welfare of common Muslims, had seriously eroded his credibility among the leaders and masses of the Hindu community and Congress. With the exception of S C Bose, his idea of “Sovereign United Bengal” as a last minute effort to stop the partition of Bengal in 1947 was not well received by the religiously imbued Congress leaders. By that time, the Hindu Mahashabha leaders and the Congress leadership in Bengal were already committed to the division of Bengal on communal lines. Therefore, there is little wonder that the Congress-led champions of “Akhanda Bharat” and Hindu Mahashabha-led exponents of the “divided” Bengal were not at all willing to lend any support to his proposal for sovereign Bengal. Unfortunately, the concept of a separate sovereign Bengal, which was aimed to save the lives of thousands of Muslims in Calcutta, was not appreciated by both the top leadership of Congress and Muslim league, who were bent upon Partition of Bengal. Few realize that at the risk of his political Career he took the bold decision to leave the Muslim League meeting in Karachi on 8 August 1947 to rush to Calcutta, as he was still the CM of united Bengal to the call of GANDHI to save the lives of Muslims. As against the Punjab leaders, who failed to come forward and save millions of valuable lives lost. Instead of recognizing his popularity, political stature, commitment, and organizational skills, and his contribution to the Pakistan movement at a critical juncture, The Muslim League leadership consciously patronized un popular leader Khawaja Nazimuddin. Kh Nazimuddin was nominated the parliamentary leader of the Muslim League legislators in East Bengal on August 5, 1947 (only 9 days before Pakistan was born!). HS Suhrawardy was still popular CM of United Bengal. The Muslim League Leadership feared his popularity with the masses. With the selection of a conservative and discredited leader of the BPML for assuming the role of the Chief Minister of East Bengal (East Pakistan) over a progressive and dynamic leader of H.S. Suhrawardy caliber and stature, the leadership of the new nation of Pakistan had tacitly sealed the political fate of the last prime minister of undivided Bengal. Once Pakistan was a reality on August 14, 1947, the goal of Khawaja Nazimuddin and his coterie in the provincial Muslim League was to keep the doors of the party closed to the most progressive and dynamic members of the Bengal Provincial Muslim League. The followers of both H.S. Suhrawardy and Abul Hashim were singled out to be excluded even from the primary membership of the Muslim League. H.S. Suhrawardy was literally banished from the political scene of Pakistan by the leadership both at the center in Karachi and in the province of East Bengal. As the Chief Minister of East Bengal, Khawaja Nazimuddin lost no Page 3time in characterizing him as an “Indian agent” and an “enemy of Pakistan.”

He was quickly removed from the membership of the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan. The East Bengal Government had also prohibited him from entering or addressing public meetings in any place of East Bengal. Despite persistent attacks from the reactionary forces of the ruling Muslim League, H.S. Suhrawardy re-emerged in Pakistan’s political scene as a champion of liberal democracy. He was one of the builders of opposition politics in the early years of Pakistan. Many of his followers took an active role in the formation of both the East Pakistan Student League (EPSL) in early 1948 and East Pakistan Awami Muslim League (EPAML) in mid-June-1949. These pro- democracy organizations were in the vanguard of all of the phases (1948-52) of the Bengali Language Movement. In 1953, H.S. Suhrawardy, in collaboration with A.K. Fazlul Haq and Maulana Bhashani, was responsible for forming Jugtu Front (United Front). His organizational skills and personal charisma significantly contributed to the landslide victory of the United Front over the ruling Muslim League in the 1954 general election in East Bengal. The Ruling Muslim League was wiped out and got only 9 seats. Gen Islander Mirza an ICS officer was appointed Governor East Bengal to undo this Election Victory.

In spite of all these high handed tactics by the Ruling Muslim League, H.S. Suhrawardy emerged as the most credible voice in support of framing a Constitution with the provisions for civil liberties and a full-blown parliamentary model of liberal democracy in Pakistan. He managed to get a foothold in the Punjabi and Mohajir dominated decision- making process of the central government, when he became the Law Minister in Mohammad Ali Bogra’s Cabinet, and he held that position from December 20, 1954, through August, 1955. He was the leader of the opposition in the National Assembly of Pakistan from August 11, 1955 through September 1, 1956. His contribution to the making of the 1956 Constitution of Pakistan was substantial. He is the one who convinced the people and leaders of East Pakistan for the Parity Formula. He became Prime Minister of Pakistan from September 12, 1956 through October 11, 1957. The 1956 Constitution of Pakistan was suspended and Martial Law was promulgated by President Islander Mirza (a descendent of Mir Jaffer Ali Khan) on October 7,1958. The newly installed dictator of Pakistan knew well that H.S. Suhrawardy was an obstacle in the design and implementation of his tailor-made Constitution. Ayub Khan quietly approached him to cooperate with the Constitution making process of the military regime. Although the constitution making and democracy building were his chief concerns during his political career in Pakistan, he bluntly refused to lend any stamp of legitimacy to the illegitimate dictatorial regime of Ayub Khan. As a dedicated champion of genuine parliamentary democracy in Pakistan, he refused to endorse Ayub Khan’s illegal seizure of state power. This was HS Suhrawardy a true democrat. Mr. Qayyum served six rulers of Pakistan as PRO, speechwriter and adviser on sensitive correspondence. He wrote a book “Three prime ministers and three Presidents. ”His chapter on Mr. Suhrawardy tenure as Prime Minister makes a very interesting study. To quote from his book, Page 4“Suhrawardy commitment to Pakistan as a single, united nation was an article of faith with him. His patriotism could never be questioned. “While addressing a mammoth public meeting at Paltan Maidan in Dhaka on 26 March 1957, Suhrawardy said, “There is no difference between East and West Pakistan. We are Pakistanis first and Pakistanis last. It is wrong to say that West Pakistan has been oppressing East Pakistan. The same set of people who have oppressed you, have oppressed West Pakistan. We are one. Our prestige is founded on the sense of unity. My one success has been that I have removed mutual hatred from Pakistan’.” Mr. Qayyum further adds, “It is my firm conviction, that had Suhrawardy not got caught up in Pakistan’s ‘political phenomenon,’ and been allowed to pursue his cardinal objective of holding a general election, as he stated on assuming the office of prime minister, the nation would have been spared the ordeal of successive military regimes and the separation of East Pakistan. Mr. Suhrawardy was a great leader with qualities of head and heart, with an informal and human approach to life, complete indifference to vanity and pomp. He could talk with ease to the lowliest in his country and the highest in world councils. Mr. Qayyum cites two instances, which showed dauntless courage in the face of physical danger:- Mr. Suhrawardy decided to address a public meeting in Lahore’s Mochi Gate where the atmosphere was very hostile and the crowd (according to intelligence reports) ready for violence because of his avowed advocacy of joint electorates. Governor M.A. Gurmani advised him against going there, as he could not guarantee the PM’s safety and would not like to be held responsible for physical harm to his person. Mr. Suhrawardy asked for pen and paper and wrote a signed note: “Despite the Governor’s advice to the contrary I am attending the Mochi Gate meeting. Should any harm come to me, including losing my life, he should not be held responsible.” Then, handing this note to an Aghast Gurmani, he drove off. At Mochi Gate, the air rang with shouts and abuses. Ignoring the hail of stones and invective, the PM took his stand firmly at the microphone and said that in a democracy every citizen had the right to express his views. If anyone in the crowd wanted to speak, first he was welcome to take the microphone. When no one came up, he began to speak and soon the shouting subsided. Miraculously, when he ended his speech after 40 minutes, he was greeted with “Suhrawardy zindabad!” The second instance was when public opinion in the country was against the invasion of the Suez Canal by Britain, France and Israel. A violent crowd of Karachi University students marched to the PM House and wanted to go inside, and refused to go back. On hearing their shouts, Mr. Suhrawardy came to the gate and asked for a police van fitted with a loudspeaker. He climbed on to the roof of the van, microphone in hand. The guards did not want to open the gate for him but he ordered them to step aside. On seeing him come out like this there was a stunned silence. He spoke to the students for nearly half an hour and explained the situation to them in logical words. So persuasive and impressive was his speech that the boys dispersed peacefully. H.S. Suhrawardy was banned from politics through the imposition of the infamous Elective Bodies Disqualification Order (EBDO) on August 7, 1959. He was arrested on January Page 530, 1962 and put in a solitary confinement in the Central jail of Karachi without any trial on concocted charges of “anti-state activities” under the 1952 Security of Pakistan Act. Instead of bowing down to Ayub Khan’s smearing and torturing tactics, he decided to challenge the legality of the patently false and baseless allegations. H.S. Suhrawardy was thus released from jail on August 19,1962. After his release from jail, he launched an anti-Ayub movement in both wings of Pakistan for the restoration of democracy. To him, Ayub Khan’s Basic Democracy was nothing but a mockery in the name of democracy. Instead of becoming a collaborator of a military dictator, he decided to be the most authentic dissenting voice against the then diabolical regime. He successfully enlisted support from all pro-democratic forces of Pakistan, and he formed the National Democratic Front (NDF) in October 1962 to dislodge the undemocratic regime of a military dictator. His immediate goal was to re-establish parliamentary democracy and democratic institutions in Pakistan through the restoration of the 1956 Constitution. He worked round the clock, which adversely affected his health, suffered a severe Heart Attack for which had to go abroad for treatment. While recovering from his heart ailment, he died on December 5, 1963 in a hotel room in Beirut under mysterious circumstances. He was buried in Dhaka on December 8, 1963 beside Sher-e-Bengal A.K. Fazlul Huq’s grave, adjacent to the then Race Course Maidan. At his funeral in the grounds of Dhaka high court, there was literally a sea of humanity present to pay their homage. Many glowing tributes were paid for his qualities as a person and a political leader, but what his famous and trusted colleague Abul Hashim said about him was the most striking. “He died a magnificent pauper, receiving the burial of an emperor.” He died at a time when the dissenting political forces in Pakistan were gaining ground toward building-up an effective opposition against the military dictatorship of Ayub Khan. The passing away of this political doyen at that critical moment created a void in the core leadership of the resistance movement against the autocratic dictatorship in Pakistan. He was the most articulate voice for introduction of adult franchise and restoration of parliamentary democracy in Pakistan in an era when a military dictator was in the process of consolidating his grip over the political process through the introduction of the so-called basic democracy. Many questions arise in one’s mind, which convinces the patriotic Pakistanis that right from the early days of our independence the leaders at the helm of affairs wanted only yes men under them to rule the new country. Separation of East Pakistan and now the situation in Baluchistan confirms that any dissenting voice is to be treated as traitor? How we can justify that a person due to whose untiring efforts ML won 115 seats in 1946 elections in Bengal. This enabled Muslim League to become the majority party in the Bengal Assembly thus strengthening the case for creation of Pakistan. HS Suhrawardy became the Chief Minister of United Bengal (54% of the entire Muslim population) after the 1946 elections. He was the author and mover of the Delhi Resolution of 1946 that made the amendment for a United Pakistan. Page 6 On 5th August 1947, Khawaja Nazim ud din an unpopular leader was nominated as new CM of East Pakistan at Karachi. HS SUHRAWARDY being a popular CM of United Bengal was ignored? Why it is a mystery? Earlier Quaid e Azam had personally given task to Suhrawardy to negotiate for a united Bengal / Assam as well as retaining CALCUTTA as part of EAST Bengal. Suhrawardy left Karachi on 9 August 1947, after learning about a scheme for Massacre of Muslims in Calcutta, to meet Mr. Gandhi to save the Muslim Lives irrespective of threat to his personal and Political life. The Leadership of AIML took arbitral action against him by banning his entry to Pakistan and enacted an order that any one not having residence in Pakistan would lose his seat in the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan. He came to Dhaka in March 1948 to take residence there. The federal government directed the CM East Pakistan Khawaja Nazimuddin to ban his entry into East Pakistan and extradite him. The orders were issued by none other than Kh Nazimuddin who himself got elected to Bengal Assembly in 1937 through H S Suhrawardy, who had won on two seats and surrendered his second seat. IG East Pakistan Zakir Hussein himself delivered the orders. Zakir Hussein was against him because he did not give him out of turn promotion as CM of United Bengal. (Mr. Zakir Hussein was rescued by 3 commando battalion of Pakistan Army in Chittagong during April 1971, ALLAH has his own ways ) After the Death of his father, Mr. HS Suhrawardy came to Karachi in 1949. The Federal Government directed the Karachi Bar not to enroll him as lawyer. The Bureaucracy led by Ch Muhammad Ali implemented the order. He went to Punjab and got himself enrolled as a lawyer in the then Montgomery district Bar and stayed in the house of Nawab Iftikhar Hussein Mamdot at Lahore to start his practice. His first case in Pakistan was to Defend Nawab Iftikhar Mamdot. Later he was one of the Main defence Lawyers in 1951 Conspiracy case. (Faiz Ahmed Faiz wrote a poem in Praise of Mr. HS Suhrawardy, the only one in his life.) These and other such reasons laid the foundation of Bangladesh. H S Suhrawardy was appointed neither the Prime Minister nor CM of East Pakistan, in spite of being the leader of 54% Muslim population of Pakistan and sitting Chief Minister of United Bengal. The Government knew about the independent mindset of H S Suhrawardy, who was not acceptable to the then Establishment. The next nail in the coffin of United Pakistan was declaring Urdu as National Language at Dhaka, a proposal not acceptable to the people of East Pakistan, who were proud of their language and rich culture. Page 7 There is another incident, which speaks of West Pakistan Bureaucracy attitude towards an independent-minded East Bengal Prime Minister.

Mr. Altaf Gohar in his interview to Javed Chaudary confessed that as DC/DM Karachi he did not allow Mr. Suhrawardy the Prime Minister to address a public meeting of Awami League on 14th August but instead gave the same ground to Muslim League on the same day. The Prime Minister left for Dhaka a day earlier to address /hold the public meeting in East Pakistan. At the Airport before his departure, he only informed Mr. Altaf Gohar that he was going to Dhaka because the DC/DM Karachi would not allow the Prime Minister of Pakistan to hold a public meeting on the Pakistan’s Independence Day. In spite of this affront, the Prime Minister did not take any action against the DC/DM! He fought for democracy and the cause of united Pakistan until his death in Beirut. Now is the time for us in Pakistan to give him his due recognition by celebrating his 50 years of death in 2013.

The government should name a major road in the main Blue Area in Islamabad as H S Suhrawardy Avenue. Punjab, Karachi, Peshawar, Baluchistan and Quaid e Azam universities should institute a chair after him and carry out research about his life, his achievements, and his works. References:- Humood ur rehman commission report; Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy by Shaista Ikramullah; Memoirs of HS Suhrawardy by Talukdar ,oxford; The great divide, HV HODSON; Pakistan in search Of Identity by Mubarik ali; Gai Dinnoy kay SOORAJ by Javed Ch; East Pakistan to Bangla desh, Days Decisive by Serajuddin hussain; Three Presidents, three prime minister by Abdul Qayyum; The separation of East Pakistan by Hassan zaheer; Hum Nafus by masud mufti; Quaid e Azam as I knew him by MAH Isphani; Divide and quit by Penderel Moon; Transfer of power papers; Alama Mashriqi’s speech at Nasir Bagh Lahore in 1954/ 56.

No Comments

Pakistani Humour: Abbajee Sharif’s Lament

 
 
 
 

No Comments

BANGLADESH 1971- ASGHAR KHAN CASE – PAKISTAN 2012

 

 

BANGLADESH1971- ASGHAR KHAN CASE-PAKISTAN 2012

 

 

 

 

       

 

Lot of water has flown under the Bridge ever since 16 Dec 1971. There is a 

 

need to re evaluate the East Pakistan Tragedy in the present environment. We need 

 

to draw lessons?  Why do people revolt? What is Freedom? Can we subjugate 

 

people forcibly? How do we see the war on terror in FATA & Swat? How do we see 

 

the burning of Pakistan Flags in Baluchistan ? How do we see the Ethnic Target 

 

Killings ?      

 

 Bangla Desh Revisited.  I went to Bangla desh in 2004:  All my Bengali course mates 

 

invited me & my friends for lunch in Defence club Dhaka. They gave presents to all 

 

my Colleagues. Majority of them had revolted as Majors in 1971 and fully participated 

 

in their war of liberation. In 2004 they were as loving as in 1963, when we met first 

 

time in PMA. But I am sure we  would have killed each other like Animals if we 

 

had seen each other  during the 1971 in then EAST PAKISTAN . Thank Allah I was in 

 

Chamb sector.  

 

      How would we explain our actions of 1971 to our younger generations and 

 

compare the same to our present situation, will it be fully understood by them in 2012. 

 

Many of my best friends were involved in 1973 Attock case. They were the best of 

 

the lot, one of them having won the sword of honour from PMA another had been to 

 

RMA. Three of them had won the Sitara e Jurat. They were tried and sent to jail! 

 

       Asghar Khan takes retired retd COAS and ISI chief to Supreme court for 

 

distribution of Rs 140 million of Private money to Politicians, whereas Supreme court 

 

lets off Gen Beg for a bigger Crime of forcing the then Supreme court not to restore 

 

the Government of MK JUNEJO and Parliament?  Yayha khan is buried with full 

 

military honors by Zia Ul Haq. Zia Ul Haq and Gen PM are let off, for their actions by 

8th, 17th Amendments?       

 

A/Cdr Mitty Masud in 1971, three Brigadiers in 1977 are retired 

 

for standing up for the truth, where as the young men of Attock case are sent to jail.

 

        Why none of the Senior Officers ever stood up against Yahya khan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Zia Ul 

 

Haq for Forming IJI or Mehran Bank  1988-1999 and finally Gen PM.   Is there is 

 

anything wrong with our System to select officers for higher ranks both in civil and 

 

military? Presently Gen Aslam beg and Gen Asad Durrani are crying like children on 

 

TV and blaming each other. Why has Gen Beg and Gen Durrani forgotten the writing 

 

in the INGALL  HALL PMA” Matters not what happens to you, what matters is how 

 

you behave while it is happening.”

 

 

 

         Therefore it is high time we must discuss debate and find solutions to this aspect 

 

of adhering to the law and define what lawful command is and what is not? Other wise 

 

we shall have serious implications of discipline cases, when the ARMY is fighting the 

 

war of terror on the western border.

 

Indra Gandhi , Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Sh Mujib the architects of the 1971’ were

 

murdered by their own people (1975-1984).

 

Lt Gen Aurora the Victor in 1971 war ; A decade later was talking

 

to BBC about the injustices suffered by Sikhs at the hands of the state,

 

(Sarmila Bose writing about the 1971 war)

 

Gen Yahya was put under arrest in an isolated rest house in Kharian

 

hills. He suffered a stroke became paralyzed and died after a prolonged

 

illness in his brothers house. Lt Gen Gul Hasan summarily retired by

 

ZAB on 2 March 1972; Suffered a rash of leukoderma, died after a bout

 

with Cancer, alone in services club Rawalpindi.” (Extracts from Page 218-

 

219’ East Pakistan the end Game’ By Brig AR Siddiqui.)

 

1975-1981 Bangla Desh. Maj (Maj Gen) Zia Ur Rehman, Maj (brig)

 

Khalid Musharraf, Maj (Maj Gen) Manzur and other officers, who defected to

 

join their war of Liberation were killed by their own Soldiers within first ten

 

years of independence of Bangla Desh. Many other Freedom fighters were

 

tried and hanged in Bangla Desh; some are still in hiding either in Bangla

 

Desh or in foreign countries.

 

Bangla Desh- 25 Feb 2009. In DHAKA, the entire lower ranks of

 

Bangla Desh rifles (Ex EPR) mutinied they killed all their officers in the

 

HQ including their Director General Maj Gen Shakil Ahmed, his wife and

 

others including 40 officers and their Families. Army was called to disarm

 

them.140 died, within two days, mostly officers and their families.

 

  ADVICE BY A SENIOR BENGALI ARMY OFFICER TO PAKISTAN-

 

2003.Maj Gen I A Karim  Ex GOC 6 ARMED DIV IN 1971 in his forward to Brig A R 

 

Siddiqui’s Book’( East Pakistan the End game-  OUP-2003)’.

 

 

 

         “The people of East Pakistan now BanglaDesh are devout Muslims and if I 

 

may say, more religious in practice than our brothers in the west.  But the religious 

 

bond that gave us Pakistan could not be sustained primarily due to ethnic differences. 

 

Presently, Pakistan, though overwhelmingly Muslim, comprises four different ethnic 

 

groups: Pathans, Balochis, Sindhi and Punjabis. The pakistan government  must, 

 

therefore learn from  past mistakes and cater for some of the peculiarities of these 

 

regions so that policies can be adjusted to ensure fairness in all aspects of governance 

 

in order to bring about harmony and avoid dissention.

 

           Gen Karim is right but is there anyone listening?or we as dumb as we were in 

 

1971.

 

         

 

          MAY ALMIGHTY ALLAH HAVE MERCY ON US AND FORGIVE US 

 

AND OUR LEADERS AND GIVE THEM THE VISION TO UNDERSTAND AND 

 

FORESEE TO AVOID ANY MORE BREAK UP/BALKANISATION OF OUR 

 

BELOVED COUNTRY.    

 

   In conclusion I shall quote a write up on the death of “CHE’. “ It is men like CHE, 

 

who immortalize revolution, who brighten afresh the fading ideals and who are ever 

 

-living testimony to ultimate victory of cause of the liberation of mankind. Death for 

 

Che was more acceptable than the compromises that are made to carry out the 

 

revolution.”

 

 

 

, ,

No Comments

Journey to Pakistan – Meeting People Where They Are

Journey to Pakistan – Meeting People Where They Are
 
 
 
Sep, 03, 2013  
 
Inline image 1
 

I started studying the Pakistan culture, language and dress a few months before we left. I went on the internet, interviewed anyone who knew anything, hopefully dusted off my language skills and started shopping. So many people told me not to worry about it and that no one would care one way or the other. But I cared. The philosophy of “meet people where they are” in business extends to culture. Although I knew I would be accepted as I was, the gesture of respect for the places I travel and the effort toward a deeper understanding are important elements of not only building, but sustaining relationships.

 

As a guest of Pakistan, we were not disappointed. From the moment we arrived to the moment we left, we were shown the utmost kindness, service and support. The TiE Islamabad team and everyone that surrounded them were the pinnacle of organization, professionalism and hospitality. Throughout the next 12 days, they helped us navigate and acclimate, and educated us on the breadth and depth of the country, both historically and culturally. As anticipated, they did accept us, just as we were. At the same time, they, and everyone we encountered, appreciated the small efforts and gestures to meet them where they were, as a country and a culture.

 

I received validating comments all along the way that reassured me that my attempts at dress, language and custom were appreciated. The comment made the first day, said with some surprise, that I already dressed like a Pakistani with my long dress and dupatta (scarf), and the face of the guard taking my departure ticket as we left the country lighting up when I murmured “shukriya” (thank you), made me feel my efforts were not in vain. There were plenty of people in jeans, slacks and shirts, and I was told multiple times that I could have dressed however I liked. Most people said “thank you” instead of “shukriya” to one another and knew nearly flawless English. Still, they smiled with acknowledgement and appreciation as I perfected my salam alaikum/walekam assalam, adopted the phrase “InshAllah” and bought and wore my first kameez and (real) dupattas.

 

The short term effort we can put into learning more about a single person or an entire culture can make all the difference in the quality, depth and sustainability of a relationship. We did not go into Pakistan as the StartUp Cup to make speeches, hope someone listened and leave. We went to Pakistan to make a difference, build relationships and join their journey toward growing a stronger economy in their country. I know they would have taken me as I am, but I also know the seemingly minor gesture to meet them where they are strengthened our bond in where we are now going together.

 

We think we know people. We’ve read their bio. We’ve worked with them for years. We see them in the community. We’re their Facebook “friend”. But when “I’m going to Pakistan” enters the conversation, I found out how much I didn’t know about the people in my life.

 

As all trips abroad are tentative and subject to change, I was cautious to talk too much or over prepare everyone for my departure. Still, some conversations with family, clients and volunteer commitments had to take place. These conversations opened doors to thoughts, experiences and perspectives. And, the more conversations I had, the more affirmation I gained about our interconnected world and how disconnected we are from it at times.

 

One of my first inspiring moments was with a fellow Board member. I knew he had done some inspiring work in Romania (it was in his bio), but when I mentioned going to Pakistan, he smiled and said, “I’d like to talk to you about that.” We spent a wonderful morning on the deck of a local coffee shop where he told me about his experiences around the world, including Pakistan. His insights into the country and culture affirmed my commitment to go, and his advice gave me grounding in own perspective. But, above all, I had an opportunity to find out more about him and be reminded of the depths of people and their experiences that, in the hustle and bustle of our lives and work, we don’t take time to ask about.

 

Another surprise encounter was when I went home and a woman I grew up knowing came forward with all kinds of insights and even clothes for me to take on my trip! Again, I “know” her, I follow what she is doing, where she is working, her health and how she is doing, but still had no idea where her experiences had taken her. I learned about a very best girlfriend whose world experiences I follow closely and lean on her as my travel adviser, but found that I didn’t know her specific field of economic study until we had lunch with another world traveler. I learned that a woman in my Zumba class is married to a man from Pakistan… and the list of connections and inspiring conversations goes on.

 

We think we “know” people, then we have a conversation. My work gives me all forms of opportunity to ask questions of my clients to help them explore and find their answers. They are often seemingly obscure questions about life, family and perspectives, but they always lead to a better understanding of what they’re trying to accomplish and how they’re going to get there. I’m so grateful for the phrase, “I’m going to Pakistan” and the opportunity it gave me to do this for myself and get to know about the people I live, work and share a community with. To have deeper conversations with those whom I share my life.

 

 

StartUp Cup Karachi 9.1.13
 

, ,

No Comments